Polyimide Recycling Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
- Filing peaked in 2020 at 29 records and has declined since, with the 2022 midpoint at 8 — this is a maturing filing cycle, not a growing one.
- C08G condensation-polymer claims dominate, appearing in 161 of 162 families, while battery-adjacent H01M and coating-adjacent C09D filings stay in single digits — a sign of where recycling chemistry has not yet crossed into application claims.
- No tracked assignee filed in the latest year, including every name in the recent-momentum list, which points to a filing pause across the field rather than one company pulling back.
Filing growth compares 2021 (5 records) with 2024 (5) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 162 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What the polyimide recycling patent record shows
Polyimide recycling sits at the intersection of high-performance polymer chemistry and end-of-life recovery — chemical depolymerization and film recovery routes for a polymer normally prized for chemical inertness. The search set covers 162 patent families filed between 2015 and 2026 across the IPC classes for polymer recovery, decomposition and treatment (C08J11/16, C08J11/24) and polyimide-specific condensation chemistry (C08G73/10). Filing rose through the late 2010s, peaked in 2020, and has since fallen back toward the level of the earlier years in the window.
Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025-2026 counts in any trend chart are undercounts, not a true drop-off — but the decline visible from 2020 onward predates that lag and is a genuine signal. Receiving-office data shows filing concentrated in Europe and the United States, with Japan and a scatter of other jurisdictions trailing well behind, which suggests the active prosecution front is largely transatlantic rather than centred on the traditional East Asian polyimide film producers.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
The two views below cut the same 162 families two ways: by filing year, and by the IPC subclasses their claims fall into. Read together they show a field that grew fast, crested once, and is now distributing its remaining activity across a wider set of adjacent classes rather than deepening the core one.
Filing trend, 2017-2026
Filings climbed from 3 in 2017 to a peak of 29 in 2020, then eased back toward the 2022 midpoint of 8 — a bell-shaped cycle rather than sustained growth. The final one to two years understate true filing volume because of publication lag.
IPC subclass composition
C08G (condensation polymers) appears in 161 of 162 records, effectively a gating class for this search. C08J (processing/solutions) and C08L (polymer compositions) form the next tier at 62 and 56 records; C09D, B01J, H01M and B32B each sit at 16 or fewer, marking them as adjacent rather than core claim territory.
Shares are the percentage of the 162 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Polyimide Recycling with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about polyimide recycling and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaRepresentative filing
Poly(imide-amic ester) and processes for preparing polyimide film and fiber
A poly(imide amic ester) having a defined repeating unit is disclosed, together with a process for its preparation. The filing further covers processes for preparing polyimide, polyimide film and polyimide fiber from that intermediate — placing the claims at the synthesis stage that precedes any recovery or recycling step downstream.Filed by Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, granted 1997-11-11 — this predates the recycling-specific search window and illustrates how upstream synthesis patents can still shape freedom-to-operate for later recovery chemistry.

| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US7071287B2 | Aerogel metallic compositions | 1,530 |
| 2 | US20040132845A1 | Polyimide aerogels, carbon aerogels, and metal carbide aerogels and methods of making same | 198 |
| 3 | US7074880B2 | Polyimide aerogels, carbon aerogels, and metal carbide aerogels and methods of making same | 147 |
| 4 | US20050131163A1 | Aerogel metallic compositions | 56 |
| 5 | US20080275181A1 | Block Copolymerized Polyimide Ink Composition for Printing | 50 |
| 6 | US5952448A | Stable precursor of polyimide and a process for preparing the same | 46 |
| 7 | US5202411A | Tri-component polyimide composition and preparation thereof | 45 |
| 8 | WO2004009673A1 | Polyimide aerogels, carbon aerogels, and metal carbide aerogels and methods of making same | 41 |
| 9 | US20170275425A1 | Polyimide resin | 35 |
| 10 | JP1990036232A | New soluble polyimide siloxane and its manufacture and use | 35 |
Citation counts reward older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate them — treat this table as a map of influence, not a ranking of current best practice.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three patterns in the data matter more than the headline family count: where citations concentrate, how thin the collaboration layer is, and how narrow the recent-activity list has become.
Influence sits on aerogel chemistry, not on recycling per se
The most-cited records in this set are polyimide aerogel compositions rather than depolymerization or recovery processes. That means the highest-influence prior art a new filer will run into is adjacent aerogel and foam chemistry, not competing recycling methods directly.
Almost no joint filing
Only three co-assignee pairings appear across the entire dataset, and each involves a single named individual alongside one aerogel-focused corporate assignee. Recycling-route development here looks like solo corporate or institutional filing, not joint ventures or consortium research.
A field-wide pause, not a single dropout
Every assignee in the recent-momentum list — spanning Japanese, Korean and US-based filers — shows zero filings in the latest tracked year. That breadth argues against reading the slowdown as one company exiting; it looks more like a shared lull ahead of the next filing cycle.
