PIC Optical Waveguide Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
- Filing has cooled since 2022. the peak year for this search (44 filings) sits mid-window, and the count drops toward the most recent, still-partial year — read the tail as reporting lag, not disengagement.
- Lasers and modulation dominate the adjacent claim space. H01S (lasers) and G02F (optical control/modulation) each appear in a large share of records alongside the core G02B waveguide class, showing where waveguide claims most often get bundled.
- Collaboration is rare and concentrated. only 10 co-assignee pairs exist across 379 families, and one pairing — imec with Ghent University — accounts for the bulk of that joint activity.
Filing growth compares 2021 (43 records) with 2024 (29) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 379 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this search covers
This landscape tracks 379 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine photonic integrated circuit or silicon photonics terminology with waveguide-specific claim language, filtered to the optical-elements IPC subclasses (G02B6/12, G02B6/122, G02B6/136) most associated with integrated waveguide structures. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the 2025-2026 counts in the trend chart will rise as later filings publish.
The corpus spans a decade of filing across transmitter/receiver PIC chips, silicon nitride waveguide fabrication, and the laser and modulation components that surround a waveguide core in a working circuit. Receiving-office data shows the United States as the dominant filing venue, with Europe and the PCT route as the next largest pools.
Filing trends and technology composition
Two views of the same 379-family dataset: filings by year, and how those filings distribute across IPC subclasses beyond the core optical-elements class.
Filing trend, 2017-2026
Filings rose from 13 in 2017 to a peak of 44 in 2022, then decline toward the present. The most recent year (2026) shows only 1 record, which reflects the 18-month publication lag rather than an actual stop in filing.
IPC composition beyond G02B
All 379 records sit in G02B by construction of the search. Beyond that, H01S (lasers, 103 records) and H04B (general transmission, 101) are the two largest adjacent classes, followed by G02F (optical control/modulation, 84), H01L (semiconductor devices, 70) and H04J (multiplex communication, 69) — showing waveguide claims are usually filed as part of a laser-plus-modulation-plus-transmission system, not standalone.
Shares are the percentage of the 379 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Photonic Integrated Circuit Optical Waveguide with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about photonic integrated circuit optical waveguide and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaRepresentative and most-cited filings
WO2024231800A1 — Silicon nitride waveguide or photonic integrated circuit fabrication method
Silicon nitride waveguide fabrication method including providing a substrate including a stress release trench structure, the stress release recess structure being formed in a silicon oxide layer, depositing a silicon nitride material or layer onto the silicon oxide layer, providing a silicon oxide hard mask on the deposited silicon nitride material or layer to provide an exposed surface delimited by the silicon oxide hard mask and defined by the deposited silicon nitride material or layer, the silicon oxide hard mask including or defining an elongation extending on the deposited silicon nitride material or layer, dry etching the exposed surface a silicon nitride elongated waveguide core locFiled by École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), published 2024-11-14. Abstract truncated as provided in the source record.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20030095737A1 | Transmitter photonic integrated circuits (TxPIC) and optical transport networks employing TxPICs | 294 |
| 2 | US20040033004A1 | Optical signal receiver photonic integrated circuit (RxPIC), an associated optical signal transmitter photoni… | 274 |
| 3 | US6330378B1 | Photonic integrated detector having a plurality of asymmetric waveguides | 186 |
| 4 | US20050100345A1 | Monolithic transmitter/receiver photonic integrated circuit (Tx/RxPIC) transceiver chip | 151 |
| 5 | US20040067006A1 | Transmitter photonic integrated circuit ( TxPIC) chips | 143 |
| 6 | US20030235370A1 | Fiber-to-waveguide coupler | 126 |
| 7 | US6795622B2 | Photonic integrated circuits | 122 |
| 8 | US7065272B2 | Fiber-to-waveguide coupler | 105 |
| 9 | US7885492B2 | Transmitter photonic integrated circuit (TxPIC) chips | 88 |
| 10 | US20030007719A1 | Photonic integrated circuits | 82 |
Citation counts favour older records in any searched corpus; treat these as markers of influence on later filings, not of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the data implies for strategy
Reading the trend, the IPC mix and the citation table together points to where claim space is dense, where it is thin, and where the biggest players still hold ground.
Growth has flattened, not stopped
The count climbs from 13 filings in 2017 to a 2022 peak of 44, then falls in the following years of the window. Given the ~18-month publication lag, the true 2024-2025 filing level is understated in this chart, but the shape still points to a maturing rather than an accelerating field.
Waveguide claims rarely stand alone
103 records also sit in H01S (lasers) and 101 in H04B (transmission systems), meaning most applicants are claiming the waveguide as one element of a laser-source-plus-transport system rather than filing the waveguide structure in isolation.
The US is the primary battleground
United States filings outnumber the next-largest venue, Europe (EPO, 65 filings), by more than three to one. Any freedom-to-operate check for this space has to start with US prosecution history before extending to the PCT and EPO pools.
