Book a demo

PEM Water Electrolysis Patent Landscape 2026

PEM Water Electrolysis Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

PEM Water Electrolysis Patent Landscape in 2026

PEM water electrolysis patent activity is in a Growth stage, with filings expanding strongly over the multi-year window and the field still rising rather than having eased from a peak. UOP LLC holds a commanding lead with 161 patent families, while Siemens Energy and 1S1 Energy trail at roughly half that volume, pointing to a moderately concentrated but actively contested space.

1,568
Patent families in scope
33%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+189%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

UOP LLC leads a moderately concentrated field with clear tier gaps

UOP LLC is the clear KG at 73 patent families and 1S1 Energy Inc at 64 patent families.

The top five filers — UOP LLC, Siemens Energy, 1S1 Energy, Air Products & Chemicals, and Hysata — together account for 33% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, indicating a moderately concentrated structure with meaningful room for challengers below the top tier.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1UOP LLC161
2SIEMENS ENERGY GLOBAL GMBH & CO KG73
31S1 Energy Inc64
4AIR PROD & CHEM INC42
5Hysata Pty Ltd33
63M Innovative Properties Co29
7Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences26
8Robert Bosch GmbH25
9IDE Water Technologies Ltd24
10UMICORE AG & CO KG23
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Shaheen Innovations Holding Ltd21
12C&R ENTERPRISES CO21
13AeroVironment Inc19
14Toray Industries Inc17
15Yokogawa Electric Corporation15
16Ohmium International Inc15
17Fraunhofer Society15
18HERAEUS DEUTSCHLAND GMBH & CO KG15
19Brilliant Light Power Inc15
20Atomic Energy of Canada Limited15
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

UOP LLC’s position, anchored heavily in fuel cell and electrolytic compound production subclasses, reflects a mature internal portfolio that newer entrants such as Hysata and Robert Bosch are only beginning to challenge through focused cell-architecture and system-level filings.

Patent records from the most recent 18–24 months are under-counted due to publication lag; apparent softness in 20252026 figures should not be interpreted as a real decline in activity. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Filings have grown sharply since 2020 and the technology mix is anchored in core electrolytic chemistry

Two charts together reveal both the pace of investment and where technical effort is concentrated: the annual trend shows a sustained surge from 2020 onward, while the IPC composition confirms that core electrolytic production and fuel-cell subclasses dominate but a long tail of adjacent branches is present.

Annual filing trend

Filings rose from 44 in 2017 to a recorded high of 328 in 2023, representing 189% growth over the recent window. The 2024 and 2025 counts should be treated as under-stated due to publication lag; the apparent plateau does not signal a genuine slowdown.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 328 in 2023.44201760201842201976202020020212882022328202330420242062025202026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

C25B (electrolytic production of compounds) is overwhelmingly dominant, reflecting the core electrochemical focus of the field. H01M (batteries, cells and fuel cells) is the second-largest branch, capturing membrane and electrode cross-filing. A long tail of branches — from B01J catalysis through C08J polymer processing — signals growing interest in enabling materials and supporting processes.

Technology compositionC25B · Electrolytic production of compounds leads with 1,541; H01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells 545.C25B · Electrolytic prod…1,541H01M · Batteries, cells …545B01J · Chemical/physical…178B01D · Separation proces…137C01B · Non-metallic elem…126C08J · Polymer processin…115C02F · Water & wastewate…84C08G · Condensation poly…63↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20260049406A1Published 2026-02-19

Electrocatalyst for polymer electrolyte membrane (…

The Carbon Studio INC.

Proposed are an electrocatalyst for polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) water electrolysis, the electrocatalyst including an iridium-based catalyst, wherein the iridium-based catalyst is a core-shell particle, the core contains iridium metal, and the shell contains an iridium tin composite oxide, a method of preparing the same, a PEM water electrolysis… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Electrocatalyst for polymer electrolyte membrane (… — patent drawingElectrocatalyst for polymer electrolyte membrane (… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Method and apparatus for integrated water deioniza…143
2Apparatus for integrated water deionization, elect…130
3Bifunctional catalytic electrode115
4Water sources for automotive electrolyzers79
5Method and apparatus for integrated water deioniza…70
6Unitized regenerative fuel cell with bifunctional …68
7Energy storage system64
8水电解用贵金属氧化物催化剂62

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the patent structure means for R&D strategy

The combination of a Growth life-cycle stage, a moderate concentration ratio, active cross-sector collaboration, and broad geographic filing defines both the opportunity and the competitive risk for new entrants and incumbents alike.

Growth

Growth stage — annual volume still rising on a multi-year basis

The field is classified as Growth, with annual filings expanding strongly since 2020 and no evidence of easing from a peak. The 189% growth recorded over the recent window confirms that PEM electrolysis remains an actively contested frontier rather than a maturing or declining area. R&D investment decisions should account for an accelerating prior-art landscape that is being built in real time.

Life-cycle: Growth
Concentration

Moderate concentration with a pronounced leader gap

The top five filers hold 33% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, a moderate concentration level that leaves meaningful space for mid-tier challengers. However, UOP LLC’s lead of 161 patent families — more than twice Siemens Energy’s 73 — creates a practical barrier in the core electrochemical and fuel-cell subclasses. New entrants may find more accessible entry points in adjacent enabling-material or system-integration branches where the incumbent density is lower.

Concentration: moderate
Collaboration

Early-stage cross-institutional co-filing, led by Dalian Institute with State Grid entities

The most active co-filing pairs identified in the evidence are Siemens Energy Global with Siemens AG, the Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics (Chinese Academy of Sciences) with State Grid Liaoning Electric Power and with State Grid Corporation of China, and BASF with the Max Planck Society. These pairings suggest that the dominant collaboration model pairs industrial hydrogen system developers with grid operators or fundamental-research institutes, rather than horizontal industry alliances.

