Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now

Plasma Assisted Etching Landscape 2026 — PatSnap Eureka

Plasma Assisted Etching Landscape 2026 — PatSnap Eureka
Technology Landscape 2026

Plasma Assisted Etching: Innovation Intelligence for 2026

From foundational RIE frameworks to gate-all-around nanosheet release and green chemistry substitution — map the full plasma assisted etching IP landscape across 15+ assignees, 9 jurisdictions, and 4 decades of innovation using PatSnap Eureka.

Plasma Etching Innovation Eras: Foundational (1978–1989), Development (1996–2011), Maturation (2014–2026) — 15+ assignee organizations, 9 jurisdictions A process diagram showing three innovation eras in plasma assisted etching from 1978 to 2026, illustrating the progression from foundational dry plasma etching through geographic diversification to advanced GAA and green chemistry applications. Source: PatSnap Eureka patent dataset analysis. FOUNDATIONAL 1978 – 1989 RIE Western Electric Bell Labs / AT&T GB · SG · IL · AU Anisotropic etch Trilevel resist DEVELOPMENT 1996 – 2011 KR/JP Tokyo Electron Mitsubishi · Hitachi KR · JP · GB Process control CD distribution MATURATION 2014 – 2026 GAA Lam Research Tokyo Electron KR · EP · JP · SG 2 nm node · GAA Green chemistry Source: PatSnap Eureka · Patent dataset 1978–2026 · 15+ assignees · 9 jurisdictions
15+
Distinct assignee organizations in this dataset
8+
Currently active patents (Lam, TEL, ULVAC, LG Chem, others)
35–40%
KR jurisdiction share of all patent records in dataset
2026
Most recent filing: Tokyo Electron GAA selective Ge etching, JP
Technology Overview

Four Core Technical Axes in Plasma Assisted Etching

Plasma assisted etching (PAE) encompasses multiple sub-disciplines defined by how plasma is generated and how reactive species interact with the substrate. Within this dataset, the dominant technical axes are: (1) reactive ion etching (RIE) and its variants, where ion bombardment drives anisotropic material removal; (2) chemically selective plasma etching using fluorocarbon, halogen, or oxygen-based chemistries; (3) atmospheric pressure plasma processes that eliminate the need for vacuum infrastructure; and (4) plasma endpoint detection and process control systems that ensure etch termination accuracy.

Foundational work from Western Electric Co. (Bell System, filed 1978–1982) established the core framework of dry plasma etching for LSI devices, describing anisotropic etch profiles, trilevel resist processes, and the challenge of achieving submicron resolution without radiation damage. These early patents, filed across GB, AU, IL, and SG jurisdictions, form the scientific bedrock from which the entire field descended.

More recent literature expands the chemistry and materials envelope significantly: SF₆/O₂ mixed plasmas for silicon texturing and wide bandgap semiconductor etching; C₄F₈/Ar and HFIP-based chemistries for SiO₂ contact hole etching; O₂ plasma with SF₆ additive for Parylene C; and Cl₂/Ar systems for aluminum-doped zinc oxide (AZO) thin films. The dataset contains records from at least 15 distinct assignee organizations and spans jurisdictions including GB, US, KR, JP, EP, SG, AU, IL, and FR. For broader context on semiconductor IP strategy, the PatSnap Analytics platform provides comprehensive patent landscape analysis across device scaling domains.

According to WIPO, semiconductor manufacturing remains among the highest-volume patent filing categories globally, with dry etch processes consistently among the most contested sub-domains. The European Patent Office (EPO) has seen growing plasma etch filings from both Asian equipment OEMs and European specialty material companies since 2018.

1978
Earliest filing in dataset — Western Electric, GB
9
Jurisdictions covered: GB, US, KR, JP, EP, SG, AU, IL, FR
6
Key application domains from semiconductors to photovoltaics
2 nm
Node targeted by 2026 Tokyo Electron GAA etching patent
  • Reactive ion etching (RIE) — dominant mechanism across dataset
  • Chemically selective plasma etching — fluorocarbon, halide, oxidant blends
  • Atmospheric pressure plasma — eliminates vacuum infrastructure
  • Endpoint detection & process control — OES, virtual metrology
  • Wide bandgap semiconductor etching — GaN, SiC, Ga₂O₃, diamond
Patent Data Visualized

Jurisdiction Distribution & Assignee Concentration

Key quantitative signals from the plasma assisted etching patent dataset, spanning 1978–2026 across 9 filing jurisdictions and 15+ assignee organizations.