Core claims are narrow, adjacent claims are thin
With C08G present in 161 of 162 records but H01M, C09D and B32B each in the low double digits or less, the recycling chemistry itself is well-claimed while its downstream applications — battery components, coatings, laminates — remain lightly claimed extensions.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to polyimide recycling, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the gaps sit
The assignee list is led by a mix of Japanese specialty-chemical majors, a Korean industrial group, and a smaller aerogel-focused filer that anchors most of the co-assignee activity — behind them sits a long tail of single-filing entrants. None of the tracked leaders filed in the most recent year, which is consistent with the field-wide plateau visible in the trend data rather than any one firm's retreat.
Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company, Inc. (Mitsubishi Gas Chemical)
A specialty-chemical major with a long-running polyimide materials business; its presence at the top of the ranking reflects depth of core synthesis and processing IP rather than recent recycling-specific activity.
Aspen Aerogels, Inc. (Aspen Aerogels)
The only assignee in this dataset with recorded co-assignee activity, each pairing with a named individual inventor. Its filings anchor the aerogel-adjacent citation cluster that dominates the most-cited-records table.
Kolon Industries, Inc. (Kolon Industries)
A Korean industrial materials group with polyimide film manufacturing scale; its filings sit in the core C08G/C08J classes rather than the thinner application-adjacent ones.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Aspen Aerogels, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Kolon Industries, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Occidental Chemical Corporation | 0 | — |
| Kaneka Corporation | 0 | — |
| Fujifilm Business Innovation Corp. | 0 | — |
| Tamura Corporation | 0 | — |
| Sumitomo Bakelite Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to a specific set of follow-up questions rather than a single next step.
Model the post-2020 decline against upstream demand
Check whether the filing pullback since 2020 tracks a slowdown in polyimide film production itself, or reflects claim space becoming genuinely occupied in the core C08G chemistry.
Explore in Eureka →Map the application-adjacent classes
C09D, H01M and B32B are each lightly claimed relative to the core — a targeted search of these classes alone would show whether that is genuine white space or simply out of scope for this search string.
Explore in Eureka →Watch for the next filing wave
Because publication lags filing by about 18 months, any recovery in activity from 2024 onward will not be fully visible in this data until later — worth a re-run on a rolling basis.
Explore in Eureka →Common questions about polyimide recycling patents
The ranking in this dataset is led by a mix of established polyimide film and specialty-chemical producers, including Japanese and Korean industrial groups alongside a smaller aerogel-focused filer that also accounts for the dataset's few recorded co-assignee collaborations. None of these leading assignees show any filings in the most recent tracked year, which suggests the field as a whole has slowed rather than that leadership has shifted to a new filer. Family counts, not raw document counts, are the fairer basis for this comparison since they neutralise duplicate filings across jurisdictions.
Based on this dataset, filing rose from 3 records in 2017 to a peak of 29 in 2020, then fell back toward roughly 8 by 2022 — a rise-and-fall pattern rather than sustained growth. The most recent one to two years will look artificially low because patent publication typically lags filing by about 18 months, so some of the apparent decline at the very end of the window is a reporting artefact rather than a real drop. Even accounting for that lag, the post-2020 decline started early enough that it is a genuine signal, not just a lag effect.
The IPC composition shows condensation-polymer chemistry (C08G) as the near-universal gating class, present in 161 of 162 records, with polymer processing and solution-based recovery (C08J) and polymer compositions (C08L) forming a substantial second tier. Chemical depolymerization sits inside this core chemistry, while film recovery and mechanical/solution-based approaches show up in the processing class. Smaller but present clusters in coatings (C09D), catalysis (B01J), batteries (H01M) and laminates (B32B) indicate where recovered or reprocessed polyimide is being routed into downstream applications, though claim density there is much thinner.
The clearest gaps sit in the application-adjacent classes rather than the core recovery chemistry: battery-electrode polyimide recovery, coating reformulation from recycled polyimide, and laminate delamination recovery each show only single-digit-to-low-double-digit filing counts against a core chemistry class present in nearly every record. That gap between a heavily claimed core and lightly claimed applications is where a first-mover claim is more likely to clear prior art cleanly. It's worth verifying with a targeted search on those specific IPC codes before committing to a filing strategy.
US5686559A claims a poly(imide-amic ester) intermediate and the processes for turning it into polyimide, polyimide film and polyimide fiber — it sits at the synthesis stage, upstream of any recovery or recycling step. It does not itself block a recycling process, but anyone whose recycling route depends on regenerating or reprocessing through a similar amic-ester intermediate should check its claims for overlap. Because the patent was granted in 1997, its core term has expired in most jurisdictions, but it remains useful as a reference point for how synthesis-stage claims can shape freedom-to-operate for later-stage recovery chemistry.
Research Polyimide Recycling in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole polyimide recycling corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.