Book a demo

Panoramic Roof Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Panoramic Roof Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/panoramic-roof-and-sunroof-systems-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Automotive Glazing · Patent Landscape
Panoramic Roof and Sunroof System Patents: Who Holds the Claim Space
  • 47.6% concentration. The top 5 of 43 ranked assignees hold 59 of 124 records in scope — under half the field, with a long tail below them.
  • +75% filing growth. Filings rose from 4 in 2021 to 7 in 2024, the last year the data can treat as complete.
  • Acoustics is now a glazing problem. G10K acoustics classes appear on 16.9% of records alongside the core B60J window/fitting class, showing noise control is filed as part of the roof, not bolted on after.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
124
Published Records
48%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+75%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (4 records) with 2024 (7) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 124 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this patent set covers

This landscape tracks patents and applications at the intersection of panoramic roof and sunroof hardware and the specific engineering problems that make large glass roofs hard to sell: water leak sealing, wind noise, shade mechanisms, roof stiffness, glass weight and opening mechanisms. The search deliberately pairs a structural term with a problem term, so the 124 records in scope are the ones where an applicant claimed a fix to one of these named issues rather than a roof panel in the abstract.

The IPC composition confirms the frame: B60J (windows, doors and vehicle fittings) sits under 58.9% of records, with acoustics (G10K), laminates (B32B) and door/window operating gear (E05F) layered underneath it. That stack is the fingerprint of a mechanical-and-materials problem, not a software one, though data-processing classes do appear on a small share of records tied to speed-based panel control.

Records by filing year, 2017-2026
  1. 1SILENTIUM LTD16
  2. 2AISIN TECHNICAL CENTER OF AMERICA INC14
  3. 3SEKISUI CHEMICAL CO LTD11
  4. 4AGP AMERICA11
  5. 5ASTON MARTIN LAGONDA LIMITED7
  6. 6VOLVO CAR CORP5
  7. 7FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC5
  8. 8TESLA INC4
  9. 9HONDA MOTOR CO LTD4
  10. 10AAMP OF FLORIDA4
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Panoramic Roof and Sunroof Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Filing Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 124-record set: how filing activity moved year on year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.

Filing activity, 2017-2026

Filings peaked at 16 in 2019, the highest single year in the window. Growth resumed after that peak: 2021 (4) to 2024 (7) is a +75% rise, and 2024 is the most recent year the trend can be read as complete — 2025 and 2026 will fill in further as publication catches up with filing, typically an 18-month lag.

Filing activity, 2017-20260510152012017201816201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass distribution

B60J covers 58.9% of the 124 records, confirming this is primarily a windows-and-fittings problem. G10K (16.9%) and B32B (16.1%) show that acoustic performance and laminate construction are claimed alongside the mechanical roof, not as separate filings. E05F (5.6%) and G06F (4.8%) are the smaller, more specific layers — operating gear and electronic control respectively. Because records carry multiple classes, these shares add to more than 100% of the 124-record total and should be read individually, not summed.

IPC subclass distributionB60J · Windows, doors & vehicle fitti…7358.9%G10K · Acoustics & sound generation2116.9%B32B · Layered products & laminates2016.1%B62D · Motor vehicles & steering97.3%B60R · Vehicles, parts & accessories86.5%C08K · Use of additives in polymers86.5%E05F · Door & window operating gear75.6%G06F · Electric digital data processi…64.8%Other7459.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 124 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Panoramic Roof and Sunroof Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Panoramic Roof and Sunroof Systems with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about panoramic roof and sunroof systems and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Representative Filing

A representative claim: speed-linked panel control

Representative Record
US20130268163A12013-10-10

Panoramic Roof Module for a Vehicle

FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

A panoramic vehicle sunroof system with a movable roof panel operable to define a sunroof opening extending generally from a front pillar to a rear pillar. A sunroof controller receives input indicative of vehicle speed and automatically controls movement of the panel, commanding it to a second, smaller opening position when speed exceeds a threshold, in order to reduce wind noise.Filed by Ford Global Technologies; a clear example of wind-noise mitigation claimed as a control-logic feature rather than a purely mechanical one.

