Book a demo

Polyetheretherketone Curing Process Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026

Polyetheretherketone Curing Process Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/polyetheretherketone-curing-process-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Polymers & Composites · Patent Landscape
Polyetheretherketone curing process patents: where filings concentrated and where they stalled
  • Filing peaked in 2018 at 18 families and has declined since, with the most recent year showing zero — a mature, occupied claim space rather than a growing one.
  • C08L polymer-composition claims dominate at 116 of 157 records, while B29B plastics-preparation claims sit at just 7 — a narrow gate compared to the composition crowd.
  • Momentum has gone flat across every leading assignee, with Solvay Specialty Polymers, Victrex, Arkema, Evonik and SHPP all recording zero filings in the latest tracked year.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
157
Published Records
79%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-83%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
EP
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (6 records) with 2024 (1) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 157 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks 157 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine PEEK-specific terminology with melt processing, crystallization control, annealing or thermal processing language, filtered to the core polymer and shaping IPC classes. It captures how curing and thermal-history claims around polyetheretherketone have been staked out across composition, additive and shaping art, rather than treating PEEK chemistry broadly.

Filing activity rose from single digits in 2017 to a peak of 18 families in 2018, then eased back toward the 2022 midpoint of 5 and further since — consistent with a technology whose core thermal-processing claims were staked early and have not needed re-filing at the same pace. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent year understates real activity, but the multi-year decline predates that lag effect.

Filing trend, 2017–2026
  1. 1VICTREX MFG LTD47
  2. 2SOLVAY SPECIALTY POLYMERS USA LLC34
  3. 3ARKEMA FRANCE SA25
  4. 4SHPP GLOBAL TECH BV9
  5. 5SYENSQO SPECIALTY POLYMERS USA LLC9
  6. 6INVIBIO8
  7. 7CYTEC IND INC4
  8. 8SABIC INNOVATIVE PLASTICS IP BV3
  9. 9ARKEMA INC3
  10. 10NANJING COMPTECH COMPOSITES CORP2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Polyetheretherketone Curing Process covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 157-family dataset: activity over time, and where claims sit across the IPC hierarchy.

Filings by year

Activity climbed from 8 families in 2017 to a peak of 18 in 2018, eased to 5 by the 2022 midpoint, and has continued to soften toward the present, partial year.

Filings by year0510152082017182018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass distribution

C08L (polymer compositions) and C08G (condensation polymers) carry the bulk of the art at 116 and 90 records respectively; shaping (B29C, 32) and additive (C08K, 28) claims trail well behind, and sterilising applications (A61L, 8) and plastics preparation (B29B, 7) remain the thinnest branches.

IPC subclass distributionC08L · Polymer compositions11673.9%C08G · Condensation polymers9057.3%B29C · Shaping of plastics3220.4%C08K · Use of additives in polymers2817.8%B29K · Plastics moulding materials (i…138.3%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions127.6%A61L · Sterilising & disinfecting85.1%B29B · Plastics preparation74.5%Other5132.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 157 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Polyetheretherketone Curing Process covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Polyetheretherketone Curing Process with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about polyetheretherketone curing process and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited prior art and a recent representative filing

Representative recent filing
WO2025168444A12025-08-14

Extruded films comprising PEEK with low extractables content

SOLVAY SPECIALTY POLYMERS USA, LLC

The present invention relates to use of a PEEK polymer to manufacture films by extrusion, wherein the PEEK polymer is characterised by a total amount of extractables of no more than 3000 µg/g and by an amount of Oligomer (1) of no more than 70 µg/g.Filed by Solvay Specialty Polymers USA, LLC, published 2025-08-14 as WO2025168444A1 — one of the few active filings after several quiet years across the field.

WO2025168444A1 — patent drawing 1WO2025168444A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-cited records in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1WO2005030836A1Polymeric ketone53
2US20060251878A1Polymeric material51
3US4960818APolymer composite preform and process for producing same25
4WO2018086873A1Polyarylether ketone copolymer24
5WO2011117607A1Method of prudicng a composite pipe and such a composite pipe21
6WO2007023253A1Polyether and its use for lining21
7CN101157268A一种聚醚醚酮棒材的制备方法20
8US20190322804A1Polyarylether ketone copolymer16
9US7906574B2Polymeric ketone15
10EP3012297A1Composition based on poly(arylene ether ketone) having improved properties13

Citation counts accumulate over time inside the searched corpus, so older records such as the 2005 and 2006 filings naturally lead — treat this as a measure of influence on later filers, not of current commercial relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Polyetheretherketone Curing Process covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers indicate

Reading the filing curve, IPC spread and citation table together points to a field with settled core claims and a few narrow openings.

