Book a demo

Polyimide Scale-Up Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026

Polyimide Scale-Up Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/polyimide-scale-up-and-mass-production-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Polymers & Composites
Polyimide Scale-Up and Mass Production Patents
  • Filing has cooled since a 2019 peak. 13 families filed that year against a flat 2022 midpoint of 9, suggesting the core continuous-casting and tenter-process claim space is largely staked out rather than still expanding.
  • China dominates the receiving-office split. 105 of the tracked filings route through China, well ahead of Europe (26) and the United States (19), which tells you where freedom-to-operate checks matter most for scale-up hardware.
  • The oldest cited patents still carry the most weight. A pair of 1989 Japanese filings on thermal dimensional stability out-cite every later record, a sign that foundational film-property claims, not new casting hardware, remain the reference point examiners return to.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
172
Published Records
42%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+30%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
CN
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks patent families at the intersection of polyimide film chemistry and the continuous manufacturing methods used to scale it: continuous film casting, roll-to-roll imidization and tenter-frame stretching, filtered against IPC classes for polymer processing, film shaping and condensation-polymer composition. It captures 172 families published between 2015 and mid-2026, spanning the material science of the polyimide itself and the mechanical process that turns lab-scale resin into commercial-width film.

Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the 2025-2026 filing counts in the trend chart are necessarily incomplete and should be read as a floor, not a ceiling, on current activity.

Filing activity and IPC composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1DONGHUA UNIV22
  2. 2SHANGHAI RUITU ELECTRONICS MATERIALS21
  3. 3EI DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO11
  4. 4CHANGCHUN HIPOLYKING11
  5. 5MOBIL OIL CORP7
  6. 6OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORP5
  7. 7THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE UNIV OF TORONTO5
  8. 8DING MENGXIAN5
  9. 9INDUSTRY UNIVERSITY COOPERATION FOUNDATION HANYANG UNIVERSITY4
  10. 10TEIJIN LTD4
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Polyimide Scale-Up and Mass Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 172-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim weight.

Filings rose to a 2019 peak, then flattened

From 2 families in 2017, filings climbed to a peak of 13 in 2019, then settled to a midpoint of 9 by 2022. That flat-to-declining pattern after an early peak is typical of a process technology whose core mechanical claims (casting, stretching, imidization sequencing) were staked out early, with later filings concentrated on incremental film-property and additive claims rather than new production architectures.

Filings rose to a 2019 peak, then flattened04811152201720181320192020202120222023132024202552026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Condensation chemistry outweighs the machinery

C08G (condensation polymers) appears in 147 of 172 records and C08J (polymer processing) in 103, far ahead of B29C (plastics shaping, 9 records) or B32B (laminates, 13). The imbalance suggests most applicants are claiming the polyimide chemistry that survives continuous processing, not the casting or tenter equipment itself — equipment claims are the thinner, more open layer of this landscape.

Condensation chemistry outweighs the machineryC08G · Condensation polymers14785.5%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions10359.9%C08L · Polymer compositions9354.1%C08K · Use of additives in polymers2112.2%H05K · Printed circuits & assemblies148.1%B32B · Layered products & laminates137.6%H01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells137.6%B29C · Shaping of plastics95.2%Other7644.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 172 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Polyimide Scale-Up and Mass Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Polyimide Scale-Up and Mass Production with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about polyimide scale-up and mass production and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The records this field cites most

Representative record
US7691961B22010-04-06

US7691961B2 — Polyimide film and use thereof (Kaneka Corporation)

KANEKA CORPORATION

A polyimide film in which the dimensional change is reduced when it has undergone a step of laminating a metal on the polyimide film or a step of etching the metal layer to form wiring, and the rate of dimensional change can be stabilized across the entire width. The film is produced by a continuous process in which coefficients of linear expansion measured along and perpendicular to the molecular orientation axis satisfy a defined relationship across the entire film width.Granted 2010-04-06; the claim scope centres on width-uniform dimensional stability in continuously processed film, a property claim that reaches beyond any single casting line design.

US7691961B2 — patent drawing 1US7691961B2 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1JP1989131241APolyimide of high dimensional stability to heat76
2WO2012011970A1Matte finish polyimide films and methods relating thereto53
3WO2011017291A1Matte finish polyimide films and methods relating thereto47
4JP1989131242APolyimide having excellent thermal dimensional stability34
5CN102875835A一种聚酰亚胺多孔膜及其制备方法24
6CN102604093A聚酰亚胺的制备方法23
7CN105968354A一种CO<sub>2</sub>吸附用聚酰亚胺气凝胶的制备方法19
8US20150344625A1Polyimide film, method of preparing polyimide film, optical device including polyimide film19
9US4405550AManufacture of polyimide film by solvent casting18
10US20020010311A1Polyimide composition having improved peel strength when clad17

Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations within this searched corpus; treat them as a marker of influence on later filings, not of current commercial relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Polyimide Scale-Up and Mass Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Four read-outs from the trend, geography and citation data that matter more for strategy than the raw counts alone.

