https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/photonic-integrated-circuit-system-integration-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Photonics & Optics
Photonic integrated circuit system integration patents: who is filing, and where the claim space is still open
  • Filing peaked in 2024 at 66 families, then the pace through the most recent partial year suggests the growth phase has already crested rather than continued climbing.
  • G02B dominates the IPC mix at 216 of 240 records, while H01L, H04B and adjacent classes trail well behind — most of the claim activity sits in optical elements, not the electronic side of integration.
  • The United States receives the largest share of filings at 126, with WIPO, EPO and China each running a distant second tier — filing strategy here is still heavily US-centred.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
240
Published Records
44%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+313%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (16 records) with 2024 (66) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 240 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks patent families at the intersection of photonic integrated circuits and their packaging into working systems — co-packaged optics, electronic-photonic integration, optical engine integration and system-in-package approaches. The search combines title/abstract terms for PIC and silicon photonics with claim-description language for the integration step itself, restricted to IPC classes covering optical coupling structures, semiconductor device packaging and high-speed transmission.

Coverage runs from 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off. Because publication typically lags filing by around eighteen months, the most recent one or two years in any trend line will understate actual filing activity — treat the tail of the chart as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing activity, 2017–2026
  1. 1SICILY MERGER SUB II INC35
  2. 2INTEL CORP26
  3. 3TERAMOUNT LTD20
  4. 4CELESTIAL AI INC13
  5. 5II VI DELAWARE INC11
  6. 6LIGHTMATTER INC10
  7. 7CISCO TECHNOLOGY INC9
  8. 8LIPAC CO LTD8
  9. 9UNIMICRON TECH CORP8
  10. 10TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD8
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photonic Integrated Circuit System Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 240-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim weight.

Filing trend

Filings rose from zero in 2017 to a peak of 66 in 2024, with the 2022 midpoint sitting at 35 — a trajectory that flattens rather than accelerates once the peak is reached, and the final partial year should be read with the publication lag in mind rather than as a drop-off.

Filing trend02040608002017201820192020202120222023662024202552026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC composition

G02B (optical elements & systems) accounts for 216 of 240 records, far ahead of H01L (semiconductor devices, 79) and H04B (transmission, 35). Smaller counts in G02F, H01S, H04Q and H10B mark narrower but still active sub-fields — modulation, laser sources and optical switching — that sit adjacent to the core coupling and packaging claims.

IPC compositionG02B · Optical elements & systems21690.0%H01L · Semiconductor devices7932.9%H04B · Transmission (general)3514.6%H10W3112.9%G02F · Optical control & modulation156.3%H01S · Lasers & stimulated emission93.8%H04Q · Switching & selecting93.8%H10B · Memory device manufacture93.8%Other3514.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 240 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photonic Integrated Circuit System Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Photonic Integrated Circuit System Integration with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about photonic integrated circuit system integration and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited records in this dataset

Representative record
US20250125320A12025-04-17

Optical module using optical system-in-package, and optical transceiver

LIPAC CO., LTD.

Provided are an optical module and an optical transceiver using an optical system-in-package (O-SIP) including a photonic integrated circuit (IC), an electronic IC, and the like, in a package. The optical module includes an O-SIP for generating or receiving an optical signal, in which a photonic IC and an electronic IC for driving or interfacing the photonic IC are molded inside a mold body having a first surface and a second surface which are flat, on a lower portion and an upper portion of the mold body, respectively, and a vertical coupler mounted on an upper portion of the O-SIP with a corresponding through hole.Filed by LIPAC CO., LTD., published 2025-04-17 — a recent example of the molded system-in-package approach to combining photonic and electronic ICs.

US20250125320A1 — patent drawing 1US20250125320A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation patents
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20190137706A1Photonic package with a bridge between a photonic die and an optical coupling structure64
2US20220179159A1Photonic computing platform59
3US10866376B1Method and system for co-packaging photonics integrated circuit with an application specific integrated circu…54
4US20200278508A1Fiberless co-packaged optics39
5US10962728B2Co-packaged optics and transceiver38
6US10598875B2Photonic package with a bridge between a photonic die and an optical coupling structure32
7US20230204879A1Optical packaging using embedded-in-mold (EIM) optical module integration30
8US20210288035A1Active bridge enabled co-packaged photonic transceiver29
9US11411643B1Optical self loopback for co-packaged optics25
10US20230130045A1Detachable connector for co-packaged optics22

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations — read them as a signal of influence on the field, not as a ranking of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photonic Integrated Circuit System Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

Three patterns stand out once the raw counts are read against filing behaviour and citation weight.

