https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/pipeline-integrity-and-hydrostatic-testing-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Pipelines & Pressure Equipment
Pipeline Integrity and Hydrostatic Testing Patents
  • Flat filing trend. Filings ran from 2 in 2017 to a peak of 18 in 2024, with 2022 at the midpoint (8) — a mature field, not an accelerating one.
  • Testing and piping claims dominate. G01M (111 records) and F16L (91 records) together outweigh pipeline transport (F17D, 57) and material analysis (G01N, 60) combined.
  • The oldest patents still lead on citations. The five most-cited records date back decades and cover mechanical leak-test and inspection-system apparatus, not recent data-driven approaches.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
199
Published Records
36%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+200%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

A mature field built on mechanical foundations

Pipeline integrity and hydrostatic testing patents span a search space defined by three overlapping IPC groups: G01M testing machinery and structural balance, F16L pipes and fittings, and F17D pipeline transport. Across 199 tracked families, filing activity has stayed largely flat since 2017 rather than accelerating, and the most heavily cited records are decades-old mechanical apparatus for leak testing and in-line inspection rather than recent digital approaches. That combination — flat filing volume, old claims carrying the most citation weight — is characteristic of a field where the core commercial methods are settled and newer entrants are looking for room at the edges.

The receiving-office spread, led by the United States, China, Europe and Canada, shows the field is filed broadly across the major pipeline-operating jurisdictions rather than concentrated in one region. Recent-year filing counts should be read cautiously: publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the most recent year in any trend chart is always an undercount at the time of measurement.

Filing volume and technology composition, 2017–2026
  1. 1PII LIMITED32
  2. 2ENTEGRA LLP18
  3. 3ENGIP LLC8
  4. 4HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC7
  5. 5HASHA BRUCE B6
  6. 6HASHA MALVERN M6
  7. 7HASHA BRIAN B6
  8. 8NDT SYST & SERVICES AG6
  9. 9TUBOSCOPE IP5
  10. 10TDW DELAWARE INC5
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Pipeline Integrity and Hydrostatic Testing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Filing Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Filing activity in pipeline integrity and hydrostatic testing has stayed flat rather than accelerated over the past decade, while the underlying claim space is spread unevenly across testing, piping and transport-level IPC subclasses.

A flat filing curve since 2017

Filings ran from 2 in 2017 to a peak of 18 in 2024, with the midpoint year (2022) at 8 and 2026 tracking at only 2 so far — a partial year that will revise upward as publications catch up, but the underlying trend across the period is flat to declining rather than growing.

A flat filing curve since 20170510152022017201820192020202120222023182024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Testing and piping claims dominate the IPC mix

G01M (testing machines and structural balance) and F16L (pipes and pipe fittings) account for the largest share of records, well ahead of G01N material analysis and F17D pipeline transport; smaller buckets in E21B, B08B, G01B and G06F mark the thinner, less-claimed edges of the field.

Testing and piping claims dominate the IPC mixG01M · Testing machine & structure ba…11155.8%F16L · Pipes & pipe fittings9145.7%G01N · Material analysis & testing6030.2%F17D · Pipeline transport5728.6%E21B · Earth & rock drilling (wells)147.0%B08B · Cleaning (general)105.0%G01B · Measuring length & dimensions84.0%G06F · Electric digital data processi…84.0%Other7135.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 199 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Pipeline Integrity and Hydrostatic Testing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Pipeline Integrity and Hydrostatic Testing with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about pipeline integrity and hydrostatic testing and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The patents shaping this field

Representative Recent Filing
US12398847B22025-08-26

System for providing integrated pipeline integrity data

FATHOM SOLUTIONS FOR COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

A system for providing an interface that allows access to a system used to collect oil and gas pipeline integrity related data sets, inspection and survey reports to process the integrity status and to determine the remaining lifetime of each point of a pipeline on a sophisticated mapping platform. The system integrates databases for centralized storage of information needed for pipeline integrity assessment, deploying results in an augmented reality platform, and uses artificial intelligence to compare consecutive in-line inspection results.Filed by Fathom Solutions for Communications and Information Technology, published 2025-08-26 as US12398847B2.

US12398847B2 — patent drawing 1US12398847B2 — patent drawing 2
View full patent record
Most-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5295392APipe testing equipment112
2US5209105AMethod and apparatus for externally and internally testing for leaks in connections between tubular members84
3US6813949B2Pipeline inspection system80
4US20040031337A1Pipeline inspection system79
5US4926680AMethod and apparatus for externally and internally testing for leaks in connections between tubular members58
6US4211107APipe testing machine with clamping pressure keyed to hydrostatic test pressure51
7US4599890AHydrostatic test apparatus47
8US20200208769A1Self-adaptive inline inspection vehicle for pipelines32
9US9721448B2Wireless communication systems for underground pipe inspection31
10US6640655B1Self tracking sensor suspension mechanism31

Ranked by citation count within the searched corpus; older mechanical apparatus patents lead, which is typical of citation graphs that favour early filings.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Pipeline Integrity and Hydrostatic Testing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the filing pattern signals

Read together, the technology mix, the citation graph and the recent-year momentum point to a field where the mechanical core is settled and the open ground is in data integration layered on top of it.

