Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (2 records) with 2024 (0) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.
This dataset isolates patent families that combine PERC (passivated emitter rear contact) cell architecture claims with testing and inspection methods — electroluminescence inspection, IV measurement, photoluminescence and general defect detection — under IPC classes tied to semiconductor devices, optical/electrical testing and solar power generation hardware. It is a deliberately narrow cut: twelve published families across roughly a decade of possible filing activity.
Because publication lags filing by around eighteen months, the most recent years in any trend line understate true filing activity. Read the tail of the chart as incomplete rather than as a genuine drop-off, though the flat midpoint at 2022 predates that lag effect and is a real signal.
The filing curve and the IPC spread together show where testing and inspection claims for PERC cells actually sit, and how thinly they are spread outside the core semiconductor and solar-power classes.
Filings rose to five in 2018 and fell back afterward, with 2022 recording zero. This is consistent with a technology pocket that had one wave of patenting activity — likely tied to PERC's commercialisation push — rather than an ongoing arms race in inspection method claims.
All twelve families sit in H01L (semiconductor devices) and ten also touch H02S (photovoltaic power generation), confirming the corpus is squarely about solar cell hardware. Coating processes, welding/soldering, additive manufacturing and glass/coating compositions each appear in only two families apiece — these are adjacent manufacturing steps referenced inside PERC patents, not separately developed inspection sub-fields.
Shares are the percentage of the 12 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about perc solar cell testing and inspection and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaMethods for forming electrical contacts with CdTe layers, methods for forming photovoltaic devices, methods for passivating a CdTe surface, and photovoltaic devices are described.Filed by The University of Toledo, this family extends PERC-style rear-contact and passivation methods from silicon into cadmium telluride cells — a cross-material adaptation rather than a pure silicon-PERC inspection claim.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WO2018209147A1 | Multi-layer metal film stacks for shingled silicon solar cell arrays | 5 |
| 2 | CN113270336A | SE-PERC电池正银的测试方法及系统 | 4 |
| 3 | US10696851B2 | Print-on pastes for modifying material properties of metal particle layers | 3 |
| 4 | US11189748B2 | PERC-like contact to CdTe solar cells | 2 |
| 5 | US10233338B2 | Fired multilayer stacks for use in integrated circuits and solar cells | 2 |
Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside this corpus; treat them as a signal of influence, not of current relevance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (5 of 5 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →With only twelve families in the set, conclusions should be read as directional rather than statistically robust — but the shape of the data is still informative for anyone deciding where to file next.
Filing activity peaked in 2018 and did not repeat. A midpoint of zero in 2022 suggests the wave of inspection-method patenting that accompanied PERC's commercial ramp has largely passed, at least in the records captured here.
The United States leads on receiving-office count, with China and Europe tied behind it. Single filings in India, Malaysia and Singapore point to opportunistic regional protection rather than a deliberate multi-market strategy.
Every family touches semiconductor device claims and most also touch photovoltaic power generation claims. Coating, welding, additive manufacturing and glass-composition classes appear only incidentally, at two families each.
All three identified co-assignee pairs link entities inside the same corporate family (Aiko's Zhejiang, Guangdong and Tianjin units). There is no evidence in this set of cross-company joint filings or licensing partnerships around PERC inspection methods.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to perc solar cell testing and inspection, with the prior art for and against each one.
The raw counts here are small enough that manual review is feasible, but a structured second pass will surface claim-level detail this summary cannot.
The five most-cited records, including the shingled-array metal-film stack and the SE-PERC silver-paste test method, are worth reading claim-by-claim before filing near them.
Open citation table →All three co-assignee pairs sit inside one corporate group; confirming whether that pattern holds outside this narrow search string would clarify how consolidated PERC inspection IP really is.
Explore assignee network →Use Patsnap Eureka to trace which claim elements in the CdTe cross-material family are load-bearing, and where a silicon-PERC filer could design around them.
Try Eureka →This dataset identifies twelve published patent families combining PERC cell architecture with testing and inspection methods such as electroluminescence inspection, IV measurement, photoluminescence and general defect detection, filed between 2015 and mid-2026. That is a small, tightly scoped set rather than a broad field, because the search string requires both a PERC-specific claim and a specific inspection method in the same family. Broader searches on PERC alone or on solar defect detection alone would return substantially more records.
2018 was the single highest year in this dataset at five filings, coinciding with PERC's broader commercialisation ramp in the solar manufacturing industry. Filings dropped afterward and the midpoint year, 2022, recorded zero, suggesting the initial wave of inspection-method patenting was tied to that commercialisation push rather than to an ongoing cycle of innovation. Readers should treat the most recent one to two years of the trend as understated because of the typical eighteen-month gap between filing and publication.
The assignee list in this dataset is dominated by three affiliated Aiko Solar entities — Zhejiang Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd., Guangdong Aiko Technology Co., Ltd. and Tianjin Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd. — which also form all three identified co-assignee pairs, indicating shared internal filing practice. Resonac Holdings Corporation and Plant PV, Inc. also appear as assignees, alongside The University of Toledo with an academic filing extending PERC methods to CdTe cells. None of the six tracked assignees show filings in the latest tracked year.
US20200343403A1, filed by The University of Toledo and published 2020-10-29, covers methods for forming electrical contacts with CdTe layers, methods for forming photovoltaic devices, methods for passivating a CdTe surface, and the resulting photovoltaic devices themselves. It applies PERC-style rear-contact and passivation concepts to cadmium telluride cells rather than to conventional silicon PERC architecture. Anyone building a CdTe-based rear-contact or passivation process should review its claims before finalising a process flow.
Based on the IPC composition, coverage is dense in core semiconductor device and photovoltaic power generation classes but thin in adjacent manufacturing-linked areas — coating processes, welding and soldering, additive manufacturing, and glass and coating compositions each appear in only two of the twelve families. Specific sub-areas such as in-line electroluminescence for bifacial PERC, photoluminescence defect classification for CdTe-PERC hybrids, automated IV-curve anomaly scoring, and laser-induced defect signatures on rear passivation layers show little dedicated claim activity in this set. That thinness is a starting point for a novelty search, not proof of open white space — a broader search should confirm it before any filing decision.
Go past this page: query the whole perc solar cell testing and inspection corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.