Book a demo

PIC Optical Modulator Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026

PIC Optical Modulator Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/photonic-integrated-circuit-optical-modulator-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Photonics & Optics · Patent Landscape
Photonic Integrated Circuit Optical Modulator Patents: Filing Trends and White Space
  • Filings have flattened, not grown. the 2022 peak of 17 families has not been exceeded, and 2026 filings sit at 1 — a plateau rather than a rush, even accounting for publication lag.
  • Ownership is unusually fragmented for a photonics niche. no single assignee shows sustained late-year momentum; several previously active filers (Nokia, TSMC among them) show 0 filings and -100% YoY in the latest tracked year.
  • Claim activity is concentrated in one IPC lane. 114 of 116 records sit in G02F (optical control & modulation), with only a thin secondary presence in H01L, H01S and AI-adjacent G06N — a narrow technical corridor to search and to file into.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
116
Published Records
48%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+63%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (8 records) with 2024 (13) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 116 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this patent set actually covers

This landscape draws on 116 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026, filtered to records that combine photonic integrated circuit (PIC) or silicon photonics terminology with explicit claims on Mach-Zehnder, ring, thin-film lithium niobate or general electro-optic modulator structures, classified under G02F1/225, G02F1/21 or G02F1/035. It is a claims-first cut of the field: the search string requires the modulator terms to appear in title, claims or description, not just in passing description text, so the result set skews toward records where a modulator architecture is the actual invention rather than an incidental component.

Reading the set this way surfaces a field that is technically narrow — almost all of it sits inside one IPC subclass — but organisationally scattered, with no assignee showing durable filing momentum through the most recent tracked years.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1NOKIA SOLUTIONS & NETWORKS OY17
  2. 2INFINERA CORP16
  3. 3ADVANCED MICRO FOUNDRY PTE LTD8
  4. 4OPENLIGHT PHOTONICS INC8
  5. 5TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD7
  6. 6NEDERLANDSE ORG VOOR WETENSCHAPPELIJK ONDERZOEK NWO6
  7. 7TECH UNIV EINDHOVEN6
  8. 8SMART PHOTONICS HLDG BV6
  9. 9MARVELL ASIA PTE LTD5
  10. 10LIGHTWAVE LOGIC INC4
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photonic Integrated Circuit Optical Modulator covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 116-family set: filings by year, and how those filings distribute across IPC subclasses. Both point to a field that has occupied its core claim space early and is now filling in adjacent, thinner lanes.

Filings plateaued after 2022

Filings rose to a peak of 17 families in 2022 from 13 in 2017, then did not break higher; 2026 shows just 1 filing, though that year is still partial and will understate true filing volume once publication catches up over the next 18 months.

Filings plateaued after 202205101520132017201820192020202117202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

G02F dominates; everything else is a footnote

114 of 116 records carry a G02F classification (optical control and modulation) — essentially the whole set. G02B (optical elements, 48 records) and H04B (transmission, 23) appear as secondary classifications on many of the same families, while H01L, H01S and G06N each register only single digits, marking those as adjacent rather than core to this claim space.

G02F dominates; everything else is a footnoteG02F · Optical control & modulation11498.3%G02B · Optical elements & systems4841.4%H04B · Transmission (general)2319.8%H01L · Semiconductor devices76.0%H01S · Lasers & stimulated emission76.0%G06N · Computing based on AI models65.2%G06F · Electric digital data processi…32.6%F21V · Lighting device components10.9%Other65.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 116 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photonic Integrated Circuit Optical Modulator covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Photonic Integrated Circuit Optical Modulator with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about photonic integrated circuit optical modulator and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The most-cited records in this set

Representative recent filing
US20240380492A12024-11-14

Silicon photonics transmitter and method therefor

ELECTRONICS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH INSTITUTE

A silicon photonics transmitter and a method therefor are disclosed. The silicon photonics optical transmitter includes a Mach-Zehnder modulator, a plurality of optical couplers, a plurality of photodetectors, a monitor configured to measure an input optical power based on a sum of photocurrents or photovoltages corresponding to the plurality of photodetectors, and a modulator controller configured to control a voltage supplied to the Mach-Zehnder modulator based on a difference between the photocurrents or the photovoltages corresponding to the plurality of photodetectors.Filed by Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute, published 2024-11-14.

