Book a demo

Photodetector Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026

Photodetector Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/photodetectors-and-optical-sensors-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Semiconductors · Patent Landscape
Photodetector and optical sensor patents: who holds the claim space, and where it is still open
  • Filing has cooled since its 2019 peak of 329 and by 2026 fresh filings are down to a handful, meaning most core avalanche-photodiode and CMOS-sensor architecture claims are already staked out.
  • H01L dominates at 4,448 of the corpus while G01J, G02B and H04N sit far behind, indicating that semiconductor device structure — not optics or imaging integration — is where most claim density has concentrated.
  • Recent-year momentum has gone flat across the largest holders with several major assignees, including a -100% YoY drop from one large fabricator, showing zero filings in the latest year — a sign the field's biggest names are consolidating rather than expanding their positions.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
5,368
Published Records
11%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-44%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (208 records) with 2024 (117) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 5,368 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks patent families filed against photodetectors, avalanche photodiodes and single-photon avalanche diodes, scoped to documents whose claims or descriptions touch dark count rate, quantum efficiency, responsivity, bandwidth or temperature dependence. The IPC gate — H01L31, H04N25 and G01J1 — pulls in semiconductor device structure, pixel-level imaging readout and radiometric measurement together, which is why the composition skews so heavily toward device physics rather than downstream imaging systems.

Coverage runs from 2015 through the 2026 cut-off. Because publication typically lags filing by around eighteen months, the last one to two years in any trend chart will understate true filing activity — treat the most recent bars as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing activity, 2017–2026
  1. 1NEC CORP142
  2. 2NIPPON TELEGRAPH & TELEPHONE CORP130
  3. 3INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION123
  4. 4INTEL CORP105
  5. 5TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD89
  6. 6FUJITSU LTD88
  7. 7HAMAMATSU PHOTONICS KK70
  8. 8GLOBALFOUNDRIES US INC68
  9. 9RAYTHEON CO64
  10. 10MASSACHUSETTS INST OF TECH55
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photodetectors and Optical Sensors covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

A peak in 2019, then a slow retreat

Filings rose from 185 in 2017 to a peak of 329 in 2019, held near the midpoint at 217 in 2022, and have fallen sharply toward the 2026 cut-off. Read the last one to two bars as undercounted given publication lag, but the multi-year direction — flat-to-declining since 2019 — is not an artefact of lag alone.

A peak in 2019, then a slow retreat0100200300400185201720183292019202020212022202320242025112026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

H01L carries the corpus; everything else is a supporting cast

H01L (semiconductor devices) accounts for 4,448 of the records — well above G01J (1,165), G02B (627) and H04N (491). That gap says the contested ground is device architecture and material stacks, not the optical or imaging systems built around them.

H01L carries the corpus; everything else is a supporting castH01L · Semiconductor devices4,44882.9%G01J · Radiation & light measurement1,16521.7%G02B · Optical elements & systems62711.7%H04N · Pictorial communication (video…4919.1%H04B · Transmission (general)2564.8%G01S · Radar, sonar & positioning2394.5%H10P2043.8%H10D · Semiconductor devices (general)1883.5%Other1,85634.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 5,368 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photodetectors and Optical Sensors covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Photodetectors and Optical Sensors with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about photodetectors and optical sensors and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The most-cited prior art, and the newest filing worth reading closely

Representative recent filing
US20260101123A12026-04-09

Dark count rate mitigation on an avalanche photodiode-based ambient light sensor

STMICROELECTRONICS (RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT) LIMITED

STMicroelectronics' April 2026 filing pairs an exposed avalanche photodiode array with a shielded 'dark' array on the same sensor, using the dark array's illumination count as a live baseline to subtract dark-count noise from the exposed array's reading — a self-calibrating approach to a problem that otherwise degrades responsivity in low-light conditions.Filed by STMicroelectronics (Research & Development) Limited, published 2026-04-09.

