https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/perc-solar-cell-testing-and-inspection-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Photovoltaics & Solar
PERC Solar Cell Testing and Inspection Patent Landscape 2026
Get a prior-art report on your approach
12
Published Records
-100%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction
6
Active Filers Ranked

Filing growth compares 2021 (2 records) with 2024 (0) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset isolates patent families that combine PERC (passivated emitter rear contact) cell architecture claims with testing and inspection methods — electroluminescence inspection, IV measurement, photoluminescence and general defect detection — under IPC classes tied to semiconductor devices, optical/electrical testing and solar power generation hardware. It is a deliberately narrow cut: twelve published families across roughly a decade of possible filing activity.

Because publication lags filing by around eighteen months, the most recent years in any trend line understate true filing activity. Read the tail of the chart as incomplete rather than as a genuine drop-off, though the flat midpoint at 2022 predates that lag effect and is a real signal.

Filing activity, 2017–2026
  1. 1Resonac Holdings Corporation5
  2. 2Plant PV, Inc.3
  3. 3Zhejiang Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd.2
  4. 4The University of Toledo2
  5. 5Guangdong Aiko Technology Co., Ltd.2
  6. 6Tianjin Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd.2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on PERC Solar Cell Testing and Inspection covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Data

Filing trend and technology composition

The filing curve and the IPC spread together show where testing and inspection claims for PERC cells actually sit, and how thinly they are spread outside the core semiconductor and solar-power classes.

A single peak, no sustained follow-through

Filings rose to five in 2018 and fell back afterward, with 2022 recording zero. This is consistent with a technology pocket that had one wave of patenting activity — likely tied to PERC's commercialisation push — rather than an ongoing arms race in inspection method claims.

A single peak, no sustained follow-through013450201752018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Concentrated in H01L and H02S, thin everywhere else

All twelve families sit in H01L (semiconductor devices) and ten also touch H02S (photovoltaic power generation), confirming the corpus is squarely about solar cell hardware. Coating processes, welding/soldering, additive manufacturing and glass/coating compositions each appear in only two families apiece — these are adjacent manufacturing steps referenced inside PERC patents, not separately developed inspection sub-fields.

Concentrated in H01L and H02S, thin everywhere elseH01L · Semiconductor devices12100.0%H02S · Photovoltaic / solar power gen…1083.3%B05D · Coating processes216.7%B23K · Welding, soldering & brazing216.7%B33Y · Additive manufacturing (3D pri…216.7%C03C · Glass & enamel compositions216.7%C09D · Coatings, paints & inks216.7%H10P216.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 12 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on PERC Solar Cell Testing and Inspection covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on PERC Solar Cell Testing and Inspection with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about perc solar cell testing and inspection and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records in this set

Representative filing
US20200343403A12020-10-29

PERC-like Contact to CdTe Solar Cells

THE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO

Methods for forming electrical contacts with CdTe layers, methods for forming photovoltaic devices, methods for passivating a CdTe surface, and photovoltaic devices are described.Filed by The University of Toledo, this family extends PERC-style rear-contact and passivation methods from silicon into cadmium telluride cells — a cross-material adaptation rather than a pure silicon-PERC inspection claim.

US20200343403A1 — patent drawing 1US20200343403A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Citation leaders
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1WO2018209147A1Multi-layer metal film stacks for shingled silicon solar cell arrays5
2CN113270336ASE-PERC电池正银的测试方法及系统4
3US10696851B2Print-on pastes for modifying material properties of metal particle layers3
4US11189748B2PERC-like contact to CdTe solar cells2
5US10233338B2Fired multilayer stacks for use in integrated circuits and solar cells2

Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside this corpus; treat them as a signal of influence, not of current relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (5 of 5 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on PERC Solar Cell Testing and Inspection covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers imply for filing strategy

With only twelve families in the set, conclusions should be read as directional rather than statistically robust — but the shape of the data is still informative for anyone deciding where to file next.

Filing pattern
Peak 2018 · 5 filings
single-year high

One wave, not a trend

Filing activity peaked in 2018 and did not repeat. A midpoint of zero in 2022 suggests the wave of inspection-method patenting that accompanied PERC's commercial ramp has largely passed, at least in the records captured here.

Peak year 2018 vs. midpoint 2022 = 0
Jurisdictional spread
US 4 · CN 2 · EP 2
lead receiving offices

US-weighted, thinly spread elsewhere

The United States leads on receiving-office count, with China and Europe tied behind it. Single filings in India, Malaysia and Singapore point to opportunistic regional protection rather than a deliberate multi-market strategy.

12 families across 6 receiving offices
Technology mix
H01L 12/12 · H02S 10/12
IPC coverage

Solar hardware core, manufacturing periphery

Every family touches semiconductor device claims and most also touch photovoltaic power generation claims. Coating, welding, additive manufacturing and glass-composition classes appear only incidentally, at two families each.

6 secondary IPC subclasses, 2 families apiece
Assignee structure
3 co-assignee pairs
internal collaboration only

Collaboration is intra-group, not cross-company

All three identified co-assignee pairs link entities inside the same corporate family (Aiko's Zhejiang, Guangdong and Tianjin units). There is no evidence in this set of cross-company joint filings or licensing partnerships around PERC inspection methods.

3 pairs, all within one group structure
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to perc solar cell testing and inspection, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on PERC Solar Cell Testing and Inspection covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The raw counts here are small enough that manual review is feasible, but a structured second pass will surface claim-level detail this summary cannot.

Read the citation leaders in full

The five most-cited records, including the shingled-array metal-film stack and the SE-PERC silver-paste test method, are worth reading claim-by-claim before filing near them.

Open citation table →

Map the co-assignee network

All three co-assignee pairs sit inside one corporate group; confirming whether that pattern holds outside this narrow search string would clarify how consolidated PERC inspection IP really is.

Explore assignee network →

Model design-around options in Eureka

Use Patsnap Eureka to trace which claim elements in the CdTe cross-material family are load-bearing, and where a silicon-PERC filer could design around them.

Try Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on PERC Solar Cell Testing and Inspection covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on PERC Solar Cell Testing and Inspection covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research PERC Solar Cell Testing and Inspection in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole perc solar cell testing and inspection corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.