https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/polyimide-film-manufacturing-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Engineering Plastics
Polyimide Film Manufacturing Patents: Who Files, What They Claim, and Where the Field Is Still Open
  • 16.0% concentration at the top. The five leading assignees hold 1,628 of the 10,147 records in scope — a real lead, but not a lock: the rest is a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants.
  • Filing has cooled from its 2017 peak. 442 records published in 2017 fell to 153 by 2024, a -48% move over 2021-2024, though 2025-2026 figures are still filling in as publications lag filing.
  • Semiconductor and circuit classes now rival the polymer chemistry itself. H01L and H05K appear on roughly a fifth to a quarter of all records, alongside the core C08G/C08J/C08L polymer classes — this is as much a device-integration field as a materials one.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
10.1K
Published Records
16%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-48%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (294 records) with 2024 (153) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 10,147 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

Polyimide film manufacturing sits at the intersection of aromatic polymer chemistry and device fabrication. The search string underlying this dataset pulls records that combine core casting and imidization process language — polyamic acid, casting solution, imidization process — with downstream application terms such as film tension, black polyimide and adhesive lamination. That combination is deliberate: it captures both the materials-science side of making the film and the process controls that determine whether it performs in a flexible display, a semiconductor package or a laminate stack.

Coverage runs from 2015 through the 2026-07-31 data cut-off, spanning 10,147 published records. Because publication trails filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any trend understate real filing activity and should be read as provisional rather than declining.

Filing activity by year, 2015-2026
  1. 1EI DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO436
  2. 2SEMICON ENERGY LAB CO LTD377
  3. 3RESONAC CORP296
  4. 4LG CHEM LTD267
  5. 5HITACHI LTD252
  6. 6KK TOSHIBA199
  7. 7TORAY INDUSTRIES INC195
  8. 8KANEKA CORP174
  9. 9CANON KK166
  10. 10UBE CORPORATION165
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Polyimide Film Manufacturing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 10,147-record corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how the underlying technology splits across IPC subclasses.

From a 2017 peak to a cooling trend

Filings peaked at 442 records in 2017. By 2021 the field was publishing 294 records a year, and by 2024 — the most recent year that can be treated as complete — that had fallen to 153, a -48% move. 2025 and 2026 show far lower counts, but that reflects publication lag rather than a real collapse in filing.

From a 2017 peak to a cooling trend0125250375500442201720182019202020212022202320242025162026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Polymer chemistry and device integration in near-parity

C08G (condensation polymers) leads at 27.8% of all records, closely trailed by H01L (semiconductor devices) at 26.9%. H05K (printed circuits), C08J (polymer processing) and C08L (polymer compositions) each sit between 17% and 19%, with B32B (laminates) at 13.6% and C08K (additives) at 8.9%. Because records can carry several classes, these figures do not sum to 100% — they show a field where film chemistry and device-side integration are claimed together about as often as either is claimed alone.

Polymer chemistry and device integration in near-parityC08G · Condensation polymers2,81827.8%H01L · Semiconductor devices2,72926.9%H05K · Printed circuits & assemblies1,92819.0%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions1,87718.5%C08L · Polymer compositions1,73017.0%B32B · Layered products & laminates1,37713.6%C08K · Use of additives in polymers9028.9%H10W7077.0%Other10,626104.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 10,147 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Polyimide Film Manufacturing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Polyimide Film Manufacturing with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about polyimide film manufacturing and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Foundational IP

A representative early claim

Representative Record
US4778872A1988-10-18

US4778872A — Polyamic acid solution composition and polyimide film made therefrom

UBE INDUSTRIES, LTD.,

Discloses an aromatic polyamic acid solution comprising 5-40% by weight polyamic acid in an organic polar solvent, prepared from a tetracarboxylic acid component of biphenyltetracarboxylic acid and pyromellitic acid, and a diamine component of phenylenediamine and diaminodiphenyl ether, formed into an aromatic polyimide film.Filed by Ube Industries; issued 1988. Its claim structure around specific monomer mole-ratio ranges is a recurring pattern across later filings in this space.

