Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Pipeline integrity and hydrostatic testing patents span a search space defined by three overlapping IPC groups: G01M testing machinery and structural balance, F16L pipes and fittings, and F17D pipeline transport. Across 199 tracked families, filing activity has stayed largely flat since 2017 rather than accelerating, and the most heavily cited records are decades-old mechanical apparatus for leak testing and in-line inspection rather than recent digital approaches. That combination — flat filing volume, old claims carrying the most citation weight — is characteristic of a field where the core commercial methods are settled and newer entrants are looking for room at the edges.
The receiving-office spread, led by the United States, China, Europe and Canada, shows the field is filed broadly across the major pipeline-operating jurisdictions rather than concentrated in one region. Recent-year filing counts should be read cautiously: publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the most recent year in any trend chart is always an undercount at the time of measurement.
Filing activity in pipeline integrity and hydrostatic testing has stayed flat rather than accelerated over the past decade, while the underlying claim space is spread unevenly across testing, piping and transport-level IPC subclasses.
Filings ran from 2 in 2017 to a peak of 18 in 2024, with the midpoint year (2022) at 8 and 2026 tracking at only 2 so far — a partial year that will revise upward as publications catch up, but the underlying trend across the period is flat to declining rather than growing.
G01M (testing machines and structural balance) and F16L (pipes and pipe fittings) account for the largest share of records, well ahead of G01N material analysis and F17D pipeline transport; smaller buckets in E21B, B08B, G01B and G06F mark the thinner, less-claimed edges of the field.
Shares are the percentage of the 199 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about pipeline integrity and hydrostatic testing and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA system for providing an interface that allows access to a system used to collect oil and gas pipeline integrity related data sets, inspection and survey reports to process the integrity status and to determine the remaining lifetime of each point of a pipeline on a sophisticated mapping platform. The system integrates databases for centralized storage of information needed for pipeline integrity assessment, deploying results in an augmented reality platform, and uses artificial intelligence to compare consecutive in-line inspection results.Filed by Fathom Solutions for Communications and Information Technology, published 2025-08-26 as US12398847B2.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5295392A | Pipe testing equipment | 112 |
| 2 | US5209105A | Method and apparatus for externally and internally testing for leaks in connections between tubular members | 84 |
| 3 | US6813949B2 | Pipeline inspection system | 80 |
| 4 | US20040031337A1 | Pipeline inspection system | 79 |
| 5 | US4926680A | Method and apparatus for externally and internally testing for leaks in connections between tubular members | 58 |
| 6 | US4211107A | Pipe testing machine with clamping pressure keyed to hydrostatic test pressure | 51 |
| 7 | US4599890A | Hydrostatic test apparatus | 47 |
| 8 | US20200208769A1 | Self-adaptive inline inspection vehicle for pipelines | 32 |
| 9 | US9721448B2 | Wireless communication systems for underground pipe inspection | 31 |
| 10 | US6640655B1 | Self tracking sensor suspension mechanism | 31 |
Ranked by citation count within the searched corpus; older mechanical apparatus patents lead, which is typical of citation graphs that favour early filings.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Read together, the technology mix, the citation graph and the recent-year momentum point to a field where the mechanical core is settled and the open ground is in data integration layered on top of it.
Filings moved from 2 in 2017 to 8 at the 2022 midpoint and 18 at the 2024 peak, then dropped back — a pattern typical of a technology area with established commercial routes rather than one still being actively staked out.
G01M (testing machines and structural balance) accounts for more records than any other subclass, ahead of F16L pipes and fittings at 91 and F17D pipeline transport at 57, confirming that instrumentation and measurement methods — not transport-level system claims — carry the densest prior art.
The most-cited records in this corpus are mechanical leak-test and pipeline inspection system patents from decades past, which is expected in a searched citation graph that favours older filings — but it also means new entrants are building on claims that have already absorbed the field's heaviest citation load.
Assignees who historically drove filing volume in this space, including several of the more prolific entities, show zero filings in the latest tracked year, with at least one recording a full year-over-year drop — a signal that current activity may be shifting to less established filers.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to pipeline integrity and hydrostatic testing, with the prior art for and against each one.
Recent-year momentum data shows several previously active assignees dropping to zero filings in the latest tracked year, including a full year-over-year decline for at least one — a sign that leadership in this field is more open than the historical citation graph suggests.
