Book a demo

PEMFC Simulation & Modeling Patent Landscape 2026

PEMFC Simulation & Modeling Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
PEMFC Simulation & Modeling Patent Landscape in 2026

The PEMFC simulation and modeling space is in a Growth stage, with a 146% expansion in recent filings concentrated overwhelmingly among Chinese universities and a handful of global industrials. Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics leads the applicant ranking, while multi-physics coupling and water-management modeling dominate the most-cited prior art.

122
Patent families in scope
22%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+146%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Chinese universities lead a fragmented but rapidly growing field

Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics holds the top position with 10 patent records, followed by Xi’an Jiaotong University with 8 and Tianjin University and Dassault Systèmes Americas Corp each with 7. The top five filers together account for 22% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, indicating a field that is active but not yet dominated by any single incumbent.

The tier gap between the leader (10 patent records) and the mid-pack (3–4 records each) is narrow, which means the current ranking is contestable. No single applicant has established a commanding share that would deter entry from well-resourced challengers.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1NANJING UNIV OF AERONAUTICS & ASTRONAUTICS10
2Xi’an Jiaotong University8
3Tianjin University7
4Dassault Systèmes Americas Corp7
5KOREA ADVANCED INST OF SCI & TECH5
6Jilin University4
7Tsinghua University4
8University of Leeds4
9Southwest Jiaotong University3
10Wuhan University of Technology3
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Hunan Institute of Science and Technology3
12Kusn Fuersai Energy3
13North China Electric Power University3
14KUNMING UNIV OF SCI & TECH3
15GM Global Technology Operations LLC3
16Ford Global Technologies LLC3
17Shanghai Hydrogen Propulsion Technology Co., Ltd.2
18UNIV OF SCI & TECH BEIJING2
19Thomas J. Pavlik2
20UNIV OF SHANGHAI FOR SCI & TECH2
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The presence of Dassault Systèmes Americas Corp — a commercial simulation software vendor — among the top four signals that simulation-tool IP is being filed alongside fundamental cell-physics modeling, creating distinct competitive sub-tracks within the same landscape.

Filings from approximately 2024 onward are subject to standard publication lag and are likely under-counted; interpret recent-year totals as a floor rather than a ceiling. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Filings rising sharply; fuel-cell physics and computational methods co-dominate

The annual filing trend reveals a clear growth arc from 2019 onward, while the technology composition chart shows that PEMFC-specific classification (H01M) and general computational methods (G06F) together account for the large majority of activity — with AI and computational chemistry appearing as smaller but meaningful adjacent branches.

Annual filing trend

Activity was negligible through 2018, began climbing from 2019, and accelerated sharply from 2022 through 2024, consistent with the 146% recent-period growth figure. The 2025–2026 bars are suppressed by publication lag and should not be read as a slowdown.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 27 in 2024.4201702018720191020209202112202225202327202423202552026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H01M (fuel cells) and G06F (digital data processing / simulation software) are the two dominant branches, reflecting the hybrid nature of the field — physical cell modeling combined with computational implementation. G06N (AI models) and G16C (computational chemistry) appear at materially lower counts, marking them as adjacent rather than core to current filings.

Technology compositionH01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells leads with 123; G06F · Electric digital data processing 69.H01M · Batteries, cells …123G06F · Electric digital …69G06N · Computing based o…13G16C · Computational che…9G06T · Image data proces…8G01R · Electric & magnet…5B01J · Chemical/physical…4B60L · Electric vehicle …4↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20240256735A1Published 2024-08-01

Computer simulation methodology to analyze mass, m…

Dassault Systemes Americas CORP.

A method analyzes physical transport in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) having three adjacent layers L<sub>1</sub>, L<sub>2</sub>, L<sub>3</sub>, each with a distinct porous structure. A first small scale multiphase simulation S<sub>1 </sub>of a first portion of the L<sub>1</sub>/L<sub>2 </sub>interface is used to characterize the… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Computer simulation methodology to analyze mass, m… — patent drawingComputer simulation methodology to analyze mass, m… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1质子交换膜燃料电池内部水分布预测方法46
2基于多物理场的质子交换膜燃料电池水淹故障诊断方法36
3一种改进粒子群优化模糊PID燃料电池温度控制方法31
4Proton exchange membrane fuel cell30
5Fuel cell flowfield design for improved water mana…28
6一种质子交换膜燃料电池用膜加湿器控制方法25
7一种质子交换膜燃料电池多物理场耦合模拟方法23
8PEMFC双极板流道截面的优化方法及三维质子交换膜燃料电池21

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment

Three structural signals stand out: the field is in active growth, the ranking is contestable, and geographic concentration in. China creates exposure and opportunity for non-Chinese entrants.

Growth

Growth stage — annual filings still rising

The lifecycle evidence designates this field as Growth, with annual filings still rising and a 146% expansion over the recent measurement window. The technology base is maturing enough that multi-physics coupling and water-management methods are well-cited, but early-mover advantages are still available in adjacent computational branches. Teams entering now can still shape claim boundaries rather than designing around established walls.

Growth stage
Concentration

Fragmented top tier — low barrier to ranking entry

The top five filers hold only 22% of the hundred largest filers’ combined output, and the leader holds just 10 patent records. This fragmentation means there is no entrenched gatekeeper whose portfolio would require extensive freedom-to-operate work for a newcomer. However, the narrow gaps also mean that a focused two-to-three-year filing program could move a new entrant into the top five.

