Book a demo

PIC Optical Waveguide Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

PIC Optical Waveguide Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/photonic-integrated-circuit-optical-waveguide-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Photonics & Optics · Patent Landscape
Photonic Integrated Circuit Optical Waveguide Patents
  • Filing has cooled since 2022. the peak year for this search (44 filings) sits mid-window, and the count drops toward the most recent, still-partial year — read the tail as reporting lag, not disengagement.
  • Lasers and modulation dominate the adjacent claim space. H01S (lasers) and G02F (optical control/modulation) each appear in a large share of records alongside the core G02B waveguide class, showing where waveguide claims most often get bundled.
  • Collaboration is rare and concentrated. only 10 co-assignee pairs exist across 379 families, and one pairing — imec with Ghent University — accounts for the bulk of that joint activity.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
379
Published Records
43%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-33%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (43 records) with 2024 (29) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 379 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this search covers

This landscape tracks 379 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine photonic integrated circuit or silicon photonics terminology with waveguide-specific claim language, filtered to the optical-elements IPC subclasses (G02B6/12, G02B6/122, G02B6/136) most associated with integrated waveguide structures. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the 2025-2026 counts in the trend chart will rise as later filings publish.

The corpus spans a decade of filing across transmitter/receiver PIC chips, silicon nitride waveguide fabrication, and the laser and modulation components that surround a waveguide core in a working circuit. Receiving-office data shows the United States as the dominant filing venue, with Europe and the PCT route as the next largest pools.

Filing activity, 2017-2026
  1. 1INFINERA CORP75
  2. 2INTERUNIVERSITAIR MICRO ELECTRONICS CENT (IMEC VZW)31
  3. 3GLOBALFOUNDRIES US INC20
  4. 4UNIV GENT20
  5. 5INTEL CORP18
  6. 6PSIQUANTUM CORP17
  7. 7ANELLO PHOTONICS INC14
  8. 8THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIV13
  9. 9SARNOFF CORP12
  10. 10MARVELL ASIA PTE LTD10
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photonic Integrated Circuit Optical Waveguide covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 379-family dataset: filings by year, and how those filings distribute across IPC subclasses beyond the core optical-elements class.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings rose from 13 in 2017 to a peak of 44 in 2022, then decline toward the present. The most recent year (2026) shows only 1 record, which reflects the 18-month publication lag rather than an actual stop in filing.

Filing trend, 2017-2026013253850132017201820192020202144202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC composition beyond G02B

All 379 records sit in G02B by construction of the search. Beyond that, H01S (lasers, 103 records) and H04B (general transmission, 101) are the two largest adjacent classes, followed by G02F (optical control/modulation, 84), H01L (semiconductor devices, 70) and H04J (multiplex communication, 69) — showing waveguide claims are usually filed as part of a laser-plus-modulation-plus-transmission system, not standalone.

IPC composition beyond G02BG02B · Optical elements & systems379100.0%H01S · Lasers & stimulated emission10327.2%H04B · Transmission (general)10126.6%G02F · Optical control & modulation8422.2%H01L · Semiconductor devices7018.5%H04J · Multiplex communication6918.2%G01C · Distance, navigation & gyrosco…164.2%G01N · Material analysis & testing133.4%Other7018.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 379 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photonic Integrated Circuit Optical Waveguide covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Photonic Integrated Circuit Optical Waveguide with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about photonic integrated circuit optical waveguide and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative and most-cited filings

Representative recent filing
WO2024231800A12024-11-14

WO2024231800A1 — Silicon nitride waveguide or photonic integrated circuit fabrication method

ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE FEDERALE DE LAUSANNE (EPFL)

Silicon nitride waveguide fabrication method including providing a substrate including a stress release trench structure, the stress release recess structure being formed in a silicon oxide layer, depositing a silicon nitride material or layer onto the silicon oxide layer, providing a silicon oxide hard mask on the deposited silicon nitride material or layer to provide an exposed surface delimited by the silicon oxide hard mask and defined by the deposited silicon nitride material or layer, the silicon oxide hard mask including or defining an elongation extending on the deposited silicon nitride material or layer, dry etching the exposed surface a silicon nitride elongated waveguide core locFiled by École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), published 2024-11-14. Abstract truncated as provided in the source record.

WO2024231800A1 — patent drawing 1WO2024231800A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20030095737A1Transmitter photonic integrated circuits (TxPIC) and optical transport networks employing TxPICs294
2US20040033004A1Optical signal receiver photonic integrated circuit (RxPIC), an associated optical signal transmitter photoni…274
3US6330378B1Photonic integrated detector having a plurality of asymmetric waveguides186
4US20050100345A1Monolithic transmitter/receiver photonic integrated circuit (Tx/RxPIC) transceiver chip151
5US20040067006A1Transmitter photonic integrated circuit ( TxPIC) chips143
6US20030235370A1Fiber-to-waveguide coupler126
7US6795622B2Photonic integrated circuits122
8US7065272B2Fiber-to-waveguide coupler105
9US7885492B2Transmitter photonic integrated circuit (TxPIC) chips88
10US20030007719A1Photonic integrated circuits82

Citation counts favour older records in any searched corpus; treat these as markers of influence on later filings, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photonic Integrated Circuit Optical Waveguide covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data implies for strategy

Reading the trend, the IPC mix and the citation table together points to where claim space is dense, where it is thin, and where the biggest players still hold ground.

