Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (115 records) with 2024 (85) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 3,081 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Polyimide advanced materials cover a narrow but technically dense corner of specialty polymers: low-CTE, transparent and photosensitive polyimide formulations built for flexible displays, semiconductor packaging and printed-circuit substrates. The dataset spans 3,081 patent families filed between 2015 and 2026 and classified under condensation-polymer, polymer-composition and film-processing codes. Filing activity peaked in 2017 at 175 and has trended downward since, with the 2022 midpoint at 122 confirming a flat-to-declining trajectory rather than a growth curve.
Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the last one to two years in any chart will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be. That caveat matters here: the zero-filing readings for several major assignees in the latest year likely reflect pending publications rather than an actual halt in R&D. What the longer trend does show reliably is a technology area that built out its core claim space early and has been filing incrementally against it since.
Two views of the same 3,081-family corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.
Annual filings dropped from 175 in 2017 to 122 by the 2022 midpoint and to single digits (9) by 2026. Read the tail end cautiously — recent years are undercounted because of publication lag — but the multi-year downward slope through the stable years is consistent enough to treat as real.
C08G (condensation polymers) covers 2,646 records and C08L (polymer compositions) 1,406, making resin backbone and formulation chemistry the largest claim pools. G03F (photolithography, 1,127) and C08J (processing and solutions, 1,074) show how much of the activity is tied to photosensitive-PI patterning for electronics rather than the base polymer alone. H01L, C08K, C09D and H05K trail behind, marking where polyimide intersects device integration, additives, coatings and circuit assembly.
Shares are the percentage of the 3,081 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about polyimide advanced materials and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA transparent polyimide mixture is disclosed. The transparent polyimide mixture includes a transparent polyimide, an additive, and a solvent. A molecular chain of the transparent polyimide includes an active hydrogen atom. The additive includes a carbodiimide group. An equivalent ratio of the active hydrogen atom and the carbodiimide group is in a range of 1:0.8 to 1:1.2. A method for preparing the transparent polyimide mixture, a transparent polyimide film, and a method for preparing a transparent polyimide film are also disclosed.Filed by Zhen Ding Technology Co., Ltd., granted 2023-05-23 — illustrates the current generation of transparent-PI claims built around carbodiimide-based crosslinking additives rather than backbone monomer chemistry alone.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US4595548A | Process for preparing essentially colorless polyimide film containing phenoxy-linked diamines | 250 |
| 2 | US5814894A | Semiconductor device, production method thereof, and tape carrier for semiconductor device used for producing… | 216 |
| 3 | US6232428B1 | Essentially colorless, transparent polyimide coatings and films | 207 |
| 4 | JP1984108031A | Photosensitive polyimide | 206 |
| 5 | JP1984219330A | Polyimide, manufacture and use | 197 |
| 6 | US4603061A | Process for preparing highly optically transparent/colorless aromatic polyimide film | 184 |
| 7 | US4113628A | Asymmetric polyimide membranes | 144 |
| 8 | CN101831175A | 一种无色透明的聚酰亚胺纳米复合材料膜及其制备方法 | 138 |
| 9 | US4880895A | Polyimide film-forming polyamide acid solution | 136 |
| 10 | JP2002146021A | Soluble and transparent polyimide and method for producing the same | 124 |
Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations inside the searched corpus — read this as a map of foundational influence, not of current competitive priority.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Four read-outs from the trend, IPC and citation data that matter more than the raw counts on their own.
Annual filings fell from a 2017 high of 175 to 9 by 2026, with the 2022 midpoint of 122 confirming a genuine decline rather than a plateau. New entrants are filing into a claim landscape that was largely built out in the mid-2010s.
C08G alone covers 2,646 of the 3,081 families, meaning most of the corpus stakes claims on the core imide-forming condensation chemistry itself. Formulation-side codes (C08L, C08K) and processing codes (C08J) are dense too, leaving less room for a new diamine or dianhydride claim to stand alone.
The most-cited records in the corpus concern colorless and photosensitive polyimide film chemistry from the 1980s and 1990s, still the reference points examiners cite against new transparent-PI filings. Anything claiming a colorless or low-color polyimide film needs to be read against this lineage first.
