https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/oxide-and-ltpo-backplane-technology-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Display Driving & Backlight
Oxide and LTPO backplane patents: mapping the leaders and the open claim space
  • Concentrated at the top. the five largest assignees hold 65.6% of all 22,019 records in scope, and the top ten hold 77.7% — a small group controls most of the filed art.
  • Filing has cooled from its peak. activity peaked in 2022 at 2,124 filings and eased to 1,396 by 2024, down 14% from 2021's 1,632 — though 2025-26 figures are still filling in under publication lag.
  • Momentum has shifted away from the leaders. the largest filers each show sharp year-on-year declines in their most recent filing year, suggesting the core claim territory is filled and new entrants must look elsewhere.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
22K
Published Records
66%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-14%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (1,632 records) with 2024 (1,396) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 22,019 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Oxide semiconductor and LTPO (low-temperature polycrystalline oxide) backplane technology sits at the intersection of thin-film transistor design and display driving. The search underlying this page combines terms for the semiconductor layer itself — oxide semiconductor layer, low temperature polycrystalline, indium gallium zinc — with the operating characteristics that make or break a panel in production: threshold voltage shift, leakage current, variable refresh rate, field effect mobility, annealing process and uniformity across panel.

That combination captures 22,019 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026, spanning transistor architecture, backplane manufacturing steps, and the display control circuitry that depends on stable, low-leakage switching. The dataset is dominated by semiconductor device classifications, but a meaningful share also touches display control and organic semiconductor classes, reflecting how tightly backplane process choices are coupled to panel-level performance claims.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1SEMICON ENERGY LAB CO LTD8,379
  2. 2SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO LTD2,159
  3. 3BOE TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO LTD2,080
  4. 4LG DISPLAY CO LTD1,082
  5. 5INTEL CORP744
  6. 6CHENGDU BOE OPTOELECTRONICS TECH CO LTD705
  7. 7SHARP KK649
  8. 8TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD609
  9. 9SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD438
  10. 10APPLE INC268
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Oxide and LTPO Backplane Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 22,019 records: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings rose from 1,132 in 2017 to a peak of 2,124 in 2022, then eased to 1,396 by 2024 — a 14% decline from 2021's 1,632. Figures for 2025 and 2026 are still incomplete because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the apparent tail-off should not yet be read as a slowdown.

Filing trend, 2017-202606251,2501,8752,5001,132201720182019202020212,12420222023202420251162026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC composition

H01L (semiconductor devices) appears on 57.5% of the 22,019 records, far ahead of any other class, with H10D (general semiconductor devices) at 27.4% and H10B (memory device manufacture) at 19.1%. G09G (display control circuits) reaches 17.3% and H10K (organic semiconductors, including OLED) 15.3%, showing that backplane claims routinely cross into both memory-adjacent architecture and display-control circuitry. Because records carry multiple classes, these shares sum to well over 100% of the record total.

IPC compositionH01L · Semiconductor devices12,66557.5%H10D · Semiconductor devices (general)6,02327.4%H10B · Memory device manufacture4,19519.1%G09G · Display control circuits3,81917.3%H10K · Organic semiconductors (OLED e…3,37815.3%H10P2,42811.0%G11C · Static & digital memories1,8918.6%G02F · Optical control & modulation1,8368.3%Other7,03632.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 22,019 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Oxide and LTPO Backplane Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Oxide and LTPO Backplane Technology with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about oxide and ltpo backplane technology and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

Most-cited prior art and a representative recent filing

Representative recent filing
US12336284B22025-06-17

US12336284B2 — Method for manufacturing thin film transistor array substrate and display panel

GUANGZHOU CHINA STAR OPTOELECTRONICS SEMICONDUCTOR DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.

The disclosure covers forming dispersed metal oxide grains on a substrate, forming an amorphous metal oxide semiconductor layer in contact with those grains sharing at least one metal element, and then annealing the amorphous layer to obtain a crystallized metal oxide semiconductor layer.Filed by Guangzhou China Star Optoelectronics Semiconductor Display Technology, published 2025-06-17.

