Optical Transceiver Interface Patents: Leaders, Trends & Gaps 2026
- Filing has flattened, not grown. activity peaked at 18 families in 2024 after climbing from 7 at the 2022 midpoint — this is a field that surged once and has not repeated it.
- One patent dominates the citation graph. US10333623B1 carries 100 citations, more than three times the next most-cited record, meaning most later filers are designing around a single foundational document.
- Ownership is thin and unconsolidated. only 10 co-assignee pairs exist across 55 families, and every tracked assignee shows flat or negative year-over-year momentum — no single lab is currently pulling away.
Filing growth compares 2021 (2 records) with 2024 (18) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 55 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
Optical transceiver interface engineering sits at the mechanical and optical boundary between a photonic chip and the outside world: fiber-to-chip coupling, facet interfaces, edge couplers, and the hybrid integration schemes that let a laser, a modulator and a fiber sit on the same package without excess loss. As co-packaged optics moves from prototype to product, this interface — not the modulator or the laser itself — is increasingly the part that determines yield and cost.
The dataset behind this page is built from 55 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026, filtered to documents whose title, abstract or claims name the coupling or facet interface directly and whose IPC codes sit in the optical-element, laser and modulator classes. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the 2025-2026 count understates real filing activity.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 55-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.
A single peak, not a growth curve
Filings were at zero in 2017, rose gradually to 7 by the 2022 midpoint, and peaked at 18 in 2024 — the closest thing this field has to a boom year. There is no year-over-year assignee showing positive momentum in the most recent tracked period, which is consistent with a technology that had one active filing wave rather than sustained compounding growth.
Concentrated in optics, thin everywhere else
G02B (optical elements & systems) covers 52 of the 55 records — nearly the entire dataset — with H01L (semiconductor devices) and H04B (transmission) tied at 14 each as the largest secondary classes. H01S (lasers), H10D, G01S, G02F and H05B each register single-digit counts, marking them as adjacent rather than core to how this interface is currently claimed.
Shares are the percentage of the 55 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Optical Transceiver Interface Engineering with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about optical transceiver interface engineering and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe documents shaping this space
US20250341688A1 — Pluggable fiber-to-chip coupling for wafer scale co-packaged optics
Described herein are pluggable fiber-attach-first techniques and related manufacturing methods for assembling photonic chips according to the fiber-attach-first technique. The techniques may be used in several fields including, but not limited to, 2D, 2.5D, and 3D package architectures, wafer scale packaging technologies, and transceiver technologies. A photonic device comprises a photonic stack, a glass substrate and epoxy configured to hold the photonic stack and the glass substrate together. The photonic stack comprises one or more alignment features. The glass substrate comprises one or more alignment features, wherein each of the one or more alignment features of the glass substrate eng…Filed by Lightmatter, Inc., published 2025-11-06 — abstract truncated as provided in the source record.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US10333623B1 | Optical transceiver | 100 |
| 2 | US20230204879A1 | Optical packaging using embedded-in-mold (EIM) optical module integration | 30 |
| 3 | US20190033627A1 | Optical transmission module, optical transceiver, and optical communication system including same | 12 |
| 4 | WO2020014154A1 | Light emission apparatus | 7 |
| 5 | US12189198B1 | Manufacturing optically accessible co-packaged optics | 6 |
| 6 | US12197023B1 | Manufacturing optically accessible co-packaged optics | 3 |
| 7 | CN115236811A | 双输出硅光芯片、光收发模块、分光线缆及分光方法 | 3 |
| 8 | CN108141285A | 光发送模块、光收发器以及包括其的光通信系统 | 3 |
| 9 | US20250216627A1 | Fiber array unit assembly and co-packaged optics using the same | 2 |
| 10 | US12455423B2 | Co-packaging optical modules with surface and edge coupling | 2 |
Citation counts favour older filings by construction — a highly cited 2019 patent is not necessarily more relevant today than a lightly cited 2024 one, only more established.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the data actually indicates
Three read-throughs from the filing, citation and geographic data — each one changes where an R&D or IP team should look next.
One wave, not a trend line
Filings climbed from 0 in 2017 to 7 at the 2022 midpoint before peaking at 18 in 2024. That shape reads as a response to co-packaged optics reaching commercial attention around 2023-2024, not as a technology on a steady compounding growth curve.
A single foundational patent dominates
US10333623B1's 100 citations dwarf the next-highest record at 30. Most subsequent filers in this space are, directly or indirectly, building around or citing back to one early optical transceiver patent.
US-led, but genuinely multi-jurisdictional
The United States leads with 20 filings, but Europe (13), China (9), WIPO/PCT (7) and Singapore (5) all carry meaningful volume. A freedom-to-operate check confined to the US alone would miss roughly two-thirds of the documented filings.
