Book a demo

Perovskite PV Testing Patent Landscape 2026

Perovskite PV Testing Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
Perovskite PV Testing Patent Landscape in 2026

The perovskite PV testing patent space is concentrated among a small cluster of academic and corporate filers, with Contemporary Amperex Technology (Hong Kong) and City University of Hong Kong jointly holding the top two positions. The field is still expanding on a multi-year basis, though annual volume has eased from its 2023 peak and the most recent filing years remain understated by publication lag.

55
Patent families in scope
53%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+550%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

A concentrated field led by CATL’s Hong Kong arm and a tight academic cluster

Contemporary Amperex Technology (Hong Kong) Limited holds the top position among ranked filers, followed closely by City University of Hong Kong and Imperial College Innovations Ltd. The top five filers account for more than half of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, signalling a highly concentrated competitive structure for a still-nascent technology area.

A clear two-tier gap separates the top three applicants from the remainder of the field. The leader’s count is roughly equal to the second-ranked filer, suggesting a tight contest at the top rather than a single dominant incumbent. Filers ranked fourth and below hold materially smaller positions, and several appear with only one or two patent records each.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Contemporary Amperex Technology (Hong Kong) Limited11
2City University of Hong Kong10
3Imperial College Innovations Ltd7
4Nanyang Technological University5
5Nanofilm Technologies International Ltd5
6Swansea University4
7Shandong University3
8Hodogaya Chemical Co., Ltd.2
9Huaneng Qinghai Power Generation Co., Ltd.2
10Huaneng Renewables Corporation Limited2
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Huaneng Clean Energy Research Institute2
12Indian Institute of Technology Bombay2
13Solaires Entreprises Inc2
14Shenzhen Hiking PV Technology Co., Ltd.1
15Kunshan GCL Optoelectronic Material Co., Ltd.1
16Shanghai Jiao Tong University1
17Contemporary Amperex Technology (Hong Kong) Limited1
18Kunshan MIS Information Consulting Co., Ltd.1
19South China University of Technology1
20Purdue Research Foundation1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The co-presence of a major battery manufacturer, elite research universities, and specialist materials firms at the top of the ranking reflects the cross-disciplinary nature of perovskite PV testing — spanning electrochemistry, photovoltaics, and organic semiconductor characterisation. Incumbents’ positions are all marked as new entrants in the momentum data, confirming the field formed rapidly and no filer yet holds a legacy portfolio.

Filing counts for 2024, 2025, and 2026 are understated due to standard patent publication lag of 18–24 months; the apparent recent softening does not reflect actual inventive activity in those years. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

A 2023 filing surge and a dominant organic-semiconductor technology branch

Two charts frame the field’s dynamics: a filing timeline that shows explosive recent growth from a near-zero base, and a technology composition breakdown that reveals H10K organic-semiconductor classification as the overwhelming primary branch.

Annual filing trend

Filings were effectively zero through 2019, then grew steadily from 2020 before surging sharply in 2023. The three-year recent window sits well above the prior three-year window, consistent with the Growth lifecycle stage. The 2024–2026 bars should be read as floors rather than totals given publication lag; the field has not actually contracted.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 26 in 2023.020170201802019220204202162022262023720248202522026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H10K (organic semiconductors) dominates the technology mix by a wide margin, reflecting the perovskite absorber layer’s classification home. Secondary branches — H02S (photovoltaic power generation), C09D (coatings and inks), H01G (capacitors), and H01L (semiconductor devices) — each hold a small share, indicating that characterisation methods spanning device physics, materials deposition, and electrical measurement remain relatively sparse compared to core device architecture filings.

