Book a demo

Piezoelectric Ceramics Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Piezoelectric Ceramics Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/piezoelectric-ceramics-and-devices-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Piezoelectric Ceramics and Devices
Piezoelectric ceramics and device patents: filing trends, leading assignees and open claim space
  • Filing has cooled since its 2024 peak. 40 families in 2024 gave way to a lighter 2025-2026, though the final year is still filling in as publications lag filing.
  • Three IPC subclasses carry almost all the volume. H10N, H01L and C04B each cover roughly half of the 876 families, while B41J, H03H and H04R sit far behind as thinner, more specialised claim territory.
  • The largest assignees have gone quiet in the latest year. Names like General Electric, Canon, Murata and Panasonic show zero filings in the most recent year tracked, leaving momentum open to newer entrants.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
876
Published Records
18%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+11%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (36 records) with 2024 (40) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 876 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks 876 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine piezoelectric ceramic composition language with device-level claim terms such as poling, depolarization temperature, actuator displacement and energy harvesting. The search string deliberately pairs a materials phrase with an application phrase, so the corpus sits at the intersection of ceramics chemistry and solid-state device engineering rather than either field alone.

Filing is spread across three core IPC subclasses — solid-state devices, semiconductor devices and ceramics — with smaller but distinct pockets in vibration generation, audio transducers, printing and impedance filtering. The United States and China together receive the majority of filings, with Europe, WIPO and Japan making up most of the remainder.

Filing activity by year, 2017-2026
  1. 1CANON KK33
  2. 2GENERAL ELECTRIC CO33
  3. 3SABIC GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES BV33
  4. 4THE PENN STATE RES FOUND INC32
  5. 5MURATA MFG CO LTD29
  6. 6PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORP25
  7. 7HEWLETT PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LP20
  8. 8KYOCERA CORP19
  9. 9XI AN JIAOTONG UNIV16
  10. 10TDK CORP16
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Piezoelectric Ceramics and Devices covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Annual filing counts and IPC distribution for the 876 families in this corpus, drawn directly from the underlying dataset.

A peak in 2024, then a pullback

Filings rose from 28 in 2017 to a peak of 40 in 2024, passing through 32 at the 2022 midpoint. The 2025-2026 figures trail off, but because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent one to two years understate actual filing activity rather than confirm a real decline.

A peak in 2024, then a pullback010203040282017201820192020202120222023402024202542026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Three subclasses dominate, five others are thin

H10N (509 records), H01L (493) and C04B (474) between them cover almost all of the corpus, reflecting how tightly device claims, semiconductor-adjacent claims and ceramics composition claims overlap in this field. H02N, B06B, H04R, B41J and H03H each sit well under 80 records, marking narrower, more specialised application areas rather than core contested ground.

Three subclasses dominate, five others are thinH10N · Other electric solid-state dev…50958.1%H01L · Semiconductor devices49356.3%C04B · Ceramics, cement & refractories47454.1%H02N · Electric machines (other)799.0%B06B · Generating mechanical vibratio…475.4%H04R · Loudspeakers & audio transduce…465.3%B41J · Typewriters & printers384.3%H03H · Impedance networks & filters354.0%Other39845.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 876 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Piezoelectric Ceramics and Devices covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Piezoelectric Ceramics and Devices with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about piezoelectric ceramics and devices and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative and most-cited filings

Representative Filing
US20140004000A12014-01-02

Lead-free piezoelectric ceramic films and a method for making thereof

DREXEL UNIVERSITY

This invention relates to a method of making lead-free piezoelectric ceramic films. Specifically, the invention is directed to a method for fabricating lead-free piezoelectric free standing films having enhanced piezoelectric properties. The films may be used for a number of applications including incorporation in microelectronic devices such as energy harvesting devices and sensor technologies.Filed by Drexel University, published 2014-01-02, this application sits at the boundary of the corpus window and illustrates the lead-free composition route that much of the later filing builds on.

