Book a demo

Polyimide Recycling Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026

Polyimide Recycling Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/polyimide-recycling-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Polymers & Composites · Patent Landscape
Polyimide Recycling Patents: Who Files, What They Claim, and Where Claim Space Is Still Open
  • Filing peaked in 2020 at 29 records and has declined since, with the 2022 midpoint at 8 — this is a maturing filing cycle, not a growing one.
  • C08G condensation-polymer claims dominate, appearing in 161 of 162 families, while battery-adjacent H01M and coating-adjacent C09D filings stay in single digits — a sign of where recycling chemistry has not yet crossed into application claims.
  • No tracked assignee filed in the latest year, including every name in the recent-momentum list, which points to a filing pause across the field rather than one company pulling back.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
162
Published Records
67%
Top-5 Share of All Records
0%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
EP
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (5 records) with 2024 (5) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 162 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the polyimide recycling patent record shows

Polyimide recycling sits at the intersection of high-performance polymer chemistry and end-of-life recovery — chemical depolymerization and film recovery routes for a polymer normally prized for chemical inertness. The search set covers 162 patent families filed between 2015 and 2026 across the IPC classes for polymer recovery, decomposition and treatment (C08J11/16, C08J11/24) and polyimide-specific condensation chemistry (C08G73/10). Filing rose through the late 2010s, peaked in 2020, and has since fallen back toward the level of the earlier years in the window.

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025-2026 counts in any trend chart are undercounts, not a true drop-off — but the decline visible from 2020 onward predates that lag and is a genuine signal. Receiving-office data shows filing concentrated in Europe and the United States, with Japan and a scatter of other jurisdictions trailing well behind, which suggests the active prosecution front is largely transatlantic rather than centred on the traditional East Asian polyimide film producers.

Filing activity, 2017-2026
  1. 1MITSUBISHI GAS CHEM CO INC68
  2. 2KOLON INDUSTRIES INC13
  3. 3ASPEN AEROGELS INC12
  4. 4OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORP8
  5. 5KANEKA CORP7
  6. 6FUJIFILM BUSINESS INNOVATION CORP7
  7. 7NEXOLVE CORPORATION6
  8. 8SUMITOMO BAKELITE CO LTD5
  9. 9LAIR LIQUIDE SA POUR LETUDE & LEXPLOITATION DES PROCEDES GEORGES CLAUDE4
  10. 10TAMURA KK4
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Polyimide Recycling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
Data

Filing trend and technology composition

The two views below cut the same 162 families two ways: by filing year, and by the IPC subclasses their claims fall into. Read together they show a field that grew fast, crested once, and is now distributing its remaining activity across a wider set of adjacent classes rather than deepening the core one.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings climbed from 3 in 2017 to a peak of 29 in 2020, then eased back toward the 2022 midpoint of 8 — a bell-shaped cycle rather than sustained growth. The final one to two years understate true filing volume because of publication lag.

Filing trend, 2017-20260815233032017201820192920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

C08G (condensation polymers) appears in 161 of 162 records, effectively a gating class for this search. C08J (processing/solutions) and C08L (polymer compositions) form the next tier at 62 and 56 records; C09D, B01J, H01M and B32B each sit at 16 or fewer, marking them as adjacent rather than core claim territory.

IPC subclass compositionC08G · Condensation polymers16199.4%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions6238.3%C08L · Polymer compositions5634.6%C08K · Use of additives in polymers3722.8%C09D · Coatings, paints & inks169.9%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …116.8%H01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells116.8%B32B · Layered products & laminates106.2%Other6741.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 162 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Polyimide Recycling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Polyimide Recycling with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about polyimide recycling and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative filing

Representative record
US5686559A1997-11-11

Poly(imide-amic ester) and processes for preparing polyimide film and fiber

KOREA RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY

A poly(imide amic ester) having a defined repeating unit is disclosed, together with a process for its preparation. The filing further covers processes for preparing polyimide, polyimide film and polyimide fiber from that intermediate — placing the claims at the synthesis stage that precedes any recovery or recycling step downstream.Filed by Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, granted 1997-11-11 — this predates the recycling-specific search window and illustrates how upstream synthesis patents can still shape freedom-to-operate for later recovery chemistry.