Patent Filing Share by Jurisdiction

Korea (KR) accounts for approximately 35–40% of all patent records, reflecting both Korean semiconductor manufacturing scale and Japanese OEM filing strategies targeting KR as a key market.

Plasma Etching Patent Filing Share by Jurisdiction: Korea (KR) ~37.5%, Great Britain (GB) ~22%, Japan (JP) ~18%, Europe (EP) ~15%, Other (SG/IL/FR/AU) ~7.5% Donut chart showing jurisdiction distribution of plasma assisted etching patents in the PatSnap Eureka dataset. Korea dominates at ~37.5%, driven by semiconductor manufacturing hub status and Japanese OEM filing strategies. Source: PatSnap Eureka patent dataset 1978–2026. 9 Jurisdictions KR ~37.5% GB ~22% JP ~18% EP ~15% Other ~7.5% Source: PatSnap Eureka · Patent dataset 1978–2026

Top Assignees by Active Patent Significance

Tokyo Electron and Lam Research hold the largest share of commercially active patents. At least 8 patents are currently active across the dataset; the majority of early Western Electric and Korean display filings are inactive.

Plasma Etching Top Assignees by Active Filing Count: Tokyo Electron (KR/EP/JP) — highest active portfolio; Lam Research (KR/SG) — internal plasma grid, augmented plasma; LG Chem (EP) — Faraday cage blazed grating; SPTS Technologies (KR) — high-temp ESC; ULVAC (EP) — monopolar ESC; Sumitomo Precision (EP) — endpoint detection; Robert Bosch (KR) — deep silicon etching Horizontal bar chart comparing active patent significance of top plasma etching assignees in the PatSnap Eureka dataset. Tokyo Electron and Lam Research lead in active commercially significant patents, followed by LG Chem, SPTS Technologies, ULVAC, Sumitomo Precision, and Robert Bosch. Source: PatSnap Eureka patent dataset 2014–2026. Tokyo Electron Lam Research LG Chem SPTS Technologies ULVAC Sumitomo Precision Robert Bosch KR·EP·JP KR·SG EP KR EP EP KR Source: PatSnap Eureka · Active patent portfolio analysis 2014–2026

Run your own plasma etching patent landscape analysis in PatSnap Eureka

Search the Full PAE Patent Dataset
Key Technology Approaches

Four Innovation Clusters Shaping Plasma Assisted Etching

The plasma assisted etching patent landscape organizes into four distinct innovation clusters, each addressing a different layer of the process stack — from mechanism physics to hardware architecture and process intelligence.

Cluster 1

Reactive Ion Etching (RIE) and Ion-Assisted Anisotropic Etching

The dominant mechanism across the majority of retrieved patent records. Directed ion bombardment combined with reactive chemistry achieves vertical sidewall profiles essential to all semiconductor patterning. Key process gases include CF₄/O₂, C₄F₈/Ar, SF₆, HBr/O₂, and fluorocarbon mixtures. Western Electric's foundational GB filings (1980) established the framework; Robert Bosch GmbH (KR, 2007) introduced dynamic ion acceleration voltage modulation — a direct precursor to advanced Bosch-process deep silicon etching. Tokyo Electron's CF₃I-based method (KR, 2011) enabled high-precision deep sub-micron pattern formation with controlled self-bias voltage of ≥200 V.

Self-bias voltage ≥200 V for deep sub-micron patterning
Cluster 2

Plasma Chemistry Optimization and Selective Etching

A distinct cluster focuses on gas chemistry engineering to achieve high etch selectivity between target and mask/stop layers. Advanced materials chemistry is central here: Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU, 2022) demonstrated HFIP as a lower-GWP substitute for PFC gases in SiO₂ etching, achieving higher etch rates and thinner fluorocarbon films via in-situ oxygen radical generation. LTM (CNRS/CEA Grenoble, 2015) showed pulsed HBr/O₂ plasma increases silicon-to-SiO₂ selectivity and improves etch homogeneity versus continuous wave processing. Sandia National Laboratories (2020) identified mask erosion and micromasking as key challenges for GaN, SiC, Ga₂O₃, and diamond etching.

