Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (7 records) with 2024 (4) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 74 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Periscope and folded-optics patents cover the mechanical and optical engineering needed to bend a lens's light path 90 degrees inside a thin mobile-device body — prism or mirror assemblies, zoom actuation, stabilization of the folded path, and control of stray light across the fold. The dataset spans 74 published records from 2015 through mid-2026, drawn from filings that name a prism tilt mechanism, zoom mechanism, module length constraint, stray-light control, folded-path stabilization, or assembly tolerance in their claims or description.
Because publication trails filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 counts in any trend chart are still filling in and understate real filing activity in those years.
The filing trend and IPC composition below are drawn from the same 74-record scope used throughout this page.
Records rose from 6 in 2017 to a peak of 14 in 2022, then declined -43% from 2021 (7) to 2024 (4) — the most recent year with a complete publication picture. Read 2025 and 2026 as provisional rather than as evidence of continued decline.
G02B (optical elements & systems) touches 77.0% of the 74 records, with G03B (photographic apparatus, 20.3%) and G02C (spectacles & lenses, 18.9%) as the next-largest classes. Measurement classes G01J and H04N each sit at 13.5%, and G02F (optical control & modulation) at 5.4% is the smallest of the tracked classes — each record can carry more than one class, so these shares add up past 100%.
Shares are the percentage of the 74 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about periscope and folded optics for mobile and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaFiled by Polaroid, this 1980 filing describes a compact, rigid camera with a folded optical path between the objective lens and film plane, formed in part by a prism with an entrance face, an exit face overlying the film plane, and a reflective face. The exit face both reflects incoming light and transmits it outward; the reflective face returns internally reflected light back through the exit face to the film plane at a controlled angle.The geometry it claims — an inclined reflective face returning light through an exit face at a set angular relationship — is the same basic fold geometry that modern periscope camera modules still rely on, decades before the mobile-phone use case existed.
View full record| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20120050891A1 | objective | 50 |
| 2 | US4850706A | Low profile spectral analysis system | 31 |
| 3 | US5659637A | Vander lugt optical correlator on a printed circuit board | 29 |
| 4 | US5471043A | Electro-optic barcode reader | 27 |
| 5 | US5796516A | Collimator/diopter assembly with folder optics for a night vision monocular device | 22 |
| 6 | US3734601A | Flow cell assembly for colorimetric measurements | 21 |
| 7 | US4109263A | Compact prism camera | 20 |
| 8 | US5589717A | Compact spectrum analyzer module | 18 |
| 9 | US20190353522A1 | Integration of optical components within a folded optical path | 13 |
| 10 | WO2017197013A1 | Integration of optical components within a folded optical path | 12 |
Citation counts favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations within this searched corpus — read them as a signal of influence, not of current technical importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns stand out once the ranking, the trend, and the IPC composition are read together.
The top 5 assignees combine for 64.9% of all 74 records in scope, and the top 10 combine for 82.4%. With a leader at 16 records and fifth place at only 4, the drop-off after the top few names is steep — a new entrant is filing directly against a handful of well-established portfolios, not against a diffuse field.
Filings rose to a peak of 14 in 2022, then fell -43% between 2021 (7 records) and 2024 (4 records), the most recent year with a complete publication record. That is a real pullback from peak activity, not a sign the field is closed — 2025-2026 counts are still incomplete under the usual 18-month publication lag.
G02B (optical elements & systems) touches 77.0% of records, well ahead of G03B photographic apparatus (20.3%) and G02C spectacles & lenses (18.9%). That skew means most of the contested claim space is in the optical fold itself — prism, mirror and light-path geometry — rather than in the surrounding camera-module or eyewear housing.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to periscope and folded optics for mobile, with the prior art for and against each one.
The ranking below covers all 26 companies the data endpoint returns for this scope — it is not a top-50 or top-100 cut, so absence from it means no record was found, not that a company was excluded.
