Book a demo

Photocatalyst Synthesis & Facet Engineering Patent Landscape

Photocatalyst Synthesis & Facet Engineering Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape
Photocatalyst Synthesis & Facet Engineering Patent Landscape in 2026

The field is in a Growth stage, with a 43% increase in filings over the most recent three-year window versus the prior three years, though annual volume has eased from its 2023 peak. The Council of Scientific and Industrial Research leads by patent records, and China is the dominant filing jurisdiction, reflecting a broadly distributed but research-institution-heavy competitive structure.

50
Patent families in scope
29%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+43%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Research institutions dominate a moderately concentrated field

The Council of Scientific and Industrial Research holds the top position with 7 patent records, followed by the Regents of the University of Colorado with 6. The top five filers account for 29% of the combined total across the hundred largest filers, indicating moderate rather than extreme concentration.

A clear tier gap separates the top two applicants from the rest of the ranking, where most entrants hold two or three patent records. This pattern is typical of an emerging-to-growth field still populated primarily by academic and government research bodies rather than established industrial IP portfolios.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1COUNCIL OF SCI & IND RES7
2The Regents of the University of Colorado6
3National Institute of Technology Rourkela3
4Zhejiang Wanli University3
5University of South Africa2
6CASTELLANOS BELTRAN IGNACIO2
7The Regents of the University of Michigan2
8Heilongjiang University2
9Jiangsu University2
10Tianjin University2
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11SABIC Global Technologies B.V.2
12CERKOVNIK LOGAN JEROME2
13Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences2
14MR SAMPAT R SHINGDA1
15Guozhong Chuangye (Beijing) Environmental Technology Co., Ltd.1
16PSG INST OF TECH & APPLIED RES1
17Qujing Normal University1
18DR NILESH V GANDHARE1
19University of Ulsan Foundation for Industry-Academy Cooperation1
20The University Court of the University of Aberdeen1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The dominance of universities and national research institutes signals that core enabling IP is still being staked out. Industrial entrants such as SABIC Global Technologies and Toshiba Lighting & Technology have filed but have not yet accumulated comparable depth, leaving room for industrial players to build positions.

The most recent 18–24 months of filing data are subject to publication lag and likely undercount actual activity; read near-term figures conservatively. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Multi-year growth with a dominant catalysis core and diversifying applications

The filing trend reveals sustained expansion on a multi-year basis, while the technology composition chart shows that chemical and physical catalysis processes dominate but adjacent application branches are accumulating share.

Annual filing trend

Annual filings grew from 2 records in 2017 to a peak of 10 in 2023, with 2024 and 2025 also at high levels; note that 2024–2025 figures are understated by publication lag and should not be read as a plateau. The 43% multi-year growth rate confirms the field remains in expansion.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 10 in 2023.2201742018120195202082021120221020239202410202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B01J (Chemical/physical processes and catalysis) dominates the IPC distribution, reflecting the primacy of catalyst synthesis methodology. C01B (non-metallic elements and inorganic compounds), C04B (ceramics and refractories), C02F (water and wastewater treatment), and C25B (electrolytic production) each hold meaningful shares, indicating that facet engineering is being applied across photocatalytic hydrogen production, environmental remediation, and electrochemical synthesis.

Technology compositionB01J · Chemical/physical processes & catalysis leads with 71; C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorganic compounds 12.B01J · Chemical/physical…71C01B · Non-metallic elem…12C04B · Ceramics, cement …11C02F · Water & wastewate…10C25B · Electrolytic prod…10C01G · Compounds of othe…8C09C · Inorganic pigment…8B01D · Separation proces…5↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
EP4056273A1Published 2022-09-14

IN-SITU-PHOTOKATALYSATORNANOSTRUKTURWACHSTUM ZUR M…

Universite Gustave Eiffel

Method for synthesizing photocatalyst semi-conductor nanostructure (16) into a continuous flow rate microfluidic reactor (1) for fluid purification, comprising the following steps: realizing a nanocristallite seedlayer (12) on a substrate (2) by: applying a homogeneous layer (13) of a seed solution (11) composed by precursors and a spreader compound… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

IN-SITU-PHOTOKATALYSATORNANOSTRUKTURWACHSTUM ZUR M… — patent drawingIN-SITU-PHOTOKATALYSATORNANOSTRUKTURWACHSTUM ZUR M… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Nanostructured photocatalysts and doped wide-bandg…42
2Nanostructured photocatalysts and doped wide-bandg…30
3一种硼掺杂含特定晶面二氧化钛晶体的制备方法25
4Nanostructured photocatalysts and doped wide-bandg…20
5暴露活性{001}晶面TiO<sub>2</sub>/TiC MXene复合光催化剂的制备方法与应用14
6一种碳纤维负载二氧化钛纳米薄片的制备方法11
7光触媒合成法、光触媒材料、光触媒涂料以及光触媒体11
8一种金属-有机骨架的多孔纳米线及其制备方法和应用9

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

The landscape combines a clear growth signal with open application branches, suggesting that targeted R&D investment can still establish meaningful IP positions, particularly outside the dominant catalysis synthesis core.

Growth

Growth stage with annual volume easing from 2023 peak

The field is classified as Growth: the most recent three-year filing window is 43% above the prior three-year window on a multi-year basis. Annual volume peaked in 2023 and has eased since, though recent years are further understated by publication lag. Core synthesis methodologies are being actively claimed, and the window for foundational filing remains open.

