Book a demo

Perovskite Stability & Durability Patent Landscape 2026

Perovskite Stability & Durability Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
Perovskite Stability & Durability Patent Landscape in 2026

The perovskite stability and durability space is in active growth, with filings accelerating sharply from 2021 onward and China’s solar and battery manufacturers now dominating the applicant pool. Activity is concentrated but still fragmented enough that well-targeted R&D can establish defensible positions, particularly in adjacent chemistry and semiconductor-device branches.

2,237
Patent families in scope
19%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+1362%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Trina Solar leads a China-heavy field with moderate top-tier concentration

Trina Solar Co Ltd holds the leading position with 99 patent families, ahead of Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd (CATL) at 66 and Huaneng Clean Energy Research Institute at 53. The top five filers account for 19% of the combined output of the hundred largest applicants, signalling that leadership exists but the field is not yet locked up by one or two players.

A clear two-tier structure is visible: Trina Solar and CATL have a material lead over the third-ranked applicant and below. The gap narrows quickly from rank 3 onward, with several industrial firms and universities clustered between 20 and 40 patent families. This suggests that challengers can still close the gap with focused filing programs.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Trina Solar Co Ltd99
2Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd66
3Huaneng Clean Energy Research Institute Co Ltd53
4Wuxi Utmost Light Technology Co Ltd39
5Contemporary Amperex Technology (Hong Kong) Limited39
6Chint New Energy Technology Co Ltd37
7Xian TJ-Solar New Energy Co Ltd37
8Northwestern Polytechnical University30
9Suzhou University27
10Hanwha Solutions Corporation26
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Wuhan University25
12Contemporary Amperex Future Energy Research Institute (Shanghai) Co Ltd24
13Nankai University24
14Tianjin Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co Ltd23
15Zhejiang Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co Ltd23
16Zhuhai Fushan Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co Ltd23
17Renshuo Photonics (Suzhou) Co Ltd23
18Guangdong Aiko Solar Energy Technology Co Ltd23
19Tongwei Solar Energy (Chengdu) Co Ltd22
20China Three Gorges Corporation21
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The fact that the top two positions are held by a solar module manufacturer and a battery giant — rather than pure chemistry or device-physics research houses — indicates that the field has crossed from exploratory research into application-driven IP accumulation, with commercial deployment timelines now shaping filing strategies.

The most recent 18–24 months of data are subject to publication lag and likely understate actual filing volumes; treat figures from 20252026 as preliminary. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Explosive growth since 2021 driven almost entirely by organic-semiconductor device filings

Two structural features define this landscape: a step-change acceleration in annual filings beginning in 2022, and a technology mix that is overwhelmingly concentrated in H10K (organic semiconductors / perovskite device architecture), with a long tail of adjacent chemistry and materials branches.

Annual filing trend

Filings were modest through 2020, then surged — rising from 46 families in 2021 to 221 in 2022, 517 in 2023, and 695 in 2024. The 2025 figure of 587 and the 2026 stub of 59 are understated by publication lag and should not be read as a slowdown; the underlying trajectory remains upward.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 695 in 2024.2320173720182820192420204620212212022517202369520245872025592026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H10K (organic semiconductors, including perovskite photovoltaic device architecture) accounts for the dominant share of filings. H01L (semiconductor devices) is the next largest branch, followed by organometallic chemistry (C07F), heterocyclic compounds (C07D), and metal compound synthesis (C01G). Coating and surface-deposition methods (C23C) and nanotechnology applications (B82Y) represent smaller but technically relevant adjacent clusters.

Technology compositionH10K · Organic semiconductors (OLED etc.) leads with 2,111; H01L · Semiconductor devices 266.H10K · Organic semicondu…2,111H01L · Semiconductor dev…266C07F · Organo-metallic &…106C07D · Heterocyclic comp…96C07C · Acyclic & carbocy…62C01G · Compounds of othe…57B82Y · Nanotechnology ap…51C08G · Condensation poly…50↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20230320110A1Published 2023-10-05