Filing trajectory
18 → 0
peak (2018) to latest year

Activity has cooled since 2018

The peak of 18 families in 2018 was followed by a steady slide through the 2022 midpoint of 5 down toward zero in the most recent tracked year. That pattern reads as a field where the foundational curing and crystallization-control claims were filed early and have not required much follow-on protection since.

Publication lag means the final year is understated, but the multi-year decline is not a lag artefact.
Claim concentration
116 of 157
records touch C08L

Composition claims dominate the class map

C08L polymer-composition claims appear in 116 of 157 records, with C08G condensation-polymer claims close behind at 90. Shaping (B29C, 32) and additive (C08K, 28) claims are comparatively sparse, suggesting most protection has been sought at the material-composition level rather than at the process-equipment level.

A composition-heavy IPC map usually signals dense prior art for formulation claims specifically.
Filing geography
41 EPO filings
leading receiving office

Europe leads filing volume, the US and PCT follow

Europe (EPO) accounts for 41 filings, ahead of the United States at 31 and WIPO PCT route filings at 22. The United Kingdom (14), Austria (12) and China (11) trail, indicating that protection strategy has centred on European and US markets more than on China to date.

Receiving-office counts reflect where applicants sought protection, not where R&D occurred.
Collaboration pattern
10 co-assignee pairs
across the dataset

Co-filing is limited and clustered

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the 157 families, and the strongest pairing links Solvay Specialty Polymers USA with Cytec Industries at 4 shared filings. Most other pairs, including Victrex Manufacturing's links to named inventors, sit at 2, pointing to a field of largely independent corporate filers rather than joint-venture activity.

Sparse co-filing suggests licensing or supply relationships have not driven joint patenting here.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to polyetheretherketone curing process, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Polyetheretherketone Curing Process covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the ground, and where it is open

Filing has gone quiet across every named leader in the latest tracked year, which changes how a newcomer should read the competitive map.

Momentum check
0
latest-year filings, Solvay Specialty Polymers

Solvay's filing pace has stopped, not disappeared

Solvay Specialty Polymers USA shows a -100% year-on-year change with zero filings in the latest tracked year, following a co-filing relationship with Cytec Industries that produced the dataset's strongest assignee pair at 4 shared families. Its 2025 extruded-film filing (WO2025168444A1) shows the company still active on extractables-control claims even as raw filing counts have fallen.

A quiet recent year does not mean an abandoned portfolio — check granted claim scope before assuming freedom to operate.
Momentum check
0
latest-year filings, Victrex Manufacturing

Victrex's named-inventor filings have also gone flat

Victrex Manufacturing appears twice in the co-assignee data, each time paired with a named individual inventor rather than another corporation, and shows zero filings in the latest year. That pattern is more typical of inventor-led incremental filings than of a coordinated program, which may leave gaps between the granted claims worth checking individually.

Inventor-paired filings often carry narrower claim scope than corporate-only families.
Momentum check
0
latest-year filings, Arkema

Arkema's two listed entities are both inactive in the latest year

Both Arkema France and Arkema Inc. show zero filings in the latest tracked year. Combined with SHPP Global Technologies and Evonik also at zero, the entire top of the assignee ranking has paused simultaneously, which is unusual and worth watching for the next filing wave once the publication lag clears.

A field-wide pause across leaders can precede either consolidation or a fresh filing cycle.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
These sub-areas show thinner IPC coverage relative to the composition-heavy core, and may offer more freedom to operate.
Sterilisable PEEK medical-device processing (A61L overlap)Low-extractables extrusion film processingPlastics-preparation-stage crystallinity control (B29B)Additive-modified thermal cycling (C08K overlap)PCT-route filings outside EPO/US/China corridors
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Victrex Manufacturing Limited0
Solvay Specialty Polymers USA, LLC0-100%
Arkema France0
Evonik0
SHPP Global Technologies B.V.0
Arkema Inc.0
SABIC Innovative Plastics IP B.V.0
Cytec Industries Inc.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Polyetheretherketone Curing Process covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a settled core and a few thin branches — the next steps depend on whether you are clearing a product or scouting a filing gap.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on composition claims

With 116 of 157 records touching C08L, any new PEEK formulation should be checked against the composition claims held by the leading assignees before committing to a specification.

Explore composition claims in Eureka

Watch for the next filing wave

Every leading assignee shows zero filings in the latest tracked year; given publication lag, a renewed wave from Solvay, Victrex or Arkema could surface within the next reporting cycle.

Track assignee activity in Eureka

Scope the thinner IPC branches directly

B29B plastics-preparation and A61L sterilising overlaps carry far fewer records than the composition core, and may be where a first claim is still available.

Search white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Polyetheretherketone Curing Process covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on PEEK curing process patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Polyetheretherketone Curing Process covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Polyetheretherketone Curing Process in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole polyetheretherketone curing process corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.