Book a demo

PIC Optical Fiber Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

PIC Optical Fiber Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/photonic-integrated-circuit-optical-fiber-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Photonics & Optics · Patent Landscape
Photonic integrated circuit optical fiber patents: fiber-to-chip coupling under the microscope
  • Filing has already peaked. Activity crested at 159 families in 2022 and has fallen every year since — this is a maturing claim space, not a growing one.
  • Momentum has drained from the named leaders. Every tracked assignee shows a negative year-on-year swing in the latest year, several down 90% or more, well beyond the usual publication lag.
  • Coupling claims sit almost entirely inside three IPC families. 1,084 of 1,085 records touch G02B, with H01L and H10W a distant second and third — everything else is a comparatively thin sliver.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,085
Published Records
31%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+33%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (118 records) with 2024 (157) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,085 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this patent set covers

This landscape tracks patent families at the intersection of photonic integrated circuits (PICs) and the optical fiber interfaces that connect them to the outside world — fiber-to-chip coupling, fiber attach, edge couplers and fiber arrays. The search restricts to documents whose title or abstract explicitly names these coupling mechanisms, filtered to the IPC classes covering optical waveguide and connector structures. That combination isolates the packaging and interconnect layer of silicon photonics rather than the broader PIC design space.

Coverage runs from 2015 through the middle of 2026, with 1,085 published families in the set. Publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the last one to two years understate real filing activity; even accounting for that lag, the trend below shows a market past its filing peak.

Filing activity, 2017–2026
  1. 1INTEL CORP142
  2. 2TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD66
  3. 3CISCO TECHNOLOGY INC52
  4. 4SICILY MERGER SUB II INC42
  5. 5GOOGLE LLC39
  6. 6HUAWEI TECH CO LTD37
  7. 7NOKIA SOLUTIONS & NETWORKS OY35
  8. 8PSIQUANTUM CORP35
  9. 9SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD30
  10. 10LIGHTMATTER INC29
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photonic Integrated Circuit Optical Fiber covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 1,085 families: when the filings happened, and which technical classes they sit in.

A peak already behind us

Filings rose from 40 in 2017 to a peak of 159 in 2022, then declined through to 13 in the most recent (partial) year. Even allowing for publication lag depressing the last one to two years, the shape is a bulge around 2020–2022 rather than a still-climbing curve — consistent with a packaging technique that went through its main wave of claiming and is now consolidating.

A peak already behind us05010015020040201720182019202020211592022202320242025132026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Concentrated in optical elements, thin everywhere else

G02B (optical elements & systems) appears in 1,084 of 1,085 records — essentially the whole set, as expected given the search scope. H01L (semiconductor devices) and H10W follow at 140 and 70, reflecting the chip-side integration work behind the coupling structures. H01S (lasers), G02F (optical modulation) and H04J (multiplexing) each account for well under 60 records, meaning laser-source and modulation aspects of fiber-chip integration are claimed far more thinly than the coupling geometry itself.

Concentrated in optical elements, thin everywhere elseG02B · Optical elements & systems1,08499.9%H01L · Semiconductor devices14012.9%H10W706.5%H04B · Transmission (general)595.4%H01S · Lasers & stimulated emission514.7%G02F · Optical control & modulation373.4%H04J · Multiplex communication181.7%G01M · Testing machine & structure ba…121.1%Other16615.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,085 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photonic Integrated Circuit Optical Fiber covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Photonic Integrated Circuit Optical Fiber with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about photonic integrated circuit optical fiber and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The most-cited records and one to read closely

Representative recent filing
US20240184067A12024-06-06

US20240184067A1 — Improved photonic packaging (SENTEA NV, 2024-06-06)

SENTEA NV

An optoelectronic device with a PCB carrying a photonic integrated circuit that has a fiber-attach region for a fiber array. The PCB has an opening that thermally separates the PIC-mounting region from a second region, so the electronics side of the interface is thermally insulated from the fiber-attach side.Abstract trimmed for length — see the full-text record for the complete claim set.

US20240184067A1 — patent drawing 1US20240184067A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited patents in this set
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US10333623B1Optical transceiver100
2US20160116688A1Photonic interface for electronic circuit84
3US6888989B1Photonic chip mounting in a recess for waveguide alignment and connection81
4US20190086618A1High Density Opto-Electronic Interconnection Configuration Utilizing Passive Alignment72
5US20210096310A1Package assembly and manufacturing method thereof61
6US20170045697A1Photonic interface for electronic circuit61
7US20160377821A1Optical connection of optical fibers to grating couplers60
8US20220179159A1Photonic computing platform59
9US11536897B1Multi-chip photonic quantum computer assembly with optical backplane interposer49
10US11500153B2Multi-chip packaging of silicon photonics48

Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside this corpus — read them as a signal of influence on the field, not as a ranking of current importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photonic Integrated Circuit Optical Fiber covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns worth acting on before drafting new claims in this space.

