Optical Transceiver Modules Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026
- Filing peaked in 2023 at 663 families and has since declined toward 31 in the most recent partial year, a pattern consistent with claim space maturing rather than expanding.
- H04B and G02B dominate the IPC mix with 3,885 and 3,451 records respectively, while H01L semiconductor-device claims sit far behind at 309 — a gap worth checking before assuming coverage.
- Momentum is pulling back across the largest filers Hisense Broadband is down 86% YoY and Huawei down 94% YoY in the latest year, with several major assignees at zero — a sign the field is consolidating, not growing.
What the optical transceiver module patent record shows
Optical transceiver modules sit at the intersection of high-speed electronics, photonic packaging and network protocol standards, which is why the patent record spans eight distinct IPC subclasses rather than one tidy category. The search corpus underlying this page combines title/abstract hits on “optical transceiver”, “optical module” and “pluggable optical transceiver” with claim-language terms like data rate, digital signal processing and form factor, filtered to the H04B10, G02B6 and H01S5 classification codes that cover optical transmission, optical elements, and semiconductor lasers respectively.
Filing activity across 6,627 patent families rose steadily through the late 2010s, peaked in 2023, and has since turned downward — a shape that typically marks a technology moving from active claim-staking into consolidation among a smaller set of incumbents. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the last one to two years in any trend chart will always look thinner than the underlying filing activity actually was.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trends and technology composition
Two views of the same 6,627-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how that volume splits across the IPC subclasses that define the technology.
Filing trend, 2017–2026
Annual filings rose from 289 in 2017 to a peak of 663 in 2023, then declined to 31 in the most recent (partial) year. The 2022 midpoint of 540 sits well below the 2023 peak, confirming the growth phase has ended rather than merely paused.
IPC subclass composition
H04B (transmission, 3,885 records) and G02B (optical elements, 3,451) anchor the field. H01S (lasers, 777), H04J (multiplexing, 607) and H04L (digital transmission, 440) form a mid tier, while H05K (printed circuits, 424), H01L (semiconductors, 309) and H04Q (switching, 307) are comparatively thin — a possible signal of under-claimed packaging and switching integration work.
Shares are the percentage of the 6,627 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Optical Transceiver Modules with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about optical transceiver modules and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaMost-cited prior art and a representative filing
Pluggable optical transceiver interface module (US20170279533A1, Menara Networks)
A pluggable optical transceiver interface module adapted to operate in a host device includes a housing compliant to a Multi Source Agreement (MSA), a slot adapted to receive a pluggable optical transceiver with an optical transmitter and receiver, and interface circuitry that bridges data and power connectivity between the transceiver and the host device according to the MSA.Filed 2017-09-28. The MSA-compliant housing and bridging interface circuitry are the claim elements most likely to intersect with new module designs.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20080310850A1 | LED light communication system | 357 |
| 2 | US20090279180A1 | High brightness optical device | 337 |
| 3 | US20020126967A1 | Hybrid electro-optic cable | 307 |
| 4 | US7008120B2 | High frequency emmitter and detector packaging scheme for 10GB/S transceiver | 226 |
| 5 | US6931183B2 | Hybrid electro-optic cable for free space laser antennas | 206 |
| 6 | US6350063B1 | Pluggable optical transceiver module having a high speed serial data connector (HSSDC) | 199 |
| 7 | US20060093365A1 | Selectable host-transceiver interface protocol | 194 |
| 8 | US20100111523A1 | EPON with power-saving features | 186 |
| 9 | US20120230696A1 | LED light communication system | 182 |
| 10 | US6471388B1 | Illumination apparatus for edge lit signs and display | 179 |
Citation counts reflect influence within this searched corpus and skew toward older filings; they are not a measure of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for filing strategy
Three patterns in the data matter more than any single ranking: where filing offices concentrate, how citation influence skews old, and how co-assignee activity reveals collaboration structure.
The US receiving office leads by a wide margin
US filings (2,940) outnumber China (1,466) by roughly two to one, with WIPO/PCT (712) and EPO (670) trailing. Japan (329) and Taiwan (106) are comparatively small but concentrated among a few specialist filers.
The most-cited prior art predates the current filing wave
The highest-cited record, a LED light communication system patent, carries 357 citations but sits outside the module-specific claim language driving recent filings. Treat citation rank as a map of historical influence, not of what blocks a design today.
Co-assignee activity is thin and concentrated
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the corpus. The strongest link, between NTT and its electronics affiliate at 35 joint filings, dwarfs the next tier at 15 — most filers here work alone rather than in joint ventures.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to optical transceiver modules, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (NTT) | NTT Electronics Corporation | 35 |
| Finisar Corporation | HAHIN JAYNE C | 15 |
| Finisar Corporation | DYBSETTER GERALD L | 15 |
| Qingdao Hisense Broadband Multimedia Technology Co., Ltd. | HISENSE BROADBAND MULTIMEDIA TECH LTD | 13 |
| Finisar Corporation | EKKIZOGLOY LUKE M | 12 |
| Qingdao Hisense Broadband Multimedia Technology Co., Ltd. | Shandong University | 9 |
| Finisar Corporation | ARONSON LEWIS B | 8 |
| NEC Corporation | Fujitsu Limited | 8 |
Ten identified co-assignee pairs is low for a corpus this size, suggesting most optical transceiver IP is developed and filed in-house rather than through cross-licensed joint development.
