Photocatalysis Environmental Durability Patents: Trends 2026
- Filing has stayed flat, not grown. the midpoint year sat at 3 filings and the peak year so far reached only 4 — this is a narrow, still-emerging claim set rather than a maturing one.
- Water treatment carries more weight than the core catalysis class alone. C02F appears in over half of all records, meaning durability claims are being anchored to wastewater applications almost as often as to the catalyst itself.
- Citation weight sits with older, broader patents. the most-cited record in this set dates back well before the 2015 window, a reminder that influence here still traces to foundational photocatalyst art rather than recent stability work.
Filing growth compares 2021 (1 records) with 2024 (1) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 30 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
This dataset isolates patent families that combine photocatalysis language with explicit durability framing — photocatalyst stability, deactivation resistance, or anti-photocorrosion — inside the catalysis-structure and catalyst-composition IPC classes (B01J35, B01J21/06, B01J38). That combination is deliberately narrow: it excludes general photocatalysis filings that never address why a catalyst loses activity or corrodes under illumination, and it excludes durability claims outside catalytic materials entirely.
Coverage runs from 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent one or two years in any trend line will understate actual filing activity once those applications publish.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology mix
Two views of the same 30-family set: how filing has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the durability claims.
A flat filing curve
Filing was at zero in 2017, climbed to a midpoint of 3 by 2022, and peaked at only 4 in 2025 before the partial, understated 2026 count. That is not a growth curve — it is a small, still-forming niche that has not yet attracted a wave of filers.
Catalysis core, water-treatment overlay
Every record sits in B01J by construction, but C02F (water and wastewater treatment) appears in roughly half of them, well ahead of the smaller clusters in polymer additives, coatings and separation processes. Durability claims here are being written as much for water-treatment deployment as for the catalyst chemistry itself.
Shares are the percentage of the 30 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Photocatalysis Environmental Durability with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about photocatalysis environmental durability and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaMost-cited records in this set
US20190381476A1 — Photocatalytic Device (Flux Photon Corporation)
Describes a photocatalytic device that spatially separates radiation-generated electrons and holes before they reach the reactant flow, addressing the electron-hole recombination that limits photocatalytic efficiency and reaction specificity.Filed by Flux Photon Corporation; published 2019-12-19.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6558553B1 | Photocatalyst | 27 |
| 2 | EP0522703A2 | Diluent for iodonium photocatalysts | 19 |
| 3 | US20200179910A1 | Method for producing photocatalyst and photocatalyst filter for air cleaning | 9 |
| 4 | CN111389465A | 一种MOF@TiO<sub>2</sub>@PDVB光催化剂及其制备方法与应用 | 8 |
| 5 | CN113398914A | 一锅水热合成可见光催化剂的制备方法 | 7 |
| 6 | WO2000061290A1 | A photocatalyst | 7 |
| 7 | US20190381476A1 | Photocatalytic Device | 4 |
| 8 | CN117065746A | 一种碳层桥接的Au-C/TiO<sub>2</sub>复合光催化剂的制备方法和应用 | 2 |
| 9 | WO2023272389A1 | Tri-functional heterogeneous photocatalyst | 2 |
| 10 | EP0522703A3 | Diluent for iodonium photocatalysts | 2 |
Citation counts favour older records inside any searched corpus — read them as a signal of influence on later filings, not as a measure of current commercial relevance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers indicate
Three read-throughs from the filing trend, technology mix and citation pattern above.
A niche that has not yet accelerated
Filing volume moved from 3 families at the 2022 midpoint to a peak of 4 in 2025 — modest growth against a near-zero 2017 baseline, not the inflection point that would signal a technology entering a growth phase.
Water treatment is the dominant use case
More than half of the durability-focused photocatalyst families also carry a water/wastewater treatment classification, well ahead of the coatings, polymer-additive and separation-process clusters that each sit at 3–4 records.