Assignees that built up filing volume over the tracked period, show no filings in the most recent year, with one entity recording a full -100% year-over-year drop. That does not necessarily mean exit from the field — it may reflect publication lag or a shift to different filing entities.
Only three co-assignee pairs appear in this corpus, all involving the same small cluster of related filers, each pairing appearing 8 times. This points to a field where most patents are filed by a single assignee rather than through joint development arrangements.
The United States leads as receiving office with 56 filings, ahead of China (29), Europe (28) and Canada (25), with WIPO PCT and Australia rounding out the spread. That distribution reflects where pipeline infrastructure investment and regulatory testing requirements are concentrated.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| PII Limited | 0 | — |
| ENTEGRA LLP | 0 | -100% |
| TUBOSCOPE IP | 0 | — |
| HASHA MALVERN M | 0 | — |
| HASHA BRUCE B | 0 | — |
| HASHA BRIAN B | 0 | — |
| Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | 0 | — |
| TDW Delaware, Inc. | 0 | — |
The filing pattern here points to two distinct follow-up questions: whether the mechanical core still leaves room to file, and whether the data-integration layer is where new entrants should focus instead.
The most-cited patents in this corpus are decades-old mechanical leak-test and inspection-system claims. Before investing in a new hydrostatic test rig or in-line inspection tool, run a freedom-to-operate check against those foundational filings and their active continuations.
Run a freedom-to-operate search in EurekaDigital data processing (G06F) and dimensional measurement (G01B) subclasses each carry only 8 records in this dataset, well below the testing and piping core. A first claim scoped to inspection-data fusion or remaining-life calculation may sit outside the densest prior art.
Explore white space mapping in EurekaSeveral historically prolific filers show zero activity in the latest tracked year. Confirm whether that reflects publication lag, a change in filing strategy, or genuine exit before treating citation-based rankings as a current picture of competitive activity.
Monitor assignee activity in EurekaThe core classes in this dataset are G01M (testing machines and structural balance) and F16L (pipes and pipe fittings), which together account for the largest share of the 199 families tracked. F17D (pipeline transport) and G01N (material analysis and testing) form a second tier, while E21B, B08B, G01B and G06F carry smaller, more specialized claim sets around drilling-adjacent, cleaning, dimensional-measurement and data-processing aspects. Searching across all of these subclasses together, rather than any single one, is necessary to capture the full field because inspection, transport and testing claims overlap heavily in practice.
Based on the tracked filings, activity is flat rather than accelerating: 2017 recorded 2 filings, the 2022 midpoint recorded 8, and the peak year so far is 2024 at 18. The most recent year, 2026, shows only 2 filings, but that figure is not yet meaningful because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so recent-year counts are always understated at the time of measurement. The broader multi-year pattern still points to a mature field with steady rather than rising filing volume.
Citation counts in this corpus are led by older mechanical leak-test and inspection-system filings, including patents on externally and internally testing tubular connections for leaks and on pipeline inspection systems generally. High citation counts reflect influence built up over a long time in a searched corpus, and they favour older records almost by construction, so they should be read as a signal of foundational importance rather than of which assignee is most active today. Recent-year momentum data in this dataset shows the previously dominant filers registering zero activity in the latest tracked year, underscoring that citation leadership and current filing leadership are not the same thing here.
In-line inspection, reflected in the G01M and F17D claims in this dataset, uses tooling that travels through a pipeline to detect corrosion, deformation or other defects without taking the line out of service. Hydrostatic testing, reflected heavily in the F16L and G01M claims, pressurizes a pipeline segment with water to a specified test pressure and checks for pressure decay or leakage before or during service. Many of the most-cited patents in this corpus address the mechanical apparatus for one or the other, while newer filings such as the representative record here increasingly claim systems that integrate outputs from both approaches.
The thinnest IPC buckets in this dataset are G06F (digital data processing, 8 records), G01B (dimensional measurement, 8 records) and B08B (cleaning, 10 records), all of which sit adjacent to the heavily-claimed G01M and F16L core. That gap suggests data-integration methods that combine inspection and test outputs, purpose-built dimensional sensors for test rigs, and pre-inspection cleaning methods scoped narrowly to inspection preparation are comparatively open. None of this means the underlying technology is immature — it means the claim space in those specific corners has not been occupied as densely as the mechanical testing and inspection core.
Go past this page: query the whole pipeline integrity and hydrostatic testing corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.