Book a demo

PERC Anti-Reflective Texturing Patent Landscape 2026

PERC Anti-Reflective Texturing Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
PERC Anti-Reflective / Texturing Patent Landscape in 2026

The PERC anti-reflective and texturing patent space is heavily concentrated, with the Aiko Solar group alone commanding the largest share of filings among the top hundred filers. Annual filing volume peaked in 2019 and has since contracted sharply, signalling a maturing, post-peak technology field where incremental improvement work is replacing foundational invention.

240
Patent families in scope
38%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-82%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Aiko Solar leads a concentrated, China-dominated field

Zhejiang Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd. sits at the top of the applicant ranking, followed by two sister entities — Guangdong Aiko and Tianjin Aiko — making the consolidated Aiko group the dominant force in this space. The top five filers account for 38% of the combined patent records held by the hundred largest filers.

A clear two-tier structure exists: the Aiko entities, Hengdian Group DMEGC Magnetics, and Tongwei Solar (Chengdu) form a top tier separated by a material gap from the remaining applicants, most of which hold fewer than ten records each. This concentration reduces the field’s breadth and limits the diversity of technical approaches represented in the prior art.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Zhejiang Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd.53
2Guangdong Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd.42
3Tianjin Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd.20
4Hengdian Group DMEGC Magnetics Co., Ltd.18
5Tongwei Solar Energy (Chengdu) Co., Ltd.15
6Zhuhai Fushan Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd.15
7Suzhou Talesun Solar Technology Co., Ltd.10
8Tongwei Solar Energy (Meishan) Co., Ltd.9
9Jiangsu Shunfeng New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.7
10Hanwha Solarone (Qidong) Co., Ltd.7
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Jiangsu Jingwang New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.6
12JinkoSolar Co., Ltd.6
13Zhejiang JinkoSolar Co., Ltd.6
14HUNAN RED SUN PHOTOELECTRICITY SCI & TECH6
15CSI Cells Co., Ltd.6
16Chint New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.5
17Qinghai Huanghe Hydropower Development Co., Ltd.5
18Shanxi Lu’an Photovoltaics Technology Co., Ltd.5
19Changzhou Shichuang Energy Co., Ltd.5
20Trina Solar Co., Ltd.4
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leaders’ positions imply that any entrant seeking to practise novel PERC surface-passivation or light-trapping texturing processes must navigate a dense thicket of Aiko and Tongwei filings centred on semiconductor device and coating/deposition classifications, particularly H01L 31 and C23C 16.

Filings from approximately 2023 onward are likely under-represented due to standard patent-publication lag; apparent low volumes in those years should not be read as definitive activity levels. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

A 2019 filing peak followed by steep decline; semiconductor device IP dominates the class mix

The annual filing trend and IPC technology composition together reveal both the temporal trajectory of inventive activity and the technical scope in which it has concentrated. Filing volume surged from 2017 through 2019 before falling sharply, while the technology mix shows overwhelming focus on a single IPC branch.

Annual filing trend

Filings grew from 22 records in 2017 to a peak of 64 in 2019, then fell to 44–45 in 2020–2021 before dropping steeply to 16 in 2022 and single digits thereafter. The 2023–2026 data points are subject to publication lag and understate true recent activity; the underlying trend is nonetheless clearly post-peak. The multi-year window through 2021 showed sustained elevated volume, but the decline from the 2019 peak is well-established.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 64 in 2019.22201737201864201944202045202116202282023320240202512026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H01L (semiconductor devices) accounts for the large majority of IPC-tagged records, confirming that cell-level device architecture dominates the patent claims. C23C (coating and surface deposition) is the second branch, reflecting thin-film passivation and anti-reflection coating processes. All other branches — including C30B (crystal growth), B23K (welding/laser), and H10F (photovoltaic devices) — are sparsely populated, indicating narrow technical coverage outside the core device and deposition axes.

Technology compositionH01L · Semiconductor devices leads with 263; C23C · Coating & surface deposition 35.H01L · Semiconductor dev…263C23C · Coating & surface…35H10P15C30B · Crystal growth9B23K · Welding, solderin…4C23F · Corrosion & metal…3H10D · Semiconductor dev…3H10F · Photovoltaic & li…3↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20170294545A1Published 2017-10-12

A process for preparing passivated emitter rear co…

Csi Cells CO., LTD.