Who is filing, and who has pulled back
Recent-year momentum diverges sharply from historical filing volume. Several of the assignees with the deepest portfolios have gone quiet in the latest year, while others show single-digit but non-zero activity.
Hisense Broadband is still filing but slowing sharply
8 filings in the latest year against a much larger prior base marks an 86% year-over-year decline — still active, but clearly past its peak filing rate.
Huawei's filing rate has nearly stopped
Down to 2 filings in the latest year, a 94% drop, Huawei's transceiver-specific filing has contracted far faster than the market average.
Several historically active filers show zero latest-year activity
Finisar, Sumitomo Electric and NTT all report zero filings in the most recent year in this dataset. Given the 18-month publication lag, this likely reflects reporting lag as much as an actual filing halt.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Qingdao Hisense Broadband Multimedia Technology Co., Ltd. | 8 | -86% |
| Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | 2 | -94% |
| NEC Corporation | 1 | 0% |
| Finisar Corporation | 0 | — |
| Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (NTT) | 0 | — |
| Mitsubishi Electric Corporation | 0 | -100% |
| Source Photonics Inc. | 0 | — |
Where to take this next
The dataset points to a field past its filing peak but not empty of opportunity — the openings are in the thinner IPC branches and in the gap between historical citation leaders and current filers.
Check freedom-to-operate against the top filers, not just top citations
The most-cited records are not the same assignees driving recent filing volume. A freedom-to-operate review should weight current filers like Hisense Broadband and Huawei alongside the historical citation leaders.
Run a freedom-to-operate check in EurekaProbe the thinner IPC branches before committing claim language
H01L, H05K and H04Q each sit well below H04B and G02B in record count. That gap can mean either genuine white space or claims filed under adjacent classification codes worth checking.
Explore IPC branches in EurekaCommon questions on optical transceiver module patents
Filing activity in this corpus is led by assignees such as Hisense Broadband and Huawei by historical volume, though both have shown sharp year-over-year declines in the most recent filing year (-86% and -94% respectively). Other long-standing filers including Finisar, Sumitomo Electric and NTT show zero filings in the latest year, which given the roughly 18-month publication lag may partly reflect reporting delay rather than an outright stop. No single assignee dominates the full 6,627-family dataset; the field is concentrated among a handful of large filers with a long tail of smaller entrants.
No, not currently. Annual filings rose from 289 in 2017 to a peak of 663 in 2023, then declined toward 31 in the latest partial year. The 2022 figure of 540 sitting below the 2023 peak, combined with the sharp drop-off since, indicates the field has moved past its growth phase into consolidation, though the most recent year is always undercounted due to publication lag.
H04B (transmission systems) and G02B (optical elements and systems) dominate, with 3,885 and 3,451 records respectively out of 6,627 total families. H01S (lasers), H04J (multiplexing) and H04L (digital transmission) form a mid tier. Semiconductor device claims under H01L and printed-circuit assembly claims under H05K are comparatively thin, at 309 and 424 records, which is worth checking when scoping a freedom-to-operate search.
US20170279533A1, filed by Menara Networks in 2017, covers a pluggable optical transceiver interface module built around a housing compliant with a Multi Source Agreement (MSA), a slot for the pluggable transceiver itself, and interface circuitry that bridges data and power connectivity between the transceiver and the host device per that MSA. The claims center on the housing form factor and the bridging circuitry rather than the transceiver's internal optics, so it is most relevant to anyone designing host-side interface hardware around MSA form factors. It should be checked specifically against any new pluggable housing or interface-circuitry design, rather than against laser or detector-level innovation.
The IPC composition suggests thinner claim density in semiconductor packaging for optical-electrical co-design (H01L, 309 records), printed-circuit thermal and mechanical integration in pluggable form factors (H05K, 424 records), and switching-integrated transceiver architectures (H04Q, 307 records) relative to the dominant H04B and G02B branches. These are not confirmed gaps without a dedicated search, but they sit well below the core subclasses in record count within this dataset. Co-assignee data also shows only 10 identified collaboration pairs, suggesting joint-development filings are rare and may represent an underused filing strategy.
Citation counts accumulate over time within a searched corpus, so records filed a decade or more ago — like the top-cited LED light communication system patent at 357 citations — have simply had more years to be cited by later filings. This makes citation rank a signal of historical influence rather than current commercial importance. A recently filed patent addressing today's data-rate or power-consumption requirements may be technically more relevant even with a low citation count.
Research Optical Transceiver Modules in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole optical transceiver modules corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.