PIC Optical Fiber Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
- Filing has already peaked. Activity crested at 159 families in 2022 and has fallen every year since — this is a maturing claim space, not a growing one.
- Momentum has drained from the named leaders. Every tracked assignee shows a negative year-on-year swing in the latest year, several down 90% or more, well beyond the usual publication lag.
- Coupling claims sit almost entirely inside three IPC families. 1,084 of 1,085 records touch G02B, with H01L and H10W a distant second and third — everything else is a comparatively thin sliver.
Filing growth compares 2021 (118 records) with 2024 (157) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,085 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this patent set covers
This landscape tracks patent families at the intersection of photonic integrated circuits (PICs) and the optical fiber interfaces that connect them to the outside world — fiber-to-chip coupling, fiber attach, edge couplers and fiber arrays. The search restricts to documents whose title or abstract explicitly names these coupling mechanisms, filtered to the IPC classes covering optical waveguide and connector structures. That combination isolates the packaging and interconnect layer of silicon photonics rather than the broader PIC design space.
Coverage runs from 2015 through the middle of 2026, with 1,085 published families in the set. Publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the last one to two years understate real filing activity; even accounting for that lag, the trend below shows a market past its filing peak.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 1,085 families: when the filings happened, and which technical classes they sit in.
A peak already behind us
Filings rose from 40 in 2017 to a peak of 159 in 2022, then declined through to 13 in the most recent (partial) year. Even allowing for publication lag depressing the last one to two years, the shape is a bulge around 2020–2022 rather than a still-climbing curve — consistent with a packaging technique that went through its main wave of claiming and is now consolidating.
Concentrated in optical elements, thin everywhere else
G02B (optical elements & systems) appears in 1,084 of 1,085 records — essentially the whole set, as expected given the search scope. H01L (semiconductor devices) and H10W follow at 140 and 70, reflecting the chip-side integration work behind the coupling structures. H01S (lasers), G02F (optical modulation) and H04J (multiplexing) each account for well under 60 records, meaning laser-source and modulation aspects of fiber-chip integration are claimed far more thinly than the coupling geometry itself.
Shares are the percentage of the 1,085 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Photonic Integrated Circuit Optical Fiber with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about photonic integrated circuit optical fiber and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe most-cited records and one to read closely
US20240184067A1 — Improved photonic packaging (SENTEA NV, 2024-06-06)
An optoelectronic device with a PCB carrying a photonic integrated circuit that has a fiber-attach region for a fiber array. The PCB has an opening that thermally separates the PIC-mounting region from a second region, so the electronics side of the interface is thermally insulated from the fiber-attach side.Abstract trimmed for length — see the full-text record for the complete claim set.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US10333623B1 | Optical transceiver | 100 |
| 2 | US20160116688A1 | Photonic interface for electronic circuit | 84 |
| 3 | US6888989B1 | Photonic chip mounting in a recess for waveguide alignment and connection | 81 |
| 4 | US20190086618A1 | High Density Opto-Electronic Interconnection Configuration Utilizing Passive Alignment | 72 |
| 5 | US20210096310A1 | Package assembly and manufacturing method thereof | 61 |
| 6 | US20170045697A1 | Photonic interface for electronic circuit | 61 |
| 7 | US20160377821A1 | Optical connection of optical fibers to grating couplers | 60 |
| 8 | US20220179159A1 | Photonic computing platform | 59 |
| 9 | US11536897B1 | Multi-chip photonic quantum computer assembly with optical backplane interposer | 49 |
| 10 | US11500153B2 | Multi-chip packaging of silicon photonics | 48 |
Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside this corpus — read them as a signal of influence on the field, not as a ranking of current importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three patterns worth acting on before drafting new claims in this space.
The main filing wave has passed
Filings climbed for roughly five years, peaked at 159 families in 2022, and have fallen every year since. Even discounting the last two years for publication lag, this is not a space still accelerating — it is one where the core coupling geometries have largely been claimed and firms have moved on or consolidated positions.
Even the largest filers have pulled back
Named assignees in the recent-momentum data all show negative year-on-year change in the latest year, several exceeding -90%. That is a broader retreat than publication lag alone would produce, suggesting active filers have shifted attention elsewhere rather than simply having recent filings still in the pipeline.
Coupling geometry, not laser or modulation, dominates the claims
Almost every record touches G02B (optical elements & systems), while laser sources (H01S, 51 records) and modulation (G02F, 37 records) are claimed far less. That imbalance suggests the mechanical and optical alignment problem of getting light into and out of a chip has drawn far more patenting attention than what happens to the light once it is aboard.
Filing is heavily US-weighted
The United States receives more than half of all publications in this set (585 of 1,085), with Europe and WIPO/PCT as the next tier and China and Taiwan trailing well behind. A packaging technique this US-concentrated is worth checking against US prosecution history before assuming a clear path in other jurisdictions.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to photonic integrated circuit optical fiber, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| Lumentum Operations LLC | SHAH BINOY | 2 |
| Lumentum Operations LLC | SANE SANDEEP | 2 |
| Lumentum Operations LLC | ROSENBERG JESSIE | 2 |
| Lumentum Operations LLC | PFNUER STEFAN | 2 |
| Lumentum Operations LLC | MODI MITUL | 2 |
| Lumentum Operations LLC | KARHADE OMKAR | 2 |
| Lumentum Operations LLC | BHATTARAI SHREYASH | 2 |
| Lumentum Operations LLC | AHMED SUFI | 2 |
Only 8 co-assignee pairs appear across the whole set, the strongest repeated twice — this is a field of largely independent filers rather than joint-development consortia.
