Book a demo

Optical Transceiver Interface Patents: Leaders, Trends & Gaps 2026

Optical Transceiver Interface Patents: Leaders, Trends & Gaps 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/optical-transceiver-interface-engineering-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Photonics & Optics · Patent Landscape
Optical Transceiver Interface Engineering Patents: Who Holds the Fiber-to-Chip Interface
  • Filing has flattened, not grown. activity peaked at 18 families in 2024 after climbing from 7 at the 2022 midpoint — this is a field that surged once and has not repeated it.
  • One patent dominates the citation graph. US10333623B1 carries 100 citations, more than three times the next most-cited record, meaning most later filers are designing around a single foundational document.
  • Ownership is thin and unconsolidated. only 10 co-assignee pairs exist across 55 families, and every tracked assignee shows flat or negative year-over-year momentum — no single lab is currently pulling away.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
55
Published Records
60%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+800%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (2 records) with 2024 (18) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 55 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

Optical transceiver interface engineering sits at the mechanical and optical boundary between a photonic chip and the outside world: fiber-to-chip coupling, facet interfaces, edge couplers, and the hybrid integration schemes that let a laser, a modulator and a fiber sit on the same package without excess loss. As co-packaged optics moves from prototype to product, this interface — not the modulator or the laser itself — is increasingly the part that determines yield and cost.

The dataset behind this page is built from 55 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026, filtered to documents whose title, abstract or claims name the coupling or facet interface directly and whose IPC codes sit in the optical-element, laser and modulator classes. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the 2025-2026 count understates real filing activity.

Annual filing trend, 2017-2026
  1. 1IND UNIV COOP FOUND HANYANG UNIV ERICA CAMPUS8
  2. 2SICILY MERGER SUB II INC8
  3. 3ARTILUX INC7
  4. 4CELESTIAL AI INC6
  5. 5LIGHTMATTER INC4
  6. 6INNOLIGHT TECHNOLOGY (SUZHOU) LTD3
  7. 7TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD3
  8. 8INTEL CORP2
  9. 9MARVELL ASIA PTE LTD2
  10. 10HUAWEI TECH CO LTD2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Optical Transceiver Interface Engineering covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 55-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

A single peak, not a growth curve

Filings were at zero in 2017, rose gradually to 7 by the 2022 midpoint, and peaked at 18 in 2024 — the closest thing this field has to a boom year. There is no year-over-year assignee showing positive momentum in the most recent tracked period, which is consistent with a technology that had one active filing wave rather than sustained compounding growth.

A single peak, not a growth curve0510152002017201820192020202120222023182024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Concentrated in optics, thin everywhere else

G02B (optical elements & systems) covers 52 of the 55 records — nearly the entire dataset — with H01L (semiconductor devices) and H04B (transmission) tied at 14 each as the largest secondary classes. H01S (lasers), H10D, G01S, G02F and H05B each register single-digit counts, marking them as adjacent rather than core to how this interface is currently claimed.

Concentrated in optics, thin everywhere elseG02B · Optical elements & systems5294.5%H01L · Semiconductor devices1425.5%H04B · Transmission (general)1425.5%H01S · Lasers & stimulated emission712.7%H10D · Semiconductor devices (general)610.9%G01S · Radar, sonar & positioning47.3%G02F · Optical control & modulation47.3%H05B · Electric heating & lighting ci…47.3%Other814.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 55 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Optical Transceiver Interface Engineering covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Optical Transceiver Interface Engineering with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about optical transceiver interface engineering and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The documents shaping this space

Representative Recent Filing
US20250341688A12025-11-06

US20250341688A1 — Pluggable fiber-to-chip coupling for wafer scale co-packaged optics

LIGHTMATTER, INC.

Described herein are pluggable fiber-attach-first techniques and related manufacturing methods for assembling photonic chips according to the fiber-attach-first technique. The techniques may be used in several fields including, but not limited to, 2D, 2.5D, and 3D package architectures, wafer scale packaging technologies, and transceiver technologies. A photonic device comprises a photonic stack, a glass substrate and epoxy configured to hold the photonic stack and the glass substrate together. The photonic stack comprises one or more alignment features. The glass substrate comprises one or more alignment features, wherein each of the one or more alignment features of the glass substrate eng…Filed by Lightmatter, Inc., published 2025-11-06 — abstract truncated as provided in the source record.

US20250341688A1 — patent drawing 1US20250341688A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in the dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US10333623B1Optical transceiver100
2US20230204879A1Optical packaging using embedded-in-mold (EIM) optical module integration30
3US20190033627A1Optical transmission module, optical transceiver, and optical communication system including same12
4WO2020014154A1Light emission apparatus7
5US12189198B1Manufacturing optically accessible co-packaged optics6
6US12197023B1Manufacturing optically accessible co-packaged optics3
7CN115236811A双输出硅光芯片、光收发模块、分光线缆及分光方法3
8CN108141285A光发送模块、光收发器以及包括其的光通信系统3
9US20250216627A1Fiber array unit assembly and co-packaged optics using the same2
10US12455423B2Co-packaging optical modules with surface and edge coupling2

Citation counts favour older filings by construction — a highly cited 2019 patent is not necessarily more relevant today than a lightly cited 2024 one, only more established.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Optical Transceiver Interface Engineering covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signal Check

What the data actually indicates

Three read-throughs from the filing, citation and geographic data — each one changes where an R&D or IP team should look next.

