Book a demo

Perovskite Solar Cells Patent Landscape 2026 2026

Perovskite Solar Cells Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

Perovskite Solar Cells Patent Landscape in 2026

With 8,014 patent families on record and a 263% growth rate over the recent filing window, perovskite solar cells represent one of the fastest-expanding fronts in photovoltaics IP. Chinese manufacturers now dominate the applicant ranking, with Trina Solar leading at 259 families, though a handful of Korean and European players hold strategically differentiated positions.

8,014
Patent families in scope
18%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+263%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Trina Solar leads a China-heavy field with meaningful challengers from Korea and Europe

The corpus spans 8,014 patent families. Among the hundred largest filers, ranked by patent families, Trina Solar Co. Ltd. holds first place with 259 families, followed by Contemporary Amperex Technology (CATL) at 180 and Hanwha Solutions at 135.

The top five filers account for 18% of the combined output of the hundred largest applicants—a moderate concentration that signals room for mid-tier players to compete. The gap between the leader (259 families) and the fifth-ranked Oxford Photovoltaics (130 families) is meaningful but not insurmountable for well-resourced entrants.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Trina Solar Co. Ltd.259
2Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd.180
3Hanwha Solutions Corp.135
4Oxford Photovoltaics Ltd.130
5Huaneng Clean Energy Research Institute Co. Ltd.122
6Zhejiang JinkoSolar Co. Ltd.97
7Wuxi Utmost Light Technology Co. Ltd.96
8Contemporary Amperex Technology (Hong Kong) Limited95
9Oxford University Innovation Ltd.84
10RES & BUSINESS FOUND SUNGKYUNKWAN UNIV84
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11TNO (Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research)77
12Tongwei Solar Energy (Chengdu) Co. Ltd.75
13Chint New Energy Technology Co. Ltd.74
14JinkoSolar Co. Ltd.73
15CubicPV Inc.70
16Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology70
17Alliance for Sustainable Energy LLC67
18LONGi Green Energy Technology Co. Ltd.67
19Xi’an TJ-Solar New Energy Co. Ltd.65
20Alliance for Energy Innovation LLC64
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The presence of both manufacturing heavyweights (Trina Solar, CATL, JinkoSolar entities) and specialist innovators (Oxford Photovoltaics, Oxford University Innovation, NREL’s Alliance for Sustainable Energy) indicates a field where process-scale know-how and fundamental device science coexist—an important signal for technology-licensing and partnership strategies.

Rankings and the corpus total are measured at the patent-family level, so a single invention is counted once regardless of how many national filings it generates. Branch, jurisdiction, and route-matrix figures are at the patent-record level; because one family can carry multiple IPC classes or be filed across multiple offices, those record counts exceed the family total and are not directly comparable to it. The most recent 18–24 months of filings are systematically under-counted due to publication lag; treat 20252026 figures as lower bounds.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Applicant ranking chart shows patent families per filer among the top 100 applicants. Applicant family counts can overlap where a family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Filing volume has surged since 2021 and the device-physics class dominates the technology mix

Two charts together reveal both the pace and the composition of innovation: annual filing volume shows the trajectory of commercial interest, while the IPC breakdown identifies which technical branches are crowded and which remain lightly contested.

Annual filing trend

Annual families climbed from 249 in 2017 to a recorded peak of 1,931 in 2024, with the field in a confirmed growth stage. The 2025 figure of 1,458 and the 2026 figure of 131 are substantially under-counted due to publication lag and should not be read as a slowdown; the evidence base supports continued expansion.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 1,931 in 2024.2492017392201837320193892020487202195120221,65320231,93120241,45820251312026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H10K (organic semiconductors, the primary perovskite device class) accounts for the largest share of patent records at 6,415, followed by H01L (semiconductor devices) at 2,707. H02S (photovoltaic system integration) at 618 and H01G (capacitors, relevant to charge-transport layers) at 394 are notably smaller, flagging under-represented adjacent branches. Downstream system-integration and materials-chemistry classes each represent a fraction of the dominant device-physics class.

Technology compositionH10K · Organic semiconductors (OLED etc.) leads with 6,415; H01L · Semiconductor devices 2,707.H10K · Organic semicondu…6,415H01L · Semiconductor dev…2,707H02S · Photovoltaic / so…618H01G · Capacitors394C07F · Organo-metallic &…358C23C · Coating & surface…281C07D · Heterocyclic comp…244C01G · Compounds of othe…241↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology composition is measured at the patent-record level; a single family can carry multiple IPC classes.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Foundational and most-cited patents

The most-cited families that anchor this space. Hover a row and click to open it in Eureka.