PMMA:PS selectivity of 6:1 via O₂/C₄F₈ mixed plasmas
Cluster 3

Plasma Source Architecture and Chamber Design

Hardware-level innovations address how plasma is generated, shaped, and delivered to the substrate. Lam Research (KR, 2014) introduced a slotted plasma grid partitioning the reaction chamber into upper (electron-ion plasma) and lower (ion-ion plasma) sub-chambers, substantially improving center-to-edge uniformity and isolated/dense (I/D) loading balance. Tokyo Electron (EP, 2019) disclosed a dual RF power supply system with a power modulation mode alternating between polymer deposition and etching power levels at a preset cycle, enabling fine profile control in sub-10 nm feature fabrication. SPTS Technologies (KR, 2025) addressed dechuck time reduction in high-temperature plasma etching using a bipolar electrostatic chuck (ESC) with a cooling gas system.

Dual RF modulation for sub-10 nm feature control
Cluster 4

Endpoint Detection and Process Monitoring

Reliable etch termination is critical for yield in multi-layer device stacks. Hitachi Ltd. (GB, 1981/1983) established early optical emission monitoring principles for glow discharge plasma. Sumitomo Precision Products (EP, 2018) used a two-stage SF₆ supply scheme to isolate Si/SiFₓ optical emission signals during the low-flow step, enabling precise endpoint detection without dedicated endpoint areas on the wafer. Seoul National University (2021) extended OES-based virtual metrology to real-time etch profile prediction — not just etch depth — using plasma information (PI) variables in a statistical regression model. According to NIST, metrology innovation at advanced nodes is among the most critical enabling capabilities for sub-5 nm manufacturing.

Virtual metrology for full etch profile prediction
PatSnap Eureka

Map all four clusters across your competitive landscape

Identify white-space opportunities and freedom-to-operate risks in plasma etching IP

Analyze Your Plasma Etching IP Position
Application Domains

Where Plasma Assisted Etching Is Being Applied in 2026

Patent and literature records in this dataset span six distinct application domains, from mainstream IC manufacturing to emerging AR/VR optical component fabrication.

🔒
Unlock Full Application Domain Intelligence
See all 7 domains with key records, IP status signals, and emerging opportunity flags — directly in PatSnap Eureka.
WBG semiconductor IP gaps DSA lithography selectivity data OLED atmospheric plasma records + more
Explore Application Domains in Eureka →
Emerging Directions

Five Frontier Directions Identified in the 2026 Dataset

The most recently filed patents and literature records in this dataset signal five distinct innovation vectors that R&D teams and IP strategists should monitor through 2027.

⚛️

Selective Ge Etching for Gate-All-Around (GAA) Devices

The most recently published patent in this dataset — Tokyo Electron US Holdings (JP, February 2026) — discloses selective plasma etching of germanium-containing layers within Si/Ge thin film stacks using a fluorine/nitrogen/hydrogen agent plasma that simultaneously forms a passivation layer on exposed silicon surfaces to suppress silicon etching. This is a direct enabler of gate-all-around (GAA) transistor manufacturing at the 2 nm node and below.

🌡️

High-Temperature Plasma Etching with Advanced Chuck Management

SPTS Technologies Limited (KR, filed 2025) specifically addresses dechuck time reduction in high-temperature etch applications using a bipolar ESC combined with a precision cooling gas system. This signals growing demand for plasma etching at elevated wafer temperatures — relevant to III-V, SiC, and certain high-k dielectric processes — where conventional dechucking becomes a throughput bottleneck.

🌿

Green Chemistry Substitution for PFC Gases

SKKU (2022) directly tackles semiconductor industry obligations to reduce perfluorocarbon (PFC) emissions. HFIP's embedded oxygen atoms generate in-situ radicals that replicate the fluorocarbon film thinning needed for high-selectivity SiO₂ etching without the full PFC emission load. This direction is expected to intensify as emissions regulations tighten post-2025. The US EPA has identified PFC reduction as a semiconductor manufacturing priority.

🔭

Faraday Cage Angular Ion Control for AR Optical Gratings

LG Chem (EP, 2023) represents a novel application of plasma etching to the fabrication of blazed diffraction gratings for augmented reality (AR) waveguides. By controlling the angular distribution of ions through a mesh Faraday cage and shutter mechanism, the process creates asymmetric (blazed) sawtooth profiles — a departure from conventional symmetric RIE and a signal that plasma etching is moving into precision optics manufacturing.