US20240380492A1 — patent drawing 1US20240380492A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-cited families
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20170194309A1Photonic integrated circuit package111
2US20170194310A1Photonic integrated circuit package82
3US20170194308A1Photonic integrated circuit package68
4WO2020191217A1Optoelectronic computing systems60
5US20170163000A1Photonic Integrated Circuit Including Compact Lasers With Extended Tunability57
6US20160103382A1Methods and devices for photonic m-ary pulse amplitude modulation52
7US20160363835A1MZM linear driver for silicon photonics device characterized as two-channel wavelength combiner and locker42
8US10026723B2Photonic integrated circuit package34
9US20170163001A1Photonic Integrated Circuit Including Compact Lasers With Extended Tunability29
10US20120045163A1Optical circuit apparatus, method, and application24

Citation counts are drawn from a searched corpus and favour older filings; treat them as a signal of influence on later filers, not as a ranking of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photonic Integrated Circuit Optical Modulator covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once families, IPC codes and receiving offices are lined up against each other.

Filing trend
17 in 2022
peak year, families

Growth has stalled, not accelerated

The count climbed from 13 families in 2017 to a high of 17 in 2022 and has not exceeded that since. Combined with a near-empty 2026, this reads as a field that reached its filing ceiling rather than one still building momentum.

Filing trend, 2017–2026
Jurisdiction
69 US
of 116 receiving-office records

Filing is US-centred with a thin PCT/EPO tail

United States receives the large majority of filings (69), with Europe (19) and WIPO/PCT (16) a distant second and third. China, the UK and South Korea each register only 2 — a filer betting on Asia-Pacific enforcement would be entering with little prior art to route around, or very little cover to rely on.

Receiving office distribution
Ownership
5 co-assignee pairs
across 116 families

Collaboration is narrow and academic-industry paired

Co-filing is rare in this set — only 5 pairs — and the strongest links sit between a research organisation, a university and a spin-out (NWO, Eindhoven University of Technology and a photonics holding entity), each pairing appearing 6 times. Most filers here are working alone.

Co-assignee network
Momentum
0 latest-year filings
across tracked leading assignees

No assignee shows sustained late-stage momentum

Every tracked leading assignee — including firms with -100% YoY changes — shows zero filings in the latest year. That is consistent with the overall plateau, but it also means the current leaderboard reflects historical filing, not active claim-building.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to photonic integrated circuit optical modulator, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photonic Integrated Circuit Optical Modulator covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who's filing

Assignees, momentum and where claim space is thin

The ranking beneath this section orders assignees by family count; read it alongside the momentum figures, which tell a different story than raw counts alone.

Pattern 1
0 YoY momentum
across leading assignees

Historical leaders, not active ones

Assignees at the top of the family count — including large telecom and foundry names — show zero filings in the most recent tracked year. Their position reflects filings made earlier in the window, not current activity.

Momentum table
Pattern 2
6 shared families
top co-assignee pairs

A small academic-industry cluster

The densest collaboration links a Dutch research organisation, a technical university and a photonics holding company, each pairing appearing in 6 shared families. Outside that cluster, co-filing is essentially absent.

Co-assignee pairs
Pattern 3
116 total families
no dominant single owner

Fragmented ownership, no consolidator

With 116 families spread across a wide assignee list and only thin co-filing, no single entity has built a defensible thicket the way concentrated fields often show. That leaves room for a well-drafted new entrant, provided it clears the dense G02F core.

Assignee ranking
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
These sit adjacent to the dense G02F core and show only thin coverage in this dataset.
thin-film lithium niobate ring resonator tuningphotodetector-fed modulator bias control loopsAI-driven modulator calibration (G06N overlap)laser-modulator monolithic integration on siliconpackage-level thermal compensation for PIC modulators
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Nokia Solutions and Networks0-100%
Infinera Corporation0
Advanced Micro Foundry Pte Ltd0
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC)0-100%
Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO)0
Smart Photonics Holding B.V.0
Orion Corporation0
Eindhoven University of Technology0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photonic Integrated Circuit Optical Modulator covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a narrow technical corridor with fragmented ownership. Two follow-up angles are worth pursuing before committing a filing budget.

Check the thin-film lithium niobate lane specifically

Thin-film lithium niobate modulator claims sit inside the same G02F subclass as silicon Mach-Zehnder designs but represent a materials shift that older filings did not anticipate. A targeted search against this dataset's most-cited families would show how much of that lane is actually spoken for.

Explore this sub-area in Eureka

Model the co-filing cluster's next move

The NWO–Eindhoven–photonics holding company cluster is the only dense collaboration network in the set. Tracking whether that cluster extends into thin-film or AI-calibrated modulator claims would signal where the next concentration of filings is likely to land.

Track this cluster in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photonic Integrated Circuit Optical Modulator covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photonic Integrated Circuit Optical Modulator covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Photonic Integrated Circuit Optical Modulator in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole photonic integrated circuit optical modulator corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.