Book a demo

Photocatalysis Environmental Durability Patents: Trends 2026

Photocatalysis Environmental Durability Patents: Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/photocatalysis-environmental-durability-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Chemical & Process Engineering
Photocatalysis Environmental Durability Patents
  • Filing has stayed flat, not grown. the midpoint year sat at 3 filings and the peak year so far reached only 4 — this is a narrow, still-emerging claim set rather than a maturing one.
  • Water treatment carries more weight than the core catalysis class alone. C02F appears in over half of all records, meaning durability claims are being anchored to wastewater applications almost as often as to the catalyst itself.
  • Citation weight sits with older, broader patents. the most-cited record in this set dates back well before the 2015 window, a reminder that influence here still traces to foundational photocatalyst art rather than recent stability work.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
30
Published Records
63%
Top-5 Share of All Records
0%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (1 records) with 2024 (1) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 30 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset isolates patent families that combine photocatalysis language with explicit durability framing — photocatalyst stability, deactivation resistance, or anti-photocorrosion — inside the catalysis-structure and catalyst-composition IPC classes (B01J35, B01J21/06, B01J38). That combination is deliberately narrow: it excludes general photocatalysis filings that never address why a catalyst loses activity or corrodes under illumination, and it excludes durability claims outside catalytic materials entirely.

Coverage runs from 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent one or two years in any trend line will understate actual filing activity once those applications publish.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1UNISEARCH LTD8
  2. 2GENERAL ELECTRIC CO4
  3. 3THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE UNIV OF TORONTO3
  4. 4TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY2
  5. 5FLUX PHOTON CORP2
  6. 6SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD2
  7. 7POSTECH ACADEMY INDUSTRY FOUNDATION2
  8. 8SHOOLINI UNIV OF BIOTECH & MANAGEMENT SCI1
  9. 9SAVEETHA INST OF MEDICAL & TECH SCI1
  10. 10LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photocatalysis Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology mix

Two views of the same 30-family set: how filing has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the durability claims.

A flat filing curve

Filing was at zero in 2017, climbed to a midpoint of 3 by 2022, and peaked at only 4 in 2025 before the partial, understated 2026 count. That is not a growth curve — it is a small, still-forming niche that has not yet attracted a wave of filers.

A flat filing curve012340201720182019202020212022202320244202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Catalysis core, water-treatment overlay

Every record sits in B01J by construction, but C02F (water and wastewater treatment) appears in roughly half of them, well ahead of the smaller clusters in polymer additives, coatings and separation processes. Durability claims here are being written as much for water-treatment deployment as for the catalyst chemistry itself.

Catalysis core, water-treatment overlayB01J · Chemical/physical processes & …30100.0%C02F · Water & wastewater treatment1653.3%C08G · Condensation polymers413.3%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions413.3%C08K · Use of additives in polymers413.3%C08L · Polymer compositions413.3%C09D · Coatings, paints & inks413.3%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…310.0%Other516.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 30 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photocatalysis Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Photocatalysis Environmental Durability with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about photocatalysis environmental durability and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

Most-cited records in this set

Representative filing
US20190381476A12019-12-19

US20190381476A1 — Photocatalytic Device (Flux Photon Corporation)

FLUX PHOTON CORPORATION

Describes a photocatalytic device that spatially separates radiation-generated electrons and holes before they reach the reactant flow, addressing the electron-hole recombination that limits photocatalytic efficiency and reaction specificity.Filed by Flux Photon Corporation; published 2019-12-19.

US20190381476A1 — patent drawing 1US20190381476A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-cited photocatalyst durability patents
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6558553B1Photocatalyst27
2EP0522703A2Diluent for iodonium photocatalysts19
3US20200179910A1Method for producing photocatalyst and photocatalyst filter for air cleaning9
4CN111389465A一种MOF@TiO<sub>2</sub>@PDVB光催化剂及其制备方法与应用8
5CN113398914A一锅水热合成可见光催化剂的制备方法7
6WO2000061290A1A photocatalyst7
7US20190381476A1Photocatalytic Device4
8CN117065746A一种碳层桥接的Au-C/TiO<sub>2</sub>复合光催化剂的制备方法和应用2
9WO2023272389A1Tri-functional heterogeneous photocatalyst2
10EP0522703A3Diluent for iodonium photocatalysts2

Citation counts favour older records inside any searched corpus — read them as a signal of influence on later filings, not as a measure of current commercial relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photocatalysis Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers indicate

Three read-throughs from the filing trend, technology mix and citation pattern above.

