Petrophysical Interpretation Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026
Petrophysical Interpretation and Saturation Model Patents
23 families from the leading assignee against a fifth-place mark of 17 and a tenth-place mark of 6 — a steep drop-off rather than an even spread across the 30 ranked companies. Filings ran near 11-12 a year through 2017-2018 (the peak, at 12), before settling into a lower, choppier pace. The 2021-to-2024 span shows a documented 33% rise (3 to 4 records) — the only stretch clean enough to call growth. Counts for 2025 and 2026 are undercounted because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months; they should not be read as a slowdown.
- 1SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY BV23
- 2BAKER HUGHES CO23
- 3HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC22
- 4SCHLUMBERGER TECH CORP22
- 5EXXONMOBIL OIL CORP17
See the full petrophysical interpretation and saturation models analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Common questions on this landscape
Who holds the most patents in petrophysical interpretation and saturation modelling?
This dataset’s assignee ranking covers 30 companies, and the leading assignee holds 23 families, well ahead of the fifth-place holder at 17 and the tenth-place holder at 6. The names behind these totals are dominated by long-established oilfield-service groups with decades of wireline and formation-evaluation filing history, several of which appear under related corporate entities. That structure means genuine white space is more likely to be found by checking specific claim elements against the leader’s portfolio rather than assuming the field is fragmented.
Is patent filing in this field growing or slowing down?
The clean, comparable figure this dataset supports is a 33% rise in filings from 2021 to 2024, from 3 to 4 records. Filing counts for 2025 and 2026 look lower, but that is expected: publication typically lags actual filing by around 18 months, so recent years are always undercounted at the time a search is run. Read the 2021-2024 span as the reliable growth signal and treat anything after 2024 as still filling in rather than as a genuine decline.
What does US6470274B1 actually cover, and does it block new saturation-model work?
US6470274B1 covers a tensorial dual water saturation model that derives laminar shale volume and sand conductivity from multi-component induction log data, combined with NMR-derived measurements of clay-bound water in shale and formation. It is the most-cited record in this dataset behind a small group of hydrocarbon-production patents, with 124 citations, making it a foundational reference point for laminated-reservoir saturation work. It does not block every saturation approach, but any model relying on tensorial resistivity components plus NMR clay-bound water measurement in laminated shaly sands should be checked against its specific claim language before filing.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Petrophysical Interpretation and Saturation Models covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.