US12336284B2 — patent drawing 1US12336284B2 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US7211825B2Indium oxide-based thin film transistors and circuits4,344
2US20060108529A1Sensor and image pickup device4,338
3US20080258143A1Thin film transitor substrate and method of manufacturing the same4,250
4US7453065B2Sensor and image pickup device4,105
5US9614258B2Power storage device and power storage system1,005
6US20050275038A1Indium oxide-based thin film transistors and circuits824
7US20100025678A1Semiconductor device and method for manufacturing the same667
8US20090065771A1Field effect transistor using oxide film for channel and method of manufacturing the same619
9US20110101351A1Semiconductor device603
10US8203143B2Thin film field effect transistor598

Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside the searched corpus — treat them as a signal of influence on the field, not of current filing activity.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Oxide and LTPO Backplane Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-outs from the concentration, class and citation data that matter more for strategy than the raw counts alone.

Concentration
65.6% of 22,019 records
held by the top 5 assignees

A small group controls most of the claim space

With the top five assignees combined holding 65.6% of all records and the top ten reaching 77.7%, a new entrant is filing into territory already dense with prior art from a handful of large device makers. Freedom-to-operate work here should start with those leaders' portfolios, not a broad landscape search.

Top 10 = 77.7% of 22,019 records
Momentum
-14% (2021-2024)
filing change among leaders

The largest filers are pulling back, not just plateauing

Filing volume dropped 14% from 1,632 in 2021 to 1,396 in 2024, and several of the largest individual assignees show year-on-year declines well beyond that average in their most recent complete filing year. That pattern is more consistent with a maturing core architecture than with waning interest in oxide backplanes generally.

Peak year: 2022 at 2,124 filings
Technology mix
57.5% H01L
of 22,019 records

Claims cluster in device structure, not just circuits

H01L dominates at 57.5% of records, but the presence of G09G (display control circuits, 17.3%) and H10K (organic semiconductors, 15.3%) shows backplane claims are frequently drafted alongside display-driving and OLED-adjacent circuitry rather than in isolation.

G09G present on 17.3% of records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to oxide and ltpo backplane technology, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Oxide and LTPO Backplane Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the ground, and where it is thin

The ranked leaders account for the bulk of filing volume, but the momentum data suggests the frontier is moving to adjacent sub-areas rather than deeper into the core architecture.

Leader
8,379 records
single largest assignee

One filer sits well ahead of the field

The leading assignee alone accounts for more records than the combined fifth-through-tenth-place filers, a gap wide enough that any competitive analysis of this space has to treat that portfolio as a distinct category rather than one of many peers.

Fifth place: 744 records
Long tail
268 records
tenth-place filer

Volume drops off sharply after the top tier

By tenth place, annual and cumulative filing volume is a fraction of the leader's, and the ranking of 100 companies overall shows a long tail of smaller filers rather than a second concentrated cluster.

100 companies in the ranked list
Collaboration
582 shared filings
strongest co-assignee pair

Filing often runs through corporate affiliate structures

The strongest co-assignee pairing links a parent group with its regional manufacturing subsidiary, and similar parent-subsidiary pairings appear elsewhere in the co-assignee data, indicating that some of the apparent single-company concentration is really consolidated group filing.

10 co-assignee pairs identified
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth scanning first
Branches with lower filing density relative to the core architecture claims, based on the class composition above.
Panel-level uniformity compensation circuitsLow-frequency LTPO refresh-rate switching schemesOxide TFT annealing process controlHybrid oxide/LTPS backplane integrationLeakage-current suppression at pixel level
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum among leading assignees
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd.31-79%
BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd.15-73%
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.9-97%
LG Display Co., Ltd.7-94%
Chengdu BOE Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd.6-80%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.5-86%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.3-95%
Japan Display Inc.3-93%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Oxide and LTPO Backplane Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The landscape points to two practical next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate or new filing strategy.

Check freedom-to-operate against the concentrated leaders

Because 77.7% of records sit with the top ten assignees, a targeted clearance search against those specific portfolios will surface most of the relevant blocking art faster than a broad keyword sweep.

Run a freedom-to-operate search in Eureka

Scan the under-claimed sub-areas before drafting

The gate chips above point to branches with comparatively thin filing density relative to the core oxide TFT architecture — a faster path to defensible claims than re-filing into the crowded centre.

Explore white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Oxide and LTPO Backplane Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Oxide and LTPO Backplane Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Oxide and LTPO Backplane Technology in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole oxide and ltpo backplane technology corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.