PEM Water Electrolyzer Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
- Filing activity peaked in 2023 at 64 families and has since eased back toward 2022 levels, suggesting the core claim space around membrane electrode assemblies is filling in rather than still opening up.
- One 1980s bipolar-plate patent still dominates citations US4214969A draws 349 citations — five times the next most-cited record — meaning current bipolar plate designs are still measured against a four-decade-old reference.
- Momentum has stalled across nearly every named assignee most tracked filers show zero activity in the latest year, with several posting a full -100% year-on-year drop, which points to a lull rather than a wind-down.
Filing growth compares 2021 (28 records) with 2024 (42) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 351 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
This review tracks 351 patent families filed against a search built on PEM electrolyzer, proton exchange membrane electrolysis and water electrolyzer terms, narrowed to documents that also claim iridium catalyst, bipolar plate, membrane electrode assembly, current density or degradation rate subject matter, and classified under C25B1, C25B9 or C25B11. The IPC spread shows the core sits firmly in electrolytic production of compounds, with meaningful overlap into fuel cell hardware (H01M) and catalysis (B01J), and smaller but real overlaps into separation membranes, water treatment and electroplating.
Filing offices skew toward the United States and Europe, with WIPO PCT filings a close third and China, India and Australia forming a smaller but active tail. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the 2025-2026 counts in any trend chart understate real filing activity for those years.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trends and technology composition
Two views of the same 351-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those families distribute across IPC subclasses.
Filings rose through the late 2010s, peaked in 2023, then eased
Annual counts climbed from 12 in 2017 toward a peak of 64 in 2023. The 2022 midpoint of 50 sits below that peak, and counts since have flattened rather than continued climbing, consistent with a technology whose core claim space is now well populated rather than one still in an early land-grab phase. The final year shown is partial because of publication lag.
C25B dominates, but fuel cell and catalysis classes overlap heavily
Every family in this set carries a C25B classification by construction of the search, but 63 also sit in H01M (batteries, cells & fuel cells) and 27 in B01J (catalysis), showing that PEM electrolyzer claims routinely cross into fuel cell hardware and catalyst chemistry. Smaller counts in B01D, C02F, C07C, C25D and C01B mark adjacent process and materials claims rather than a separate sub-field.
Shares are the percentage of the 351 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on PEM Water Electrolyzer Technology with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about pem water electrolyzer technology and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe records the field cites
Membrane electrode assembly for PEM water electrolyzers
Provided is a membrane electrode assembly for a proton exchange membrane water electrolyzer, including an oxygen electrode with an electrodeposited iridium oxide layer on a titanium diffusion layer, a hydrogen electrode layer formed on its own diffusion layer, and an electrolyte membrane placed between the two, with a portion of the titanium diffusion layer's pores filled by electrolyte from the membrane.Filed by Korea Institute of Science and Technology, published 2019-03-07 as US20190071786A1.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US4214969A | Low cost bipolar current collector-separator for electrochemical cells | 349 |
| 2 | US6949178B2 | Electrochemical method for preparing peroxy acids | 69 |
| 3 | US20100187102A1 | Universal cell frame for high-pressure water electrolyzer and electrolyzer including the same | 37 |
| 4 | US20150349368A1 | Reversible alkaline membrane hydrogen fuel cell-water electrolyzer | 36 |
| 5 | JP2010121146A | Solid-state polymer type water electrolyzing device | 35 |
| 6 | US20180127668A1 | System And Process For The Production Of Renewable Fuels And Chemicals | 31 |
| 7 | US20130092549A1 | Proton exchange membrane electrolysis using water vapor as a feedstock | 31 |
| 8 | US8349151B2 | Universal cell frame for high-pressure water electrolyzer and electrolyzer including the same | 31 |
| 9 | US4488951A | Integrated electrochemical/chemical oxygen generating system | 30 |
| 10 | CN101768752A | 一种固体聚合物电解质膜水电解槽 | 28 |
Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had longer to accumulate them; treat this table as a map of influence, not a ranking of current best practice.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers say about the field
Three readings of the dataset that matter more than the raw counts: where the claim density sits, who still cites what, and how filing has moved recently.
One bipolar-plate patent anchors the whole citation graph
US4214969A, a 1980s bipolar current collector-separator patent, is cited 349 times in this corpus — roughly five times the next most-cited record. Any new bipolar plate filing is effectively being measured against that baseline design.
Growth has flattened since the 2023 peak
Annual filings rose steadily from 12 in 2017 to a peak of 64 in 2023, then settled back near the 2022 level of 50. That pattern reads as claim space filling in, not a technology losing relevance.
