Book a demo

Polymer-Based Composite Current Collectors Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026

Polymer-Based Composite Current Collectors Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/polymer-based-composite-current-collectors-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Batteries & Energy Storage
Polymer-based composite current collector patents: who is filing, and where the claim space is still open
  • Filing is diffuse, not concentrated. the top 5 assignees combined hold only 6.5% of the 4,241 records in scope, and the top 10 just 11.0% — this is a field without a single gatekeeper.
  • Filings have held roughly steady, not grown. 2021 to 2024 (the last complete year) moved from 147 to 138 filings, a -6% change rather than a decline or a surge.
  • Classification is scattered across process disciplines. H01M battery-cell claims sit at 18.0% of records, but B32B laminates, B29C plastics shaping, C23C coating and B23K welding each carry meaningful, separate shares — this is a multi-discipline filing problem, not a single-class one.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
4,241
Published Records
6%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-6%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (147 records) with 2024 (138) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 4,241 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Polymer-based composite current collectors replace pure metal foil with a layered structure — typically a polymer substrate carrying thin metal or conductive layers — aimed at weight saving and improved safety benefit relative to conventional foil. The patent record spans not just battery-cell claims (H01M) but also lamination (B32B), plastics shaping (B29C), coating deposition (C23C), alloy composition (C22C) and joining processes like welding (B23K) and sheet-metal working (B21D), reflecting that a composite collector is as much a materials-and-process problem as a cell-design one.

The 4,241 records in scope run from 2015 through the 2026-07-31 cut-off, with receiving-office activity concentrated in the United States, Europe and Japan, and meaningful volume also filed through WIPO's PCT route and directly in China and the UK.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015 to present
  1. 1DAI NIPPON PRINTING CO LTD82
  2. 2NISSAN MOTOR CO LTD57
  3. 3TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK50
  4. 4SEMICON ENERGY LAB CO LTD44
  5. 5JFE STEEL CORP42
  6. 6AGC INC41
  7. 7CALERA CORP40
  8. 8NINGDE AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY LTD38
  9. 9TORAY INDUSTRIES INC37
  10. 10KOBE STEEL LTD36
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Polymer-Based Composite Current Collectors covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technical classification

Two views of the same 4,241 records: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

Filing trend: activity peaked in 2022, then normalised

Annual filings rose from 149 in 2017 to a peak of 171 in 2022. Across the most recent complete three-year span, 2021 to 2024, volume moved from 147 to 138 filings — a -6% change. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the years closest to the 2026-07-31 cut-off (including the 13 records recorded for 2026) are still filling in and should not be read as a fall-off.

Filing trend: activity peaked in 2022, then normalised050100150200149201720182019202020211712022202320242025132026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition: a multi-discipline claim space

H01M battery-cell claims lead at 18.0% of the 4,241 records, followed by B32B layered products and laminates at 8.5% and H01L semiconductor devices at 7.2%. Plastics shaping (B29C, 5.3%), coating and surface deposition (C23C, 5.1%), alloys (C22C, 4.9%), welding and brazing (B23K, 4.8%) and sheet-metal working (B21D, 3.7%) round out the picture. Because a single record can carry several IPC classes, these shares sum to more than 100% of the record total — the composite collector is claimed from the cell side and the materials-and-joining side at once.

Technology composition: a multi-discipline claim spaceH01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells76418.0%B32B · Layered products & laminates3628.5%H01L · Semiconductor devices3057.2%B29C · Shaping of plastics2245.3%C23C · Coating & surface deposition2185.1%C22C · Alloys2084.9%B23K · Welding, soldering & brazing2034.8%B21D · Sheet-metal working1583.7%Other4,21599.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 4,241 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Polymer-Based Composite Current Collectors covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Polymer-Based Composite Current Collectors with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about polymer-based composite current collectors and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

A representative recent filing

Representative filing
WO2023245872A12023-12-28

WO2023245872A1 — Composite current collector, its preparation method and application

YANGZHOU NANOPORE INNOVATIVE MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY LTD

The filing describes a composite current collector built from a polymer substrate layer, a diamond-like carbon layer on at least one surface (with the sp3-sp3 carbon bond ratio held between 40% and 88%), and a metal layer on top of the carbon layer. Controlling the carbon-bond ratio is claimed to raise hardness without materially harming conductivity or flexibility, while replacing conventional pure metal foil with the polymer-plus-metal structure is claimed to reduce collector density and raise energy density in secondary batteries.Filed by Yangzhou Nanopore Innovative Materials Technology Ltd, published 2023-12-28.

