https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/periscope-and-folded-optics-for-mobile-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Imaging & Cameras · Patent Landscape
Periscope and Folded Optics for Mobile Camera Patents
  • Concentrated at the top. The top 5 assignees hold 64.9% of all 74 records in scope, and the top 10 hold 82.4% — a narrow group controls most of the claimed ground.
  • Filing has pulled back from its peak. Activity peaked in 2022 at 14 records and fell -43% from 2021 (7) to 2024 (4), the last year with complete publication data.
  • Optical elements dominate the claim map. G02B (optical elements & systems) appears in 77.0% of records, far ahead of photographic apparatus (G03B, 20.3%) and spectacles/lenses (G02C, 18.9%).
Get a prior-art report on your approach
74
Published Records
65%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-43%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (7 records) with 2024 (4) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 74 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

Periscope and folded-optics patents cover the mechanical and optical engineering needed to bend a lens's light path 90 degrees inside a thin mobile-device body — prism or mirror assemblies, zoom actuation, stabilization of the folded path, and control of stray light across the fold. The dataset spans 74 published records from 2015 through mid-2026, drawn from filings that name a prism tilt mechanism, zoom mechanism, module length constraint, stray-light control, folded-path stabilization, or assembly tolerance in their claims or description.

Because publication trails filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 counts in any trend chart are still filling in and understate real filing activity in those years.

Records by publication year, 2015–2026
  1. 1COREPHOTONICS16
  2. 2TECTUS CORP15
  3. 3CHROMATION INC7
  4. 4TENCENT AMERICA LLC6
  5. 5BEIJING ZITIAO NETWORK TECH CO LTD4
  6. 6POLAROID CORP3
  7. 7LEMON INC(GB)3
  8. 8JIAXING UROPTICS CO LTD3
  9. 9FRAUNHOFER GESELLSCHAFT ZUR FORDERUNG DER ANGEWANDTEN FORSCHUNG EV2
  10. 10NINGBO SUNNY OPOTECH CO LTD2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Periscope and Folded Optics for Mobile covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Filing Data

Trend and technology composition

The filing trend and IPC composition below are drawn from the same 74-record scope used throughout this page.

Filing activity has cooled from its 2022 peak

Records rose from 6 in 2017 to a peak of 14 in 2022, then declined -43% from 2021 (7) to 2024 (4) — the most recent year with a complete publication picture. Read 2025 and 2026 as provisional rather than as evidence of continued decline.

Filing activity has cooled from its 2022 peak048111562017201820192020202114202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Optical elements carry most of the claim weight

G02B (optical elements & systems) touches 77.0% of the 74 records, with G03B (photographic apparatus, 20.3%) and G02C (spectacles & lenses, 18.9%) as the next-largest classes. Measurement classes G01J and H04N each sit at 13.5%, and G02F (optical control & modulation) at 5.4% is the smallest of the tracked classes — each record can carry more than one class, so these shares add up past 100%.

Optical elements carry most of the claim weightG02B · Optical elements & systems5777.0%G03B · Photographic apparatus1520.3%G02C · Spectacles & lenses1418.9%G01J · Radiation & light measurement1013.5%H04N · Pictorial communication (video…1013.5%G01N · Material analysis & testing68.1%H04B · Transmission (general)68.1%G02F · Optical control & modulation45.4%Other1317.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 74 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Periscope and Folded Optics for Mobile covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Periscope and Folded Optics for Mobile with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about periscope and folded optics for mobile and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

A foundational filing and the most-cited prior art

Representative Filing
CA1088795A1980-11-04

CA1088795A — Compact camera with prism folded optical path

POLAROID CORPORATION

Filed by Polaroid, this 1980 filing describes a compact, rigid camera with a folded optical path between the objective lens and film plane, formed in part by a prism with an entrance face, an exit face overlying the film plane, and a reflective face. The exit face both reflects incoming light and transmits it outward; the reflective face returns internally reflected light back through the exit face to the film plane at a controlled angle.The geometry it claims — an inclined reflective face returning light through an exit face at a set angular relationship — is the same basic fold geometry that modern periscope camera modules still rely on, decades before the mobile-phone use case existed.

View full record
Most-cited records in this scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20120050891A1objective50
2US4850706ALow profile spectral analysis system31
3US5659637AVander lugt optical correlator on a printed circuit board29
4US5471043AElectro-optic barcode reader27
5US5796516ACollimator/diopter assembly with folder optics for a night vision monocular device22
6US3734601AFlow cell assembly for colorimetric measurements21
7US4109263ACompact prism camera20
8US5589717ACompact spectrum analyzer module18
9US20190353522A1Integration of optical components within a folded optical path13
10WO2017197013A1Integration of optical components within a folded optical path12

Citation counts favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations within this searched corpus — read them as a signal of influence, not of current technical importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Periscope and Folded Optics for Mobile covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once the ranking, the trend, and the IPC composition are read together.

