Phase Plate Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
Phase plate and contrast enhancement patents: filing trends and leaders through 2026
65.2% concentration at the top. The top 5 of 51 ranked assignees hold 101 of the 155 records in scope — a field with a short, dominant leadership tier. Volume rose to a peak of 24 records in 2023, then eased to 13 in 2024 — a documented -38% from the 2021 level of 21. 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in as publications catch up to filing dates, so treat the tail as incomplete rather than declining.
- 1RGT UNIV OF CALIFORNIA30
- 2VRIJE UNIV BRUSSEL19
- 3VLAAMS INTERUNIVERSITAIR INST VOOR BIOTECHNOLOGIE VZW18
- 4FEI CO17
- 5SHARP KK17
See the full phase plates and contrast enhancement analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Common questions about phase plate patents
How concentrated is the phase plate patent field among a few companies?
It is concentrated at the top but not monopolised: the top 5 of 51 ranked assignees hold 101 of 155 records in scope, or 65.2%. The top 10 push that to 93.5%, meaning the remaining 41 ranked assignees split roughly 6.5% of the field between them. This pattern is typical of a technical niche anchored by a handful of research institutions and one or two instrument makers, with a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants rather than a broad competitive middle.
Is phase plate patent filing activity growing or shrinking?
Filing peaked at 24 records in 2023 and eased to 13 in 2024, a documented -38% change from the 2021 level of 21 records. However, publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so 2025 and 2026 figures in any dataset will look artificially low simply because not all filings from those years have published yet. The honest read is a cooling from a 2023 peak, not a confirmed collapse in activity.
What is the difference between phase plate patents and general electron microscopy patents?
This landscape is scoped specifically to phase contrast and contrast transfer function methods combined with practical failure-mode language such as charging drift, alignment stability and hole-free plate design. That is narrower than electron microscopy broadly, which also covers detectors, sample preparation, and unrelated imaging modes. The IPC mix here — nearly half the records touching C07K peptide claims — shows this specific niche leans heavily toward biological sample applications rather than general instrumentation.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Phase Plates and Contrast Enhancement covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.