Filing trend
Peak 13 (2019) → 9 (2022)
families per year

The growth phase has already passed

Filing peaked at 13 families in 2019 and had eased to a midpoint of 9 by 2022, well before the 18-month publication lag affects the most recent years. A technology that peaks and flattens rather than keeps climbing usually means the core process claims are settled and later entrants are filing around the edges.

Trend data, 2017-2026
Geography
China 105 / US 19 / EPO 26
receiving-office filings

China is the primary battleground

China accounts for 105 of the tracked filings, more than four times the United States (19) and well ahead of Europe (26). Any freedom-to-operate review for a scale-up line destined for a Chinese fab should weight this jurisdiction first, not treat it as secondary to US or EPO filings.

Receiving-office counts
Technology mix
C08G in 147 of 172 records
share of corpus

Chemistry claims outnumber process-hardware claims

Condensation-polymer chemistry (C08G) and polymer processing (C08J) dominate the classification mix, while shaping equipment (B29C, 9 records) is comparatively thin. That gap is where mechanical and line-integration claims have more room to be filed without running into dense prior art.

IPC composition
Citation base
Top cite: 76 (1989 filing)
citations in corpus

Old foundational patents still anchor the field

The most-cited record in this corpus is a 1989 Japanese filing on thermal dimensional stability, cited 76 times — more than any filing from the last decade. New entrants are still designing against decades-old property claims, not against recent casting-line patents.

Most-cited records table
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to polyimide scale-up and mass production, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Polyimide Scale-Up and Mass Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and how concentrated is it

Co-assignee pairings and recent-year momentum both point to a landscape with a small set of anchor filers and a long tail of single-filing entrants, most of whom have gone quiet in the latest tracked year.

Academic-industry pairing
22 shared filings
co-assignee pair strength

Donghua University and Shanghai Ruitu Electronic Materials

The strongest co-assignee pair in this dataset links a university and a specialty electronic-materials maker, with 22 shared filings — the deepest and most durable collaboration in the corpus, though recent-year momentum has dropped to zero for both.

Co-assignee pairs, n=10
Named-inventor pairing
6 shared filings
co-assignee pair strength

Changchun Gaoqi Polyimide Materials and Ding Mengxian

A named inventor filing alongside a dedicated polyimide-materials manufacturer accounts for 6 shared filings, suggesting a founder-led or closely held filing pattern rather than a diffuse corporate R&D group.

Co-assignee pairs, n=10
Momentum check
-100% YoY (leading filer)
recent-year change

The historically dominant filers have paused

Every one of the assignees with the strongest historical filing counts, including the leading academic-industry pair, shows zero filings in the latest tracked year. That is consistent with the flattening trend line and points to either a maturing claim set or a lag in publication rather than a genuine drop in R&D.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches with comparatively thin filing density relative to the core chemistry claims:
Tenter-frame line integration hardwareRoll-to-roll imidization oven stagingWidth-uniform stretching control systemsBattery-grade polyimide separator processingPrinted-circuit substrate lamination tie-ins
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Donghua University0-100%
Shanghai Ruitu Electronic Materials Co., Ltd.0
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (USA)0
Changchun Gaoqi Polyimide Materials Co., Ltd.0
Mobil Oil Corporation0
DING MENGXIAN0
Occidental Chemical Corporation0
Governing Council of the University of Toronto0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Polyimide Scale-Up and Mass Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a landscape with settled core chemistry claims and open process-hardware space. Two directions make sense from here.

Map freedom-to-operate against the chemistry claims

With C08G and C08J claims covering the majority of records, a targeted clearance search on the specific film-property parameters you need — rather than the casting method — will surface the real blocking art faster.

Explore this in Eureka

Track the quiet leaders for renewed filing

Several historically dominant assignees show zero filings in the latest year. A watch on their portfolios will show whether that is a genuine pause or a publication-lag gap about to resolve.

Set up monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Polyimide Scale-Up and Mass Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Polyimide Scale-Up and Mass Production covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Polyimide Scale-Up and Mass Production in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole polyimide scale-up and mass production corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.