Optical Transceiver Optical Modulator Patent Landscape 2026
- Filing has plateaued, not grown. the peak year so far is 2023 at 12 families, and the 2022 midpoint of 8 shows momentum flattening rather than climbing.
- Modulator claims pull in a wide neighbourhood. 53 of 117 records also carry an H04B transmission classification and 25 touch H01S lasers, so modulator IP rarely stands alone.
- US filing dominates the field by a wide margin. 72 of 117 records entered through the United States receiving office, more than five times the next-largest office, Japan at 14.
Filing growth compares 2021 (5 records) with 2024 (10) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 117 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
This landscape tracks patent families at the intersection of optical transceivers, optical modules and co-packaged optics with modulator claims — Mach-Zehnder, electro-absorption, silicon and thin-film lithium niobate (TFLN) — filtered to the core modulation and control IPC group G02F1/21, G02F1/225 and G02F1/01. The 117 families span 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, with the usual caveat that publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the last one to two years will read thinner than they eventually turn out to be.
The dataset sits at a technology junction rather than a single device category: modulator claims routinely bring transmission (H04B), free-space and waveguide optics (G02B) and laser source (H01S) classifications along with them, which is a sign that modulator IP is drafted as part of a transceiver system, not filed in isolation.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 117 families: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses ride alongside the core modulator classification.
Filing trend, 2017–2026
Filings opened the tracked window at 9 in 2017, climbed to a peak of 12 in 2023, and the 2022 midpoint of 8 confirms the growth curve is flat to declining rather than accelerating into the most recent years — bearing in mind the 2025–2026 counts are still incomplete.
IPC composition across the corpus
G02F anchors every record by construction, but H04B transmission claims appear in 53 of 117 families and G02B optical elements in 29, showing that most modulator patents are drafted inside a wider transceiver or module claim set rather than as a standalone optical component.
Shares are the percentage of the 117 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Optical Transceiver Optical Modulator with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about optical transceiver optical modulator and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA representative filing and the most-cited prior art
Electro-absorption modulator, optical semiconductor device and optical module
An electro-absorption modulator built on an InP substrate that modulates incident light via a light-absorbing layer, where that layer is a ternary or more complex III-V semiconductor mixed crystal that excludes aluminium but includes bismuth.Filed by Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, published 2021-06-10 as US20210175682A1.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20140133794A1 | Integrated Optical Device And Optical Module | 26 |
| 2 | JP2004287116A | Optical transmitter | 24 |
| 3 | US10274687B1 | Highly integrated multi-channel optical transceiver module and active optical cable based on silicon photonic… | 23 |
| 4 | US20150078763A1 | Optical module and optical transmitter | 21 |
| 5 | US20150098127A1 | Optical module outputting polarization combined optical beam | 19 |
| 6 | US20140341496A1 | Optical modulator and optical module including the same | 18 |
| 7 | US20050275920A1 | Semiconductor electro-absorption optical modulator, semiconductor electro-absorption optical modulator integr… | 18 |
| 8 | WO2019229825A1 | Optical module and optical transmitter | 16 |
| 9 | US10313014B2 | High capacity coherent optical transceiver for short reach applications | 15 |
| 10 | JP2010072495A | Coaxial type semiconductor optical module | 15 |
Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside this corpus — read them as a signal of influence on later drafting, not as a ranking of current relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers imply for filing strategy
Four read-outs from the composition and citation data, each pointed at a decision a filer or licensing team would actually need to make.
Growth has flattened, not accelerated
The 2022 midpoint of 8 families against a 2023 peak of 12 shows filing activity levelling off rather than compounding. Combined with publication lag, the true 2024–2026 picture is likely closer to a plateau than a decline.
Modulator claims travel with transmission claims
Over 45% of the corpus pairs a G02F modulator claim with an H04B transmission claim, which means freedom-to-operate work on modulators alone will miss adjacent blocking claims drafted at the system level.
US filing dominates the receiving-office mix
The United States accounts for well over half of all receiving-office filings, more than five times Japan's 14 and six times China's 13. A strategy built only on US prosecution will still leave Japan, China and PCT routes comparatively lightly watched.
Influence sits with early integrated-device filings
The most-cited record, US20140133794A1 on integrated optical devices and optical modules, predates most of the corpus and anchors citation chains into later silicon and TFLN filings — a marker of foundational drafting rather than of what is being filed today.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to optical transceiver optical modulator, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who holds the claim space, and where it is thin
Recent-year momentum is muted across the tracked assignees, which is consistent with the flat filing trend: this is a field where the claim space was staked out earlier in the window rather than being actively contested now.
