Book a demo

Optical Transceiver Optical Modulator Patent Landscape 2026

Optical Transceiver Optical Modulator Patent Landscape 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/optical-transceiver-optical-modulator-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Photonics & Optics · Patent Landscape 2026
Optical Transceiver Optical Modulator Patent Landscape
  • Filing has plateaued, not grown. the peak year so far is 2023 at 12 families, and the 2022 midpoint of 8 shows momentum flattening rather than climbing.
  • Modulator claims pull in a wide neighbourhood. 53 of 117 records also carry an H04B transmission classification and 25 touch H01S lasers, so modulator IP rarely stands alone.
  • US filing dominates the field by a wide margin. 72 of 117 records entered through the United States receiving office, more than five times the next-largest office, Japan at 14.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
117
Published Records
50%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+100%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (5 records) with 2024 (10) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 117 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks patent families at the intersection of optical transceivers, optical modules and co-packaged optics with modulator claims — Mach-Zehnder, electro-absorption, silicon and thin-film lithium niobate (TFLN) — filtered to the core modulation and control IPC group G02F1/21, G02F1/225 and G02F1/01. The 117 families span 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, with the usual caveat that publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the last one to two years will read thinner than they eventually turn out to be.

The dataset sits at a technology junction rather than a single device category: modulator claims routinely bring transmission (H04B), free-space and waveguide optics (G02B) and laser source (H01S) classifications along with them, which is a sign that modulator IP is drafted as part of a transceiver system, not filed in isolation.

Filing activity and IPC composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1SUMITOMO ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES LTD19
  2. 2NEC CORP14
  3. 3FUJITSU OPTICAL COMPONENTS LTD9
  4. 4HUAWEI TECH CO LTD9
  5. 5MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP8
  6. 6LUMENTUM TECHNOLOGY UK LTD5
  7. 7ルーメンタムラディアント ゲーエムベーハー4
  8. 8HISENSE BROADBAND MULTIMEDIA TECH4
  9. 9MER CELLO WIRELESS SOLUTIONS4
  10. 10SOLUTIONS SARL4
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Optical Transceiver Optical Modulator covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 117 families: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses ride alongside the core modulator classification.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filings opened the tracked window at 9 in 2017, climbed to a peak of 12 in 2023, and the 2022 midpoint of 8 confirms the growth curve is flat to declining rather than accelerating into the most recent years — bearing in mind the 2025–2026 counts are still incomplete.

Filing trend, 2017–202603691292017201820192020202120221220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC composition across the corpus

G02F anchors every record by construction, but H04B transmission claims appear in 53 of 117 families and G02B optical elements in 29, showing that most modulator patents are drafted inside a wider transceiver or module claim set rather than as a standalone optical component.

IPC composition across the corpusG02F · Optical control & modulation117100.0%H04B · Transmission (general)5345.3%G02B · Optical elements & systems2924.8%H01S · Lasers & stimulated emission2521.4%H04J · Multiplex communication119.4%H01L · Semiconductor devices54.3%C09J · Adhesives21.7%G01N · Material analysis & testing10.9%Other65.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 117 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Optical Transceiver Optical Modulator covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Optical Transceiver Optical Modulator with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about optical transceiver optical modulator and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

A representative filing and the most-cited prior art

Representative filing
US20210175682A12021-06-10

Electro-absorption modulator, optical semiconductor device and optical module

MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORPORATION

An electro-absorption modulator built on an InP substrate that modulates incident light via a light-absorbing layer, where that layer is a ternary or more complex III-V semiconductor mixed crystal that excludes aluminium but includes bismuth.Filed by Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, published 2021-06-10 as US20210175682A1.

US20210175682A1 — patent drawing 1US20210175682A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20140133794A1Integrated Optical Device And Optical Module26
2JP2004287116AOptical transmitter24
3US10274687B1Highly integrated multi-channel optical transceiver module and active optical cable based on silicon photonic…23
4US20150078763A1Optical module and optical transmitter21
5US20150098127A1Optical module outputting polarization combined optical beam19
6US20140341496A1Optical modulator and optical module including the same18
7US20050275920A1Semiconductor electro-absorption optical modulator, semiconductor electro-absorption optical modulator integr…18
8WO2019229825A1Optical module and optical transmitter16
9US10313014B2High capacity coherent optical transceiver for short reach applications15
10JP2010072495ACoaxial type semiconductor optical module15

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside this corpus — read them as a signal of influence on later drafting, not as a ranking of current relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Optical Transceiver Optical Modulator covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers imply for filing strategy

Four read-outs from the composition and citation data, each pointed at a decision a filer or licensing team would actually need to make.