US20140004000A1 — patent drawing 1US20140004000A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20070257634A1Self-powered portable electronic device360
2US5844349AComposite autoclavable ultrasonic transducers and methods of making227
3US5340510AMethod for making piezoelectric ceramic/polymer composite transducers212
4US6088894AMethods of making composite ultrasonic transducers209
5US4999819ATransformed stress direction acoustic transducer170
6US5392259AMicro-grooves for the design of wideband clinical ultrasonic transducers136
7US4812698APiezoelectric bending actuator116
8US4786837AComposite conformable sheet electrodes115
9US8703040B2Method for manufacturing a piezoelectric ceramic body102
10US5702629APiezeoelectric ceramic-polymer composites97

Citation counts reflect influence within this searched corpus and skew toward older filings; treat them as a marker of prior-art density, not current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Piezoelectric Ceramics and Devices covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the filing pattern signals

Reading the IPC spread, the office distribution and the citation table together points to where claim space is dense and where it has room.

Filing Trend
40 in 2024
peak year

Growth has flattened, not accelerated

Filing climbed from 28 families in 2017 to a peak of 40 in 2024 before easing off. That is a mature, cyclical pace rather than a technology in a growth phase — new entrants are more likely to be filling gaps than racing to stake early claims.

2017-2024 filing count
Technology Composition
509 / 876
H10N share

Device claims outweigh pure materials claims

H10N and H01L together outnumber the core ceramics subclass C04B, showing that most contested claim territory is in how the ceramic is integrated into a device — electrodes, layering, actuation — rather than in the ceramic composition itself.

IPC subclass distribution
Citation Signal
360 citations
top-cited record

Ultrasonic transducer art anchors the field

The most-cited records are transducer and composite-manufacture patents from the 1990s and a 2007 self-powered device filing. Their citation weight reflects age and foundational status in the corpus, not present-day filing priority.

Top five cited records
Assignee Momentum
0 in latest year
for six major assignees

Established players have stopped filing recently

Several of the largest historical filers, including General Electric, Canon, Murata and Panasonic, show no filings in the latest tracked year. That pause does not mean the technology is abandoned; it more likely reflects portfolio consolidation or a shift to trade-secret protection for incremental improvements.

Recent-year filing count
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to piezoelectric ceramics and devices, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Piezoelectric Ceramics and Devices covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Assignees and collaboration patterns

Filing is led by a mix of industrial conglomerates, ceramics specialists and universities, with co-filing concentrated in a small number of repeated pairings.

Co-filing
10 pairs
co-assignee pairs

Collaboration is limited and specific

Only ten co-assignee pairs appear in the corpus. The strongest pairing links Xerox with the National Research Council of Canada, followed by Canon with University of Yamanashi and Xi'an Jiaotong University with the National Institute for Materials Science, suggesting durable, project-level partnerships rather than broad industry alliances.

Strongest pairing: 8 shared families
Receiving Offices
301 US filings
leading office

US and China dominate filing venue

The United States receives the largest share of filings at 301, with China close behind at 224. Europe, WIPO and Japan together account for a smaller but still meaningful share, indicating that protection strategies are concentrated in the two largest device markets.

US 301, China 224, EPO 114
Assignee Activity
6 assignees at zero
in latest year

Historical leaders have gone quiet

General Electric, Saudi Basic Global Technologies, Canon, Penn State Research Foundation, Murata and Panasonic all show no filings in the most recent year. Whether this reflects genuine pullback or a publication-lag artefact will only become clear as later-year data fills in.

Zero filings, latest tracked year
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
These pockets carry far fewer records than the core IPC subclasses, which can mean open claim space or simply a narrower application niche.
Impedance-matched filter stacks (H03H)Piezo-actuated print-head arrays (B41J)Composite ultrasonic transducer housingsDepolarization-temperature stabilised filmsVibration energy harvesting from low-frequency sources
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
General Electric0
Saudi Basic Global Technologies (SABIC)0
Canon0
Penn State Research Foundation0
Murata Manufacturing0
Panasonic0
Kyocera0
Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Piezoelectric Ceramics and Devices covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, licensing or new filing strategy.

Check the thin IPC branches for open claims

B41J, H03H and H04R carry a fraction of the volume in H10N, H01L and C04B. Before assuming crowding, run a targeted search inside these narrower subclasses to see whether the low count reflects real white space or simply a smaller application market.

Explore IPC white space in Eureka

Watch for re-entry from quiet assignees

Six major historical filers show zero activity in the latest year. A resumed filing from any of them, especially paired with a new co-assignee, would be an early signal of a strategic pivot back into this space.

Track assignee activity in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Piezoelectric Ceramics and Devices covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about piezoelectric ceramics patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Piezoelectric Ceramics and Devices covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Piezoelectric Ceramics and Devices in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole piezoelectric ceramics and devices corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.