Filing Pattern
18 in 2024
peak year

One wave, not a trend line

Filings climbed from 0 in 2017 to 7 at the 2022 midpoint before peaking at 18 in 2024. That shape reads as a response to co-packaged optics reaching commercial attention around 2023-2024, not as a technology on a steady compounding growth curve.

Watch whether 2025-2026 filings (understated by publication lag) confirm or break the pattern.
Citation Concentration
100 citations
top record

A single foundational patent dominates

US10333623B1's 100 citations dwarf the next-highest record at 30. Most subsequent filers in this space are, directly or indirectly, building around or citing back to one early optical transceiver patent.

High citation age means influence, not current freshness — treat it as a design-around reference point, not a technology bellwether.
Filing Geography
US 20, EPO 13, CN 9
receiving offices

US-led, but genuinely multi-jurisdictional

The United States leads with 20 filings, but Europe (13), China (9), WIPO/PCT (7) and Singapore (5) all carry meaningful volume. A freedom-to-operate check confined to the US alone would miss roughly two-thirds of the documented filings.

Canada's single filing marks it as a jurisdiction of last resort, not a gap.
Ownership Structure
10 co-assignee pairs
across 55 families

Thin collaboration, no consolidation

Only 10 co-assignee pairs exist across the full dataset, and the strongest pairings each register a single joint filing. This is a field of largely independent filers rather than an ecosystem built on joint ventures or cross-licensing clusters.

Expect bilateral licensing negotiations, not consortium-style standard-setting, to govern access here.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to optical transceiver interface engineering, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Optical Transceiver Interface Engineering covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who's Filing

Assignee landscape and momentum

The named assignees in this dataset span component makers, foundries and university tech-transfer offices, but none show growing filing momentum in the most recent tracked year.

Momentum Check
0 in latest year
across tracked assignees

No assignee is currently accelerating

Every tracked assignee — from component specialists to a major foundry — registers zero filings in the latest year, with the two assignees carrying prior-year activity both showing -100% year-over-year change. This is a lull, not a retreat by any single player.

Re-check this once 2025-2026 filings finish publishing; the lag alone could restore several of these to positive counts.
Collaboration Pattern
1 joint filing per pair
top co-assignee pairs

Individual inventors drive the strongest pairings

The strongest co-assignee links in the dataset pair a single corporate assignee with individually named inventors, each appearing in exactly one joint filing. That points to inventor-led filing relationships rather than institutionalized joint R&D programs.

Diligence on inventor assignment terms matters more here than in fields with dense corporate co-filing.
Geographic Reach
6 receiving offices
US, EPO, CN, WIPO, SG, CA

A globally filed, thinly held field

Filings span six receiving offices, including PCT and Singapore, but combine with a flat assignee ranking — no player has used broad geographic filing to build a defensive moat around this interface yet.

That combination — wide geography, no dominant filer — is itself the opening for a new entrant.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
These sit adjacent to the core G02B claim density rather than inside it.
passive alignment tolerance structuresglass-substrate interposer bondingwafer-scale fiber-attach-first assemblythermal management at hybrid laser interfacesembedded-in-mold optical packaging
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Skywater Artificial Intelligence Co., Ltd.0-100%
Hanyang University ERICA Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation0
PhotonicSys Inc.0
Lightmatter, Inc.0-100%
Suzhou Innolight Technology Co., Ltd.0
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSMC)0
Marvell Asia Pte Ltd.0
Intel Corporation0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Optical Transceiver Interface Engineering covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

This page surfaces the pattern. Turning it into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision means going deeper on specific claims and specific assignees.

Map the claim scope around US10333623B1

The dataset's most-cited patent is the reference point nearly every later filer works around. Understanding exactly what it claims — not just that it is cited often — is the first step before drafting in this space.

Explore claim charts in Eureka

Track the 2025-2026 filing wave as it publishes

The apparent flattening after 2024 is partly a publication-lag artifact. Re-running this search in six to twelve months will reveal whether the 2024 peak was a one-off or the start of a new wave.

Set up a filing alert in Eureka

Check the under-claimed sub-areas directly

Passive alignment tolerance, glass-substrate interposer bonding and wafer-scale fiber-attach-first assembly all show light claim density relative to the core coupling claims. Each is a candidate for a defensible first filing.

Run a white space search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Optical Transceiver Interface Engineering covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Frequently Asked

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Optical Transceiver Interface Engineering covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Optical Transceiver Interface Engineering in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole optical transceiver interface engineering corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.