Book a demo

Plasma Doping Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Plasma Doping Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
Data to 2026-07-31

Plasma Doping and Conformal Doping Patents: Concentration, Momentum and Open Claim Space

52.7% of all 848 records sit with just five assignees, so most of the accessible claim territory in dose retention, sidewall dose and sheath conformality is already staked out by a small group. Filings peaked at 50 in 2019, then declined; the 2021-to-2024 span alone shows a 34% drop (32 to 21). Treat 2025 and 2026 as still filling in rather than as evidence of a further decline.

Filing trend, 2017–2026
Complete Incomplete
Filing trend, 2017–2026013253850462017201850201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.
848
Published Records
53%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-34%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Top filers · published records
  1. 1APPLIED MATERIALS INC127
  2. 2VARIAN SEMICON EQUIP ASSC INC121
  3. 3TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD95
  4. 4INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION63
  5. 5MONOLITHIC 3D INC41
Published by Patsnap Research·

See the full plasma doping and conformal doping analysis in Eureka

  • The complete ranking, not just the top five
  • Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
  • The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Read more about this analysis in Eureka
FAQ

Common questions on plasma doping patents

What is the difference between plasma doping and conformal doping?+

Plasma doping refers to the process of introducing dopant ions from a plasma into a substrate, often without the mass separation used in conventional beamline ion implantation. Conformal doping is the broader goal that plasma doping is frequently used to achieve: an even dopant profile across a non-planar surface, such as a fin sidewall or trench wall, where a directional ion beam would leave the vertical faces under-doped. In patent claim language the two terms overlap heavily, and this dataset treats them together because most filings claim conformal doping as an outcome achieved through a plasma doping or plasma immersion method.

Who are the leading patent holders in plasma doping technology?+

The assignee ranking in this dataset is led by a semiconductor process-equipment maker with 127 of the 848 records in scope, with the top five assignees together holding 52.7% of all records. The leaderboard is dominated by equipment and foundry companies rather than fabless design houses, which reflects plasma doping’s nature as a tool and process-integration technology. Anyone assessing competitive position in this space should look at the full ranked list rather than assume the leader’s share reflects the whole field, since concentration drops off quickly after the top few names.

Is patent filing activity in plasma doping growing or slowing down?+

Filing activity peaked in 2019 at 50 records and has declined since, with the last three complete years showing a 34% drop from 32 filings in 2021 to 21 in 2024. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete and should not yet be read as confirming a further decline. The honest reading is that the field cooled through 2024, with the most recent trend still an open question until later filings finish publishing.

Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.

Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Plasma Doping and Conformal Doping covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.