Porous Pavement Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
Porous and Functional Pavement Surface Patents
A narrow, road-focused field. 81.3% of the 32 records in scope sit in E01C (roads & pavements) — the closest secondary classes are data-processing and materials testing, each under 20%. The trend runs from 0 in 2017 to a high of 6 in 2020, then tapers; 2026 is partial and not comparable to complete years. With fewer than four complete years available after accounting for publication lag, no growth rate can be stated from this evidence.
- 1RES INST OF HIGHWAY MINIST OF TRANSPORT7
- 2JIANGSU AOXIN SCIENCE&TECHNOLOGY CO LTD5
- 3SEIKITOKYUINDS4
- 4WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY4
- 5THE BOEING CO4
See the full porous and functional pavement surfaces analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Common questions about porous pavement patents
What counts as a porous or functional pavement surface in patent terms?
In this dataset, the term covers pavement structures built for drainage (open-graded or porous asphalt), plus surfaces engineered for a specific function such as noise reduction, skid resistance, or winter anti-icing performance. Claims typically address either the physical layer structure — aggregate size, pore layout, drainage layers — or a functional treatment applied to that structure, such as an anti-icing gel or a noise-damping surface texture. The classification data confirms this is a road-engineering field first: over 80% of records sit in the roads-and-pavements IPC subclass, with material-science and sensing classes appearing far less often.
Who are the leading patent filers in porous pavement technology?
The ranked assignee list for this dataset includes 22 companies and institutions, headed by an organisation with 7 records. The gap to the field is not large — fifth place already holds 4 records, and by tenth place the count drops to 1 — so this is a fragmented field rather than one with an entrenched dominant filer. Filers include highway-research institutes, universities, and specialist materials or construction-technology companies, several of which recur together as co-assignees on the same filings.
Has patent filing in this field been growing?
The filing trend in this dataset peaked at 6 records in 2020 and has not shown a clean upward trajectory since. Because there are fewer than four complete years of data once the typical 18-month publication lag is accounted for, no reliable growth rate can be calculated from this evidence, and the most recent years should be read as undercounted rather than as a genuine slowdown. Anyone tracking this space should expect the 2024-2026 figures to rise as pending applications publish.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Porous and Functional Pavement Surfaces covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.