Polymer-Based Composite Current Collectors Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026
- Filing is diffuse, not concentrated. the top 5 assignees combined hold only 6.5% of the 4,241 records in scope, and the top 10 just 11.0% — this is a field without a single gatekeeper.
- Filings have held roughly steady, not grown. 2021 to 2024 (the last complete year) moved from 147 to 138 filings, a -6% change rather than a decline or a surge.
- Classification is scattered across process disciplines. H01M battery-cell claims sit at 18.0% of records, but B32B laminates, B29C plastics shaping, C23C coating and B23K welding each carry meaningful, separate shares — this is a multi-discipline filing problem, not a single-class one.
Filing growth compares 2021 (147 records) with 2024 (138) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 4,241 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
Polymer-based composite current collectors replace pure metal foil with a layered structure — typically a polymer substrate carrying thin metal or conductive layers — aimed at weight saving and improved safety benefit relative to conventional foil. The patent record spans not just battery-cell claims (H01M) but also lamination (B32B), plastics shaping (B29C), coating deposition (C23C), alloy composition (C22C) and joining processes like welding (B23K) and sheet-metal working (B21D), reflecting that a composite collector is as much a materials-and-process problem as a cell-design one.
The 4,241 records in scope run from 2015 through the 2026-07-31 cut-off, with receiving-office activity concentrated in the United States, Europe and Japan, and meaningful volume also filed through WIPO's PCT route and directly in China and the UK.
Filing trend and technical classification
Two views of the same 4,241 records: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.
Filing trend: activity peaked in 2022, then normalised
Annual filings rose from 149 in 2017 to a peak of 171 in 2022. Across the most recent complete three-year span, 2021 to 2024, volume moved from 147 to 138 filings — a -6% change. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the years closest to the 2026-07-31 cut-off (including the 13 records recorded for 2026) are still filling in and should not be read as a fall-off.
Technology composition: a multi-discipline claim space
H01M battery-cell claims lead at 18.0% of the 4,241 records, followed by B32B layered products and laminates at 8.5% and H01L semiconductor devices at 7.2%. Plastics shaping (B29C, 5.3%), coating and surface deposition (C23C, 5.1%), alloys (C22C, 4.9%), welding and brazing (B23K, 4.8%) and sheet-metal working (B21D, 3.7%) round out the picture. Because a single record can carry several IPC classes, these shares sum to more than 100% of the record total — the composite collector is claimed from the cell side and the materials-and-joining side at once.
Shares are the percentage of the 4,241 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Polymer-Based Composite Current Collectors with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about polymer-based composite current collectors and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA representative recent filing
WO2023245872A1 — Composite current collector, its preparation method and application
The filing describes a composite current collector built from a polymer substrate layer, a diamond-like carbon layer on at least one surface (with the sp3-sp3 carbon bond ratio held between 40% and 88%), and a metal layer on top of the carbon layer. Controlling the carbon-bond ratio is claimed to raise hardness without materially harming conductivity or flexibility, while replacing conventional pure metal foil with the polymer-plus-metal structure is claimed to reduce collector density and raise energy density in secondary batteries.Filed by Yangzhou Nanopore Innovative Materials Technology Ltd, published 2023-12-28.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20030032210A1 | Semiconductor device and peeling off method and method of manufacturing semiconductor device | 671 |
| 2 | US6853151B2 | LED retrofit lamp | 479 |
| 3 | US7728326B2 | Light emitting device and electronic apparatus | 358 |
| 4 | US8415208B2 | Semiconductor device and peeling off method and method of manufacturing semiconductor device | 331 |
| 5 | US20040189218A1 | Led retrofit lamp | 293 |
| 6 | US20050019581A1 | Process for producing niobium suboxide | 282 |
| 7 | US7800099B2 | Light emitting device, electronic equipment, and organic polarizing film | 268 |
| 8 | US20030199860A1 | Devices and methods for directed, interstitial ablation of tissue | 259 |
| 9 | US8367440B2 | Semiconductor device and peeling off method and method of manufacturing semiconductor device | 253 |
| 10 | US4223115A | Structural adhesive formulations | 224 |
Citation counts favour older, foundational filings inside this searched corpus — read them as a signal of influence within the set, not as a ranking of current commercial importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for filing strategy
Three patterns stand out once the ranking, the trend and the IPC composition are read together.
No single assignee owns this field
The leader holds 82 records and fifth place holds 42, but the top 5 combined still amount to only 6.5% of all 4,241 records in scope, and the top 10 just 11.0%. That is a long tail of filers rather than a gatekeeper structure, which changes freedom-to-operate work: clearing a handful of large portfolios will not clear the field.
A steady field, not a growing or shrinking one
Filing volume peaked at 171 in 2022 and the last complete three-year comparison shows a modest -6% move. That reads as a maturing, steadily-active area rather than either a gold rush or a retreat — new entrants are still filing, but the pace is not accelerating.
