Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (16 records) with 2024 (66) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 240 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This dataset tracks patent families at the intersection of photonic integrated circuits and their packaging into working systems — co-packaged optics, electronic-photonic integration, optical engine integration and system-in-package approaches. The search combines title/abstract terms for PIC and silicon photonics with claim-description language for the integration step itself, restricted to IPC classes covering optical coupling structures, semiconductor device packaging and high-speed transmission.
Coverage runs from 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off. Because publication typically lags filing by around eighteen months, the most recent one or two years in any trend line will understate actual filing activity — treat the tail of the chart as a floor, not a ceiling.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 240-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim weight.
Filings rose from zero in 2017 to a peak of 66 in 2024, with the 2022 midpoint sitting at 35 — a trajectory that flattens rather than accelerates once the peak is reached, and the final partial year should be read with the publication lag in mind rather than as a drop-off.
G02B (optical elements & systems) accounts for 216 of 240 records, far ahead of H01L (semiconductor devices, 79) and H04B (transmission, 35). Smaller counts in G02F, H01S, H04Q and H10B mark narrower but still active sub-fields — modulation, laser sources and optical switching — that sit adjacent to the core coupling and packaging claims.
Shares are the percentage of the 240 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about photonic integrated circuit system integration and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaProvided are an optical module and an optical transceiver using an optical system-in-package (O-SIP) including a photonic integrated circuit (IC), an electronic IC, and the like, in a package. The optical module includes an O-SIP for generating or receiving an optical signal, in which a photonic IC and an electronic IC for driving or interfacing the photonic IC are molded inside a mold body having a first surface and a second surface which are flat, on a lower portion and an upper portion of the mold body, respectively, and a vertical coupler mounted on an upper portion of the O-SIP with a corresponding through hole.Filed by LIPAC CO., LTD., published 2025-04-17 — a recent example of the molded system-in-package approach to combining photonic and electronic ICs.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20190137706A1 | Photonic package with a bridge between a photonic die and an optical coupling structure | 64 |
| 2 | US20220179159A1 | Photonic computing platform | 59 |
| 3 | US10866376B1 | Method and system for co-packaging photonics integrated circuit with an application specific integrated circu… | 54 |
| 4 | US20200278508A1 | Fiberless co-packaged optics | 39 |
| 5 | US10962728B2 | Co-packaged optics and transceiver | 38 |
| 6 | US10598875B2 | Photonic package with a bridge between a photonic die and an optical coupling structure | 32 |
| 7 | US20230204879A1 | Optical packaging using embedded-in-mold (EIM) optical module integration | 30 |
| 8 | US20210288035A1 | Active bridge enabled co-packaged photonic transceiver | 29 |
| 9 | US11411643B1 | Optical self loopback for co-packaged optics | 25 |
| 10 | US20230130045A1 | Detachable connector for co-packaged optics | 22 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations — read them as a signal of influence on the field, not as a ranking of current commercial importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns stand out once the raw counts are read against filing behaviour and citation weight.
The climb from zero filings in 2017 to 66 in 2024, passing through 35 at the 2022 midpoint, describes a field that built up steadily and has now reached — or passed — its filing peak. New entrants should expect denser prior art in the core claim space than the raw year-over-year growth rate might suggest.
G02B (optical elements and systems) covers the large majority of records, while H01L (semiconductor devices) sits at 79 — well behind. Claim language describing the optical coupling and packaging structure is far more crowded than claim language describing the electronic driver or interposer side of the same system.
The United States receives more than half again as many filings as the next-largest office (WIPO PCT at 39), with Europe close behind at 36 and China at 23. A filing strategy built only around US and PCT coverage would still miss meaningful activity in Europe and China.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to photonic integrated circuit system integration, with the prior art for and against each one.
Ranked by family count, the assignee list is topped by a small number of repeat filers with a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants — typical of a field where the core packaging approach is still being established rather than owned by one dominant player.