The top-ranked assignee holds 16 of the 74 records in scope, well ahead of the fifth-place company at 4 and the tenth-place company at 2. That gap suggests an early, sustained filing programme rather than a recent land grab.
Beyond the leading names, most of the 26 ranked assignees hold only a handful of records each. That pattern is typical of a field where the core fold geometry is settled and later entrants are filing narrower, adjacent claims rather than foundational ones.
Several of the most active assignees show zero filings in the latest tracked year, including drops of -100% year-on-year for two of them. Given the 18-month publication lag, this should be read as a slowdown in what has published so far rather than a confirmed stop in filing activity.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Corephotonics Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| Tectus Corporation | 0 | — |
| Chromation Inc. | 0 | — |
| Tencent America LLC | 0 | — |
| Beijing Zitiao Network Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| SPY EYE LLC | 0 | — |
| Faceu Cayman Islands Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| Polaroid Corporation | 0 | — |
The figures on this page describe the shape of the field. Turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision means going claim by claim.
Run your specific prism, mirror or actuator geometry against the leading assignees' independent claims to see where overlap actually sits, rather than relying on class-level counts.
Explore in Patsnap Eureka →Zero filings in the latest tracked year does not mean a company has stopped — it may mean applications are still in the publication pipeline. Track new publications from the leading assignees as they clear the 18-month lag.
Set up monitoring in Patsnap Eureka →The gate chips above point to sub-areas with thinner claim density. Before drafting a new application, confirm whether that thinness reflects open space or simply a narrower technical niche.
Search white space in Patsnap Eureka →Within this 74-record scope, one assignee leads with 16 records, well ahead of the field. The top 5 assignees together hold 64.9% of all records and the top 10 hold 82.4%, so filing activity is concentrated among a small group rather than spread evenly across the 26 companies in the ranking. That said, a leading position in raw record count does not by itself tell you which specific claims are enforceable or how broad they are — that requires reading the independent claims directly.
No — filings peaked at 14 records in 2022 and fell -43% between 2021 (7 records) and 2024 (4 records), the most recent year with a complete publication picture. Because publication typically lags filing by about 18 months, the lower counts shown for 2025 and 2026 are provisional and should not be read as continued decline. The honest read is a pullback from a 2022 high, not a field that has stopped moving.
The dominant IPC class is G02B, optical elements and systems, appearing in 77.0% of the 74 records — this covers the prism, mirror and light-path geometry at the core of the fold. G03B (photographic apparatus, 20.3%) and G02C (spectacles & lenses, 18.9%) follow, with measurement-related classes G01J and H04N each at 13.5%. Because a single record can carry several IPC classes, these percentages add up to more than 100% and should be read against the 74-record total, not against each other.
CA1088795A, filed by Polaroid, describes a compact camera with a folded optical path built around a prism with an entrance face, an exit face over the film plane, and an inclined reflective face that returns internally reflected light to the exit face. It predates the mobile-phone use case entirely, but the basic geometry — a prism folding light through a controlled angular relationship between faces — is structurally similar to what modern periscope camera modules still use. It is best treated as foundational prior art shaping how later claims had to be drafted, not as a currently enforceable barrier on its own.
The evidence points to thinner claim density in prism tilt actuation for continuous zoom, stray-light baffling specifically across the fold point, assembly-tolerance compensation during module stacking, and stabilization coupling between the fold mechanism and the image sensor. These sit adjacent to the dominant G02B cluster rather than inside it, which is consistent with a field where the core fold geometry is well claimed but the surrounding mechanical integration is not. Any freedom-to-operate check should still confirm thinness reflects open space rather than simply narrower technical relevance.
Among the receiving offices tracked in this scope, the United States leads with 39 records, followed by the European Patent Office with 21 and the WIPO PCT route with 9. China, Canada and the United Kingdom each show single-digit counts by comparison. That distribution suggests most applicants are prioritising US and European protection first, with PCT filings used to preserve broader international options.
Go past this page: query the whole periscope and folded optics for mobile corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.