Perovskite solar cell, preparation method thereof,…

Contemporary Amperex Technology (HONG KONG) Limited

Embodiments of this application provide a perovskite solar cell, a preparation method thereof, and an electric device. The perovskite solar cell includes: a back plate; a transparent substrate, where a sealed cavity is formed between the transparent substrate and the back plate; and a perovskite solar cell device, where the perovskite solar cell device is… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Perovskite solar cell, preparation method thereof,… — patent drawingPerovskite solar cell, preparation method thereof,… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1一种钙钛矿太阳能电池的化学气相沉积制备方法69
2一种平面异质结钙钛矿太阳能电池及其制备方法54
3Monolithic Tandem Chalcopyrite-Perovskite Photovol…43
4一种铯铅溴无机钙钛矿薄膜的制备方法及基于其的光伏器件35
5Tandem solar cell and method of manufacturing the …31
6基于镧系稀土离子掺杂CsPbBr3的全无机钙钛矿太阳能电池及其制备方法和应用30
7一种高效钙钛矿太阳能电池及其制备方法27
8一种SnO2多孔结构钙钛矿光伏电池及其制备方法26

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of a growth lifecycle, Chinese industrial dominance, active corporate-corporate co-filing, and thin coverage outside. China creates several strategic considerations for teams evaluating where to build IP.

Growth

Active growth phase — annual filings still rising

The field is in a Growth stage: annual filing volumes have risen sharply since 2021 and the evidence does not indicate any easing from the 2024 peak. A multi-year growth rate of approximately 1,362% confirms that the field is far from saturation. Early movers have established volume leads, but the window to stake out sub-domain positions in stability mechanisms, encapsulants, and interface engineering remains open.

Growth stage
Concentration

Moderate top-tier concentration with a reachable second tier

The top five filers hold 19% of the output of the hundred largest applicants, and the gap between ranks 1 and 3 is already meaningful (99 vs. 53 patent families). However, applicants ranked 4 through 20 are closely bunched between 21 and 39 families, meaning second-tier status is achievable with a disciplined 2–3 year filing program. New entrant momentum across the top applicants underscores that the current rankings are not yet locked in.

Moderate concentration
Collaboration

Intra-group and utility-institute co-filing dominate collaboration patterns

The most active co-filing relationship is between Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd and its dedicated research affiliate Contemporary Amperex Future Energy Research Institute (Shanghai), with 24 jointly filed families. Huaneng Clean Energy Research Institute co-files actively with both Huaneng Qinghai Power Generation Co Ltd and Huaneng New Energy (15 families each) and has a smaller link to Tsinghua University (2 families). Northwestern Polytechnical University is the most collaborative academic node, maintaining ties to Suzhou University, Shenzhen Manern Optoelectronics, and Nanjing University of Technology. Cross-sector university–industry collaboration remains limited in scale.

Corporate-led co-filing
Geography

China overwhelmingly dominant; Western jurisdictions underpenetrated

China accounts for the large majority of filings by jurisdiction count, followed at a significant distance by the United States, Europe (EPO), and WIPO PCT. South Korea and India appear as secondary markets. Japan, Canada, and most European national offices have single-digit or no significant presence. For non-Chinese applicants, filing in China via direct or PCT routes is strategically necessary; for Chinese players, US and EPO coverage of their core stability inventions is sparse relative to their domestic portfolios, creating freedom-to-operate opportunities for Western entrants.

China-led, US/EP gaps
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co LtdContemporary Amperex Future Energy Research Institute (Shanghai) Co Ltd24
Huaneng Clean Energy Research Institute Co LtdHuaneng Qinghai Power Generation Co Ltd15
Huaneng Clean Energy Research Institute Co LtdHuaneng Renewables Corporation Limited15
Northwestern Polytechnical UniversityNorthwestern Polytechnical University Shenzhen Research Institute4
Huaneng Clean Energy Research Institute Co LtdTsinghua University2
Northwestern Polytechnical UniversitySuzhou University2
Northwestern Polytechnical UniversityShenzhen Manern Optoelectronics Technology Co Ltd2
Northwestern Polytechnical UniversityNanjing University of Technology2
Suzhou UniversityNanjing University of Technology2
Trina Solar Co LtdTrina Solar (Changzhou) Technology Co Ltd1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights derived from applicant ranking, collaboration pairs, lifecycle assessment, and jurisdiction distribution in the corpus.Explore insights →
Leaders

Trina Solar and CATL lead on volume; both entered as new filers with rapid ramp-ups

The top two applicants are large industrial corporations, not specialist photovoltaic-chemistry firms, reflecting the field’s commercial maturation. Both show a new-entrant trajectory, meaning their recent-period filings represent the near-entirety of their corpus — a sign of fast, intentional IP build-outs rather than long-term organic accumulation.