Filing momentum
44 in 2022
peak-year filings

Growth has flattened, not stopped

The count climbs from 13 filings in 2017 to a 2022 peak of 44, then falls in the following years of the window. Given the ~18-month publication lag, the true 2024-2025 filing level is understated in this chart, but the shape still points to a maturing rather than an accelerating field.

Trend data, 2017-2026
Claim bundling
103 & 101 records
H01S and H04B overlap

Waveguide claims rarely stand alone

103 records also sit in H01S (lasers) and 101 in H04B (transmission systems), meaning most applicants are claiming the waveguide as one element of a laser-source-plus-transport system rather than filing the waveguide structure in isolation.

IPC composition
Filing venue
212 US filings
of 379 total records

The US is the primary battleground

United States filings outnumber the next-largest venue, Europe (EPO, 65 filings), by more than three to one. Any freedom-to-operate check for this space has to start with US prosecution history before extending to the PCT and EPO pools.

Receiving offices
Collaboration density
10 co-assignee pairs
across 379 families

Joint filing is the exception

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the whole dataset, and one pairing — imec with Ghent University — accounts for the strongest link at 20 shared filings. Most applicants in this space file solo.

Co-assignee pairs
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to photonic integrated circuit optical waveguide, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Strongest collaboration link
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre (imec)Ghent University20
Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre (imec)Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.5
Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre (imec)UNIV OF AEGEAN3
Ghent UniversityUNIV OF AEGEAN3
Sarnoff CorporationYANG LIYOU2
Sarnoff CorporationAN HAIYAN2
The Trustees of Princeton UniversityXIA FENGNIAN1
The Trustees of Princeton UniversityMENON VINOD1

imec (Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre (imec)) and Ghent University co-file more than any other pair in this dataset (20 shared records), well ahead of the next-strongest pairing.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photonic Integrated Circuit Optical Waveguide covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is active, and who has slowed

Recent-year momentum figures show zero new filings in the latest year for every tracked assignee in this dataset, which is consistent with the publication lag rather than a simultaneous industry-wide halt.

Assignee
0 latest-year filings
across tracked assignees

Momentum reads flat across the board

Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum, including imec, Ghent University, Intel and GlobalFoundries US, shows 0 filings in the latest year of the window. Read this as the publication lag catching up with 2025-2026 activity, not as a coordinated slowdown.

Recent-year momentum
Collaboration hub
20 shared filings
imec + Ghent University

One partnership anchors joint filing

Imec's pairing with Ghent University is the strongest collaborative link in the dataset by a wide margin, well ahead of imec's smaller pairings with Samsung Electronics and the University of the Aegean.

Co-assignee pairs
Filing base
379 families
total tracked

A long tail beneath the named leaders

With 379 families spread across the assignee ranking and only 10 co-assignee pairs, most of the filing volume sits with entities that appear once or twice rather than with a small repeat-filer core.

Assignee ranking
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas to watch
Branches adjacent to the core waveguide claims that show thinner filing density in this dataset.
Stress-release trench structures for nitride coresHybrid laser-to-waveguide coupling interfacesGyroscope-grade waveguide claims (G01C overlap)Material-analysis-integrated waveguide sensing (G01N overlap)Multiplex-ready waveguide-modulator co-design
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Infinera Corporation0
Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre (imec)0
GlobalFoundries U.S. Inc.0
Ghent University0
Intel Corporation0
PsiQuantum Corp.0-100%
KVH Industries, Inc.0
Aeluma, Inc.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photonic Integrated Circuit Optical Waveguide covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio strategy, or identifying open claim space.

Check freedom-to-operate against the US filing pool

With 212 of 379 records filed in the US, any new waveguide fabrication or coupling method needs prosecution-history review there first, before extending checks to the EPO and PCT pools.

Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka

Track the imec-Ghent collaboration pattern

The strongest co-assignee link in the dataset suggests a specific university-industry filing pipeline worth monitoring for early signals of new waveguide fabrication approaches.

Set up assignee alerts in Eureka

Probe the under-claimed sub-areas directly

Thinner filing density in gyroscope- and sensing-adjacent waveguide claims (G01C, G01N overlaps) suggests room for a first-mover claim rather than crowded prior art.

Explore white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photonic Integrated Circuit Optical Waveguide covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photonic Integrated Circuit Optical Waveguide covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Photonic Integrated Circuit Optical Waveguide in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole photonic integrated circuit optical waveguide corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.