Book a demo

PEM Fuel Cell & PEM Electrolyzer Patent Landscape

PEM Fuel Cell & PEM Electrolyzer Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape

PEM Fuel Cell & PEM Electrolyzer Patent Landscape in 2026

The PEM fuel cell and electrolyzer space is in a growth phase, with annual filings trending upward and the field still understated in the most recent window due to publication lag. Siemens AG leads by a clear margin, and the top five filers collectively hold more than half the share among the hundred largest filers, signaling a concentrated competitive structure dominated by European industrials.

25
Patent families in scope
56%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+100%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Siemens AG leads a concentrated European-industrial field

Siemens AG ranks first among all applicants, followed by Robert Bosch GmbH and W C Heraeus GmbH. The top five filers — Siemens, Bosch, Heraeus, Mercedes-Benz Group, and Hydrogenics — account for 56% of the combined total among the hundred largest filers, confirming a heavily concentrated competitive structure.

A clear tier gap separates the top two applicants from the rest of the ranking. Siemens AG holds 11 patent records and Robert Bosch GmbH holds 9, while W C Heraeus GmbH follows at 6 and the next group clusters at 5 or below. This compression means the gap between tier-one and tier-two players is narrow, but the drop to the broader field is steep.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Siemens AG11
2Robert Bosch GmbH9
3W C Heraeus GmbH6
4Mercedes-Benz Group AG5
5Hydrogenics Corp5
6General Motors LLC3
7Shenyang Ligong University2
8KINKELAAR MARK R2
9Degussa Hüls AG2
10UMICORE AG & CO KG2
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Zhejiang Haizhuo New Energy Technology Co Ltd1
12Zhao Hongshan1
13NMAM Institute of Technology (Nitte Deemed to be University)1
14Indian Oil Corporation Ltd1
15Hangzhou Gongshu District Edge Intelligence Innovation Research Institute1
16Foamex Innovations Operating1
17Ruqing (Qingdao) Energy Technology Co Ltd1
18BUDINSKI MICHAEL K1
19MATHIAS MARK F1
20Tsinghua University1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The dominance of European industrial and automotive conglomerates — Siemens, Bosch, Heraeus, Mercedes-Benz, and Degussa Hüls — reflects early and sustained investment in membrane electrode assembly and electrolyzer stack technology. New entrants from. China and India are beginning to appear in the lower ranks, suggesting gradual geographic diversification of R&D activity.

Filings from 2024 onward are likely under-counted due to standard patent publication delays of 18–24 months; the apparent pause in 2025–2026 should not be read as a real decline. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Annual activity is rising and core IPC classes dominate the mix

The annual filing trend chart and the technology-composition chart together reveal a field accelerating on a multi-year basis, with the technology mix tightly anchored in two co-equal IPC classes. Minor adjacent branches represent a small but potentially meaningful tail of activity.

Annual filing trend

Filing activity was modest between 2017 and 2022, with a trough in 2018–2019, then rebounded through 2020–2022 before reaching a recorded peak of 7 patent records in 2024. The years 2025 and 2026 show lower counts, but those figures are understated by publication lag and should not be interpreted as a downturn. The overall multi-year trajectory confirms the growth stage characterization.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 7 in 2024.62017020180201932020220213202202023720244202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

C25B (Electrolytic production of compounds) and H01M (Batteries, cells and fuel cells) each account for 57 patent records, making them the co-dominant technical pillars of this corpus. Coating processes (B05D) and layered products (B32B) each contribute 4 records, while separation, catalysis, powder metallurgy, electric vehicle propulsion, inorganic compounds, refrigeration, and power grid applications each appear at 1–2 records — forming a sparse but diverse tail of adjacent activity.

Technology compositionC25B · Electrolytic production of compounds leads with 57; H01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells 57.C25B · Electrolytic prod…57H01M · Batteries, cells …57B05D · Coating processes4B32B · Layered products …4B01D · Separation proces…2B01J · Chemical/physical…1B22F · Powder metallurgy1B60L · Electric vehicle …1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US7455928B2Published 2008-11-25

Diffusion media for use in a PEM fuel cell

Gm Global Technology Operations LLC

A diffusion media is provided for implementation with a PEM fuel cell. The diffusion media is a permeable sheet that is rigid along a transverse axis, flexible along a lateral axis and has a substantially incompressible thickness. The diffusion media is able to be mass produced in large sheets and rolled along the lateral axis for transport and storage. The… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Diffusion media for use in a PEM fuel cell — patent drawingDiffusion media for use in a PEM fuel cell — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Improved diaphragm electrode unit for a PEM fuel c…79
2Gas diffusion layer containing inherently conducti…55
3Method for applying electrode layers on a tape-lik…55
4Control of a fluid flow in an electrochemical cell28
5Diffusion media for use in a PEM fuel cell23
6Gas diffusion layer containing inherently conducti…20
7Method and device for generating hydrogen and oxygen13
8一种具有尾气能量回收功能的PEM燃料电池发电装置10

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment

Four structural signals — lifecycle stage, top-filer concentration, co-applicant relationships, and jurisdiction footprint — shape the risk and opportunity calculus for any organization entering or expanding in this space.

Growth

Growth stage with rising annual filings

The field is classified as Growth, with annual filings still rising and the most recent years understated by publication lag. A 100% recent-window growth rate confirms that activity is accelerating rather than plateauing. Entrants arriving now face established incumbents but can still carve positions in emerging sub-branches before the field matures further.

