Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (31 records) with 2024 (103) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 364 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Optical transceiver miniaturization and integration covers the packaging, coupling and co-integration techniques that let optical modules shrink and move closer to the switch silicon they serve — co-packaged optics, chiplet-style photonic integration, and compact fiber-to-chip coupling. The corpus underneath this page spans 364 patent families filed between 2015 and 2026, drawn from a search built around optical module, optical transceiver and co-packaged optics language in titles, abstracts and claims, filtered to IPC classes covering waveguide coupling, laser sources and optical connectors.
Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent filing year in any trend chart understates real activity; treat the last one to two years as a floor, not a ceiling.
The dataset's shape — where filings cluster by year and by IPC subclass — tells a more reliable story than any single ranking, because it shows where claim space is dense and where it is thin.
Filings rose from 4 in 2017 to a peak of 103 in 2024, but the 2022 midpoint of 39 sits well below a straight-line path to that peak, and the count since has flattened rather than kept climbing — a pattern more consistent with a maturing claim space than with a technology still in its early land-grab phase.
G02B (optical elements & systems) covers 341 of 364 records, roughly five times the next tier of H01L (semiconductor devices, 69), H04B (transmission, 69) and H01S (lasers, 66). Printed-circuit integration (H05K, 33) and multiplex communication (H04J, 17) are present but thin, suggesting the packaging and system-level side of co-packaged optics has drawn far fewer claims than the optical coupling and waveguide mechanics themselves.
Shares are the percentage of the 364 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about optical transceiver miniaturization and integration and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaAn opto-electronic module and a co-packaged optics device included therein are provided. The co-packaged optics device can include a package substrate; an electronic component disposed on the package substrate; optical transceivers disposed on the package substrate, arranged around the electronic component, wherein the electronic component is electrically connected to the optical transceivers; and a waveguide component disposed on the package substrate.Filed by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd.; published 2025-05-29.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5883988A | Optical module including a photoreception device | 112 |
| 2 | US5555333A | Optical module and a fabrication process thereof | 83 |
| 3 | US20040042729A1 | Optical beam transformer module for light coupling between a fiber array and a photonic chip and the method o… | 66 |
| 4 | US5853626A | Optical module and a fabrication process thereof | 66 |
| 5 | US7303339B2 | Optical beam transformer module for light coupling between a fiber array and a photonic chip and the method o… | 57 |
| 6 | US10866376B1 | Method and system for co-packaging photonics integrated circuit with an application specific integrated circu… | 54 |
| 7 | US10826613B1 | Integrated compact in-package light engine | 52 |
| 8 | US20220003948A1 | Integrated Silicon Photonics Transceivers Enabling Ultra-High-Speed High Dense Input/Output And Interconnect … | 50 |
| 9 | US20100265983A1 | Surface emitting laser module and vertical illuminated photodiode module | 42 |
| 10 | US5759453A | Optical module and a fabrication process thereof | 41 |
Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations inside this corpus; read them as a signal of foundational influence, not of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three signals matter more than the headline count: where filings are concentrated by geography, how thin joint filing is, and how citation weight sits with older foundational patents rather than recent ones.
United States filings outnumber the next office by more than two to one, with China and PCT filings forming a second tier and Europe, Japan and Taiwan close behind. A filer targeting only one non-US jurisdiction should look at China first on volume alone.
Only three co-assignee pairings appear in the entire corpus, and the strongest of them accounts for just eight shared families. Co-packaged optics is often discussed as a foundry-and-hyperscaler collaboration story, but the filing record does not yet show much joint IP.
The most-cited record in this corpus is a 1990s photoreception-device optical module patent, not a recent co-packaged optics filing. That is a citation-age effect as much as a relevance signal, but it means freedom-to-operate work still has to clear decades-old packaging claims.
A number of the assignees with the deepest filing history, including major Japanese and Chinese electronics groups, show no filings in the latest tracked year. Given publication lag, this may reflect a filing pause or simply filings not yet published — it is worth checking directly before reading it as retreat.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to optical transceiver miniaturization and integration, with the prior art for and against each one.