Japan (714), the United States (674) and China (589) account for the bulk of receiving-office filings, with Europe, South Korea and Taiwan trailing. A freedom-to-operate check that skips Japanese-language prior art is checking less than a quarter of the relevant filings.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to polyimide advanced materials, with the prior art for and against each one.
Ten co-assignee pairs exist across the corpus, most of them tight collaborations rather than broad alliances — a sign that most polyimide work is still done in-house or with a single long-term partner.
The strongest co-assignee link in the dataset sits between two units of the same corporate group, filing together 12 times. The next strongest pairs involve a materials manufacturer filing alongside named individual inventors, suggesting smaller, founder-linked filing teams rather than multi-company joint ventures.
Every major assignee tracked for recent-year momentum — including established materials producers — shows 0 filings in the latest year, one with a reported -100% YoY change. This is very unlikely to mean these firms have stopped filing; it is far more consistent with the roughly 18-month gap between filing and publication.
The representative record in this dataset, granted in 2023 to Zhen Ding Technology, claims a transparent polyimide mixture built around a carbodiimide-group additive at a specific equivalent ratio — a formulation-level claim layered on top of established transparent-PI backbones rather than a new monomer system.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| LG Chem, Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Mitsui Chemicals, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Toray Industries, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Kolon Industries, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Nitto Denko Corporation | 0 | -100% |
| Resonac Holdings Corporation | 0 | — |
| Asahi Kasei Corporation | 0 | -100% |
| Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company, Inc. | 0 | — |
The trend and assignee data point to a claim landscape that is dense at the core and thin at a few specific edges. Two directions follow from that.
With 2,646 of 3,081 families sitting in C08G, any new backbone chemistry claim needs a full read against the foundational colorless and photosensitive PI patents before drafting.
Run a freedom-to-operate check in EurekaAdditive-based crosslinking, recyclable PI chemistries and high-frequency dielectric applications show thinner filing density than the core backbone and lithography codes — worth monitoring for early-mover claims.
Set up a white-space alert in EurekaThe dataset shows filing concentrated among a group of established materials and electronics manufacturers, including firms such as LG Chem, Mitsui Chemicals, Toray, Kolon Industries and Nitto Denko, alongside a long tail of smaller filers. No single assignee dominates the full corpus; instead, filing is spread across a recognizable set of Japanese, Korean and Chinese materials producers. Because the ranking is family-based rather than raw document counts, it also neutralizes the effect of any one company filing multiple continuations on the same invention.
Annual filings fell from a peak of 175 in 2017 to 122 by the 2022 midpoint and to single digits by 2026, a genuine multi-year decline rather than a plateau. High filing density in the early-to-mid 2010s built out most of the core claim space around condensation-polymer chemistry and photosensitive formulations, leaving less room for entirely new backbone claims. Readers should still treat the very last one to two years of any chart cautiously, since publication lags filing by roughly 18 months and recent filings are undercounted.
Transparent and low-CTE (coefficient of thermal expansion) polyimide films are used where a polymer needs to survive high-temperature processing without yellowing or excessive dimensional shift, notably in flexible display substrates, semiconductor packaging tape, and printed-circuit dielectric layers. The most-cited patents in this space date to the 1980s-1990s and established the core colorless-polyimide film chemistry that later transparent-PI claims are still measured against. Later filings, including the representative 2023 grant in this dataset, tend to layer specific additive chemistries — such as carbodiimide-based crosslinkers — onto that established base rather than replacing it.
Relative to the dense claim pools in condensation-polymer backbone chemistry (C08G) and photosensitive lithography (G03F), several adjacent branches show thinner filing activity: additive-based crosslinking chemistries for transparent PI, recyclable or depolymerizable polyimide systems, and PI dielectric layers tuned for high-frequency printed circuits. These are not guaranteed-clear areas, but they sit outside the heaviest-filed subclasses in this corpus. Any filing strategy targeting these branches should still run a full prior-art search, since thinner density in a broad IPC code does not mean zero relevant art exists.
The most-cited records in a searched corpus are almost always the oldest ones, simply because they have had decades to accumulate citations — the top entries here date to the 1980s and 1990s. That makes citation count a good signal of foundational influence and a poor signal of what is commercially current. For a view of active technology direction, recent representative filings and the IPC composition of newer publications are more useful than the citation leaderboard alone.
Go past this page: query the whole polyimide advanced materials corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.