Concentration
64.9% / 82.4%
top 5 / top 10 share of 74 records

A small group holds most of the claimed ground

The top 5 assignees combine for 64.9% of all 74 records in scope, and the top 10 combine for 82.4%. With a leader at 16 records and fifth place at only 4, the drop-off after the top few names is steep — a new entrant is filing directly against a handful of well-established portfolios, not against a diffuse field.

Based on the 26-company ranking returned for this scope.
Momentum
-43% (2021→2024)
three-year filing change, last complete years

Activity has pulled back from its 2022 high

Filings rose to a peak of 14 in 2022, then fell -43% between 2021 (7 records) and 2024 (4 records), the most recent year with a complete publication record. That is a real pullback from peak activity, not a sign the field is closed — 2025-2026 counts are still incomplete under the usual 18-month publication lag.

2024 is treated as the last complete filing year.
Claim geography
77.0% G02B
share of records touching optical elements & systems

Optical-path claims dominate over device-level claims

G02B (optical elements & systems) touches 77.0% of records, well ahead of G03B photographic apparatus (20.3%) and G02C spectacles & lenses (18.9%). That skew means most of the contested claim space is in the optical fold itself — prism, mirror and light-path geometry — rather than in the surrounding camera-module or eyewear housing.

Classes overlap; shares are measured against the 74-record total, not against each other.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to periscope and folded optics for mobile, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Periscope and Folded Optics for Mobile covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the field is still open

The ranking below covers all 26 companies the data endpoint returns for this scope — it is not a top-50 or top-100 cut, so absence from it means no record was found, not that a company was excluded.

Leader
16 records
leading assignee's count

One assignee holds a clear lead

The top-ranked assignee holds 16 of the 74 records in scope, well ahead of the fifth-place company at 4 and the tenth-place company at 2. That gap suggests an early, sustained filing programme rather than a recent land grab.

Counts are by patent family, the fairer unit for cross-jurisdiction comparison.
Long tail
26 companies
total ranked assignees

A long tail of single- and double-digit filers

Beyond the leading names, most of the 26 ranked assignees hold only a handful of records each. That pattern is typical of a field where the core fold geometry is settled and later entrants are filing narrower, adjacent claims rather than foundational ones.

Fifth place holds 4 records; tenth place holds 2.
Recent activity
0 in latest year
multiple leaders show no filings in the most recent tracked year

Momentum has cooled even among the leaders

Several of the most active assignees show zero filings in the latest tracked year, including drops of -100% year-on-year for two of them. Given the 18-month publication lag, this should be read as a slowdown in what has published so far rather than a confirmed stop in filing activity.

Momentum figures are year-on-year by assignee, latest tracked year.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
These sub-areas show comparatively thin claim density relative to the core fold-geometry cluster.
prism tilt actuation for continuous zoomstray-light baffling across the foldassembly-tolerance compensation in module stackingstabilization coupling between fold and sensormodule-length reduction below current thickness floors
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Corephotonics Ltd.0-100%
Tectus Corporation0
Chromation Inc.0
Tencent America LLC0
Beijing Zitiao Network Technology Co., Ltd.0-100%
SPY EYE LLC0
Faceu Cayman Islands Co., Ltd.0-100%
Polaroid Corporation0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Periscope and Folded Optics for Mobile covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The figures on this page describe the shape of the field. Turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision means going claim by claim.

Map claims against your own design

Run your specific prism, mirror or actuator geometry against the leading assignees' independent claims to see where overlap actually sits, rather than relying on class-level counts.

Explore in Patsnap Eureka →

Watch the leaders' recent-year activity

Zero filings in the latest tracked year does not mean a company has stopped — it may mean applications are still in the publication pipeline. Track new publications from the leading assignees as they clear the 18-month lag.

Set up monitoring in Patsnap Eureka →

Check the under-claimed branches before drafting

The gate chips above point to sub-areas with thinner claim density. Before drafting a new application, confirm whether that thinness reflects open space or simply a narrower technical niche.

Search white space in Patsnap Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Periscope and Folded Optics for Mobile covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about periscope and folded-optics patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Periscope and Folded Optics for Mobile covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Periscope and Folded Optics for Mobile in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole periscope and folded optics for mobile corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.