🔒
Unlock AI-Driven Process Control & IP Strategy Insights
Access the full virtual metrology analysis and freedom-to-operate assessment for plasma etching hardware architectures.
OES virtual metrology data FTO risk assessment + strategic implications
Access Full Emerging Directions Report →
Innovation Timeline

Plasma Etching Patent Activity Across Three Eras

The dataset spans 1978 to 2026, with geographic diversification toward KR and JP jurisdictions accelerating from 1996 onward and active commercially significant filings concentrating in the 2014–2026 maturation era.

Plasma Etching Innovation Timeline: Key Milestones by Era and Assignee

Three distinct eras define the landscape: Foundational (1978–1989) led by Western Electric/Bell Labs; Development (1996–2011) dominated by Tokyo Electron and Korean filings; Maturation (2014–2026) with Lam Research, LG Chem, and SPTS Technologies at the frontier.

Plasma Etching Innovation Timeline: 1978 Western Electric foundational RIE (GB); 1981 Hitachi endpoint monitoring (GB); 1989 Drytek multi-planar electrode (FR); 1996 Mitsubishi UV post-etch irradiation (JP); 2007 Robert Bosch dynamic ion acceleration (KR); 2011 Tokyo Electron CF₃I polysilicon etching (KR); 2014 Lam Research internal plasma grid (KR); 2018 Sumitomo endpoint detection (EP); 2019 Tokyo Electron dual-RF modulation (EP); 2022 LG Chem Faraday cage (EP); 2025 SPTS bipolar ESC (KR); 2026 Tokyo Electron GAA selective Ge etching (JP) Chronological milestone chart showing the progression of plasma assisted etching innovation from 1978 to 2026. The timeline illustrates geographic diversification from GB-centric foundational work to KR/JP/EP-dominated active patent filings. Source: PatSnap Eureka patent and literature dataset. FOUNDATIONAL 1978–1989 DEVELOPMENT 1996–2011 MATURATION & SPECIALIZATION 2014–2026 1978 Western Electric Foundational RIE 1981 Hitachi OES 1989 Drytek multi-wafer 2007 Bosch deep Si 2011 TEL CF₃I polysilicon 2014 Lam plasma grid 2019 TEL dual-RF EP 2022 LG Chem Faraday 2026 TEL GAA Selective Ge etch Source: PatSnap Eureka · Patent dataset 1978–2026 · Milestone records by era and assignee

Track plasma etching patent activity from 1978 to 2026 in real time

Build Your Own Innovation Timeline
Strategic Implications

What the 2026 Plasma Etching Landscape Means for R&D and IP Strategy

Gate-All-Around nanosheet processing is the most urgent near-term technical frontier. The 2026 Tokyo Electron patent on selective Si/SiGe etching signals that plasma chemistry for GAA transistor channel release is actively being locked down by leading equipment OEMs. R&D teams targeting 2 nm and below should prioritize F/N/H plasma chemistry development and passivation layer selectivity as core IP domains.

Lam Research and Tokyo Electron hold strong active IP positions in hardware architecture. Their internal plasma grid and dual-RF modulation patents (active in KR and EP) create meaningful freedom-to-operate constraints for new entrants designing plasma etch chambers. Competing architectures — such as atmospheric pressure plasma for certain applications — may offer differentiated paths to market. The PatSnap Analytics platform provides FTO analysis tools for exactly this type of landscape assessment.

Green chemistry substitution is both a regulatory requirement and a technical opportunity. The HFIP/C₄F₈ substitution work from SKKU (2022) and the broader PFC reduction agenda represent an under-patented space in the academic record. IP strategists should monitor whether fab-side filers (TSMC, Samsung, Intel) or chemistry suppliers accelerate patent filing in low-GWP etch chemistry between 2024 and 2027. For life sciences and chemicals IP strategy context, see PatSnap's chemicals intelligence solutions.

Wide bandgap semiconductor etching remains technically immature and IP-sparse. Sandia National Laboratories' 2020 review identifies Ga₂O₃, diamond, and high-Al-content AlGaN alloys as materials where optimum plasma chemistries remain poorly defined and mask erosion/micromasking problems are unsolved. This represents an open IP landscape for power electronics and RF device manufacturers investing in GaN-on-SiC and Ga₂O₃ platforms. The IEEE has identified wide bandgap device manufacturing as one of the defining technical challenges of the decade.