Leader · Trina Solar

Trina Solar Co Ltd

Trina Solar holds 99 patent families and is the top-ranked applicant in this space. Its technology focus is concentrated almost entirely within H10K (organic semiconductor / perovskite device architecture), with H10K30, H10K71, and H10K85 as the primary sub-classes. Applicant momentum is classified as a new entrant, with 60 recent families representing a rapid, intentional IP ramp. This positions Trina Solar as the benchmark against which other industrial players are measuring their own filing programs.

families: 99
Challenger · CATL

Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd

CATL ranks second with 66 patent families, leveraging its electrochemistry and materials-science capabilities to extend into perovskite stability. Its technology focus mirrors Trina Solar’s H10K concentration (H10K30, H10K85, H10K71), and it co-files actively with its dedicated research institute Contemporary Amperex Future Energy Research Institute (Shanghai). Momentum is also flagged as new entrant, with 83 recent families — the highest recent-period count among the top applicants — suggesting CATL’s filing rate may challenge Trina Solar’s cumulative lead in the near term.

families: 66
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access rankings, technology emphasis, and momentum scores for all 100 tracked applicants in this landscape.
Huaneng Clean Energy Research InstituteWuxi Utmost Light Technology Co Ltd+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Trina Solar Co Ltd60▲ new entrant
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd83▲ new entrant
Huaneng Clean Energy Research Institute Co Ltd31▲ new entrant
Wuxi Utmost Light Technology Co Ltd37▲ new entrant
Xian TJ-Solar New Energy Co Ltd35▲ new entrant
Chint New Energy Technology Co Ltd34▲ new entrant
Northwestern Polytechnical University13▲ new entrant
Suzhou University14▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards cite patent family counts from the applicant ranking and technology emphasis from applicant-level IPC data.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served IPC branches adjacent to the dominant device-architecture cluster

Several IPC branches appear at materially lower filing densities relative to H10K, representing areas where the technical relevance to perovskite stability is plausible but current patent coverage is thin. These are observations of relative sparsity — not validated market opportunities — and should be assessed alongside freedom-to-operate and prior-art searches before committing R&D resources.

C07F · Organometallic & Non-Carbon Compounds

With 106 patent families recorded under C07F, organometallic precursor chemistry is the largest of the sparse adjacent branches. Perovskite stability is strongly influenced by the choice of A-site and B-site organic cations, and organometallic passivation agents are an active research area. The relatively low filing count suggests that precursor and additive chemistry is underprotected relative to device-level claims. Teams with synthetic chemistry expertise could build differentiated positions here, particularly around tin-based or mixed-halide systems where toxicity and stability trade-offs remain unsolved.

Search this in Eureka →

C23C · Coating & Surface Deposition

C23C covers coating processes and surface deposition techniques, with 42 patent families in scope — a notably thin cluster given that thin-film deposition uniformity and interfacial quality are among the primary determinants of perovskite device lifetime. Atomic layer deposition, sputtering, and chemical vapor deposition of encapsulant or charge-transport layers are technically relevant entry points. The sparse filing density in this branch, combined with the high citation count of vapor-deposition methods among the top-cited patents, suggests that process-level claims in coating and deposition remain an under-filed area with plausible commercial value.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See filing density, trend direction, and lead applicants for every IPC branch in the perovskite stability landscape.
C07D · Heterocyclic compoundsC01G · Compounds of other metals+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branch analysis is based on relative IPC filing density within the 2,237-family perovskite stability and durability corpus.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ by technology sub-class emphasis

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerH10K 30 · Organic semiconductors (OLED etc.)H10K 71 · Organic semiconductors (OLED etc.)H10K 85 · Organic semiconductors (OLED etc.)H01L 31 · Semiconductor devicesH10K 39 · Organic semiconductors (OLED etc.)
Trina Solar Co LtdStrong · 97Strong · 83Moderate · 41AbsentModerate · 23
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co LtdStrong · 85Moderate · 39Strong · 50Emerging · 16Emerging · 3
Huaneng Clean Energy Research Institute Co LtdStrong · 50Strong · 41Strong · 31AbsentEmerging · 3
Chint New Energy Technology Co LtdStrong · 37Strong · 27Strong · 23AbsentAbsent
Wuxi Utmost Light Technology Co LtdStrong · 38Strong · 31AbsentAbsentAbsent
Northwestern Polytechnical UniversityStrong · 28Strong · 28AbsentAbsentAbsent
Hanwha Solutions CorporationStrong · 26AbsentStrong · 17AbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own perovskite stability landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.