US20260101123A1 — patent drawing 1US20260101123A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20090152664A1Materials, Systems and Methods for Optoelectronic Devices660
2US6451415B1Organic photosensitive optoelectronic device with an exciton blocking layer633
3US5726440AWavelength selective photodetector579
4US5671914AMulti-band spectroscopic photodetector array574
5US5892540ALow noise amplifier for passive pixel CMOS imager338
6US6252287B1InGaAsN/GaAs heterojunction for multi-junction solar cells303
7US20090242935A1Monolithically integrated photodetectors299
8US5986297AColor active pixel sensor with electronic shuttering, anti-blooming and low cross-talk296
9US20050110007A1Multilayer organic photodetectors with improved performance271
10US20050104064A1Semiconductor photodetector258

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more years to accumulate citations inside this searched corpus — read them as markers of influence on later filers, not as a ranking of current importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photodetectors and Optical Sensors covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once volume, geography and citation age are read together.

Filing momentum
329 → 11
peak year to latest year

The growth phase is over

Filings peaked at 329 in 2019 and have fallen every year since toward a partial count of 11 in 2026. Even allowing for publication lag understating the last year or two, the multi-year trajectory from the 2022 midpoint of 217 downward is a real slowdown, not a reporting gap.

Source: filing trend, 2017-2026
Geographic filing
2,595 US filings
vs. 801 EPO, 496 PCT

The US is the primary gate, PCT is a secondary route

United States filings outnumber the next-largest office, Europe, by more than three to one, with WIPO's PCT route and Japan close behind. China and Canada trail well behind the top tier, suggesting most applicants are still prioritising US protection first.

Source: receiving office counts
Assignee activity
0 filings
latest year, several major holders

Large incumbents have gone quiet, not absent

Several of the corpus's largest historical filers — spanning IBM, NEC, NTT, Fujitsu and Intel — show zero filings in the latest year, and one major fabricator posted a -100% year-on-year drop. That reads as portfolio consolidation around existing claims rather than exit from the space.

Source: recent-year momentum by assignee
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to photodetectors and optical sensors, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photodetectors and Optical Sensors covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the ground, and where the field is still open

Assignee activity in this corpus splits into a dense core of long-standing filers and a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants — plus a handful of IPC branches with comparatively thin coverage relative to the H01L core.

Historical filing depth
5,368 families
total in ranking

A dense, multi-decade core

The assignee ranking spans thousands of families built up since 2015, with the heaviest historical filers being large semiconductor and telecom device makers rather than pure imaging or optics houses — consistent with the H01L-heavy composition.

Source: assignee ranking, full corpus
Collaboration signal
10 co-assignee pairs
strongest pair: 18 shared families

Co-filing is limited and concentrated

Only ten co-assignee pairs appear in the data, and the strongest pair — a Japanese telecom operator and its electronics affiliate — shares 18 families. Most other filers, including several individually-named co-inventors on a single pair, are working largely alone rather than in joint ventures.

Source: co-assignee pair analysis
Recent momentum
-100% YoY
one major fabricator

The biggest names are pulling back

Zero-filing latest years across several historically large assignees, plus an outright year-on-year collapse at one major fabricator, point to a maturing claim landscape where incumbents are defending existing positions rather than filing new ones.

Source: recent-year momentum by assignee
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
IPC subclasses present in the corpus at far lower density than H01L, suggesting room for narrowly-scoped claims
Temperature-compensated responsivity circuitsLIDAR-integrated avalanche photodiode arraysDark-count calibration for SPAD arraysWideband transimpedance amplifier front-endsWavelength-selective pixel filtering
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
IBM0
NEC Corporation0
Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (NTT)0
Fujitsu Limited0
Intel Corporation0
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC)0-100%
Hamamatsu Photonics K.K.0
Sony Semiconductor Solutions Corporation0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photodetectors and Optical Sensors covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this

The trend and assignee data point to a field where core architecture claims are largely staked out but calibration, integration and niche-wavelength work remain open.

Map claim scope before drafting

With H01L carrying most of the corpus, a new filing's freedom-to-operate analysis should start there rather than in G01J or G02B, where density is thinner but so is prior art depth.

Explore the IPC breakdown

Watch consolidation, not just volume

Zero-filing years from historically dominant assignees can mean a technology is settling around existing patents rather than opening up — verify before assuming a gap is truly unclaimed.

Review assignee momentum
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photodetectors and Optical Sensors covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about photodetector patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photodetectors and Optical Sensors covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Photodetectors and Optical Sensors in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole photodetectors and optical sensors corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.