Faraday cage and geometric ion-steering methods for optical components are an emerging adjacent space. LG Chem's active EP patents (2022, 2023) on blazed grating fabrication via Faraday cage plasma etching signal that AR/VR optical waveguide manufacturing is pulling plasma etching expertise into a new precision optics vertical — one with very different process requirements and competitive dynamics from mainstream semiconductor fab. Teams with proven IP intelligence workflows will be best positioned to identify and act on this white space.

6:1
PMMA:PS selectivity achieved via O₂/C₄F₈ mixed plasmas (Osaka Prefecture University, 2015)
Aspect ratio enhancement in DSA nanopatterning — 80 nm width, 250 nm depth trenches
≥200V
Self-bias voltage enabling high-precision deep sub-micron pattern formation (TEL, 2011)
2 nm
Node targeted by selective Ge/Si etching in 2026 Tokyo Electron GAA patent
IP Status Summary
Active patents in dataset8+
Inactive (expired/lapsed)Majority
Most active jurisdictionKR (35–40%)
Newest filing year2026 (JP)
Frequently asked questions

Plasma Assisted Etching — key questions answered

Still have questions? Let PatSnap Eureka answer them for you.

Ask PatSnap Eureka About Plasma Etching
PatSnap Eureka

Map Every Plasma Etching Patent Before Your Competitors Do

Join 18,000+ innovators already using PatSnap Eureka to accelerate their R&D and sharpen their IP strategy in semiconductor process technology.

References

  1. Plasma Etching Technology — Tokyo Electron US Holdings, Inc., JP, 2026
  2. Plasma etching method and apparatus — SPTS Technologies Limited, KR, 2025
  3. Plasma etching apparatus and plasma etching method — Tokyo Electron Limited, EP, 2019
  4. Internal plasma grid for semiconductor fabrication — Lam Research Corporation, KR, 2021
  5. Internal plasma grid for semiconductor fabrication — Lam Research Corporation, KR, 2014
  6. Plasma-enhanced etching in an augmented plasma processing system — Lam Research Corporation, SG, 2014
  7. Plasma etching method using Faraday cage — LG Chem, Ltd., EP, 2023
  8. Plasma etching method using Faraday cage — LG Chem, Ltd., EP, 2022
  9. End point detectable plasma etching method and plasma etching apparatus — Sumitomo Precision Products Co., Ltd., EP, 2018
  10. Plasma etching method, plasma etching device, plasma processing method, and plasma processing device — ULVAC, Inc., EP, 2018
  11. Method for anisotropic plasma etching of semiconductors — Robert Bosch GmbH, KR, 2007
  12. Method for plasma etching of a wafer — Disco Corporation, JP, 2024
  13. Plasma etching of wide bandgap and ultrawide bandgap semiconductors — Sandia National Laboratories, 2020
  14. Plasma Etching of SiO₂ Contact Holes Using Hexafluoroisopropanol and C₄F₈ — Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), 2022
  15. Development of Virtual Metrology Using Plasma Information Variables to Predict Si Etch Profile — Seoul National University, 2021
  16. Silicon etching in a pulsed HBr/O₂ plasma. II. Pattern transfer — LTM (CNRS/UJF-Grenoble1/CEA), 2015
  17. High Selective Plasma Etching of PMMA to PS — Osaka Prefecture University, 2015
  18. SF₆ Optimized O₂ Plasma Etching of Parylene C — National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Micro/Nano Fabrication (Beijing), 2018
  19. Selective Plasma Etching of Polymeric Substrates for Advanced Applications — Jozef Stefan International Postgraduate School, 2016
  20. WIPO — World Intellectual Property Organization: Global Patent Filing Statistics
  21. European Patent Office (EPO) — Semiconductor Manufacturing Patent Trends
  22. NIST — National Institute of Standards and Technology: Semiconductor Metrology
  23. IEEE — Wide Bandgap Semiconductor Device Manufacturing
  24. US EPA — Perfluorocarbon Emissions Reduction in Semiconductor Manufacturing

All data and statistics on this page are sourced from the references above and from PatSnap's proprietary innovation intelligence platform. This landscape is derived from a limited set of patent and literature records retrieved across targeted searches and represents a snapshot of innovation signals within this dataset only.

Ask PatSnap Eureka
Ask PatSnap Eureka
AI innovation intelligence · always on
Ask anything about plasma assisted etching.
PatSnap Eureka searches patents and research to answer instantly.
Try asking
Powered by PatSnap Eureka