A process for preparing a passivated emitter rear contact solar cell, which includes the steps as follows: removing the damaged layer on the surface of the silicon wafer and at the same time polishing both surfaces, texturing, forming PN junction, etching, removing the glass impurity, depositing a passivation film on the back surface, depositing a… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1一种三层介电钝化膜PERC太阳电池及制作工艺56
2一种双面PERC太阳能电池结构及其制备工艺52
3一种高效晶硅太阳电池的表界面钝化层及其钝化方法43
4一种碱抛光高效PERC电池及其制备工艺40
5Methods of manufacturing a low cost solar cell dev…40
6一种PERC电池背面钝化工艺33
7正面栅线钝化接触的PERC太阳能电池及其制备方法29
8一种PERC电池的制备方法27

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the patent structure means for PERC R&D investment decisions

The combination of high concentration, a post-peak filing curve, and geography skewed heavily toward. China shapes both the risk and opportunity profile for any organisation evaluating investment in PERC surface engineering. Four structural dimensions stand out.

Decline

Decline stage: peak passed in 2019, annual volume easing

The lifecycle evidence places this field in a Decline stage: annual filings peaked in 2019 at 64 records and have eased steadily since. For R&D planners, this signals that PERC anti-reflective/texturing is a mature technology area where foundational invention windows have largely closed and residual filing is focused on incremental process refinement. Investment rationale should shift from establishing foundational positions toward freedom-to-operate analysis or next-generation surface-passivation approaches.

Lifecycle: Decline
Concentration

Top five filers hold 38% of the top-100 combined records

The Aiko group entities collectively dominate the ranking, and the top five filers as a group hold 38% of the combined records among the hundred largest filers. This level of concentration means that a new entrant working on PERC texturing or anti-reflection coating processes faces a dense prior-art landscape controlled by a small number of Chinese manufacturers. Design-around strategies or differentiation via adjacent branches (e.g., C30B crystal growth or C23F etching) offer more viable entry paths than direct competition in the core H01L 31 space.

High concentration
Collaboration

Co-filing is almost entirely intra-group within Aiko and Tongwei

The most active co-filing pairs are Zhejiang Aiko with Guangdong Aiko (38 joint records), Zhejiang Aiko with Tianjin Aiko (18), and Guangdong Aiko with Tianjin Aiko (17), all within the same corporate group. Tongwei Solar’s subsidiaries show similar internal co-filing behaviour. There is no evidence in the data of cross-group or industry–academia collaboration at scale, suggesting the ecosystem is vertically consolidated rather than open. Independent research organisations or equipment suppliers seeking partnerships may find the major players largely self-sufficient.

Intra-group only
Geography

China accounts for the overwhelming majority of filings; international coverage thin

China is the lead jurisdiction by a wide margin, with 211 records, followed distantly by the United States (14), India (11), and Europe via the EPO (9). PCT filings stand at 7. This geographic skew means that IP protection outside China is sparse, and a non-Chinese manufacturer or research organisation could file meaningfully in the US, European, and Indian markets with relatively lower opposition risk from existing art. The thin PCT coverage also suggests most filers have not pursued broad international protection strategies.

China-dominant
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Zhejiang Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd.Guangdong Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd.38
Zhejiang Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd.Tianjin Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd.18
Guangdong Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd.Tianjin Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd.17
Zhejiang Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd.Zhuhai Fushan Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd.13
Guangdong Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd.Zhuhai Fushan Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd.13
Tianjin Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd.Zhuhai Fushan Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd.13
Tongwei Solar Energy (Chengdu) Co., Ltd.Tongwei Solar Energy (Meishan) Co., Ltd.5
Tongwei Solar Energy (Anhui) Co., Ltd.Tongwei Solar Energy (Jintang) Co., Ltd.3
Tongwei Solar Energy (Anhui) Co., Ltd.Tongwei Solar Energy (Hefei) Co., Ltd.2
Tongwei Solar Energy (Chengdu) Co., Ltd.Tongwei Solar Energy (Jintang) Co., Ltd.1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Cards are grounded in applicant ranking, lifecycle, collaboration, and jurisdiction evidence from the corpus.Explore insights →
Leaders

Aiko Solar entities lead on volume; Hengdian DMEGC and Hanwha Solarone are recent entrants

The leading applicants are defined by their concentration in semiconductor-device and coating/deposition classifications. Momentum data show the established leaders have experienced sharp recent-period declines consistent with the field’s overall lifecycle stage, while a handful of entrants have begun filing for the first time.