No single assignee dominates this corpus the way leaders do in more consolidated fields; filing is spread across device makers, telecom carriers and a long tail of single-filing entrants, with momentum data showing even established filers pausing in the latest year.
Applicants filing in the United States outnumber those in any single other jurisdiction, with China and PCT applications forming the next tier. A defensive filing strategy limited to one non-US market should default to China on volume evidence alone.
The strongest co-assignee relationship in the dataset links a Wuxi-based optical interconnect research institute with a related chip company, at eight shared families — modest in absolute terms but the clearest joint-filing signal in a corpus otherwise dominated by solo filers.
Several assignees with substantial filing histories, spanning Japanese, Taiwanese and Chinese origin, show zero filings in the most recent tracked year. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this is as likely to reflect filings still working through the pipeline as an actual slowdown in R&D.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| The Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| PhotonTech Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. (British Virgin Islands) | 0 | -100% |
| Sky AI Corporation | 0 | -100% |
| Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| Teramount Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (NTT) | 0 | — |
| ZTE Corporation | 0 | — |
| Wuxi Xinguang Interconnect Technology Research Institute Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
The filing and citation patterns above point to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio strategy or technology scouting.
The most-cited patents in this corpus are decades old and centre on foundational optical module packaging; any new coupling or transceiver design should be checked against them before filing.
Explore prior art in EurekaSeveral established filers show zero filings in the latest year; given publication lag, re-check this cohort in six to twelve months before concluding they have exited the space.
Track assignee activity in EurekaWaveguide-embedded substrates and chiplet-to-optics interconnect schemes show thinner coverage than core coupling optics, making them a more promising area for a defensible first claim.
Map white space in EurekaCo-packaged optics (CPO) places optical transceiver components directly on or next to the switch or accelerator package substrate, rather than as a separate pluggable module at the faceplate. This shortens the electrical path between silicon and optics, which reduces power loss and enables higher data rates, and it is one of the main drivers behind the current wave of miniaturization patent filings. From a patent standpoint, CPO claims tend to sit across packaging, waveguide coupling and electrical interconnect simultaneously, so a single CPO patent can block work in several adjacent technical areas at once.
Filing in this corpus is spread across device manufacturers, telecom carriers and specialist optical interconnect firms rather than concentrated in one or two companies. The dataset shows a long tail of single-filing entrants alongside a smaller group of repeat filers, and several of the assignees with the longest filing histories show no filings in the most recent tracked year. Because publication lags actual filing by roughly 18 months, current rankings should be treated as a snapshot rather than a final scoreboard.
Filings rose steadily through the late 2010s, reached a midpoint of 39 in 2022, and peaked at 103 in 2024 before flattening rather than continuing to climb. This pattern is more consistent with a claim space that is filling in around established coupling and packaging architectures than with a market still in an early expansion phase. It does not mean R&D has stopped, only that the rate of new distinct claims being staked is no longer accelerating.
The IPC composition of this corpus is heavily weighted toward core optical elements and waveguide coupling (G02B), with far thinner coverage in printed-circuit-level integration (H05K) and multiplexing-aware compact architectures (H04J). That imbalance suggests the packaging, thermal management and system-level integration side of co-packaged optics has drawn fewer claims than the optical coupling mechanics themselves, making it a more open area for new filings. Waveguide-embedded package substrates and chiplet-to-optics electrical interconnect schemes stand out as specific under-claimed branches.
Citation counts inside any fixed-date patent corpus systematically favour older records, simply because they have had more years to accumulate citing references. In this dataset, the most-cited patents date to the 1990s and cover foundational optical module packaging, not recent co-packaged optics innovations. Use citation rank as a guide to which prior art a freedom-to-operate search must clear, not as a ranking of which recent technology is most important today.
Go past this page: query the whole optical transceiver miniaturization and integration corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.