Filing curve
159 → 13
peak (2022) to latest year

The main filing wave has passed

Filings climbed for roughly five years, peaked at 159 families in 2022, and have fallen every year since. Even discounting the last two years for publication lag, this is not a space still accelerating — it is one where the core coupling geometries have largely been claimed and firms have moved on or consolidated positions.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Assignee momentum
Every tracked assignee down YoY
recent-year momentum

Even the largest filers have pulled back

Named assignees in the recent-momentum data all show negative year-on-year change in the latest year, several exceeding -90%. That is a broader retreat than publication lag alone would produce, suggesting active filers have shifted attention elsewhere rather than simply having recent filings still in the pipeline.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Technology mix
1,084 of 1,085 in G02B
IPC concentration

Coupling geometry, not laser or modulation, dominates the claims

Almost every record touches G02B (optical elements & systems), while laser sources (H01S, 51 records) and modulation (G02F, 37 records) are claimed far less. That imbalance suggests the mechanical and optical alignment problem of getting light into and out of a chip has drawn far more patenting attention than what happens to the light once it is aboard.

IPC subclass distribution
Geographic filing
US 585 vs EPO 163, CN 68
receiving office split

Filing is heavily US-weighted

The United States receives more than half of all publications in this set (585 of 1,085), with Europe and WIPO/PCT as the next tier and China and Taiwan trailing well behind. A packaging technique this US-concentrated is worth checking against US prosecution history before assuming a clear path in other jurisdictions.

Receiving office distribution
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to photonic integrated circuit optical fiber, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Co-filing is rare and thin
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Lumentum Operations LLCSHAH BINOY2
Lumentum Operations LLCSANE SANDEEP2
Lumentum Operations LLCROSENBERG JESSIE2
Lumentum Operations LLCPFNUER STEFAN2
Lumentum Operations LLCMODI MITUL2
Lumentum Operations LLCKARHADE OMKAR2
Lumentum Operations LLCBHATTARAI SHREYASH2
Lumentum Operations LLCAHMED SUFI2

Only 8 co-assignee pairs appear across the whole set, the strongest repeated twice — this is a field of largely independent filers rather than joint-development consortia.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photonic Integrated Circuit Optical Fiber covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is still active, and where the claim space is open

No single assignee dominates this set, and the ones that do appear are all filing less than they were a year ago.

Momentum leader (by count)
1 in latest year
Intel Corporation

Still filing, but down 50% YoY

Intel Corporation shows the mildest pullback among tracked assignees — one filing in the latest year against a 50% year-on-year decline — consistent with a large incumbent maintaining a minimal filing cadence rather than actively building out new coupling claims.

Recent-year momentum
Sharp pullback
-90% YoY
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) (TSMC)

Foundry-side filing has slowed sharply

TSMC's filing rate in this fiber-coupling niche has fallen 90% year-on-year, with a single filing in the latest year. That is a steep drop for a foundry with heavy silicon-photonics exposure, suggesting packaging-level coupling IP is being deprioritised relative to process or device claims filed elsewhere.

Recent-year momentum
Specialist filer
-95% YoY
Lumentum Operations LLC (Lumentum)

A specialist pulling back from its own niche

This assignee also anchors the strongest co-filing pairs in the dataset — twice-repeated collaborations with named individual co-assignees — yet its own filing rate has dropped 95% year-on-year, down to a single filing. That combination points to a team whose inventive output has moved to adjacent, unindexed filings rather than disappearing.

Co-assignee pairs & momentum
Zero-filing incumbents
0 in latest year, -100% YoY
谷歌, 思科, 天空人工智能

Several known names show no recent filings at all

Google, Cisco Technology and SkyAI-type entrants all register zero filings in the latest year, a full -100% year-on-year change. For a fast-publishing search this signals either a genuine pause or filings still working through the publication pipeline — worth revisiting once lag clears.

Recent-year momentum
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas that show up thinly against the dominant coupling-geometry claims — candidates for freedom-to-operate checks before drafting.
Active alignment feedback for fiber arraysThermal isolation between PIC and fiber-attach regionsLaser-source co-packaging with edge couplersWafer-level fiber array bondingMultiplexed fiber-to-chip test structures
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Intel Corporation1-50%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC)1-90%
Lumentum Operations LLC1-95%
SkyAI Corporation0-100%
Cisco Technology, Inc.0-100%
Google LLC0-100%
PsiQuantum Corp.0-100%
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photonic Integrated Circuit Optical Fiber covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this

The dataset points to a maturing packaging niche with room left in a handful of specific branches.

Check freedom-to-operate before drafting new coupling claims

With 1,084 of 1,085 records sitting inside G02B, any new fiber-attach or edge-coupler claim is filing into dense prior art. Run a focused clearance search on the most-cited records before committing drafting resources.

Explore in Eureka

Watch the pullback, not just the leaderboard

Every tracked assignee is filing less than a year ago. That is more informative than who currently holds the most families — it flags which teams have quietly moved their coupling work to adjacent, less-indexed filings.

Track assignee activity in Eureka

Test the thin branches for white space

Thermal isolation, active alignment feedback and laser co-packaging all show far fewer filings than core coupling geometry. Confirm with a targeted search before assuming the space is open.

Run a white-space search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photonic Integrated Circuit Optical Fiber covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on PIC-to-fiber patent strategy

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photonic Integrated Circuit Optical Fiber covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Photonic Integrated Circuit Optical Fiber in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole photonic integrated circuit optical fiber corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.