Filing momentum
3 → 4
midpoint (2022) to peak (2025)

A niche that has not yet accelerated

Filing volume moved from 3 families at the 2022 midpoint to a peak of 4 in 2025 — modest growth against a near-zero 2017 baseline, not the inflection point that would signal a technology entering a growth phase.

Treat 2025–2026 counts as a floor, not a ceiling, given publication lag.
Technology overlay
16 of 30
records also tagged C02F

Water treatment is the dominant use case

More than half of the durability-focused photocatalyst families also carry a water/wastewater treatment classification, well ahead of the coatings, polymer-additive and separation-process clusters that each sit at 3–4 records.

Coating and polymer-composition overlays remain thin and largely unclaimed as durability-specific routes.
Filing geography
US 6, CN 5
leading receiving offices

No single office dominates

Receiving offices are spread across the United States, China, Europe, India, the PCT route and Australia without a clear concentration in any one jurisdiction, suggesting applicants are still testing where to seek protection rather than converging on a preferred venue.

A four-way spread across US, CN, EP and IN with only marginal gaps between them.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to photocatalysis environmental durability, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photocatalysis Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

With only 30 families and 5 co-assignee pairs recorded, this is not a field with an entrenched leader — it is a set of scattered single- or few-filing entrants plus a handful of collaborative pairs.

Collaboration signal
5 pairs
co-assignee relationships recorded

Collaboration is limited and recent

The strongest co-filing relationship pairs a Korean university technology-transfer office with a major Korean electronics manufacturer, appearing twice; the remaining pairs are single instances involving named individual inventors alongside a corporate assignee.

No multi-way alliance structure is visible yet in this data.
Recent momentum
0 in latest year
across every listed assignee

No assignee shows current-year filing activity

Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum, including a Texas university system with a -100% YoY change, shows zero filings in the latest year captured — consistent with the flat overall trend rather than any single firm pulling back.

Read this alongside publication lag before concluding activity has stopped.
Filing spread
30 families, 30 records
one family per record

A field of largely unrepeated filers

With as many families as published records, there is little sign of aggressive continuation filing by any single applicant — this looks like a set of first-pass claims rather than a contested, iterated claim space.

That makes freedom-to-operate analysis more tractable than in a family-heavy field.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a validity check
Branches with thin filing density relative to the core catalysis classes
Anti-photocorrosion coating bindersMOF-supported TiO2 composite stabilityVisible-light hydrothermal catalyst synthesisPolymer-matrix photocatalyst encapsulationAir-cleaning filter photocatalyst regeneration
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Unisearch Ltd.0
General Electric Company0
The Governing Council of the University of Toronto0
POSTECH Academy-Industry Foundation0
Texas A&M University0-100%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (Korea)0
FLUX PHOTON CORP0
Jiangsu University0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photocatalysis Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a narrow, still-forming field with thin claim density outside the core catalysis class.

Map freedom-to-operate against the coating and polymer overlays

With only 3–4 records each in coatings, polymer additives and polymer compositions, a targeted search inside those overlays could surface filing room the core B01J searches miss.

Explore in Eureka

Track the water-treatment overlay separately

Because C02F carries over half of the records, durability claims aimed at non-water applications — air cleaning, coatings, structural materials — sit on a comparatively lighter prior-art base.

Explore in Eureka

Re-run this landscape after the next publication cycle

Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, the 2025–2026 filing counts shown here are a floor; a re-run in the next reporting cycle will likely lift the recent-year trend line.

Explore in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photocatalysis Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photocatalysis Environmental Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Photocatalysis Environmental Durability in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole photocatalysis environmental durability corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.