https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/optical-transceiver-miniaturization-and-integration-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Photonics & Optics · Patent Landscape
Optical transceiver miniaturization and integration patents: who is filing, and where the space is still open
  • Filing has plateaued, not accelerated. growth from 2017 to 2022 gave way to a 2024 peak of 103 filings, with the flat trajectory since suggesting the core claim space is settling rather than expanding.
  • One classification dominates the corpus. G02B (optical elements & systems) appears in 341 of 364 families, far ahead of H01L, H04B and H01S, showing most activity still sits on optics itself rather than the surrounding electronics or transmission layers.
  • Co-filing is rare. only three co-assignee pairs appear across the whole dataset, meaning most filers are protecting integration work alone rather than through joint ventures or foundry partnerships.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
364
Published Records
24%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+232%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (31 records) with 2024 (103) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 364 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Optical transceiver miniaturization and integration covers the packaging, coupling and co-integration techniques that let optical modules shrink and move closer to the switch silicon they serve — co-packaged optics, chiplet-style photonic integration, and compact fiber-to-chip coupling. The corpus underneath this page spans 364 patent families filed between 2015 and 2026, drawn from a search built around optical module, optical transceiver and co-packaged optics language in titles, abstracts and claims, filtered to IPC classes covering waveguide coupling, laser sources and optical connectors.

Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent filing year in any trend chart understates real activity; treat the last one to two years as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filings by year, 2017-2026
  1. 1FURUKAWA ELECTRIC CO LTD26
  2. 2PRIME WORLD INT HLDG LTD21
  3. 3HUAWEI TECH CO LTD15
  4. 4TERAMOUNT LTD14
  5. 5ZTE CORP13
  6. 6MARVELL ASIA PTE LTD13
  7. 7NIPPON TELEGRAPH & TELEPHONE CORP11
  8. 8WUXI INST OF INTERCONNECT TECH CO LTD9
  9. 9SICILY MERGER SUB II INC9
  10. 10JUNIPER NETWORKS INC8
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Optical Transceiver Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Data

Filing trends and technology composition

The dataset's shape — where filings cluster by year and by IPC subclass — tells a more reliable story than any single ranking, because it shows where claim space is dense and where it is thin.

A plateau after 2022

Filings rose from 4 in 2017 to a peak of 103 in 2024, but the 2022 midpoint of 39 sits well below a straight-line path to that peak, and the count since has flattened rather than kept climbing — a pattern more consistent with a maturing claim space than with a technology still in its early land-grab phase.

A plateau after 20220306090120420172018201920202021202220231032024202552026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Optics still leads electronics and transmission

G02B (optical elements & systems) covers 341 of 364 records, roughly five times the next tier of H01L (semiconductor devices, 69), H04B (transmission, 69) and H01S (lasers, 66). Printed-circuit integration (H05K, 33) and multiplex communication (H04J, 17) are present but thin, suggesting the packaging and system-level side of co-packaged optics has drawn far fewer claims than the optical coupling and waveguide mechanics themselves.

Optics still leads electronics and transmissionG02B · Optical elements & systems34193.7%H01L · Semiconductor devices6919.0%H04B · Transmission (general)6919.0%H01S · Lasers & stimulated emission6618.1%H05K · Printed circuits & assemblies339.1%H10W298.0%H04J · Multiplex communication174.7%G02F · Optical control & modulation143.8%Other4412.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 364 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Optical Transceiver Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Optical Transceiver Miniaturization and Integration with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about optical transceiver miniaturization and integration and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited prior art and a recent representative filing

Representative recent filing
US20250172777A12025-05-29

Co-packaged optics device and opto-electronic module

TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LTD.

An opto-electronic module and a co-packaged optics device included therein are provided. The co-packaged optics device can include a package substrate; an electronic component disposed on the package substrate; optical transceivers disposed on the package substrate, arranged around the electronic component, wherein the electronic component is electrically connected to the optical transceivers; and a waveguide component disposed on the package substrate.Filed by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd.; published 2025-05-29.

US20250172777A1 — patent drawing 1US20250172777A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5883988AOptical module including a photoreception device112
2US5555333AOptical module and a fabrication process thereof83
3US20040042729A1Optical beam transformer module for light coupling between a fiber array and a photonic chip and the method o…66
4US5853626AOptical module and a fabrication process thereof66
5US7303339B2Optical beam transformer module for light coupling between a fiber array and a photonic chip and the method o…57
6US10866376B1Method and system for co-packaging photonics integrated circuit with an application specific integrated circu…54
7US10826613B1Integrated compact in-package light engine52
8US20220003948A1Integrated Silicon Photonics Transceivers Enabling Ultra-High-Speed High Dense Input/Output And Interconnect …50
9US20100265983A1Surface emitting laser module and vertical illuminated photodiode module42
10US5759453AOptical module and a fabrication process thereof41

Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations inside this corpus; read them as a signal of foundational influence, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Optical Transceiver Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for strategy

Three signals matter more than the headline count: where filings are concentrated by geography, how thin joint filing is, and how citation weight sits with older foundational patents rather than recent ones.