Thin collaboration, no consolidation
Only 10 co-assignee pairs exist across the full dataset, and the strongest pairings each register a single joint filing. This is a field of largely independent filers rather than an ecosystem built on joint ventures or cross-licensing clusters.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to optical transceiver interface engineering, with the prior art for and against each one.
Assignee landscape and momentum
The named assignees in this dataset span component makers, foundries and university tech-transfer offices, but none show growing filing momentum in the most recent tracked year.
No assignee is currently accelerating
Every tracked assignee — from component specialists to a major foundry — registers zero filings in the latest year, with the two assignees carrying prior-year activity both showing -100% year-over-year change. This is a lull, not a retreat by any single player.
Individual inventors drive the strongest pairings
The strongest co-assignee links in the dataset pair a single corporate assignee with individually named inventors, each appearing in exactly one joint filing. That points to inventor-led filing relationships rather than institutionalized joint R&D programs.
A globally filed, thinly held field
Filings span six receiving offices, including PCT and Singapore, but combine with a flat assignee ranking — no player has used broad geographic filing to build a defensive moat around this interface yet.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Skywater Artificial Intelligence Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| Hanyang University ERICA Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation | 0 | — |
| PhotonicSys Inc. | 0 | — |
| Lightmatter, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| Suzhou Innolight Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSMC) | 0 | — |
| Marvell Asia Pte Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Intel Corporation | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
This page surfaces the pattern. Turning it into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision means going deeper on specific claims and specific assignees.
Map the claim scope around US10333623B1
The dataset's most-cited patent is the reference point nearly every later filer works around. Understanding exactly what it claims — not just that it is cited often — is the first step before drafting in this space.
Explore claim charts in EurekaTrack the 2025-2026 filing wave as it publishes
The apparent flattening after 2024 is partly a publication-lag artifact. Re-running this search in six to twelve months will reveal whether the 2024 peak was a one-off or the start of a new wave.
Set up a filing alert in EurekaCheck the under-claimed sub-areas directly
Passive alignment tolerance, glass-substrate interposer bonding and wafer-scale fiber-attach-first assembly all show light claim density relative to the core coupling claims. Each is a candidate for a defensible first filing.
Run a white space search in EurekaCommon questions on this landscape
Fiber-to-chip coupling is the physical and optical interface that transfers light between an optical fiber and a photonic integrated circuit with minimal loss. It typically uses structures such as edge couplers, grating couplers or lensed interfaces to match the very different mode sizes of a fiber and an on-chip waveguide. This interface is a major source of insertion loss and assembly cost in packaged optical transceivers, which is why it attracts dedicated patent claims separate from the laser or modulator design. In this dataset it is the single largest claim category, appearing in the majority of the 55 tracked families.
The dataset shows a field without a dominant, accelerating filer: named assignees include specialist photonics companies, a major semiconductor foundry, and university technology-transfer offices, but every one of them shows flat or negative filing momentum in the most recent tracked year. Co-assignee relationships are also thin, with only 10 joint-filing pairs across the full set of 55 families. Anyone assessing competitive position here should look at citation influence and jurisdiction spread rather than raw filing counts alone, since no single assignee currently commands a clear lead.
Filings rose from zero in 2017 to 7 at the 2022 midpoint before peaking at 18 in 2024, a pattern consistent with co-packaged optics moving from research demonstrations toward commercial packaging programs around that time. Because publication typically lags filing by about 18 months, the apparent drop in 2025-2026 numbers is partly an artifact of records not yet being published rather than a genuine falloff in R&D activity. The 2024 figure is the most reliable peak marker currently visible in the data.
Co-packaged optics places optical engines directly alongside switch silicon in the same package, rather than in a separate pluggable module, to cut power and latency in high-bandwidth networking. Making that architecture work depends heavily on the fiber-to-chip and hybrid integration interfaces tracked in this dataset, which is why co-packaged optics terminology appears directly in the search criteria. Several of the most-cited and most recent records, including the featured 2025 filing on wafer-scale co-packaged optics, frame their claims explicitly around this packaging shift.
The core edge-coupler and facet-interface claims sit inside the dominant G02B classification, which covers 52 of the 55 tracked families, but adjacent areas such as passive alignment tolerance structures, glass-substrate interposer bonding, wafer-scale fiber-attach-first assembly and thermal management at hybrid laser interfaces show much lighter claim density. These sit close enough to the core interface to be commercially relevant but are not yet heavily claimed by any single assignee. A first filing that combines one of these mechanisms with a specific packaging architecture has more room to establish clean priority than a filing aimed directly at core coupling geometry.
Research Optical Transceiver Interface Engineering in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole optical transceiver interface engineering corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.