Book a demo

Planetary Gear Tooth Contact Interface Patent Snapshot

Planetary Gear Tooth Contact Interface Patent Snapshot
Evidence Snapshot
Planetary Gear Tooth Contact Interface Patent Snapshot in 2026

This is a highly concentrated, specialist niche: 11 patent families in scope, with Genesis Advanced Tech holding the plurality position and the top five filers collectively accounting for 94% of activity among the hundred largest filers. Filing activity peaked in 2018 and has since declined, signalling a field that has moved past its primary invention phase.

11
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
Europe (EPO)
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··5 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Genesis Advanced Tech leads a heavily consolidated niche

Genesis Advanced Tech Inc commands the leading position in this niche, followed by Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp in second place. The ranking is steeply tiered, with a significant gap between these two leaders and the remaining applicants.

The top five filers account for 94% of combined activity among the ranked applicants visible in this query — an unusually high concentration that reflects a narrow, specialist application domain rather than a broad technology platform. The remaining applicants each hold only one or two patent records.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Genesis Advanced Tech Inc7
2PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP4
3United Technologies Corporation2
4JATCO Ltd2
5Sumitomo Heavy Industries Ltd1
6RTX Corporation1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leaders’ positions imply that meaningful IP coverage in planetary gear tooth contact interfaces is effectively controlled by two principal actors — Genesis Advanced Tech and Pratt & Whitney Canada — with secondary participation from United Technologies (now part of the RTX family), JATCO, and Sumitomo Heavy Industries. A new entrant faces an established, if compact, incumbency.

The most recent filing years should be treated as under-counted due to standard patent publication lags of 18–24 months; however, the absence of filings from 2022 onwards across the trend data is consistent with the lifecycle assessment of a field past its peak.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

A 2018 peak followed by quiescence; gearing fundamentals dominate the technology mix

The filing trend and technology composition together describe a field that had a brief, concentrated burst of activity around 2018–2021, with gearing and transmission classifications accounting for the large majority of coverage.

Annual filing trend

Activity spiked in 2018 with five filings, eased to two in 2020 and four in 2021, then fell to zero from 2022 onwards. Given publication lag, the post-2022 period may be marginally under-counted, but the overall pattern is consistent with a field past its primary invention peak. The 2018 spike likely corresponds to the concentrated filing programme of the leading applicant.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 5 in 2018.02017520180201922020420210202202023020240202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

F16H (Gearing & transmissions) is the visible IPC class with 20 patent records, reflecting the core mechanical focus of the field. F02C (Gas-turbine plants) and F16D (Clutches & brakes) form a secondary tier with four and three records respectively. Several adjacent classes — including powder metallurgy, gear cutting, metal working, abrasive blasting, aircraft equipment, coatings, turbine engines, and lubrication — each appear only once, indicating sparse but technically relevant peripheral coverage.

Technology compositionF16H · Gearing & transmissions leads with 20; F02C · Gas-turbine plants 4.F16H · Gearing & transmi…20F02C · Gas-turbine plants4F16D · Clutches & brakes3B22F · Powder metallurgy1B23F · Gear & thread cut…1B23P · Metal working (ge…1B24C · Abrasive blasting1B64D · Aircraft equipment1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US10837520B2Published 2020-11-17

Differential planetary gearbox

Genesis Advanced Technology INC.

A torque transfer device has plural planets arranged for planetary rotation about one or more sun gears and within one or more ring gears. Each planet includes at least one planetary gear set comprising plural planetary gears connected to rotate together, but having a different diameter to form a differential gear system. To improve load sharing, the plural… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Differential planetary gearbox — patent drawingDifferential planetary gearbox — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Lubrication system for aircraft engine reduction g…32
2Epicyclic gear12
3Epicyclic gear10
4Surface treatment method for pinion gear of planet…7
5Lubricating structure for epicyclic gear device an…7
6Differential planetary gearbox3
7Internal planetary gear structure3
8Lubrication system for aircraft engine reduction g…2

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Genesis Advanced Tech Inc

Genesis Advanced Tech Inc

Genesis Advanced Tech holds seven patent records — the largest position in this niche — concentrated across F16H1 (gearing fundamentals), F16H48 (differential gearing), and F16H55 (gear tooth geometry). This focus on core gear mechanics and differential planetary architectures reflects a systematic effort to protect the foundational contact interface design space. Applicant momentum data is not available for the recent period.

patent records: 7
Challenger · Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp

Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp

Pratt & Whitney Canada holds four patent records, with emphasis split between F02C7 (gas-turbine plant ancillaries) and F16H57 (gearing lubrication and housings), plus one record in B64D35 (aircraft propulsion). This combination signals an application-driven approach: tooth contact interface solutions developed specifically for aircraft engine reduction gearboxes. The top-cited patent in the corpus — a lubrication system for aircraft engine reduction gearboxes — is consistent with this applicant’s technical focus.

patent records: 4
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
JATCO LtdSumitomo Heavy Industries Ltd+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.