Book a demo

Perovskite Device Simulation Patent Landscape 2026

Perovskite Device Simulation Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
Perovskite Device Simulation Patent Landscape in 2026

The perovskite device simulation patent space is in a Growth stage, with the field expanding strongly on a multi-year basis, though annual volume has eased from its 2023 peak. The landscape is academically concentrated, with City University of Hong Kong, Hanwha Solutions, and several university research foundations holding the leading positions.

62
Patent families in scope
38%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+270%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Academic institutions dominate a still-nascent but rapidly growing field

City University of Hong Kong leads all applicants, followed by Hanwha Solutions Corp as the only major industrial entrant in the top tier. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the Arizona Board of Regents share third position, with universities and research foundations accounting for the majority of the top-ranked filers.

The top five filers account for 38% of the combined patent records of the hundred largest filers, indicating a moderate concentration. There is a clear tier gap between the leader’s position and the mid-table filers, most of which hold only two or three patent records.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1City University of Hong Kong11
2Hanwha Solutions Corp8
3University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill6
4Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona6
5Global Frontier Centre for Multiscale Energy Systems5
6Imperial College Innovations Ltd5
7RES & BUSINESS FOUND SUNGKYUNKWAN UNIV5
8National Institute of Technology Patna4
9Contemporary Amperex Technology (Hong Kong) Limited3
10Kookmin University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation2
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Hong Kong Polytechnic University2
12Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University2
13Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology2
14KHALSA COLLEGE OF ENG & TECH2
15Korea Electronics Technology Institute2
16Shangrao Jinko Solar Technology Development Co Ltd2
17King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals2
18National Institute of Technology Delhi2
19Hong Kong Baptist University2
20GWANGJU INST OF SCI & TECH1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The dominance of academic and quasi-academic entities suggests that core simulation IP is still being established through publicly funded research, leaving space for industrial players to enter or co-develop proprietary simulation methods.

The most recent 18–24 months are likely under-counted due to standard patent publication lag; 20242026 figures should be read as provisional minimums rather than final totals. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

A 2023 filing surge anchors multi-year growth; organic semiconductor IPC dominates the mix

Annual filing activity and technology branch composition together show both how quickly the field mobilized and where simulation work is being anchored technically. The two charts reveal a field that peaked sharply in 2023 and sits overwhelmingly within organic semiconductor and photovoltaic device classifications.

Annual filing trend

Filing volume was negligible through 2018, accelerated from 2019 onward, and reached its highest annual count in 2023. The 2024–2026 bars are understated by publication lag and should not be read as a plateau or decline; the three-year recent window remains well above the prior three-year window.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 22 in 2023.02017020183201962020120215202222202310202412202532026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H10K (organic semiconductors) is the dominant IPC class, reflecting perovskite solar cell and OLED simulation work. H01L (semiconductor devices) is the second-largest branch, while G06F (digital data processing) and G16C (computational chemistry) appear in small but notable counts, pointing to an emerging software and modeling sub-thread.

Technology compositionH10K · Organic semiconductors (OLED etc.) leads with 49; H01L · Semiconductor devices 28.H10K · Organic semicondu…49H01L · Semiconductor dev…28H01G · Capacitors10G06F · Electric digital …4H10P4C01F · Alkaline-earth, A…3C01G · Compounds of othe…3B05D · Coating processes2↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20240273256A1Published 2024-08-15

Digital twin system for optimized design and verif…

Korea Electronics Technology Institute

Proposed is a digital twin system for digitizing technologies related to development of perovskite solar cells, performing design, test, simulation, and verification on materials, physical/chemical properties, and structures in a virtual environment, and designing and manufacturing an optimal perovskite solar cell. The digital twin system may provide a… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Digital twin system for optimized design and verif… — patent drawingDigital twin system for optimized design and verif… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Crystal Control and Stability for High-Performance…63
2Perovskite solar cell and manufacturing method the…25
3Perovskite/silicon tandem photovoltaic device9
4Solar cell7
5Digital twin system for optimized design and verif…6
6Perovskite/silicon tandem photovoltaic device5
7Precursor for preparing perovskite, preparation me…4
8Perovskite photoactive composite layer, preparatio…3

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the landscape structure means for R&D investment decisions

Three structural signals—life-cycle stage, concentration pattern, collaboration activity, and geographic spread—together define where the highest-leverage entry points and competitive risks currently lie.

Growth

Growth stage with annual volume eased from 2023 peak

The field is classified as Growth, with recent three-year filing volume well above the prior three-year window. Annual counts have eased from the 2023 high, consistent with a field consolidating after an initial surge rather than declining. New entrants are still arriving, and no single technical approach has yet achieved blocking coverage.

Growth stage
Concentration

Moderate concentration with a clear academic-industrial split

The top five filers hold 38% of the combined records among the hundred largest filers, a moderate level that leaves meaningful room for new entrants. The only major industrial filer in the top two is Hanwha Solutions Corp; most other leaders are universities or research foundations, which means industrial simulation IP remains relatively underdeveloped and competitively accessible.