View full record
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US7071287B2Aerogel metallic compositions1,530
2JP1992044075AHeating device992
3US20110027127A1Analyte sensors and methods of manufacturing same882
4US20100210745A1Molecular Healing of Polymeric Materials, Coatings, Plastics, Elastomers, Composites, Laminates, Adhesives, a…718
5US20110028815A1Analyte sensors and methods of manufacturing same715
6US20110028816A1Analyte sensors and methods of manufacturing same704
7JP1992204980Aheater521
8US8967608B2Glass substrate-holding tool and method for producing an EUV mask blank by employing the same520
9US6809421B1Multichip semiconductor device, chip therefor and method of formation thereof510
10US5870289AChip connection structure having diret through-hole connections through adhesive film and wiring substrate495

Citation counts favour older, longer-indexed records — read them as a signal of influence within this searched corpus, not as a ranking of current technical importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Polyimide Film Manufacturing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signal Read

What the data means for a filing decision

Three patterns worth acting on before drafting claims in this space.

Concentration
16.0% top-5 share
of 10,147 records

The top of the field is real but not dominant

The five leading assignees account for 1,628 of 10,147 records — enough to signal where prior art density is highest, but low enough that most of the field's claim space is held by companies outside that leading group.

Check leader portfolios before filing in adjacent claim territory.
Momentum
-48% (2021-2024)
filing volume, complete years

Filing has genuinely cooled from its peak

The 2017 peak of 442 records has not been matched since. A drop from 294 records in 2021 to 153 in 2024 marks a real slowdown in publications, even accounting for the fact that later years are still filling in.

Weigh whether reduced filing signals a maturing claim space or a shift to trade-secret practice.
Composition
26.9% H01L overlap
of records also touch semiconductor devices

Device integration is inseparable from film chemistry

Nearly as many records touch H01L semiconductor-device classification as touch the core C08G polymer class. Claims that isolate pure film chemistry without addressing device-side integration risk missing where competitors are actually filing.

Draft claims that span both the material and its integration context.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to polyimide film manufacturing, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Polyimide Film Manufacturing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Competitive Set

Who is active, and where they are pulling back

The ranking covers 100 companies drawn from the full assignee set behind this corpus — not a curated top list. Recent-year momentum points to a field where the largest historical filers have slowed sharply.

Leader
436 records
single leading assignee

One clear leader, then a fast taper

The leading assignee holds 436 records against a fifth-place figure of 252 and a tenth-place figure of 165 — a steep early drop-off rather than a plateau, meaning the mid-tier of the ranking is where competitive positioning is least settled.

Mid-tier assignees are the ones most likely to still be actively shaping claim scope.
Momentum
-50% to -80% YoY
across several historical leaders

Even top filers are pulling back

Several of the historically largest filers show sharp year-on-year declines in the latest year, with some recording zero filings. This is consistent with the broader -48% cooling trend rather than an isolated retreat by any single company.

Falling filing counts from a leader do not necessarily open the claim space they already hold.
Collaboration
10 co-assignee pairs
identified in the corpus

Co-filing is limited and concentrated

Only ten co-assignee pairs appear across the corpus, and the strongest of them involve the same handful of corporate groups filing jointly across related entities rather than cross-company collaboration.

Co-filing here mostly reflects internal group structure, not open partnership.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches with lower filing density relative to the core polymer and device classes above.
low-CTE film tension controlblack polyimide pigment dispersionadhesive-free lamination interfacesadditive-modified imidization kinetics
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd.1-80%
Resonac Corporation1-50%
Kaneka Corporation1-67%
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company0
Hitachi, Ltd.0
LG Chem, Ltd.0
Toshiba Corporation0
Toray Industries, Inc.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Polyimide Film Manufacturing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

The figures above describe where the field has been. The questions that matter now are about where specific claim language sits and where it does not.

Map claim scope against the leading portfolios

Cross-reference specific casting solution or imidization process claims against the top-ranked assignees before drafting in adjacent territory.

Explore assignee portfolios in Eureka

Track the under-claimed branches

Low-CTE tension control, black polyimide dispersion and adhesive-free lamination show lower filing density than the core polymer classes — worth a deeper novelty check.

Run a white space search in Eureka

Watch the 2025-2026 publication window

Current filing counts for the latest years are understated by publication lag; re-check this trend once those years complete.

Set up monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Polyimide Film Manufacturing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about polyimide film patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Polyimide Film Manufacturing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Polyimide Film Manufacturing in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole polyimide film manufacturing corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.