Filing Trend
18 in 2024
peak year

Growth has plateaued, not accelerated

Filings moved from 2 in 2017 to 8 at the 2022 midpoint and 18 at the 2024 peak, then dropped back — a pattern typical of a technology area with established commercial routes rather than one still being actively staked out.

2026 figures are partial and will revise upward.
Technology Mix
111 records
G01M subclass

Testing instrumentation is the largest single claim area

G01M (testing machines and structural balance) accounts for more records than any other subclass, ahead of F16L pipes and fittings at 91 and F17D pipeline transport at 57, confirming that instrumentation and measurement methods — not transport-level system claims — carry the densest prior art.

Compare against F16L and F17D for filing strategy.
Citation Signal
cited 112
top record, US5295392A

Foundational mechanical claims still carry the most weight

The most-cited records in this corpus are mechanical leak-test and pipeline inspection system patents from decades past, which is expected in a searched citation graph that favours older filings — but it also means new entrants are building on claims that have already absorbed the field's heaviest citation load.

Citation weight signals influence, not current relevance.
Assignee Momentum
0 in latest year
across leading assignees

Previously active filers have gone quiet

Assignees who historically drove filing volume in this space, including several of the more prolific entities, show zero filings in the latest tracked year, with at least one recording a full year-over-year drop — a signal that current activity may be shifting to less established filers.

Recent-year counts understate true activity due to publication lag.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to pipeline integrity and hydrostatic testing, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Pipeline Integrity and Hydrostatic Testing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where activity has stalled

Recent-year momentum data shows several previously active assignees dropping to zero filings in the latest tracked year, including a full year-over-year decline for at least one — a sign that leadership in this field is more open than the historical citation graph suggests.

Momentum Signal
0 in latest year
multiple leading assignees

Historical filers have gone quiet

Assignees that built up filing volume over the tracked period, show no filings in the most recent year, with one entity recording a full -100% year-over-year drop. That does not necessarily mean exit from the field — it may reflect publication lag or a shift to different filing entities.

Track momentum by assignee before assuming exit.
Co-Filing Pattern
3 pairs
co-assignee relationships

Co-assignee activity is limited and concentrated

Only three co-assignee pairs appear in this corpus, all involving the same small cluster of related filers, each pairing appearing 8 times. This points to a field where most patents are filed by a single assignee rather than through joint development arrangements.

Limited co-filing suggests few formal cross-licensing structures.
Geographic Spread
56 US filings
leading receiving office

Filing is broad but US-weighted

The United States leads as receiving office with 56 filings, ahead of China (29), Europe (28) and Canada (25), with WIPO PCT and Australia rounding out the spread. That distribution reflects where pipeline infrastructure investment and regulatory testing requirements are concentrated.

Compare regional filing strategy against local pipeline codes.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
Based on the smallest IPC buckets in this dataset relative to the crowded testing and piping core.
AI-assisted inspection data fusionPressure-decay sensor calibration toolingPre-inspection pipeline cleaning methodsDimensional measurement for test rigsRemaining-life mapping platforms
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
PII Limited0
ENTEGRA LLP0-100%
TUBOSCOPE IP0
HASHA MALVERN M0
HASHA BRUCE B0
HASHA BRIAN B0
Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.0
TDW Delaware, Inc.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Pipeline Integrity and Hydrostatic Testing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The filing pattern here points to two distinct follow-up questions: whether the mechanical core still leaves room to file, and whether the data-integration layer is where new entrants should focus instead.

Check freedom-to-operate against the mechanical core

The most-cited patents in this corpus are decades-old mechanical leak-test and inspection-system claims. Before investing in a new hydrostatic test rig or in-line inspection tool, run a freedom-to-operate check against those foundational filings and their active continuations.

Run a freedom-to-operate search in Eureka

Map the data-integration white space

Digital data processing (G06F) and dimensional measurement (G01B) subclasses each carry only 8 records in this dataset, well below the testing and piping core. A first claim scoped to inspection-data fusion or remaining-life calculation may sit outside the densest prior art.

Explore white space mapping in Eureka

Track assignee momentum before assuming market leadership

Several historically prolific filers show zero activity in the latest tracked year. Confirm whether that reflects publication lag, a change in filing strategy, or genuine exit before treating citation-based rankings as a current picture of competitive activity.

Monitor assignee activity in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Pipeline Integrity and Hydrostatic Testing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on pipeline integrity and hydrostatic testing patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Pipeline Integrity and Hydrostatic Testing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Pipeline Integrity and Hydrostatic Testing in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole pipeline integrity and hydrostatic testing corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.