Moderate concentration
Collaboration

Three notable co-filing partnerships anchor the collaborative core

The most active co-filing pair is the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill with the Arizona Board of Regents, sharing six joint patent records. City University of Hong Kong and Imperial College Innovations Ltd share five records, as do the Research and Business Foundation of Sungkyunkwan University and the Global Frontier Centre for Multiscale Energy Systems. All three partnerships are cross-institutional and academic, suggesting that collaborative simulation research is the dominant mode of IP generation in this field.

Academic partnerships
Geography

US and EPO lead filings; India is the third-largest national office

The United States is the leading filing jurisdiction, followed by the EPO and India, with China and WIPO PCT filings at notably lower counts. India’s presence as the third-largest office is distinctive and likely reflects active university research programs at institutions such as the National Institute of Technology Patna. South Korea, Australia, and the UK each appear with minimal counts, indicating limited regional protection strategies outside the US–Europe axis so far.

US · EPO · India
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
University of North Carolina at Chapel HillArizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona6
City University of Hong KongImperial College Innovations Ltd5
Research and Business Foundation of Sungkyunkwan UniversityGlobal Frontier Centre for Multiscale Energy Systems5

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights drawn from applicant ranking, lifecycle classification, collaboration pairs, and jurisdiction distribution in evidence.Explore insights →
Leaders

City University of Hong Kong and Hanwha Solutions set the pace across organic semiconductor simulation

Both leading applicants entered the field recently and are focused overwhelmingly on H10K organic semiconductor classifications, suggesting their simulation work centers on perovskite solar cell layer modeling and device optimization.

Leader · City University of Hong Kong

City University of Hong Kong

City University of Hong Kong holds the top position and is classified as a new entrant with strong recent momentum, recording 9 of its patent records in the most recent period. Its technology emphasis spans H10K 30 (organic photovoltaic structures), H10K 85 (organic semiconductor materials), and H10K 71 (fabrication processes), indicating a broad simulation coverage across perovskite device stack layers.

patent records: 11
Challenger · Hanwha Solutions Corp

Hanwha Solutions Corp

Hanwha Solutions Corp is the only major industrial entity in the top two and is also classified as a new entrant, with 6 of its 8 patent records filed in the recent window. Like the leader, it concentrates on H10K 30, H10K 85, and H10K 71, pointing to direct competition with City University of Hong Kong on organic perovskite device simulation methods.

patent records: 8
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked data for all filers including mid-tier universities and emerging industrial entrants.
The University of North Carolina at Chapel HillImperial College Innovations Ltd+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
City University of Hong Kong9▲ new entrant
Hanwha Solutions Corp6▲ new entrant
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill1▲ new entrant
Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona1▲ new entrant
Imperial College Innovations Ltd5▲ new entrant
National Institute of Technology Patna2▲ new entrant
Contemporary Amperex Technology (Hong Kong) Limited2▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards draw on applicant ranking, technology focus, and filing momentum from evidence.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served adjacent branches in software modeling and precursor chemistry

Several IPC branches appear at low counts relative to the dominant organic semiconductor core. These represent areas where simulation-adjacent work exists but dedicated IP coverage is thin, making them worth monitoring for entrants with complementary capabilities.

G06F · Electric digital data processing for device modeling

With only 4 patent records, G06F is sparsely covered despite being the natural classification home for simulation software, numerical solvers, and digital-twin architectures applied to perovskite devices. The top-cited patent referencing a digital twin system for perovskite design verification signals plausible technical value. An entrant with software or CAE expertise could establish differentiated IP in this branch before the computational modeling thread consolidates under H10K.

Search this in Eureka →

C01G · Compounds of other metals (perovskite precursor simulation)

C01G holds only 3 patent records, indicating that simulation of precursor chemistry and metal-compound synthesis routes for perovskite formation is largely unclaimed as IP. Given that crystal control and stability is the most-cited theme in the landscape, there is a plausible technical connection between precursor simulation and device performance prediction. Entry requires chemistry modeling capability combined with experimental validation, but the low existing count suggests limited blocking risk.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all adjacent IPC branches with low filing density and assess entry pathways across the full simulation stack.
B05D · Coating process simulationG16C · Computational chemistry for perovskites+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branch analysis based on IPC class counts relative to the dominant H10K classification in evidence.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ in their technology route emphasis

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerH10K 30 · Organic semiconductors (OLED etc.)H01L 31 · Semiconductor devicesH10K 85 · Organic semiconductors (OLED etc.)H10K 71 · Organic semiconductors (OLED etc.)H01G 9 · Capacitors
City University of Hong KongStrong · 11AbsentStrong · 10Moderate · 5Emerging · 2
Hanwha Solutions CorpStrong · 8AbsentModerate · 4Moderate · 3Absent
Imperial College Innovations LtdStrong · 5AbsentStrong · 5AbsentAbsent
National Institute of Technology PatnaModerate · 2Strong · 4Moderate · 2AbsentModerate · 1
Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of ArizonaAbsentStrong · 5AbsentAbsentModerate · 2
University of North Carolina at Chapel HillAbsentStrong · 5AbsentAbsentModerate · 2
Kookmin University Industry-Academic Cooperation FoundationStrong · 2AbsentAbsentStrong · 2Strong · 2
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Map your own perovskite simulation IP landscape

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.