Book a demo

Paper-Based Barrier Coating Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026

Paper-Based Barrier Coating Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/paper-based-barrier-coating-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Paper-Based Barrier Coatings
Paper-based barrier coating patents: who holds the claims and where filings are heading

A data-backed view of paper-based barrier coating patents: who leads filings, how the technology splits across IPC classes, and where filing activity is heading through 2026.

199
Published Records
57%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+35%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth = 2021 (17 records) → 2024 (23); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 199 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.

Check your own idea
Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What paper-based barrier coating patents actually cover

Paper-based barrier coating patents describe how paper or paperboard is treated, laminated or coated to block oxygen, moisture or grease while remaining recyclable or compostable — an alternative to plastic-laminated packaging. The 199 records in scope span containers and packaging structures (B65D), layered laminates (B32B), pulp and paper compositions (D21H), and the coating chemistries themselves (C09D), which means most of the claim activity sits in how the barrier layer is built into a package rather than in the coating formulation alone.

The dataset covers filings from 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, with the receiving-office split showing the United States, Europe and the WIPO/PCT route as the three heaviest filing destinations, followed by China, Canada and Japan.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1SOCIETE DES PRODUITS NESTLE SA65
  2. 2PROAMPAC HOLDINGS INC19
  3. 3DAI NIPPON PRINTING CO LTD11
  4. 4INT PAPER CO10
  5. 5MEADWESTVACO CORP9
  6. 6STORA ENSO OYJ9
  7. 7NESTEC SA8
  8. 8WIHURI PACKAGING OY7
  9. 9NIPPON PAPER IND CO LTD6
  10. 10MANTROSE HAEUSER CO INC4
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Paper-Based Barrier Coating Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 199 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and how that activity distributes across the IPC classes that define the technology.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Annual filings rose from 1 in 2017 to a peak of 37 in 2023, with 2021-to-2024 filings up 35% (17 to 23 records) — the last span the data can treat as complete, since publication typically lags filing by around 18 months and 2025-2026 figures will still fill in.

Filing trend, 2017–202601020304012017201820192020202120223720232024202592026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

Records can carry more than one IPC class, so shares sum to more than 100% of the 199 records in scope. B65D (containers & packaging) and B32B (layered products & laminates) each cover roughly half or more of records, D21H (pulp & paper compositions) accounts for a fifth, and the coating-specific classes C09D and C08L/C08F sit in the single digits — evidence that claim activity concentrates on package structure and lamination rather than coating chemistry per se.

Technology composition by IPC subclassB65D · Containers & packaging13266.3%B32B · Layered products & laminates10150.8%D21H · Pulp & paper compositions4120.6%B65B · Packaging & wrapping189.0%C09D · Coatings, paints & inks157.5%B31B · Box & carton making115.5%C08F · Addition polymers (vinyl etc.)84.0%C08L · Polymer compositions84.0%Other4723.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 199 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Paper-Based Barrier Coating Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Paper-Based Barrier Coating Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about paper-based barrier coating patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Filings

The most-cited and most representative filings

Representative Filing
KR1020150122294A2015-11-02

KR1020150122294A — Nuts packaging methods

KIM YOUNG SEOK

Filed by an individual inventor in 2015, this record describes a method for packing nuts using a high-barrier film specified at an oxygen permeability of 1-5 cc/m^2/24hr under stated test conditions, formed into a four-sided wrapping-paper shape of uniform thickness, combined with a pouch-type deoxidizer dosed at 150-500 cc per packing container to prevent acidification and preserve flavour.Its narrow, numerically bounded claim (specific permeability range, specific deoxidizer dose) makes it a useful contrast against the broader laminate-structure claims that dominate the highest-cited records.

KR1020150122294A — patent drawing 1KR1020150122294A — patent drawing 2
View filing details
Highest-cited records in the dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20070184220A1Biodegradable paper-based laminate with oxygen and moisture barrier properties and method for making biodegra…94
2EP2777934A1Barrier paper packaging material58
3JP2005178829APTP lid, and PTP package using the same36
4US11242195B2Capsule for preparing a beverage such as coffee and the like24
5WO2015059022A1Capsule for preparing a beverage such as coffee and the like24
6US20110210164A1Packaging Materials With Enhanced Thermal-Insulating Performance23
7US20160251149A1Capsule for preparing a beverage such as coffee and the like22
8US20170174417A1Capsule For Preparing A Beverage Such As Coffee And The Like20
9US8637126B2Biodegradable paper-based laminate with oxygen and moisture barrier properties and method for making biodegra…18
10WO2015000775A1Capsule for preparing a beverage such as coffee and the like16

Citation counts favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations inside the searched corpus; they signal influence on later filings, not current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Paper-Based Barrier Coating Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Landscape Signals

What the concentration and composition mean for a filing strategy

Four read-throughs from the ranking, the trend line and the IPC split that matter more than the raw counts on their own.

Concentration
57.3% / top 5
share of 199 records

The top of the field is narrow

Five assignees hold 114 of the 199 records in scope. That is a small enough group that freedom-to-operate work should start with their portfolios by name rather than a broad novelty search.

Top 10 combined reach 74.4% of records — the long tail beyond that is thin.
Growth
+35%, 2021→2024
17 to 23 records

Filing activity is still building, not plateauing

The three-year span from 2021 to 2024 — the most recent period the data can call complete — shows growth rather than a slowdown. Years after 2024 will read lower simply because publication has not caught up with filing yet.

Peak filing year so far is 2023, at 37 records.
Class split
66.3% vs 7.5%
B65D vs C09D share

Package structure is claimed far more than coating chemistry

B65D (containers & packaging) touches two-thirds of records while the dedicated coatings class C09D touches under a tenth. Claims are being built around how the barrier is integrated into the package, not primarily around the coating formulation.

B32B (laminates) sits close behind B65D at 50.8% of records.
Filing venues
US 34 · EPO 30 · PCT 26
top three receiving offices

Filing is concentrated in three jurisdictions

The United States, Europe and the WIPO/PCT route together account for the bulk of receiving-office activity, ahead of China, Canada and Japan. A regional strategy should weight these three routes first.

China, Canada and Japan follow at meaningfully lower counts.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to paper-based barrier coating patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Paper-Based Barrier Coating Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis next

The dataset points to a narrow leadership group and a package-structure-heavy claim map. These are the follow-on questions worth running before committing a filing strategy.

Map the top assignees' full portfolios

The five leading assignees hold well over half of all records — pull their complete filing histories, not just this dataset's subset, before drafting around their claims.

Explore assignee portfolios in Eureka

Stress-test a white-space claim

Coating chemistry classes (C09D, C08L, C08F) are lightly claimed relative to package-structure classes. Draft a candidate claim there and check it against prior art directly.

Run a claim check in Eureka

Watch the 2025-2026 filing window

Recent years will keep rising as publication catches up with filing. Set an alert rather than concluding growth has slowed.

Set a filing alert in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Paper-Based Barrier Coating Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about paper-based barrier coating patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Paper-Based Barrier Coating Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Paper-Based Barrier Coating Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole paper-based barrier coating patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.