Claims are split across cell design and materials process
H01M leads at 18.0% of records, but lamination, plastics shaping, coating, alloys, welding and sheet-metal working each hold a meaningful independent share. A filer focused only on cell-level claims is missing the process-side prior art that a composite collector also has to clear.
Filing activity is US, Europe and Japan led
The United States leads receiving-office volume at 1,472 records, ahead of Europe (774) and Japan (432), with further activity in the UK, via WIPO's PCT route, and in China. That spread suggests parties are pursuing protection across major manufacturing and consuming markets rather than concentrating in a single jurisdiction.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to polymer-based composite current collectors, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the activity has cooled
The ranking spans automakers, materials and steel companies, battery cell makers and semiconductor-equipment firms — a mix that reflects the cross-disciplinary nature of the technology itself.
A fragmented leaderboard
The top-ranked assignee holds 82 records against a fifth-place count of 42 and a tenth-place count of 36 — a gentle taper rather than a cliff, consistent with the low 6.5%/11.0% concentration figures for the top 5 and top 10.
Automaker-supplier pairs dominate joint filing
The strongest co-assignee links pair automakers with materials and component suppliers, with the closest pairing appearing in 7 shared records. That pattern points to collector development happening inside OEM-supplier programmes rather than through arm's-length licensing.
Several long-standing filers show no latest-year activity
A number of assignees with substantial historical portfolios in this dataset show zero recorded filings in the latest year tracked. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this is as likely to reflect filings still working through the pipeline as any real pullback.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Dai Nippon Printing Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| AGC Inc. (Asahi Glass Co., Ltd.) | 0 | — |
| Toyota Motor Corporation | 0 | — |
| Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| JFE Steel Corporation | 0 | — |
| Ningde Amperex Technology Ltd. (ATL) | 0 | -100% |
| Toray Industries, Inc. | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to a fragmented field with real process-side claim depth outside the obvious battery classes. Two directions follow from that.
Map the process-side prior art before filing
Because B32B, B29C, C23C and B23K together carry substantial independent share alongside H01M, a freedom-to-operate search limited to battery classes will miss lamination, coating and welding claims that read on the same physical structure.
Explore the technology in EurekaTrack the low-momentum historical filers
Several previously active assignees show no recorded filings in the latest year. Whether that reflects publication lag or a genuine shift in R&D priority is worth confirming before assuming the field has consolidated around current top filers.
Set up assignee monitoring in EurekaCommon questions about this landscape
It is a current collector built from a polymer substrate carrying thin metal or conductive layers, rather than a solid pure metal foil, aimed at weight saving and safety benefit in battery cells. Because the structure is built from a lamination step, a coating or metallisation step, and sometimes a welding or tab-joining step, relevant prior art sits across several IPC subclasses rather than solely inside battery-specific classes like H01M. A search limited to battery-cell classifications will miss lamination, coating and joining claims that cover the same physical product from a different angle.
The ranking in this dataset covers 100 companies, counted in patent families, and includes automakers, steel and materials companies, battery cell makers and semiconductor-equipment firms. The leader holds 82 records, but the top 5 combined account for only 6.5% of the 4,241 records in scope and the top 10 for 11.0%, so no single company dominates. That low concentration means competitive tracking needs to follow a broad set of filers rather than a handful of dominant portfolios.
Filing activity peaked in 2022 at 171 records and, across the last complete three-year comparison (2021 to 2024), volume moved from 147 to 138 filings, a -6% change. That is best read as a steady, mature filing pace rather than either rapid growth or a genuine decline. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent one to two years in any trend chart will always look artificially low and should not be used to call a slowdown.
Relative to the dense H01M and B32B claim space, areas such as through-plane resistance test methodology, tab-welding joint design specific to composite foils, in-plane conductivity gradient control and sheet-metal working of laminated structures carry comparatively thin coverage in this dataset. These are process- and testing-adjacent branches rather than core cell-chemistry claims, which is often where they get overlooked by filers focused on battery classifications. A first claim in one of these areas would typically need to tie a specific structural feature to a measurable process or test outcome to stand apart from the existing lamination and coating art.
That record and others among the most-cited in this dataset relate to semiconductor device peeling-off and manufacturing methods and to LED retrofit lamps, and their high citation counts largely reflect their age and foundational role in adjacent semiconductor and lighting patent families within this searched corpus. Citation volume here is a signal of historical influence inside the dataset, not a ranking of current commercial relevance to composite current collectors specifically. Newer, less-cited filings such as the composite current collector application from Yangzhou Nanopore are often more directly on-point for current freedom-to-operate work.
Research Polymer-Based Composite Current Collectors in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole polymer-based composite current collectors corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.