US20130268163A1 — patent drawing 1US20130268163A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this set
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6129413APowered dual panel sunroof80
2US5746475ADrive mechanism for an automotive vehicle sunroof assembly76
3US8481916B2Accessory mounting system for a vehicle having a light absorbing layer with a light transmitting portion for …63
4US5941598ADrive mechanism for an automotive vehicle sunroof assembly57
5US20150367782A1Panoramic extended windshield with integrated non-moving blind49
6US20120234621A1Window Systems for Vehicles46
7US20140000977A1Interlayer for laminated glass and laminated glass43
8US7314079B2Sunshade system having blind sheet36
9US20050051285A1Sunshade system having blind sheet34
10US20130268163A1Panoramic Roof Module for a Vehicle33

Citation counts favour older filings that have had longer to accumulate citations inside this corpus — read them as a signal of influence on the field, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Panoramic Roof and Sunroof Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Analysis

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-throughs of the dataset that matter more than any single ranking.

Concentration
47.6% / top 5
of 124 records

The top of the field is not a monopoly

The five leading assignees account for 47.6% of all 124 records in scope, and the top 10 reach 65.3%. That leaves roughly a third of the field spread across 33 more ranked assignees plus unranked entrants — a real long tail, not a two-player market.

Basis: top 5 = 59/124, top 10 = 81/124
Momentum
4 → 7
2021 to 2024 filings

Growth resumed after the 2019 peak

Filing activity peaked at 16 in 2019, cooled, then climbed again: 4 filings in 2021 to 7 in 2024, a +75% rise over that span. Treat 2025-2026 counts as provisional; publication lag of roughly 18 months means the most recent years always understate true filing volume.

2024 is the last year treatable as complete
Composition
58.9% B60J
of 124 records

Acoustics is filed inside the roof claim, not around it

G10K acoustics classes sit on 16.9% of records and B32B laminates on 16.1%, both nested under the dominant B60J class. That pattern says noise and weight reduction are being claimed as integral to the roof assembly, which narrows the room to file a noise-only or laminate-only patent without touching the base mechanism claims.

Class shares sum above 100% because records carry multiple IPC codes
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to panoramic roof and sunroof systems, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Panoramic Roof and Sunroof Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Competitive Landscape

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The leader holds 16 records against a fifth-place figure of 7 and a tenth-place figure of 4 — a sharp drop-off rather than a gradual one, which is typical of a field with one or two committed platform programmes and many single-application entrants.

Leader
16 records
leading assignee

One clear filer, not a duopoly

The top-ranked assignee's 16 records are more than double the fifth-place count of 7, indicating a sustained internal programme rather than opportunistic filing. Below it, counts fall off quickly, which is where the long tail begins.

Fifth place: 7 records; tenth place: 4 records
Long tail
43 ranked
assignees total

A wide field of single- and few-filing entrants

With 43 assignees ranked across 124 records, most companies in this set hold only a handful of filings. That spread suits component and Tier-1 suppliers as much as OEMs, since a single sealing or shade-mechanism improvement is enough to appear in the ranking.

Top 10 combined hold 65.3% of the 124 records
Collaboration
3 pairs
co-assignee pairs

Co-filing is rare and individual-linked

Only three co-assignee pairings appear in the dataset, and the strongest ones pair a single corporate assignee with named individual inventors rather than with another company. Cross-company joint filing is effectively absent here, so most claim positions are built unilaterally.

Strongest pair recorded once each
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
Branches where the IPC composition and citation pattern suggest fewer entrenched claims
speed-triggered panel repositioning logiclaminate weight reduction for large glass panelsacoustic damping at panel-to-frame sealselectronic shade actuation controlmulti-panel stiffness bracing
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Silentium Ltd0-100%
Aisin Technical Center of America, Inc.0
AGP America0
Sekisui Chemical Co., Ltd.0
Aston Martin Lagonda Limited0
Volvo Car Corporation0
Tesla, Inc.0
Glaverbel0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Panoramic Roof and Sunroof Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

The ranking and trend answer who and how much. The next questions are what specifically is claimed and what is still open to file.

Map claims against your own roof architecture

Run your current or planned panel mechanism, sealing approach and shade design against the most-cited records to see which mechanical claim families you sit closest to.

Explore claims in Eureka

Track the leader's recent filings

Momentum data shows the leading assignees with zero filings in the latest year, which given publication lag may reflect filing-to-publication timing rather than a slowdown — worth confirming directly.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka

Test the white space chips against prior art

The under-claimed branches above are starting points, not clearances — search each against the full corpus before drafting.

Run a white space search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Panoramic Roof and Sunroof Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on panoramic roof and sunroof patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Panoramic Roof and Sunroof Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Panoramic Roof and Sunroof Systems in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole panoramic roof and sunroof systems corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.