Filing venue
US 150 · CN 71 · WIPO 41
records by receiving office

The US anchors filing strategy

United States filings outnumber the next office by more than two to one, with China and PCT filings forming a second tier and Europe, Japan and Taiwan close behind. A filer targeting only one non-US jurisdiction should look at China first on volume alone.

Receiving office data, all years
Joint filing
3 co-assignee pairs
across 364 families

Integration work is mostly filed solo

Only three co-assignee pairings appear in the entire corpus, and the strongest of them accounts for just eight shared families. Co-packaged optics is often discussed as a foundry-and-hyperscaler collaboration story, but the filing record does not yet show much joint IP.

Co-assignee pair analysis
Citation weight
Top cite: 112
on a 1990s-era optical module patent

Foundational patents predate the co-packaged optics push

The most-cited record in this corpus is a 1990s photoreception-device optical module patent, not a recent co-packaged optics filing. That is a citation-age effect as much as a relevance signal, but it means freedom-to-operate work still has to clear decades-old packaging claims.

Most-cited records, this corpus
Recent momentum
-100% YoY
for several leading filers

Several established filers went to zero in the latest year

A number of the assignees with the deepest filing history, including major Japanese and Chinese electronics groups, show no filings in the latest tracked year. Given publication lag, this may reflect a filing pause or simply filings not yet published — it is worth checking directly before reading it as retreat.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to optical transceiver miniaturization and integration, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Optical Transceiver Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the claim space is still open

No single assignee dominates this corpus the way leaders do in more consolidated fields; filing is spread across device makers, telecom carriers and a long tail of single-filing entrants, with momentum data showing even established filers pausing in the latest year.

Geography
US 150 records
leading receiving office

US filing leads by a wide margin

Applicants filing in the United States outnumber those in any single other jurisdiction, with China and PCT applications forming the next tier. A defensive filing strategy limited to one non-US market should default to China on volume evidence alone.

Receiving office breakdown
Collaboration
8 shared families
strongest co-assignee pair

The densest partnership is a small Chinese research-and-manufacturing pairing

The strongest co-assignee relationship in the dataset links a Wuxi-based optical interconnect research institute with a related chip company, at eight shared families — modest in absolute terms but the clearest joint-filing signal in a corpus otherwise dominated by solo filers.

Co-assignee pair analysis
Momentum
0 filings, -100% YoY
for multiple established filers

Established names show a pause, not necessarily an exit

Several assignees with substantial filing histories, spanning Japanese, Taiwanese and Chinese origin, show zero filings in the most recent tracked year. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this is as likely to reflect filings still working through the pipeline as an actual slowdown in R&D.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
Sub-areas where the IPC composition shows thin coverage relative to the core optics classes
Fiber-array-to-photonic-chip beam transformer couplingWaveguide-embedded package substrates for CPOPCB-level thermal and mechanical co-integration (H05K overlap)Multiplex-aware compact module architectures (H04J overlap)Chiplet-to-optics electrical interconnect schemes
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
The Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd.0-100%
PhotonTech Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. (British Virgin Islands)0-100%
Sky AI Corporation0-100%
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.0-100%
Teramount Ltd.0-100%
Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (NTT)0
ZTE Corporation0
Wuxi Xinguang Interconnect Technology Research Institute Co., Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Optical Transceiver Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The filing and citation patterns above point to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio strategy or technology scouting.

Run a freedom-to-operate check against the highest-cited records

The most-cited patents in this corpus are decades old and centre on foundational optical module packaging; any new coupling or transceiver design should be checked against them before filing.

Explore prior art in Eureka

Watch for published filings from paused assignees

Several established filers show zero filings in the latest year; given publication lag, re-check this cohort in six to twelve months before concluding they have exited the space.

Track assignee activity in Eureka

Scope claims around the under-claimed integration branches

Waveguide-embedded substrates and chiplet-to-optics interconnect schemes show thinner coverage than core coupling optics, making them a more promising area for a defensible first claim.

Map white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Optical Transceiver Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Optical Transceiver Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Optical Transceiver Miniaturization and Integration in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole optical transceiver miniaturization and integration corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.