WO2023245872A1 — patent drawing 1WO2023245872A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20030032210A1Semiconductor device and peeling off method and method of manufacturing semiconductor device671
2US6853151B2LED retrofit lamp479
3US7728326B2Light emitting device and electronic apparatus358
4US8415208B2Semiconductor device and peeling off method and method of manufacturing semiconductor device331
5US20040189218A1Led retrofit lamp293
6US20050019581A1Process for producing niobium suboxide282
7US7800099B2Light emitting device, electronic equipment, and organic polarizing film268
8US20030199860A1Devices and methods for directed, interstitial ablation of tissue259
9US8367440B2Semiconductor device and peeling off method and method of manufacturing semiconductor device253
10US4223115AStructural adhesive formulations224

Citation counts favour older, foundational filings inside this searched corpus — read them as a signal of influence within the set, not as a ranking of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Polymer-Based Composite Current Collectors covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

Three patterns stand out once the ranking, the trend and the IPC composition are read together.

Concentration
6.5% / 11.0%
top 5 / top 10 share of 4,241 records

No single assignee owns this field

The leader holds 82 records and fifth place holds 42, but the top 5 combined still amount to only 6.5% of all 4,241 records in scope, and the top 10 just 11.0%. That is a long tail of filers rather than a gatekeeper structure, which changes freedom-to-operate work: clearing a handful of large portfolios will not clear the field.

Based on the 100-company ranking returned for this dataset.
Momentum
147 → 138
filings, 2021 to 2024 (-6%)

A steady field, not a growing or shrinking one

Filing volume peaked at 171 in 2022 and the last complete three-year comparison shows a modest -6% move. That reads as a maturing, steadily-active area rather than either a gold rush or a retreat — new entrants are still filing, but the pace is not accelerating.

2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in due to publication lag and are excluded from this comparison.
Classification spread
8 subclasses
IPC subclasses each carrying 3.7%-18.0% of records

Claims are split across cell design and materials process

H01M leads at 18.0% of records, but lamination, plastics shaping, coating, alloys, welding and sheet-metal working each hold a meaningful independent share. A filer focused only on cell-level claims is missing the process-side prior art that a composite collector also has to clear.

Shares are of the 4,241-record total; a record can carry multiple classes.
Geography
1,472
US receiving-office records

Filing activity is US, Europe and Japan led

The United States leads receiving-office volume at 1,472 records, ahead of Europe (774) and Japan (432), with further activity in the UK, via WIPO's PCT route, and in China. That spread suggests parties are pursuing protection across major manufacturing and consuming markets rather than concentrating in a single jurisdiction.

Counts are by receiving office, not by applicant nationality.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to polymer-based composite current collectors, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Polymer-Based Composite Current Collectors covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the activity has cooled

The ranking spans automakers, materials and steel companies, battery cell makers and semiconductor-equipment firms — a mix that reflects the cross-disciplinary nature of the technology itself.

Leader
82
records

A fragmented leaderboard

The top-ranked assignee holds 82 records against a fifth-place count of 42 and a tenth-place count of 36 — a gentle taper rather than a cliff, consistent with the low 6.5%/11.0% concentration figures for the top 5 and top 10.

Ranking covers 100 companies, counted in patent families.
Co-filing
10 pairs
co-assignee relationships identified

Automaker-supplier pairs dominate joint filing

The strongest co-assignee links pair automakers with materials and component suppliers, with the closest pairing appearing in 7 shared records. That pattern points to collector development happening inside OEM-supplier programmes rather than through arm's-length licensing.

Counts reflect records naming both parties as co-assignees.
Recent momentum
0
latest-year filings for several historically active assignees

Several long-standing filers show no latest-year activity

A number of assignees with substantial historical portfolios in this dataset show zero recorded filings in the latest year tracked. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this is as likely to reflect filings still working through the pipeline as any real pullback.

Read alongside the field-wide -6% three-year filing trend, not in isolation.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a first-mover look
Branches with comparatively thin coverage relative to the core H01M and B32B claim space.
through-plane resistance test methodstab-welding joint design for composite foilsin-plane conductivity gradient controlsheet-metal working of laminated collectorsdiamond-like carbon interlayer tuning
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Dai Nippon Printing Co., Ltd.0
Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.0
AGC Inc. (Asahi Glass Co., Ltd.)0
Toyota Motor Corporation0
Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd.0
JFE Steel Corporation0
Ningde Amperex Technology Ltd. (ATL)0-100%
Toray Industries, Inc.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Polymer-Based Composite Current Collectors covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a fragmented field with real process-side claim depth outside the obvious battery classes. Two directions follow from that.

Map the process-side prior art before filing

Because B32B, B29C, C23C and B23K together carry substantial independent share alongside H01M, a freedom-to-operate search limited to battery classes will miss lamination, coating and welding claims that read on the same physical structure.

Explore the technology in Eureka

Track the low-momentum historical filers

Several previously active assignees show no recorded filings in the latest year. Whether that reflects publication lag or a genuine shift in R&D priority is worth confirming before assuming the field has consolidated around current top filers.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Polymer-Based Composite Current Collectors covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Polymer-Based Composite Current Collectors covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Polymer-Based Composite Current Collectors in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole polymer-based composite current collectors corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.