Qingdao Hisense Broadband Multimedia Technology Co., Ltd. (Hisense Broadband)
The only tracked assignee still filing in the latest year, albeit down 50% year over year, which places it as the most active near-term filer even as the field overall cools.
Established players have gone quiet in the latest year
Sumitomo Electric, NEC, Fujitsu Optical Components and Huawei all show zero filings in the latest tracked year, with Huawei down 100% year over year — a pause that may reflect publication lag as much as a genuine drop in R&D.
No single assignee dominates the full corpus
With filing spread across a long list of assignees and no runaway leader in the ranking, the field reads as competitively open rather than gated by one or two dominant portfolios.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Qingdao Hisense Broadband Multimedia Technology Co., Ltd. | 1 | -50% |
| Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. | 0 | — |
| NEC Corporation | 0 | — |
| Fujitsu Optical Components Limited | 0 | — |
| Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| Oclaro Technology Limited | 0 | — |
| Mitsubishi Electric Corporation | 0 | — |
| Yi Jie Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The trend and composition data point to a field with settled core claims and thinner coverage at its edges — the next step is deciding where those edges matter for a specific product roadmap.
Map freedom-to-operate against the H04B overlap
Because 53 of 117 families pair modulator claims with transmission claims, a freedom-to-operate review scoped only to G02F will miss blocking art. Run the check across both classifications together.
Explore modulator claims in EurekaWatch the quiet incumbents for renewed filing
Sumitomo Electric, NEC and Huawei show zero filings in the latest year but were active earlier in the window. Publication lag means fresh filings from these assignees could surface over the next 18 months.
Track assignee activity in EurekaStress-test the under-claimed sub-areas
Bismuth-doped absorbing layers and TFLN-to-silicon hybrid packaging show comparatively little dedicated filing. Confirm whether that reflects genuine white space or simply thin search coverage before committing R&D.
Search white space in EurekaCommon questions about this landscape
The core classification is G02F, specifically the subclasses G02F1/21, G02F1/225 and G02F1/01, which cover electro-optic and electro-absorption modulation and control of light. In practice these filings rarely stand alone: over half of the tracked corpus also carries an H04B transmission classification, and a quarter touches H01S laser source claims, because modulator patents are usually drafted as part of a transceiver or module system. A search limited to G02F alone will therefore under-count relevant prior art.
Not clearly. The tracked filing trend peaked so far at 12 families in 2023, and the 2022 midpoint of 8 shows the growth curve flattening rather than accelerating. The two most recent years will always look thinner than they are because publication typically lags filing by about 18 months, so some rebound in the 2024–2025 numbers is still possible as those applications publish. Taken at face value today, the field reads as mature and plateaued rather than expanding.
Recent-year momentum is muted across the board: only one tracked assignee, Hisense Broadband, still shows a filing in the latest year, and even that is down 50% year over year. Larger established names — Sumitomo Electric, NEC, Fujitsu Optical Components and Huawei — show zero filings in the latest tracked year, with Huawei down 100% year over year. That pattern is consistent with a field where core claims were staked out earlier in the window rather than being actively contested now, though publication lag means some of this apparent quiet may simply not have surfaced yet.
The composition data points to a few specific pockets: bismuth-doped III-V absorbing layers for electro-absorption modulators, thin-film lithium niobate to silicon hybrid packaging, polarization-combined output stages, and the thermal-electrical interfaces needed for co-packaged optics integration. These sub-areas sit inside a densely filed neighbourhood but show comparatively little dedicated claim coverage. Any white-space read should be confirmed against a live search before committing R&D, since thin coverage can also just mean thin search recall.
Of the 117 tracked families, 72 entered through the United States receiving office, more than five times the next-largest office, Japan at 14, with China at 13, WIPO/PCT at 12, Europe at 4 and Canada at 1. This concentration likely reflects where optical transceiver and datacom module demand and manufacturing decisions have historically been made, as well as US practice of filing continuations that add to the count. A filer relying only on US prosecution should note that Japan, China and PCT routes are comparatively under-filed and may be worth separate freedom-to-operate attention.
Research Optical Transceiver Optical Modulator in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole optical transceiver optical modulator corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.