Who is still active, and where the claim space is open
No single assignee dominates this set, and the ones that do appear are all filing less than they were a year ago.
Still filing, but down 50% YoY
Intel Corporation shows the mildest pullback among tracked assignees — one filing in the latest year against a 50% year-on-year decline — consistent with a large incumbent maintaining a minimal filing cadence rather than actively building out new coupling claims.
Foundry-side filing has slowed sharply
TSMC's filing rate in this fiber-coupling niche has fallen 90% year-on-year, with a single filing in the latest year. That is a steep drop for a foundry with heavy silicon-photonics exposure, suggesting packaging-level coupling IP is being deprioritised relative to process or device claims filed elsewhere.
A specialist pulling back from its own niche
This assignee also anchors the strongest co-filing pairs in the dataset — twice-repeated collaborations with named individual co-assignees — yet its own filing rate has dropped 95% year-on-year, down to a single filing. That combination points to a team whose inventive output has moved to adjacent, unindexed filings rather than disappearing.
Several known names show no recent filings at all
Google, Cisco Technology and SkyAI-type entrants all register zero filings in the latest year, a full -100% year-on-year change. For a fast-publishing search this signals either a genuine pause or filings still working through the publication pipeline — worth revisiting once lag clears.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Corporation | 1 | -50% |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) | 1 | -90% |
| Lumentum Operations LLC | 1 | -95% |
| SkyAI Corporation | 0 | -100% |
| Cisco Technology, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| Google LLC | 0 | -100% |
| PsiQuantum Corp. | 0 | -100% |
| Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
Where to take this
The dataset points to a maturing packaging niche with room left in a handful of specific branches.
Check freedom-to-operate before drafting new coupling claims
With 1,084 of 1,085 records sitting inside G02B, any new fiber-attach or edge-coupler claim is filing into dense prior art. Run a focused clearance search on the most-cited records before committing drafting resources.
Explore in EurekaWatch the pullback, not just the leaderboard
Every tracked assignee is filing less than a year ago. That is more informative than who currently holds the most families — it flags which teams have quietly moved their coupling work to adjacent, less-indexed filings.
Track assignee activity in EurekaTest the thin branches for white space
Thermal isolation, active alignment feedback and laser co-packaging all show far fewer filings than core coupling geometry. Confirm with a targeted search before assuming the space is open.
Run a white-space search in EurekaCommon questions on PIC-to-fiber patent strategy
Fiber-to-chip coupling covers the physical and optical structures that get light from an optical fiber into a photonic integrated circuit's waveguides, and back out again, including edge couplers, grating couplers and fiber-array attach mechanisms. It is patented separately from the PIC's core waveguide or modulator design because the coupling interface has its own alignment tolerances, materials and manufacturing steps that create independent, claimable inventions. In practice this dataset shows that separation clearly: the vast majority of records sit in optical-element IPC classes (G02B) that map specifically to connector and coupling structures, not to the semiconductor device classes that cover the PIC's active components.
Based on this dataset, yes. Filings rose from 40 in 2017 to a peak of 159 in 2022, then declined in every year since, down to 13 in the most recent partial year. Publication lag of roughly 18 months means the last one to two years are undercounted, but the decline starts well before that window, so the peak-then-decline shape is a genuine trend rather than an artefact of incomplete recent data. That points to a technology whose core coupling geometries have largely been claimed, with remaining activity concentrated in refinement rather than land-grab filing.
The recent-momentum data shows every tracked assignee — including large incumbents and specialist photonics firms — filing fewer patents in the latest year than the year before, with declines ranging from around 50% to 100%. No assignee in this set is currently accelerating its filing rate. That does not mean R&D has stopped; it more likely reflects publication lag combined with firms shifting inventive output toward adjacent, differently classified filings, or toward trade-secret protection for manufacturing know-how that does not show up in public patent filings.
US20240184067A1, assigned to SENTEA NV, claims a PCB-mounted photonic integrated circuit design where the board has an opening that thermally separates the region carrying the PIC and its fiber-attach interface from a second region, typically housing electronics. Anyone designing a PCB-integrated PIC package with a similar thermal-isolation opening should review this filing's specific claim language before finalizing a board layout, since the isolation mechanism — not just the general idea of separating hot and cool zones — is what is being claimed. Teams using different isolation approaches, such as separate substrates or active thermal management, are less likely to be affected.
The clearest gaps sit in branches that appear thinly against the dominant coupling-geometry claims: active alignment feedback systems for fiber arrays, thermal isolation techniques between PIC and fiber-attach regions, laser-source co-packaging with edge couplers, and wafer-level fiber array bonding. These areas show meaningfully fewer filings than core edge-coupler and fiber-attach geometry claims, which occupy most of the G02B-heavy filing volume. Any white-space claim should still be checked against the most-cited records in this set, since foundational patents in adjacent coupling structures sometimes extend into these thinner branches through broad dependent claims.
Research Photonic Integrated Circuit Optical Fiber in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole photonic integrated circuit optical fiber corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.