Technology compositionH10K · Organic semiconductors (OLED etc.) leads with 49; H02S · Photovoltaic / solar power generation 7.H10K · Organic semicondu…49H02S · Photovoltaic / so…7C09D · Coatings, paints …4H01G · Capacitors4H01L · Semiconductor dev…4B82Y · Nanotechnology ap…3G01N · Material analysis…3C07D · Heterocyclic comp…2↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20260101625A1Published 2026-04-09

Perovskite solar cell and its preparation

City University Of Hong Kong

A perovskite solar cell includes an electron transport layer between an anode and a cathode, wherein the electron transport layer comprises of first and second portions of tin oxide (SnO<sub>x</sub>). A method for preparing the perovskite solar cell includes depositing an electron transport layer having first and second portions of tin oxide… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Perovskite solar cell and its preparation — patent drawingPerovskite solar cell and its preparation — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Perovskite solar cell7
2Perovskite solar cell and fabrication method thereof5
3Perovskite solar cell and fabrication method thereof4
4Organic-inorganic perovskite solar cell with direc…3
5Perovskite solar cell and manufacturing method3
6Perovskite solar cell with interface layer2
7一种适用于钙钛矿太阳能电池的EL检测设备及检测方法2
8Flexible Perovskite Solar Cells and Fabrication th…1

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the patent structure means for R&D strategy

The combination of rapid growth, high concentration among new entrants, and thin coverage of adjacent measurement and materials branches creates specific strategic implications for teams deciding where to invest.

Growth

Growth stage — rapid expansion from a 2023 peak, publication lag masks true recent pace

The lifecycle is classified as Growth, with recent three-year filings well above the prior three-year window and a reported growth rate consistent with a field that formed almost entirely after 2019. Annual volume peaked in 2023 and has eased since, but the most recent years are further understated by publication lag. Teams entering now are competing against filers who themselves only established positions within the last few years.

Growth lifecycle
Concentration

Top five filers dominate the hundred-filer leaderboard; no entrenched legacy holder

The top five applicants account for 53% of the hundred largest filers’ combined patent records, a high concentration ratio for a field of this size. Critically, all top momentum filers are flagged as new entrants, meaning no single organisation has had time to build a deep, multi-generational portfolio that would be difficult to design around. This lowers the barrier to establishing a differentiated position relative to a mature, incumbent-dominated space.

High concentration
Collaboration

City University of Hong Kong–Imperial College Innovations is the dominant co-filing pair

The most active collaboration in the dataset links City University of Hong Kong and Imperial College Innovations Ltd, who co-filed 7 times. Nanofilm Technologies and Nanyang Technological University form a second active pair with 5 co-filings. Nanofilm also appears in smaller collaborations with Schlich Ltd, as does Nanyang Tech University. These pairings suggest that academic-industry partnerships, particularly spanning Asia-Pacific and UK institutions, are the primary vehicle for IP generation in this field.

Academic-industry pairs
Geography

US leads patent protection; China and Europe are secondary but meaningful destinations

The United States is the leading jurisdiction for patent filings, followed by China and the EPO (Europe) at equal second. India, WIPO PCT, Australia, Spain, the United Kingdom, and Taiwan all appear as protection destinations, indicating that leading filers are pursuing broad international coverage rather than concentrating protection in a single market. Singapore also appears, consistent with the presence of Singapore-based Nanofilm Technologies among the top applicants.

US-led, broad coverage
Patsnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
City University of Hong KongImperial College Innovations Ltd7
Nanofilm Technologies International LtdNanyang Technological University5
Nanofilm Technologies International LtdSchlich Ltd1
Nanyang Technological UniversitySchlich Ltd1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Insights drawn from applicant ranking, lifecycle, collaboration, and jurisdiction data.Explore insights →
Leaders

CATL Hong Kong and City University of Hong Kong lead; all top filers are new entrants

The two top-ranked applicants differ in organisational type — one is the Hong Kong arm of a major battery manufacturer, the other a research university — but both concentrate their filings almost entirely in H10K organic semiconductor classifications and both entered the field recently.