Growth stage
Concentration

Moderate concentration with a visible leader tier

The top five filers hold 29% of the combined total among the hundred largest filers — moderate rather than entrenched concentration. The gap between the top two applicants and the rest of the field is meaningful, but with most competitors holding only one to three patent records, displacement or leapfrogging is plausible for a well-resourced entrant with a differentiated synthesis route.

Moderate concentration
Collaboration

University of Colorado anchors the most active co-filing cluster

The most active co-applicant cluster centres on the Regents of the University of Colorado, which co-filed with five named collaborators — Vivek Singh, Prashant Nagpal, Yuchen Ding, Logan Jerome Cerkovnik, Castellanos Beltran Ignacio, and Yahya Alivov — each with four joint records. This tight cluster accounts for a significant share of the university’s portfolio and suggests a single coordinated research group rather than broad institutional collaboration.

Clustered co-filing
Geography

China leads by filing volume; the US and India are active secondary offices

China is the lead jurisdiction with 27 patent records, followed by the United States with 11 and India with 10. Eight filings have entered the PCT route, and five have been filed at the EPO, indicating selective international protection. The strong India presence aligns with the prominence of the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research and the National Institute of Technology Rourkela in the applicant ranking.

China-led, globally spread
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
SINGH VIVEKThe Regents of the University of Colorado4
NAGPAL PRASHANTThe Regents of the University of Colorado4
DING YUCHENThe Regents of the University of Colorado4
CERKOVNIK LOGAN JEROMEThe Regents of the University of Colorado4
CASTELLANOS BELTRAN IGNACIOThe Regents of the University of Colorado4
ALIVOV YAHYAThe Regents of the University of Colorado4

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insight cards are grounded in applicant ranking, collaboration, lifecycle, and jurisdiction evidence.Explore insights →
Leaders

Council of Scientific and Industrial Research leads; University of Colorado drives electrolytic synthesis

The two largest applicants differ markedly in technical emphasis: the top-ranked institution focuses on classical catalysis methodology, while the second-ranked group has a strong footprint in electrolytic compound production alongside catalysis.

Leader · Council of Scientific and Industrial Research

Council of Scientific and Industrial Research

Holding 7 patent records, the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research focuses tightly on chemical and physical catalysis processes (B01J35, B01J37, B01J21), reflecting deep investment in core photocatalyst synthesis methodology. Its momentum is marked as a new entrant in the recent filing window, indicating that most of its portfolio was filed in the recent three-year period — a sign of rapid, concentrated IP-building rather than long-accumulated position.

patent records: 7
Challenger · The Regents of the University of Colorado

The Regents of the University of Colorado

With 6 patent records, the University of Colorado group combines catalysis process coverage (B01J35, B01J23) with a notable position in electrolytic production of compounds (C25B3), distinguishing it from the leader’s purely synthesis-focused portfolio. The university files through a dense co-inventor cluster, and its collaboration network represents the most active co-filing arrangement in the dataset.

patent records: 6
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all filers including National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Zhejiang Wanli University, SABIC Global Technologies, and more.
National Institute of Technology RourkelaZhejiang Wanli University+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research6▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards cite patent-record counts from the applicant ranking and technology emphasis from applicant IPC focus data.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the catalysis core

Several IPC branches appear at lower share alongside the dominant B01J core; they are observations of relative sparsity and are noted here where they also carry plausible technical value and a realistic entry path.

C25B · Electrolytic production of compounds

This branch holds 10 patent records — lower share relative to B01J — yet facet-engineered photocatalysts that drive electrolytic hydrogen evolution or CO2 reduction are a scientifically active frontier. The University of Colorado group has already staked positions here via C25B3, but the branch remains sparsely populated overall. Teams with expertise in both surface crystallography and electrochemistry have a realistic entry path through photoelectrochemical cell design.

Search this in Eureka →

C04B · Ceramics, cement & refractories

With 11 patent records, the ceramics and refractories branch is relatively sparse given the broad applicability of facet-controlled oxide photocatalysts to structural and construction materials. Italcementi (Italcementi S.p.A.) holds an early position here through co-assignments across B01J35 and C04B14/C04B20, but the branch has few other active filers. Entrants with materials-processing capabilities and access to construction-sector deployment channels have a plausible path to differentiated filings.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all five adjacent branches including C01B, C02F, and C01G with filing density and entry-path analysis.
C02F · Water & wastewater treatmentC01B · Non-metallic elements & inorganic compounds+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branch observations are based on relative IPC share within the corpus; sparsity does not automatically imply commercial opportunity.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading filers differ across technology routes

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerB01J 35 · Chemical/physical processes & catalysisB01J 37 · Chemical/physical processes & catalysisB01J 23 · Chemical/physical processes & catalysisB01J 27 · Chemical/physical processes & catalysisB01J 21 · Chemical/physical processes & catalysis
Council of Scientific and Industrial ResearchStrong · 7Strong · 6Moderate · 2AbsentModerate · 3
The Regents of the University of ColoradoStrong · 6AbsentStrong · 4Strong · 4Absent
CASTELLANOS BELTRAN IGNACIOStrong · 4AbsentModerate · 2Moderate · 2Moderate · 1
CERKOVNIK LOGAN JEROMEStrong · 4AbsentModerate · 2Moderate · 2Moderate · 1
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your photocatalyst synthesis IP landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.