Filing pace
66 in 2024
peak year

Growth has already crested

The climb from zero filings in 2017 to 66 in 2024, passing through 35 at the 2022 midpoint, describes a field that built up steadily and has now reached — or passed — its filing peak. New entrants should expect denser prior art in the core claim space than the raw year-over-year growth rate might suggest.

Based on family filing counts 2017–2024
Claim concentration
216 of 240
records in G02B

Optics claims dominate the electronics side

G02B (optical elements and systems) covers the large majority of records, while H01L (semiconductor devices) sits at 79 — well behind. Claim language describing the optical coupling and packaging structure is far more crowded than claim language describing the electronic driver or interposer side of the same system.

IPC subclass distribution, 240 records
Jurisdiction
126 US filings
of receiving-office total

Filing strategy still centres on the US

The United States receives more than half again as many filings as the next-largest office (WIPO PCT at 39), with Europe close behind at 36 and China at 23. A filing strategy built only around US and PCT coverage would still miss meaningful activity in Europe and China.

Receiving office counts, all records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to photonic integrated circuit system integration, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photonic Integrated Circuit System Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Assignee landscape and momentum

Ranked by family count, the assignee list is topped by a small number of repeat filers with a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants — typical of a field where the core packaging approach is still being established rather than owned by one dominant player.

Momentum
-100% YoY
several top filers

Recent-year activity has cooled across leaders

Multiple assignees that were active in prior years show zero filings in the latest year, with recorded year-over-year drops of -100% for several of them. Given the publication lag, this is as likely to reflect filings not yet published as a genuine pullback, but it means recent momentum cannot be read directly from the latest-year column alone.

Recent-year filing counts by assignee
Geographic mix
6 receiving offices
represented

Filing is concentrated but not single-jurisdiction

Records span United States, WIPO PCT, EPO, China, Singapore and Taiwan receiving offices. The presence of Taiwan and Singapore filings alongside the larger US/EPO/China/PCT blocks points to semiconductor foundry and packaging supply chains as a secondary filing driver.

Receiving office breakdown
Long tail
240 families
total tracked

No single assignee dominates the full set

With 240 families spread across a ranking that includes single-digit recent-year counts even among named leaders, ownership of the core integration approaches is distributed rather than concentrated in one or two portfolios.

Assignee ranking, full dataset
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches with thin filing density relative to the core coupling and packaging claims — worth checking before assuming the space is occupied.
vertical optical coupler alignment toleranceelectronic-photonic co-design interposersmold-body thermal management for O-SIPlaser-source co-integration (H01S overlap)optical switching fabric packaging (H04Q overlap)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. (TSMC)1
Skyair Artificial Intelligence Co., Ltd.0-100%
Intel Corporation0
Teramount Ltd.0-100%
II-VI Delaware, Inc.0-100%
Lightmatter, Inc.0-100%
Cisco Technology, Inc.0-100%
Unimicron Technology Corp.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photonic Integrated Circuit System Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the reader is scoping freedom-to-operate, tracking a competitor, or looking for open claim space.

Check freedom-to-operate before filing in the core coupling space

With 216 of 240 records sitting in G02B, any new filing describing optical coupling structures or bridge elements between a photonic die and its package should be checked against the most-cited records in this set first.

Explore in Eureka

Track the momentum shift among named leaders

Several top assignees show a drop to zero in the latest recorded year. Confirming whether that is a real pullback or a publication-lag artefact matters before drawing conclusions about competitive intent.

Run a live assignee search

Scope the under-claimed electronic-photonic interposer space

H01L filings trail G02B by a wide margin, suggesting the electronic-side integration claims — interposers, co-design, thermal management — carry less prior art density than the optical coupling claims.

Map white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photonic Integrated Circuit System Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Photonic Integrated Circuit System Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Photonic Integrated Circuit System Integration in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole photonic integrated circuit system integration corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.