Collaboration: emerging
Geography

United States and China are co-leading jurisdictions; Europe and PCT filings are substantial

The United States leads on patent records with 422, closely followed by China at 408. Europe (EPO) at 261 and WIPO (PCT) at 217 indicate strong multi-jurisdictional protection strategies among the leading filers. Australia (142) appears notably high, reflecting the domestic base of Hysata and Aquahydrex. Filings in South Korea (26) and Japan (19) are relatively sparse given those nations’ industrial hydrogen programs, suggesting either strategic under-filing or a gap worth monitoring.

Geography: US–China parity
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Siemens Energy Global GmbH & Co. KGSiemens AG2
Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of SciencesState Grid Liaoning Electric Power Co Ltd2
Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of SciencesState Grid Corporation of China2
BASF SEMax Planck Society for the Advancement of Science1
Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of SciencesChina Three Gorges Corporation1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights derived from applicant ranking, collaboration pairs, lifecycle classification, and jurisdiction distribution in the evidence.Explore insights →
Leaders

UOP LLC and Siemens Energy lead by volume, with BASF and Bosch accelerating as new entrants

The two dominant filers differ meaningfully in technical emphasis: UOP LLC straddles fuel-cell and electrolytic production subclasses, while Siemens Energy concentrates more tightly on core electrolytic and electrolyzer cell architecture.

Leader · UOP LLC

UOP LLC

UOP LLC holds 161 patent families, the largest portfolio in the corpus. Its technology emphasis spans H01M 8 (fuel cells) and C25B 1 and C25B 13 (electrolytic production of compounds), indicating a dual focus on PEM cell architecture and hydrogen production chemistry. Recent-period momentum is strong at 3.1× vs. the prior three-year window (110 recent families), reflecting an accelerating rather than consolidating strategy.

families: 161
Challenger · Siemens Energy Global GmbH & Co. KG

Siemens Energy Global GmbH & Co. KG

Siemens Energy Global holds 73 patent families and is classified as a new entrant in momentum terms, having built its position in the recent filing window. Its technical focus is concentrated in C25B 1 (electrolytic compounds), C25B 9 (electrolyzer cell structures), and C25B 11 (electrodes and catalysts), marking a more system- and cell-architecture-oriented portfolio compared to UOP LLC’s dual hydrogen-production and fuel-cell footprint.

families: 73
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all top-100 filers, including momentum trends and technology emphasis for each.
Air Products & Chemicals IncHysata Pty Ltd+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
UOP LLC110▲ 3.1× vs prior 3-yr
BASF SE45▲ new entrant
Siemens Energy Global GmbH & Co. KG56▲ new entrant
1S1 Energy Inc25▼ -34%
Air Products and Chemicals Inc23▲ +21%
Hysata Pty Ltd7▼ -70%
Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences13▲ +30%
Robert Bosch GmbH16▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player profiles are based on patent family counts, recent-period momentum, and IPC subclass focus from the evidence.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served adjacent branches in catalysis, separation, and polymer processing

Several IPC branches adjacent to the dominant C25B core show relatively low filing share despite clear technical relevance to PEM electrolysis performance; they represent areas of observed sparsity that may warrant closer examination before concluding they are genuine white spaces.

B01J · Chemical/physical processes & catalysis

With 178 patent records and a 5% share of the branch distribution, B01J covers catalyst design and heterogeneous reaction engineering — directly relevant to PEM oxygen evolution and hydrogen evolution reaction catalyst development. The relatively low share compared to the dominant C25B branch suggests that fundamental catalyst innovation is under-patented relative to cell and system integration, which could represent an entry point for materials-focused R&D teams with expertise in iridium or platinum-group metal alternatives.

Search this in Eureka →

C08J · Polymer processing & solutions

C08J covers membrane fabrication and polymer solution processing, with 115 patent records and a 3% share — notable given that the proton-exchange membrane is the defining component of PEM electrolyzers. The sparse filing relative to C25B suggests that membrane processing know-how is either held as trade secret, concentrated in a small number of filers such as 1S1 Energy Inc (whose top focus includes C08J 5), or genuinely under-explored. Organizations with fluoropolymer or ionomer processing capabilities may find this branch accessible.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See branch-level filing density, applicant overlap, and claim scope analysis across all adjacent IPC classes in the corpus.
C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorganic compoundsC02F · Water & wastewater treatment+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branches identified by relative filing share within the PEM water electrolysis corpus; sparsity does not confirm commercial opportunity without further claim-scope analysis.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading filers differ across core PEM technology routes

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerC25B 1 · Electrolytic production of compoundsC25B 9 · Electrolytic production of compoundsC25B 11 · Electrolytic production of compoundsC25B 15 · Electrolytic production of compoundsH01M 8 · Batteries, cells & fuel cells
UOP LLCStrong · 77Strong · 48Moderate · 37AbsentStrong · 86
Siemens Energy Global GmbH & Co. KGStrong · 50Strong · 50Strong · 28Moderate · 23Moderate · 17
BASF SEStrong · 60AbsentStrong · 34AbsentModerate · 20
1S1 Energy IncAbsentAbsentAbsentAbsentStrong · 62
3M Innovative Properties CoStrong · 19Strong · 21Strong · 19AbsentAbsent
Shaheen Innovations Holding LtdStrong · 16Strong · 21AbsentStrong · 21Absent
Air Products and Chemicals IncStrong · 39AbsentAbsentModerate · 16Absent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own PEM electrolysis landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.