Recent-year activity has gone quiet across named filers
Several previously active assignees show zero filings in the latest tracked year, some posting a full -100% year-on-year drop. Only a small number of filers, such as Evoloh Inc, show any activity at all in the most recent year — a sign of a filing lull rather than broad retreat, since publication lag understates the newest year regardless.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to pem water electrolyzer technology, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the gaps sit
The assignee set spans established fuel-cell and materials companies alongside university and research-institute filers; recent-year momentum is thin across nearly all of them, with cross-institution co-filing rare.
Legacy fuel-cell and materials assignees have gone quiet
Names like AGC Inc. (AGC), Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd. (Panasonic) and Plug Power Inc. (Plug Power) each show zero filings in the latest tracked year, several with a -100% year-on-year drop, suggesting a pause in fresh filing rather than sustained output.
A small set of filers still show latest-year activity
Evoloh Inc is one of the few assignees in this dataset with a filing recorded in the most recent tracked year, standing out against a field where most named players show none.
Cross-institution co-filing is rare and concentrated
The strongest co-assignee pairing in this dataset — Korea Institute of Science and Technology with Hanyang University Industry-University Cooperation Foundation (Hanyang University) — appears only once, indicating that most filings in this space are pursued by a single assignee rather than joint ventures.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| EVOLOH INC | 1 | — |
| AGC Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| 3M Innovative Properties Company | 0 | — |
| Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| Plug Power Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| OM Group International | 0 | — |
| Korea Institute of Science and Technology | 0 | — |
| Smoltek AB | 0 | -100% |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to specific next steps for teams deciding where to file or how to design around existing claims.
Stress-test a bipolar plate design against the 1980s baseline
Because US4214969A anchors nearly every later bipolar plate citation, any new plate design should be checked against its claims before drafting, not after.
Explore bipolar plate claims in EurekaScope a filing in an under-claimed branch
Non-iridium catalyst chemistry and degradation-rate diagnostics show materially thinner coverage than membrane electrode assembly claims, and may offer more room to file cleanly.
Map white space in EurekaCommon questions about PEM electrolyzer patents
No single company dominates this dataset; filings are spread across established fuel-cell and materials firms, university research offices and a long tail of single-filing entrants. The most-cited record, US4214969A, covering a bipolar current collector-separator design, sits outside the modern electrolyzer field entirely but is still the reference point most later bipolar plate patents build on. Recent-year filing activity has thinned across almost every named assignee, so leadership by volume today looks different from leadership by citation influence.
Filings climbed steadily from 12 in 2017 to a peak of 64 in 2023, then eased back toward the 2022 level of 50, a pattern consistent with the core membrane electrode assembly and catalyst claim space becoming well populated rather than the technology losing commercial relevance. Because publication typically lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one or two years in any such trend will always look lower than they eventually turn out to be once late filings publish. Readers should treat the tail end of any filing trend as a floor, not a ceiling.
This filing from the Korea Institute of Science and Technology describes a membrane electrode assembly built around an iridium oxide oxygen electrode layer electrodeposited onto a titanium diffusion layer, paired with a separate hydrogen electrode layer, with the electrolyte membrane's pores partially filling the titanium diffusion layer between them. That specific combination of an electrodeposited iridium oxide layer on titanium, plus partial pore-filling by the membrane electrolyte, is the structural detail a competing design would need to route around. It is a representative filing rather than a blocking generic claim over all MEA designs, so its scope is limited to that construction and preparation method.
The IPC composition shows dense filing in the core C25B electrolytic-production classification and meaningful overlap into fuel cell hardware and catalysis, but far thinner coverage in separation-membrane integration, water-treatment overlap and electroplating-adjacent claims. Degradation-rate diagnostics under real operating conditions, and oxygen-evolution catalysts that avoid iridium entirely, also show less claim density than the well-covered membrane electrode assembly space. These thinner branches are the more realistic places to file a defensible first claim, since the core MEA and bipolar plate space is already dense with prior art.
The raw trend suggests a plateau: filings peaked at 64 in 2023 and have not exceeded that since, and most named assignees in the recent-momentum data show zero filings in the latest tracked year, several down 100% year-on-year. That said, publication lag means the most recent year or two is always undercounted at the point of any data pull, so a lull in the visible data is not proof of a lull in actual R&D activity. The more reliable read is that the field has moved from rapid early filing into a steadier, more selective phase.
Research PEM Water Electrolyzer Technology in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole pem water electrolyzer technology corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.