Leader · Zhejiang Aiko Solar Energy Technology

Zhejiang Aiko Solar Energy Technology

The top-ranked applicant with 53 patent records, Zhejiang Aiko Solar’s portfolio is concentrated in H01L 31 (semiconductor devices, 52 records) and C23C 16 (coating and surface deposition, 18 records), reflecting deep coverage of both cell architecture and thin-film passivation processes. Recent-period momentum shows a sharp contraction of –92% versus the prior window, consistent with the field’s post-peak trajectory rather than a strategic withdrawal. The entity co-files extensively with its sister companies in Guangdong and Tianjin, reinforcing group-level IP consolidation.

Patent records: 53
Challenger · Hengdian Group DMEGC Magnetics

Hengdian Group DMEGC Magnetics

Ranked fourth with 18 patent records, Hengdian Group DMEGC Magnetics enters this landscape as a new entrant in the recent period, with momentum trend flagged as ‘new entrant’ — meaning prior-window filings were negligible. Its technical focus mirrors the field’s dominant axis (H01L 31, 17 records; C23C 16, 2 records), suggesting it is building a foundational position in PERC device and coating IP. As a diversified magnetics and electronic-materials manufacturer expanding into photovoltaics, its entry may signal broader materials-sector interest in PERC process IP.

Patent records: 18
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all top filers including Tongwei Solar, JinkoSolar, Trina Solar, and CSI Cells.
Tongwei Solar Energy (Chengdu)JinkoSolar+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Zhejiang Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd.3▼ -92%
Guangdong Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd.3▼ -88%
Tianjin Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd.3▼ -81%
Hengdian Group DMEGC Magnetics Co., Ltd.1▲ new entrant
Zhuhai Fushan Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd.3▼ -70%
Tongwei Solar Energy (Meishan) Co., Ltd.1▲ new entrant
Hanwha Solarone (Qidong) Co., Ltd.3▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player profiles draw on applicant ranking, technology focus, and recent-period momentum data.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the dominant PERC device core

Several IPC branches adjacent to the dominant H01L semiconductor-device axis carry very low filing counts in this corpus, indicating relative sparsity. Whether that sparsity represents a genuine technical gap or simply out-of-scope activity requires further investigation, but two branches are worth noting for their plausible technical relevance to PERC surface engineering.

C30B · Crystal growth processes

With only 9 records in this corpus and a 3% share of the technology composition, C30B (crystal growth, including silicon wafer preparation and surface crystallography) is sparsely covered relative to its technical relevance: substrate crystal quality and surface microstructure directly influence the effectiveness of PERC texturing and passivation. Tongwei Solar (Meishan) is currently the only applicant visible in this branch (C30B 29 and C30B 31 sub-classes). An entrant with expertise in monocrystalline or quasi-mono silicon growth could build a differentiated position here, particularly for next-generation wafer-level surface preparation ahead of the anti-reflection and passivation steps.

Search this in Eureka →

C23F · Chemical etching and corrosion removal

C23F (corrosion inhibition and chemical/electrochemical metal removal) holds only 3 records in the corpus, representing 1% of the technology mix. Wet-chemical etching — including alkaline pyramid texturing and acid polishing — is a central step in PERC anti-reflection surface preparation, yet this classification is almost absent from the prior-art base. This may reflect classification practice (such work often lands in H01L), but it could also indicate genuine under-filing in the chemical process dimensions of texturing. Organisations developing novel etch chemistries or etch-stop layers for PERC texturing could explore whether claims drafted under C23F attract less prior-art competition.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all five under-served branches mapped against applicant activity and citation density.
B23K · Laser-based texturing processesH10D · General semiconductor device processing+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branches are identified from lower-share IPC classes in the corpus technology composition; sparsity does not confirm commercial opportunity without further validation.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ across technology routes

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerH01L 31 · Semiconductor devicesC23C 16 · Coating & surface depositionH01L 21 · Semiconductor devicesH10P 72C30B 33 · Crystal growth
Zhejiang Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd.Strong · 52Moderate · 18Emerging · 5Emerging · 4Emerging · 1
Guangdong Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd.Strong · 41Moderate · 17Emerging · 5Emerging · 4Absent
Tianjin Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd.Strong · 19Moderate · 6Emerging · 2AbsentAbsent
Hengdian Group DMEGC Magnetics Co., Ltd.Strong · 17Emerging · 2Emerging · 2Emerging · 1Absent
Zhuhai Fushan Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd.Strong · 13Moderate · 6Emerging · 2AbsentAbsent
Tongwei Solar Energy (Anhui) Co., Ltd.Strong · 8AbsentStrong · 5Moderate · 2Absent
Suzhou Talesun Solar Technology Co., Ltd.Strong · 10AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own PERC technology landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.