Featured patent
US12176851B2Published 2024-12-24

Energy-efficient cooling of a perovskite solar cell

Siemens Energy Global GMBH & CO. KG

A method for control of a cooling device for the active cooling of a perovskite solar cell, wherein the perovskite solar cell is part of a perovskite photovoltaic module. The method includes determining a measure of the internal temperature of the perovskite solar cell and activating the cooling device when the determined measure of the internal temperature… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Open this patent in Eureka →
Most-cited patents
#PatentCitations
1Optoelectronic device513
2Optoelectronic device195
3Photovoltaic device comprising a metal halide pero…97
4Detector for an optical detection of at least one …93
5Optoelectronic device comprising perovskites85
6Perovskite schottky type solar cell82
7Optoelectronic device comprising porous scaffold m…80
8Quantum-dot-in-perovskite solids77

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts accrue over time, so this list favours older, broadly-cited patents and may include general-purpose work beyond the specific topic; treat it as foundational context rather than a current-activity ranking.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Most-cited patent families for this query, ranked by total forward citations.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the patent structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of rapid growth, a two-tier competitive structure, strong co-filing networks, and a China-dominant filing geography shapes where and how new entrants can compete most efficiently.

Growth

Growth stage: annual volume still rising, no sign of saturation

The lifecycle evidence places perovskite solar cells firmly in the Growth stage. Annual filings rose from 249 in 2017 to 1,931 in 2024, a 263% expansion over the recent window, with the peak year recorded as 2024 and no easing from that peak confirmed in the evidence. This trajectory suggests fundamental and applied research investment remains commercially justified, though crowding in the dominant H10K device class is already material.

Growth stage
Concentration

Moderate leader-to-field gap; mid-tier window remains open

The top five applicants hold 18% of the hundred largest filers’ combined families—moderate by IP-landscape standards. The leader-to-fifth gap (259 vs. 130 families) is real but not prohibitive for a focused entrant. The ranking’s second tier—JinkoSolar entities, Wuxi Utmost Light, Oxford University Innovation, TNO, and Tongwei—each hold 75–97 families, indicating a healthy challenger cohort that keeps the field competitive below the top two or three.

Moderate concentration
Collaboration

Corporate–affiliate and university–national-lab co-filing are the dominant collaboration patterns

The most active co-filing pair is Zhejiang JinkoSolar and JinkoSolar Co. Ltd. (67 joint families), reflecting tight intra-group coordination. CATL and its Shanghai Future Energy Research Institute co-file on 51 families. Huaneng Clean Energy Research Institute co-files with Huaneng New Energy (43 families) and Huaneng Qinghai (37 families). The Alliance for Sustainable Energy (NREL) co-files with the University of Louisville Research Foundation and First Solar (12 families each), and with Shanghai Jiao Tong University (10 families)—illustrating a US national-lab-to-industry bridge model. Sungkyunkwan University’s industry-liaison body co-files with a multiscale energy systems group (34 families), signalling an active Korean academic-industrial pipeline.

Intra-group & lab–industry
Geography

China is the primary filing office; US and EPO anchor international protection

At the patent-record level, China accounts for 4,423 records, by far the largest single office, reflecting both the domestic dominance of Chinese applicants and their home-market filing strategy. The United States follows at 1,243 records and the EPO at 717, with PCT (WIPO) at 579 providing a bridge for applicants seeking broad international coverage. South Korea at 506 records underscores that country’s industry and academic activity. Coverage in India (219), Germany (190), and Japan (147) is meaningful but secondary; Southeast Asian and Middle Eastern offices carry modest counts.

China-dominant, US/EPO secondary
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Zhejiang JinkoSolar Co. Ltd.JinkoSolar Co. Ltd.67
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd.Contemporary Amperex Future Energy Research Institute (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.51
Huaneng Clean Energy Research Institute Co. Ltd.Huaneng Renewables Corporation Limited43
Huaneng Clean Energy Research Institute Co. Ltd.Huaneng Qinghai Power Generation Co. Ltd.37
成均馆大学校产学协力团Global Frontier Centre for Multiscale Energy Systems34
Alliance for Sustainable Energy LLCUniversity of Louisville Research Foundation Inc.12
Alliance for Sustainable Energy LLCFirst Solar Inc.12
Alliance for Sustainable Energy LLCShanghai Jiao Tong University10
Zhejiang JinkoSolar Co. Ltd.JinkoSolar (Haining) Co. Ltd.9
Alliance for Sustainable Energy LLCNorthern Illinois University8

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Jurisdiction counts are at the patent-record level; one family can appear across multiple offices.Explore insights →
Leaders

Trina Solar and CATL lead on volume; Oxford Photovoltaics and Oxford University Innovation lead on semiconductor-device depth

The top applicants split into two strategic archetypes: Chinese manufacturers and energy-company subsidiaries filing at high volume with an H10K device focus, and Western specialist innovators filing at lower volume but concentrated in fundamental semiconductor-device and materials classes.