Joint filing is the exception
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the whole dataset, and one pairing — imec with Ghent University — accounts for the strongest link at 20 shared filings. Most applicants in this space file solo.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to photonic integrated circuit optical waveguide, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre (imec) | Ghent University | 20 |
| Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre (imec) | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | 5 |
| Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre (imec) | UNIV OF AEGEAN | 3 |
| Ghent University | UNIV OF AEGEAN | 3 |
| Sarnoff Corporation | YANG LIYOU | 2 |
| Sarnoff Corporation | AN HAIYAN | 2 |
| The Trustees of Princeton University | XIA FENGNIAN | 1 |
| The Trustees of Princeton University | MENON VINOD | 1 |
imec (Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre (imec)) and Ghent University co-file more than any other pair in this dataset (20 shared records), well ahead of the next-strongest pairing.
Who is active, and who has slowed
Recent-year momentum figures show zero new filings in the latest year for every tracked assignee in this dataset, which is consistent with the publication lag rather than a simultaneous industry-wide halt.
Momentum reads flat across the board
Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum, including imec, Ghent University, Intel and GlobalFoundries US, shows 0 filings in the latest year of the window. Read this as the publication lag catching up with 2025-2026 activity, not as a coordinated slowdown.
One partnership anchors joint filing
Imec's pairing with Ghent University is the strongest collaborative link in the dataset by a wide margin, well ahead of imec's smaller pairings with Samsung Electronics and the University of the Aegean.
A long tail beneath the named leaders
With 379 families spread across the assignee ranking and only 10 co-assignee pairs, most of the filing volume sits with entities that appear once or twice rather than with a small repeat-filer core.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Infinera Corporation | 0 | — |
| Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre (imec) | 0 | — |
| GlobalFoundries U.S. Inc. | 0 | — |
| Ghent University | 0 | — |
| Intel Corporation | 0 | — |
| PsiQuantum Corp. | 0 | -100% |
| KVH Industries, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Aeluma, Inc. | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio strategy, or identifying open claim space.
Check freedom-to-operate against the US filing pool
With 212 of 379 records filed in the US, any new waveguide fabrication or coupling method needs prosecution-history review there first, before extending checks to the EPO and PCT pools.
Run a freedom-to-operate check in EurekaTrack the imec-Ghent collaboration pattern
The strongest co-assignee link in the dataset suggests a specific university-industry filing pipeline worth monitoring for early signals of new waveguide fabrication approaches.
Set up assignee alerts in EurekaProbe the under-claimed sub-areas directly
Thinner filing density in gyroscope- and sensing-adjacent waveguide claims (G01C, G01N overlaps) suggests room for a first-mover claim rather than crowded prior art.
Explore white space in EurekaCommon questions on this landscape
This search identifies 379 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine PIC or silicon-photonics terminology with waveguide-specific claim language in the relevant optical-elements IPC subclasses. That figure counts families, not raw document counts, which avoids double-counting continuations and multi-jurisdiction filings of the same invention. The true total for later years will grow as publication catches up, since filing-to-publication lag runs about 18 months.
The assignee ranking in this dataset is led by a small group of repeat filers, including imec, Ghent University, Intel, GlobalFoundries US and others tracked in the momentum data, but the broader pattern is a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants beneath them. Only 10 co-assignee pairs exist across all 379 families, and one pairing — imec with Ghent University, at 20 shared filings — is far stronger than any other. That concentration of joint work in one partnership is itself a useful signal for anyone mapping who collaborates with whom in this space.
Filings rose from 13 in 2017 to a peak of 44 in 2022, then decline through the rest of the window, which reads as flat-to-declining rather than accelerating. However, the most recent one to two years are understated in any patent trend chart because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the 2025-2026 dip should not be read as an actual stop in R&D activity. A clearer picture of 2024-2025 filing levels will only emerge once those applications publish.
WO2024231800A1, filed by École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) and published 2024-11-14, covers a silicon nitride waveguide fabrication method built around a stress-release trench structure formed in a silicon oxide layer, with a silicon nitride layer deposited on top and a silicon oxide hard mask used to define and dry-etch an elongated waveguide core. The stress-release step is the distinguishing feature: it addresses a known fabrication challenge in depositing thick nitride films without cracking. Anyone fabricating nitride waveguides with a comparable stress-management step should review this filing's claim scope closely.
The core waveguide claim space (G02B) is dense and usually filed alongside laser (H01S) and modulation (G02F) claims, but adjacent applications such as gyroscope-grade waveguide designs (G01C overlap, 16 records) and material-analysis-integrated waveguide sensing (G01N overlap, 13 records) show much thinner filing density. That gap suggests these branches are less claimed rather than technically unworkable, since the same core waveguide fabrication methods used elsewhere in the dataset could plausibly extend into them. A first claim written specifically for one of these adjacent use cases would face less crowded prior art than a claim filed directly against the core G02B waveguide class.
Research Photonic Integrated Circuit Optical Waveguide in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole photonic integrated circuit optical waveguide corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.