Low concentration
Collaboration

Sparse co-filing activity observed between Chinese institutions

Three co-applicant pairs are recorded in the evidence: Tsinghua University with the State Grid Qinghai Electric Power Company’s Economic and Technical Research Institute (1 joint filing), Tsinghua University with State Grid Qinghai Electric Power Company (1 joint filing), and Jilin University with Hua Ao Anxin Technology Service Group (1 joint filing). The low collaboration count relative to total filings suggests that most participants are filing independently, leaving ecosystem partnership strategies relatively open.

Early ecosystem
Geography

China overwhelmingly dominant; US and PCT filings thin

China accounts for 100 of the patent records, the United States for 25, India and WIPO (PCT) for 6 each, with Germany and Europe (EPO) at 3 each. The high China-to-PCT ratio suggests that much of the Chinese academic output is not being internationalized, which limits its enforceability outside China but also limits the prior-art barrier it poses to filings in Europe or North America. Non-Chinese applicants filing PCT or EPO routes face comparatively less prior art from the dominant filers.

China-centric
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Tsinghua UniversityState Grid Qinghai Electric Power Company Economic and Technical Research Institute1
Tsinghua UniversityState Grid Qinghai Electric Power Company1
Jilin UniversityHua Ao Anxin Technology Service Group Co., Ltd.1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Lifecycle stage and collaboration data are derived from PatSnap Eureka analytics.Explore insights →
Leaders

Academic institutions lead; one commercial simulation vendor in the top four

The ranking is topped by Chinese universities pursuing multi-physics and computational simulation of PEMFC systems, with Dassault Systèmes Americas Corp as the only commercial software entity in the top tier and KAIST as the leading non-Chinese academic presence.

Leader · Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics

Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics

The top-ranked applicant with 10 patent records, concentrating its filings across H01M 8 (fuel cell systems) and G06F 30 (simulation and digital computation), indicating a strong focus on coupled physical and computational modeling of PEMFC performance. Momentum is flagged as a new entrant in the recent period, with 7 of its records filed in the most recent window, showing an accelerating rather than established trajectory.

families: 10
Challenger · Dassault Systèmes Americas Corp

Dassault Systèmes Americas Corp

The sole major commercial software vendor in the top four, with 7 patent records split across H01M 8 and G06F 30, reflecting integration of PEMFC simulation within its broader simulation platform portfolio. Momentum is also flagged as a new entrant with 6 records in the recent period, suggesting a deliberate strategic push into fuel-cell simulation IP rather than a legacy position.

families: 7
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access rankings, momentum scores, and technology-route heatmaps for all 100 tracked applicants.
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)GM Global Technology Operations LLC+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics7▲ new entrant
Xi’an Jiaotong University1▲ new entrant
Tianjin University2▲ new entrant
Dassault Systèmes Americas Corp6▲ new entrant
Tsinghua University2▲ new entrant
Jilin University2▲ new entrant
Southwest Jiaotong University1▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Applicant counts are patent records; momentum is based on recent-vs-prior filing comparison from PatSnap Eureka.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the PEMFC simulation core

Several IPC branches appear at low counts relative to the dominant H01M and G06F classes; these represent areas of relative sparsity that may merit monitoring, subject to technical feasibility and strategic fit.

G06N · AI-driven PEMFC modeling

G06N (computing based on AI models) appears in only 13 patent records — about 5% of the hundred largest filers’ combined branch coverage — despite machine-learning surrogate models being an active research topic for accelerating multi-physics simulations. The sparse IP footprint means that applicants pursuing physics-informed neural networks or reinforcement-learning-based control for PEMFC could file in a relatively uncrowded branch. Entry would require demonstrated accuracy trade-offs versus first-principles models, and patent claims would need to distinguish over general ML methods.

Search this in Eureka →

G16C · Computational chemistry for membrane and catalyst modeling

G16C (computational chemistry and cheminformatics) accounts for only 9 patent records, representing roughly 3% of the branch coverage within the top-100 filers’ output, despite membrane degradation and electrocatalyst design being critical PEMFC bottlenecks addressable via molecular simulation. The low count suggests that atomistic or DFT-level modeling approaches for PEMFC materials are not yet being captured in significant patent filings, potentially because this work is published as academic literature rather than patented. Applicants with novel computational chemistry workflows tied to proprietary material candidates could find meaningful white space here.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all adjacent IPC branches ranked by filing density, competitor presence, and technical proximity to your core.
G06T · Image data processing applied to PEMFC diagnosticsG01R · Electrochemical measurement methods linked to simulation validation+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch counts are patent-record level; sparsity is relative to the dominant H01M and G06F classes within this corpus.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ by technology route

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerH01M 8 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsG06F 30 · Electric digital data processingG06F 119 · Electric digital data processingG06F 113 · Electric digital data processingG06F 111 · Electric digital data processing
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsStrong · 8Strong · 7Strong · 5Emerging · 1Moderate · 3
Xi’an Jiaotong UniversityStrong · 6Strong · 7Strong · 4Strong · 4Moderate · 2
Dassault Systèmes Americas CorpStrong · 6Strong · 5Moderate · 2AbsentAbsent
Tianjin UniversityStrong · 5Strong · 4Strong · 3AbsentAbsent
Jilin UniversityAbsentStrong · 4Moderate · 2Strong · 3Moderate · 1
Tsinghua UniversityStrong · 3AbsentStrong · 2Strong · 2Absent
University of Shanghai for Science and TechnologyAbsentStrong · 2Strong · 2Moderate · 1Moderate · 1
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Generate your own PEMFC simulation patent landscape

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.