Leader · Trina Solar Co. Ltd.

Trina Solar Co. Ltd.

Trina Solar leads the ranking with 259 patent families and is classified as a new entrant in the recent momentum window—meaning the bulk of its 183 recently filed families arrived with little or no prior-period baseline, indicating a very rapid strategic build-out. Its technology focus is concentrated across H10K subclasses (organic/perovskite device structures, fabrication processes, and materials), consistent with a manufacturer targeting production-ready perovskite cell and module architectures.

families: 259
Challenger · Oxford Photovoltaics Ltd.

Oxford Photovoltaics Ltd.

Oxford Photovoltaics holds 130 families and shows a declining recent trend (−52% vs. prior three-year period), suggesting a consolidation or portfolio-maturation phase rather than continued aggressive filing. Its technology emphasis is differentiated from the Chinese manufacturing cohort: the top classes are H01L31 (photovoltaic semiconductor devices, 65 records) and H01L51 (organic semiconductor devices, 42 records), alongside H10K30 (40 records). This classical semiconductor-device framing reflects its perovskite-on-silicon tandem cell heritage and positions it as a technology licensor rather than a volume filer.

families: 130
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles, momentum scores, and technology heat maps for all 100 leading perovskite solar cell applicants.
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd.Hanwha Solutions Corp.+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Trina Solar Co. Ltd.183▲ new entrant
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd.191▲ 9.6× vs prior 3-yr
Hanwha Solutions Corp.86▲ 3.7× vs prior 3-yr
Alliance for Sustainable Energy LLC52▲ +108%
Oxford University Innovation Ltd.16▼ -48%
Huaneng Clean Energy Research Institute Co. Ltd.82▲ new entrant
Zhejiang JinkoSolar Co. Ltd.66▲ +187%
Oxford Photovoltaics Ltd.16▼ -52%
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player family counts are from the applicant ranking; technology emphasis is at the patent-record level.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the dominant device-physics class

The following IPC classes carry materially fewer patent records than the dominant H10K and H01L classes, yet each maps to a technically plausible aspect of perovskite solar cell development. They are observations of relative sparsity—only teams with a credible technical entry path should treat them as investment candidates.

H02S · Photovoltaic / solar power generation (system integration)

With 618 patent records, H02S is the third-largest branch but sits at less than one-tenth the scale of H10K. This class covers the balance-of-system aspects of solar power—mounting, inverters, string wiring, and grid connection—that become critical as perovskite cells approach module-level commercialisation. Most current filings address the cell or stack; teams with expertise in system integration or power electronics could exploit a comparatively open space by anchoring perovskite-specific reliability and degradation management into H02S claims. Entry requires both device knowledge and power-systems engineering, which limits the competitive field.

Search this in Eureka →

C23C · Coating & surface deposition

C23C carries 281 patent records, representing roughly 4% of the H10K record count. Perovskite absorber and charge-transport layers are deposited by a variety of thin-film techniques (chemical vapour deposition, atomic layer deposition, sputtering), and process control at scale is a known commercialisation bottleneck. The relative sparsity in C23C suggests that deposition-process IP—as distinct from device-architecture IP—is under-claimed. Organisations with thin-film deposition equipment or process know-how (including equipment makers not currently prominent in this landscape) could build differentiated positions here.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all adjacent IPC branches ranked by sparsity, technical adjacency, and applicant overlap for perovskite solar cells.
C07F · Organo-metallic & non-carbon compoundsC07D · Heterocyclic compounds+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. White-space branch counts are at the patent-record level and represent a subset of the broader IPC distribution.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ across technology routes

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerH10K 30 · Organic semiconductors (OLED etc.)H10K 71 · Organic semiconductors (OLED etc.)H10K 85 · Organic semiconductors (OLED etc.)H01L 31 · Semiconductor devicesH01L 51 · Semiconductor devices
Trina Solar Co. Ltd.Strong · 243Strong · 205Moderate · 120AbsentAbsent
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd.Strong · 197Moderate · 84Moderate · 94Moderate · 55Absent
Huaneng Clean Energy Research Institute Co. Ltd.Strong · 115Strong · 95Strong · 59AbsentAbsent
Oxford University Innovation Ltd.Strong · 56AbsentStrong · 46Strong · 86Strong · 58
Hanwha Solutions Corp.Strong · 130Moderate · 38Strong · 72AbsentAbsent
Alliance for Sustainable Energy LLCStrong · 71AbsentStrong · 39Strong · 64Strong · 37
Wuxi Utmost Light Technology Co. Ltd.Strong · 91Strong · 70Moderate · 33AbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Route matrix counts are at the patent-record level; a single family can appear in multiple route cells.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own perovskite solar cell landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.