Filing momentum
12 in 2023
peak year so far

Growth has flattened, not accelerated

The 2022 midpoint of 8 families against a 2023 peak of 12 shows filing activity levelling off rather than compounding. Combined with publication lag, the true 2024–2026 picture is likely closer to a plateau than a decline.

Trend section, 2017–2026
Classification spread
53 of 117
records also in H04B

Modulator claims travel with transmission claims

Over 45% of the corpus pairs a G02F modulator claim with an H04B transmission claim, which means freedom-to-operate work on modulators alone will miss adjacent blocking claims drafted at the system level.

IPC composition table
Jurisdiction concentration
72 of 117
filed via United States

US filing dominates the receiving-office mix

The United States accounts for well over half of all receiving-office filings, more than five times Japan's 14 and six times China's 13. A strategy built only on US prosecution will still leave Japan, China and PCT routes comparatively lightly watched.

Receiving office breakdown
Citation influence
26 citations
top-cited record

Influence sits with early integrated-device filings

The most-cited record, US20140133794A1 on integrated optical devices and optical modules, predates most of the corpus and anchors citation chains into later silicon and TFLN filings — a marker of foundational drafting rather than of what is being filed today.

Most-cited records table
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to optical transceiver optical modulator, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Optical Transceiver Optical Modulator covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the claim space, and where it is thin

Recent-year momentum is muted across the tracked assignees, which is consistent with the flat filing trend: this is a field where the claim space was staked out earlier in the window rather than being actively contested now.

Momentum leader
1 in latest year
still filing

Qingdao Hisense Broadband Multimedia Technology Co., Ltd. (Hisense Broadband)

The only tracked assignee still filing in the latest year, albeit down 50% year over year, which places it as the most active near-term filer even as the field overall cools.

Recent-year momentum
Zero recent filings
0 in latest year
multiple large assignees

Established players have gone quiet in the latest year

Sumitomo Electric, NEC, Fujitsu Optical Components and Huawei all show zero filings in the latest tracked year, with Huawei down 100% year over year — a pause that may reflect publication lag as much as a genuine drop in R&D.

Recent-year momentum
Long tail
117 families
across the corpus

No single assignee dominates the full corpus

With filing spread across a long list of assignees and no runaway leader in the ranking, the field reads as competitively open rather than gated by one or two dominant portfolios.

Assignee ranking, 117 families
🔍
Sub-areas that look under-claimed
Pockets inside the modulator claim space with comparatively little dedicated filing relative to the surrounding art.
Bismuth-doped III-V absorbing layersTFLN-to-silicon hybrid modulator packagingPolarization-combined modulator output stagesCo-packaged optics thermal-electrical modulator interfaces
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Qingdao Hisense Broadband Multimedia Technology Co., Ltd.1-50%
Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.0
NEC Corporation0
Fujitsu Optical Components Limited0
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.0-100%
Oclaro Technology Limited0
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation0
Yi Jie Technology Co., Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Optical Transceiver Optical Modulator covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The trend and composition data point to a field with settled core claims and thinner coverage at its edges — the next step is deciding where those edges matter for a specific product roadmap.

Map freedom-to-operate against the H04B overlap

Because 53 of 117 families pair modulator claims with transmission claims, a freedom-to-operate review scoped only to G02F will miss blocking art. Run the check across both classifications together.

Explore modulator claims in Eureka

Watch the quiet incumbents for renewed filing

Sumitomo Electric, NEC and Huawei show zero filings in the latest year but were active earlier in the window. Publication lag means fresh filings from these assignees could surface over the next 18 months.

Track assignee activity in Eureka

Stress-test the under-claimed sub-areas

Bismuth-doped absorbing layers and TFLN-to-silicon hybrid packaging show comparatively little dedicated filing. Confirm whether that reflects genuine white space or simply thin search coverage before committing R&D.

Search white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Optical Transceiver Optical Modulator covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Optical Transceiver Optical Modulator covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Optical Transceiver Optical Modulator in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole optical transceiver optical modulator corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.