Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (1,632 records) with 2024 (1,396) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 22,019 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Oxide semiconductor and LTPO (low-temperature polycrystalline oxide) backplane technology sits at the intersection of thin-film transistor design and display driving. The search underlying this page combines terms for the semiconductor layer itself — oxide semiconductor layer, low temperature polycrystalline, indium gallium zinc — with the operating characteristics that make or break a panel in production: threshold voltage shift, leakage current, variable refresh rate, field effect mobility, annealing process and uniformity across panel.
That combination captures 22,019 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026, spanning transistor architecture, backplane manufacturing steps, and the display control circuitry that depends on stable, low-leakage switching. The dataset is dominated by semiconductor device classifications, but a meaningful share also touches display control and organic semiconductor classes, reflecting how tightly backplane process choices are coupled to panel-level performance claims.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 22,019 records: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.
Filings rose from 1,132 in 2017 to a peak of 2,124 in 2022, then eased to 1,396 by 2024 — a 14% decline from 2021's 1,632. Figures for 2025 and 2026 are still incomplete because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the apparent tail-off should not yet be read as a slowdown.
H01L (semiconductor devices) appears on 57.5% of the 22,019 records, far ahead of any other class, with H10D (general semiconductor devices) at 27.4% and H10B (memory device manufacture) at 19.1%. G09G (display control circuits) reaches 17.3% and H10K (organic semiconductors, including OLED) 15.3%, showing that backplane claims routinely cross into both memory-adjacent architecture and display-control circuitry. Because records carry multiple classes, these shares sum to well over 100% of the record total.
Shares are the percentage of the 22,019 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about oxide and ltpo backplane technology and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe disclosure covers forming dispersed metal oxide grains on a substrate, forming an amorphous metal oxide semiconductor layer in contact with those grains sharing at least one metal element, and then annealing the amorphous layer to obtain a crystallized metal oxide semiconductor layer.Filed by Guangzhou China Star Optoelectronics Semiconductor Display Technology, published 2025-06-17.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US7211825B2 | Indium oxide-based thin film transistors and circuits | 4,344 |
| 2 | US20060108529A1 | Sensor and image pickup device | 4,338 |
| 3 | US20080258143A1 | Thin film transitor substrate and method of manufacturing the same | 4,250 |
| 4 | US7453065B2 | Sensor and image pickup device | 4,105 |
| 5 | US9614258B2 | Power storage device and power storage system | 1,005 |
| 6 | US20050275038A1 | Indium oxide-based thin film transistors and circuits | 824 |
| 7 | US20100025678A1 | Semiconductor device and method for manufacturing the same | 667 |
| 8 | US20090065771A1 | Field effect transistor using oxide film for channel and method of manufacturing the same | 619 |
| 9 | US20110101351A1 | Semiconductor device | 603 |
| 10 | US8203143B2 | Thin film field effect transistor | 598 |
Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside the searched corpus — treat them as a signal of influence on the field, not of current filing activity.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three read-outs from the concentration, class and citation data that matter more for strategy than the raw counts alone.
With the top five assignees combined holding 65.6% of all records and the top ten reaching 77.7%, a new entrant is filing into territory already dense with prior art from a handful of large device makers. Freedom-to-operate work here should start with those leaders' portfolios, not a broad landscape search.
Filing volume dropped 14% from 1,632 in 2021 to 1,396 in 2024, and several of the largest individual assignees show year-on-year declines well beyond that average in their most recent complete filing year. That pattern is more consistent with a maturing core architecture than with waning interest in oxide backplanes generally.
H01L dominates at 57.5% of records, but the presence of G09G (display control circuits, 17.3%) and H10K (organic semiconductors, 15.3%) shows backplane claims are frequently drafted alongside display-driving and OLED-adjacent circuitry rather than in isolation.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to oxide and ltpo backplane technology, with the prior art for and against each one.
The ranked leaders account for the bulk of filing volume, but the momentum data suggests the frontier is moving to adjacent sub-areas rather than deeper into the core architecture.
The leading assignee alone accounts for more records than the combined fifth-through-tenth-place filers, a gap wide enough that any competitive analysis of this space has to treat that portfolio as a distinct category rather than one of many peers.
By tenth place, annual and cumulative filing volume is a fraction of the leader's, and the ranking of 100 companies overall shows a long tail of smaller filers rather than a second concentrated cluster.
The strongest co-assignee pairing links a parent group with its regional manufacturing subsidiary, and similar parent-subsidiary pairings appear elsewhere in the co-assignee data, indicating that some of the apparent single-company concentration is really consolidated group filing.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. | 31 | -79% |
| BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. | 15 | -73% |
| Samsung Display Co., Ltd. | 9 | -97% |
| LG Display Co., Ltd. | 7 | -94% |
| Chengdu BOE Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. | 6 | -80% |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | 5 | -86% |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | 3 | -95% |
| Japan Display Inc. | 3 | -93% |
The landscape points to two practical next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate or new filing strategy.
Because 77.7% of records sit with the top ten assignees, a targeted clearance search against those specific portfolios will surface most of the relevant blocking art faster than a broad keyword sweep.
Run a freedom-to-operate search in EurekaThe gate chips above point to branches with comparatively thin filing density relative to the core oxide TFT architecture — a faster path to defensible claims than re-filing into the crowded centre.
Explore white space in EurekaLTPO stands for low-temperature polycrystalline oxide, a backplane architecture that combines low-temperature polycrystalline silicon transistors for driving with oxide semiconductor transistors for low-leakage switching, most commonly to enable variable refresh rate displays that save power. It matters for patent strategy because the architecture sits across several IPC classes at once — this dataset shows overlap between core semiconductor device classes and display control circuitry classes on the same records. That overlap means a freedom-to-operate search limited to one classification will miss relevant art filed under another.
Filing in this space is heavily concentrated: the five largest assignees together hold 65.6% of the 22,019 records in scope, and the top ten hold 77.7%. The single largest assignee alone holds more records than several of the next-ranked companies combined, so any competitive review should treat that portfolio separately rather than as one of many similarly sized filers. The ranked list covers 100 companies in total, with volume dropping off sharply after the leading tier.
Filing peaked in 2022 at 2,124 records and declined to 1,396 by 2024, a 14% drop from 2021's 1,632 filings. Several of the largest individual assignees show even steeper year-on-year declines in their most recent complete filing year. However, publication typically lags actual filing by around 18 months, so figures for 2025 and 2026 in any dataset are still incomplete and should not be read as evidence the field is shrinking further than the confirmed 2021-2024 trend shows.
The classification data shows filing is heavily weighted toward core semiconductor device structure (H01L at 57.5% of records), with comparatively less density in areas like panel-level uniformity compensation, low-frequency refresh-rate switching schemes, and hybrid oxide/LTPS integration approaches. These adjacent branches touch the same underlying physics but have not been claimed as densely as the core transistor architecture, making them a more promising starting point for new filings than the crowded centre.
US12336284B2 claims a method for manufacturing a thin film transistor array substrate that forms dispersed metal oxide grains on a substrate, builds an amorphous metal oxide semiconductor layer in contact with those grains sharing a common metal element, and then anneals that layer to crystallize it. Filed by Guangzhou China Star Optoelectronics Semiconductor Display Technology and published in mid-2025, it sits close to the field's core annealing and crystallization process claims. Anyone drafting around similar grain-seeded crystallization methods should review this claim set specifically rather than relying on older, more general prior art.
Go past this page: query the whole oxide and ltpo backplane technology corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.
Help us improve
Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.
This page