Leader · Contemporary Amperex Technology (Hong Kong) Limited

Contemporary Amperex Technology (Hong Kong) Limited

The top-ranked applicant holds 11 patent records and concentrates its portfolio almost entirely in H10K organic semiconductor subclasses — specifically H10K30 (perovskite and organic PV device architecture) and H10K71 (fabrication and processing methods) — with additional coverage in H10K85. Its momentum is flagged as a new entrant, confirming the position was built entirely within the recent filing window. Its presence signals that CATL group views perovskite PV characterisation as strategically adjacent to its core energy storage business.

patent records: 11
Challenger · City University of Hong Kong

City University of Hong Kong

City University of Hong Kong holds 10 patent records — the closest challenger — and shares the same H10K30 and H10K85 focus as the leader, with additional coverage in H01G capacitor-related classifications. It is also the more active co-filer, partnering with Imperial College Innovations Ltd on 7 joint filings, making it the hub of the most productive academic collaboration in the dataset. Momentum is also flagged as a new entrant, consistent with rapid portfolio build-up.

patent records: 10
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Explore all ranked filers, their technology emphasis, and co-filing relationships in PatSnap Eureka.
Imperial College Innovations LtdNanofilm Technologies+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
City University of Hong Kong9▲ new entrant
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd. (CATL)9▲ new entrant
Imperial College Innovations Ltd7▲ new entrant
Nanofilm Technologies International Ltd5▲ new entrant
Nanyang Technological University5▲ new entrant
Swansea University3▲ new entrant
Shandong University2▲ new entrant
Contemporary Amperex Technology (Hong Kong) Limited1▲ new entrant
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Player profiles draw on applicant ranking, technology focus, and momentum data.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches in materials characterisation and nanotechnology

Several IPC branches adjacent to the dominant H10K core hold very few patent records relative to their technical relevance to perovskite PV testing. These represent observations of relative sparsity; whether they constitute viable entry points depends on an organisation’s existing capabilities.

G01N · Material analysis and testing

G01N covers direct material analysis and testing methods — the most literally aligned IPC branch to the topic of perovskite PV testing — yet holds only 3 patent records and a 4% share of the corpus. The technical value is plausible: standardised test protocols for perovskite absorber stability, defect density measurement, and accelerated ageing are increasingly demanded by module qualification bodies. An entry path exists for instrument makers, standards organisations, or test-house operators who can codify measurement procedures as patentable apparatus or method claims.

Search this in Eureka →

B82Y · Nanotechnology applications

B82Y nanotechnology classifications hold 3 patent records and a 4% share, despite the known relevance of nanostructured charge-transport layers and quantum-dot perovskite variants to cell performance testing. Indian Institute of Technology Bombay is currently the only filer with a clear B82Y focus in this dataset. The sparse coverage suggests that nano-scale characterisation techniques — such as atomic force microscopy protocols tailored for perovskite grain boundaries — remain largely unpublished or unprotected as discrete inventions, leaving room for specialist nanometrology or materials-testing firms.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
PatSnap Eureka maps all adjacent IPC branches and quantifies the gap between technical relevance and filing density.
C23C · Coating and surface depositionG01R · Electric and magnetic measurement+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Adjacent branches identified from IPC composition data; sparsity is relative to the dominant H10K branch.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ by technology route

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerH10K 30 · Organic semiconductors (OLED etc.)H10K 85 · Organic semiconductors (OLED etc.)H10K 71 · Organic semiconductors (OLED etc.)H02S 50 · Photovoltaic / solar power generationC09D 11 · Coatings, paints & inks
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd. (CATL)Strong · 10Strong · 7Strong · 9AbsentAbsent
City University of Hong KongStrong · 10Strong · 10Emerging · 2AbsentAbsent
Imperial College Innovations LtdStrong · 7Strong · 7AbsentAbsentAbsent
Swansea UniversityStrong · 4Strong · 3Strong · 3AbsentStrong · 4
Nanyang Technological UniversityStrong · 5Strong · 4AbsentAbsentAbsent
Nanofilm Technologies International LtdStrong · 5Strong · 4AbsentAbsentAbsent
Shandong UniversityStrong · 3Strong · 2Strong · 3AbsentAbsent
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.