Lifecycle: Growth
Concentration

High concentration; top five hold 56% of the lead-100 total

The top five filers account for 56% of the combined patent records among the hundred largest filers, indicating a field where a small number of European industrials set the technical agenda. The narrow gap between Siemens (11 records) and Bosch (9 records) suggests competitive pressure at the very top, but the steep drop to mid-tier applicants means new entrants must differentiate by sub-technology rather than compete head-on in the core stack.

High concentration
Collaboration

Siemens and W C Heraeus are the most active co-filers

The most active co-applicant pair is Siemens AG and W C Heraeus GmbH, sharing 6 collaborative patent records. Individual inventor Waidhas Manfred co-files with both Siemens (3 records) and Heraeus (2 records), as does Jeschonnek Bernd (2 records each), suggesting a tight inventor network bridging the two organizations. This cluster may indicate joint development of membrane or electrode coating technology that is not fully replicated by other players.

Co-filing cluster
Geography

China leads filings; PCT and EPO signal global ambition

China is the leading jurisdiction by patent records, followed by WIPO PCT filings and the European Patent Office. The United States ranks fourth. This distribution suggests that applicants are pursuing broad multi-regional coverage via PCT and EPO while prioritizing China as a key market or manufacturing destination. Australia, Canada, Spain, India, Japan, and South Korea are also present, reflecting a genuinely global filing strategy among the leading filers.

Multi-regional
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Siemens AGW C Heraeus GmbH6
WAIDHAS MANFREDSiemens AG3
WAIDHAS MANFREDW C Heraeus GmbH2
JESCHONNEK BERNDSiemens AG2
JESCHONNEK BERNDW C Heraeus GmbH2

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Cards draw on lifecycle, collaboration, concentration, and jurisdiction data from the patent corpus.Explore insights →
Leaders

Siemens AG and Robert Bosch GmbH lead across both electrolytic and fuel-cell branches

The two highest-ranked applicants share overlapping but distinguishable technology emphases, and Robert Bosch GmbH has shown a new-entrant momentum signal in the most recent period, indicating accelerating investment.

Leader · Siemens AG

Siemens AG

Siemens AG holds 11 patent records, the highest count in the corpus. Its technology focus centers on C25B 9 (electrolytic cell design, 10 records) and H01M 8 (fuel cell stacks, 8 records), with secondary activity in C25B 1 (electrolytic production of inorganic compounds, 2 records). This profile reflects a dual-platform strategy covering both PEM electrolyzer architecture and fuel cell integration. Siemens is also the anchor of the field’s most active co-filing cluster, partnering with W C Heraeus GmbH on 6 shared records.

11 patent records
Challenger · Robert Bosch GmbH

Robert Bosch GmbH

Robert Bosch GmbH ranks second with 9 patent records and carries a new-entrant momentum signal, indicating its filings are concentrated in the most recent period relative to its prior base. Its technology focus spans C25B 9 (9 records), H01M 8 (9 records), and B32B 15 (layered metallic laminates, 4 records) — the last of these distinguishing Bosch from Siemens and suggesting active work on gas diffusion layer or bipolar plate laminate structures. This breadth across both core and adjacent branches makes Bosch the most technically diversified of the top-two players.

9 patent records
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all 20 applicants including Hydrogenics, General Motors, Umicore, and Chinese entrants.
W C Heraeus GmbHHydrogenics Corp+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Robert Bosch GmbH2▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards reference patent record counts from the applicant ranking and IPC focus data.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Coating processes and separation technology are under-served adjacent branches

Several IPC branches adjacent to the dominant C25B and H01M classes carry low patent counts relative to their technical relevance to PEM systems. These are observations of relative sparsity; they represent plausible but unvalidated entry points that warrant further technical scoping before commitment.

B05D · Coating processes for electrode and membrane layers

B05D appears in 4 patent records, accounting for roughly 3% of the IPC-level corpus. Coating process innovation — particularly for catalyst-coated membranes and anti-corrosion layers on bipolar plates — is a known performance lever in PEM systems, yet the branch is sparsely populated here. Degussa Hüls AG is the only applicant with documented activity in B05D 7 within this corpus, suggesting limited competitive overlap. An entrant with thin-film or atomic-layer deposition expertise could find relatively open filing space in this branch.

Search this in Eureka →

B01D · Separation processes for water and gas management

B01D covers filtration, membrane separation, and gas-liquid separation — all directly relevant to water management and gas purity in PEM electrolyzers and fuel cells — yet only 2 patent records appear in this branch within the corpus. No single dominant applicant is identified in B01D here, and the branch sits well below the activity levels of the core IPC classes. Organizations specializing in membrane separation or water purification technology may find a realistic entry path by combining separation process IP with PEM-specific system integration claims.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
The full analysis covers five adjacent branches including B22F powder metallurgy and B01J catalysis with applicant overlap scoring.
B22F · Powder metallurgy for catalyst fabricationB01J · Chemical processes and catalysis+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branches are identified by low IPC share relative to the dominant C25B and H01M classes.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ across technology routes

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerH01M 8 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsC25B 9 · Electrolytic production of compoundsH01M 4 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsC25B 1 · Electrolytic production of compoundsC25B 11 · Electrolytic production of compounds
Robert Bosch GmbHStrong · 9Strong · 9AbsentModerate · 3Absent
Siemens AGStrong · 8Strong · 10AbsentEmerging · 2Absent
Foamex Innovations OperatingStrong · 5AbsentStrong · 5AbsentStrong · 5
W C Heraeus GmbHStrong · 6Strong · 6AbsentAbsentAbsent
General Motors LLCStrong · 4AbsentStrong · 4AbsentStrong · 4
Mercedes-Benz Group AGStrong · 5Strong · 5AbsentAbsentAbsent
Hydrogenics CorpStrong · 5Strong · 5AbsentAbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own PEM technology landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.