Multiple assignees that were active in prior years show zero filings in the latest year, with recorded year-over-year drops of -100% for several of them. Given the publication lag, this is as likely to reflect filings not yet published as a genuine pullback, but it means recent momentum cannot be read directly from the latest-year column alone.
Records span United States, WIPO PCT, EPO, China, Singapore and Taiwan receiving offices. The presence of Taiwan and Singapore filings alongside the larger US/EPO/China/PCT blocks points to semiconductor foundry and packaging supply chains as a secondary filing driver.
With 240 families spread across a ranking that includes single-digit recent-year counts even among named leaders, ownership of the core integration approaches is distributed rather than concentrated in one or two portfolios.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. (TSMC) | 1 | — |
| Skyair Artificial Intelligence Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| Intel Corporation | 0 | — |
| Teramount Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| II-VI Delaware, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| Lightmatter, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| Cisco Technology, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| Unimicron Technology Corp. | 0 | — |
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the reader is scoping freedom-to-operate, tracking a competitor, or looking for open claim space.
With 216 of 240 records sitting in G02B, any new filing describing optical coupling structures or bridge elements between a photonic die and its package should be checked against the most-cited records in this set first.
Explore in EurekaSeveral top assignees show a drop to zero in the latest recorded year. Confirming whether that is a real pullback or a publication-lag artefact matters before drawing conclusions about competitive intent.
Run a live assignee searchH01L filings trail G02B by a wide margin, suggesting the electronic-side integration claims — interposers, co-design, thermal management — carry less prior art density than the optical coupling claims.
Map white space in EurekaIn this dataset it means a patent family whose title or abstract references a photonic integrated circuit, PIC, or silicon photonics, and whose claims or description also cover co-packaged optics, electronic-photonic integration, optical engine integration, or system-in-package techniques. The IPC filter further restricts the set to optical coupling structures (G02B6/42), semiconductor device stacking (H01L25/16), and high-speed optical transmission (H04B10/40). This combination targets the packaging and integration step specifically, not PIC design or fabrication in isolation.
The trend shows filings climbing from zero in 2017 to 66 in 2024, passing through 35 at the 2022 midpoint, which is a maturing curve rather than an accelerating one. A peak followed by a flatter or declining tail typically means the core technical approaches have already been claimed by early movers, and later filers are working in narrower, more crowded space. The final year or two of any patent trend is also understated because publication lags filing by roughly eighteen months, so some of the apparent slowdown may resolve once later filings publish.
The assignee ranking is topped by a small number of repeat filers, but the list also includes a long tail of entrants with only one or two families each, which is typical of a field still settling on dominant packaging architectures. Recent-year momentum data shows several previously active filers, including established semiconductor and photonics firms, recording zero filings in the latest year — though this may partly reflect publication lag rather than an actual stop in R&D. Reviewing the full ranking alongside recent-year momentum gives a more reliable picture than either figure alone.
The IPC composition shows optical elements and systems (G02B) heavily outweighing semiconductor device claims (H01L) and transmission claims (H04B), which points to the electronic-photonic co-design and interposer side of integration as comparatively under-claimed. Smaller subclasses such as H01S (lasers), H04Q (optical switching) and H10B (memory device manufacture) also show thin filing counts relative to the core set, suggesting narrower opportunities where laser source co-integration or switching fabric packaging overlaps with PIC system integration. Any white-space claim should still be checked against the most-cited records in the core G02B space, since adjacent claims can still be blocked by broad coupling-structure language.
Citation counts inside a fixed, searched corpus tend to favour older patents simply because they have had more years and more later filings to accumulate citations against them. The most-cited records in this dataset, several of which date to the 2019–2021 period, should be read as markers of technical influence on the field rather than as evidence that they remain the most commercially important patents today. Newer filings, including the 2025 representative record in this set, have not had time to accumulate comparable citation counts even if their claims are commercially significant.
Go past this page: query the whole photonic integrated circuit system integration corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.