No single office dominates
Receiving offices are spread across the United States, China, Europe, India, the PCT route and Australia without a clear concentration in any one jurisdiction, suggesting applicants are still testing where to seek protection rather than converging on a preferred venue.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to photocatalysis environmental durability, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the gaps sit
With only 30 families and 5 co-assignee pairs recorded, this is not a field with an entrenched leader — it is a set of scattered single- or few-filing entrants plus a handful of collaborative pairs.
Collaboration is limited and recent
The strongest co-filing relationship pairs a Korean university technology-transfer office with a major Korean electronics manufacturer, appearing twice; the remaining pairs are single instances involving named individual inventors alongside a corporate assignee.
No assignee shows current-year filing activity
Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum, including a Texas university system with a -100% YoY change, shows zero filings in the latest year captured — consistent with the flat overall trend rather than any single firm pulling back.
A field of largely unrepeated filers
With as many families as published records, there is little sign of aggressive continuation filing by any single applicant — this looks like a set of first-pass claims rather than a contested, iterated claim space.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Unisearch Ltd. | 0 | — |
| General Electric Company | 0 | — |
| The Governing Council of the University of Toronto | 0 | — |
| POSTECH Academy-Industry Foundation | 0 | — |
| Texas A&M University | 0 | -100% |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (Korea) | 0 | — |
| FLUX PHOTON CORP | 0 | — |
| Jiangsu University | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to a narrow, still-forming field with thin claim density outside the core catalysis class.
Map freedom-to-operate against the coating and polymer overlays
With only 3–4 records each in coatings, polymer additives and polymer compositions, a targeted search inside those overlays could surface filing room the core B01J searches miss.
Explore in EurekaTrack the water-treatment overlay separately
Because C02F carries over half of the records, durability claims aimed at non-water applications — air cleaning, coatings, structural materials — sit on a comparatively lighter prior-art base.
Explore in EurekaRe-run this landscape after the next publication cycle
Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, the 2025–2026 filing counts shown here are a floor; a re-run in the next reporting cycle will likely lift the recent-year trend line.
Explore in EurekaCommon questions on this landscape
This landscape identifies 30 patent families that combine photocatalysis terminology with explicit durability framing — stability, deactivation resistance or anti-photocorrosion — inside the core catalyst-structure IPC classes. That is a small, narrowly defined set compared to the broader photocatalysis literature, because it excludes general photocatalytic-activity filings that do not address degradation or corrosion. Because the search is deliberately narrow, treat this as a count of durability-specific claims, not of photocatalysis patents overall.
Not yet in a pronounced way. Filing moved from zero in 2017 to a midpoint of 3 families in 2022 and a peak of only 4 in 2025, which is flat-to-slightly-rising rather than an accelerating trend. The most recent one to two years are also understated because of the typical 18-month lag between filing and publication, so the true 2025–2026 picture will only become clear once later filings publish. On current evidence this reads as an early-stage, still-forming niche rather than a hot area.
Water and wastewater treatment is the leading application overlay, appearing in roughly half of all records classified under C02F alongside the core catalysis classification. Coatings, polymer additives, polymer compositions and separation processes each appear in a much smaller number of records, at 3–4 apiece. This means durability claims in this space are more often framed around water-treatment deployment than around coatings, air cleaning, or structural applications, which remain comparatively thin.
The assignee base is fragmented, spanning universities, a Korean electronics manufacturer, and individual filers, with only five recorded co-assignee relationships across the whole dataset. The strongest collaboration pairs a Korean university technology-transfer office with a major electronics manufacturer, appearing twice. No single assignee shows filing activity in the latest tracked year, which is consistent with the overall flat trend rather than indicating any one firm's retreat from the space.
US20190381476A1, filed by Flux Photon Corporation, claims a photocatalytic device architecture that spatially separates radiation-generated electrons and holes before they reach the reactant flow, directly targeting the electron-hole recombination problem that limits photocatalytic efficiency. Anyone building a device that manages charge-carrier separation at the catalyst surface to improve reaction specificity should review this filing's claim scope closely. Designing around it would likely mean using a different mechanism to reduce recombination, rather than a spatial-separation architecture with the same functional effect.
Research Photocatalysis Environmental Durability in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole photocatalysis environmental durability corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.