US5686559A — patent drawing 1
View full record
Most-cited records in this set
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US7071287B2Aerogel metallic compositions1,530
2US20040132845A1Polyimide aerogels, carbon aerogels, and metal carbide aerogels and methods of making same198
3US7074880B2Polyimide aerogels, carbon aerogels, and metal carbide aerogels and methods of making same147
4US20050131163A1Aerogel metallic compositions56
5US20080275181A1Block Copolymerized Polyimide Ink Composition for Printing50
6US5952448AStable precursor of polyimide and a process for preparing the same46
7US5202411ATri-component polyimide composition and preparation thereof45
8WO2004009673A1Polyimide aerogels, carbon aerogels, and metal carbide aerogels and methods of making same41
9US20170275425A1Polyimide resin35
10JP1990036232ANew soluble polyimide siloxane and its manufacture and use35

Citation counts reward older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate them — treat this table as a map of influence, not a ranking of current best practice.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Polyimide Recycling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns in the data matter more than the headline family count: where citations concentrate, how thin the collaboration layer is, and how narrow the recent-activity list has become.

Citation concentration
1,530 citations
top-cited record

Influence sits on aerogel chemistry, not on recycling per se

The most-cited records in this set are polyimide aerogel compositions rather than depolymerization or recovery processes. That means the highest-influence prior art a new filer will run into is adjacent aerogel and foam chemistry, not competing recycling methods directly.

Based on the top five most-cited records in the corpus.
Collaboration
3 co-assignee pairs
across 162 families

Almost no joint filing

Only three co-assignee pairings appear across the entire dataset, and each involves a single named individual alongside one aerogel-focused corporate assignee. Recycling-route development here looks like solo corporate or institutional filing, not joint ventures or consortium research.

Strongest pairs each recur once.
Momentum
0 in the latest year
for every tracked assignee

A field-wide pause, not a single dropout

Every assignee in the recent-momentum list — spanning Japanese, Korean and US-based filers — shows zero filings in the latest tracked year. That breadth argues against reading the slowdown as one company exiting; it looks more like a shared lull ahead of the next filing cycle.

Six leading assignees checked.
Class breadth
8 IPC subclasses
touched by this search

Core claims are narrow, adjacent claims are thin

With C08G present in 161 of 162 records but H01M, C09D and B32B each in the low double digits or less, the recycling chemistry itself is well-claimed while its downstream applications — battery components, coatings, laminates — remain lightly claimed extensions.

Counts drawn from the eight-subclass IPC breakdown.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to polyimide recycling, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Polyimide Recycling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The assignee list is led by a mix of Japanese specialty-chemical majors, a Korean industrial group, and a smaller aerogel-focused filer that anchors most of the co-assignee activity — behind them sits a long tail of single-filing entrants. None of the tracked leaders filed in the most recent year, which is consistent with the field-wide plateau visible in the trend data rather than any one firm's retreat.

Leading filer
0 in latest year
recent momentum

Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company, Inc. (Mitsubishi Gas Chemical)

A specialty-chemical major with a long-running polyimide materials business; its presence at the top of the ranking reflects depth of core synthesis and processing IP rather than recent recycling-specific activity.

No filings recorded in the latest tracked year.
Aerogel specialist
3 co-assignee pairs
all involving this filer

Aspen Aerogels, Inc. (Aspen Aerogels)

The only assignee in this dataset with recorded co-assignee activity, each pairing with a named individual inventor. Its filings anchor the aerogel-adjacent citation cluster that dominates the most-cited-records table.

Strongest collaboration signal in the dataset.
Industrial filer
0 in latest year
recent momentum

Kolon Industries, Inc. (Kolon Industries)

A Korean industrial materials group with polyimide film manufacturing scale; its filings sit in the core C08G/C08J classes rather than the thinner application-adjacent ones.

Part of the six-assignee momentum group, all at zero.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas
Branches where filing density is thin relative to the core chemistry
battery-electrode polyimide recoverypolyimide-to-coating reformulationcatalytic depolymerization at scalelaminate delamination recoveryaerogel-route recycling economics
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company, Inc.0
Aspen Aerogels, Inc.0
Kolon Industries, Inc.0
Occidental Chemical Corporation0
Kaneka Corporation0
Fujifilm Business Innovation Corp.0
Tamura Corporation0
Sumitomo Bakelite Co., Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Polyimide Recycling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a specific set of follow-up questions rather than a single next step.

Model the post-2020 decline against upstream demand

Check whether the filing pullback since 2020 tracks a slowdown in polyimide film production itself, or reflects claim space becoming genuinely occupied in the core C08G chemistry.

Explore in Eureka →

Map the application-adjacent classes

C09D, H01M and B32B are each lightly claimed relative to the core — a targeted search of these classes alone would show whether that is genuine white space or simply out of scope for this search string.

Explore in Eureka →

Watch for the next filing wave

Because publication lags filing by about 18 months, any recovery in activity from 2024 onward will not be fully visible in this data until later — worth a re-run on a rolling basis.

Explore in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Polyimide Recycling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about polyimide recycling patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Polyimide Recycling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Polyimide Recycling in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole polyimide recycling corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.