https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/positive-train-control-wireless-connectivity-and-iot-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Rail & Transit Patent Landscape
Positive Train Control Wireless Connectivity and IoT Patents
  • Filing already peaked. 2017 was the high point at 8 filings; by the 2022 midpoint annual filings had dropped to zero, and the trend has not recovered since.
  • Everything routes through one IPC subclass. All 36 families are tagged to B61L railway traffic control, with only single-digit spillover into brakes, vehicle bodies, couplings and data processing.
  • The US carries the filing load. The United States receives 14 of the tracked filings, ahead of the EPO at 11, with India, Austria, Malaysia and the PCT route making up a thin remainder.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
36
Published Records
-100%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
7
Active Filers Ranked
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Positive train control (PTC) wireless connectivity and IoT sits at the intersection of railway traffic control and short-range or wide-area data links: train-to-wayside communication, 220 MHz radio, RFID-based location sensing, and secure messaging protocols that let a train confirm its position and authority to move. The search underlying this page combines PTC and train control system terminology with wireless-specific claim language, then filters to the IPC codes that cover railway traffic control, vehicle-to-wayside signalling and short-range wireless data transfer.

36 patent families published between 2015 and 2026 make up the corpus, concentrated almost entirely under a single IPC subclass. That concentration, combined with a filing curve that peaked in 2017 and has since gone flat, points to a field where the foundational claim territory was staked out early and has not been meaningfully re-opened since.

Filing activity and technology composition
  1. 1Panasonic Corporation16
  2. 2Avante International Technology, Inc.12
  3. 3Thales Canada Inc.4
  4. 4Beijing Jiaotong University2
  5. 5KANNER ABE2
  6. 6FARCASIU IOAN2
  7. 7DOOYEWEERD PAUL2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Positive Train Control Wireless Connectivity and IoT covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 36-family corpus: how filing activity has moved year over year, and how those families distribute across the railway-control and adjacent IPC subclasses.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings peaked at 8 in 2017 and declined to 0 by 2022, the dataset's midpoint. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent years understate real activity, but the multi-year run of near-zero filings before that lag effect applies is a genuine signal of a cooled field rather than an artefact of the cut-off.

Filing trend, 2017-202602468820172018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC composition

All 36 records sit under B61L (railway traffic control), with much smaller counts spilling into B60T (brakes), B61D (vehicle bodies), B61G (couplings), G06F (digital data processing) and G09B (educational/demonstration aids), and a single record in G05D. The near-total concentration in one subclass means claim differentiation inside this corpus mostly happens at the sub-group level, not across technology families.

IPC compositionB61L · Railway traffic control36100.0%B60T · Vehicle brakes & braking38.3%B61D · Railway vehicle bodies38.3%B61G · Railway couplings & buffers38.3%G06F · Electric digital data processi…38.3%G09B · Educational & demonstration ai…38.3%G05D · Control of non-electric variab…12.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 36 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Positive Train Control Wireless Connectivity and IoT covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Positive Train Control Wireless Connectivity and IoT with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about positive train control wireless connectivity and iot and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

Most-cited records and a representative filing

Representative filing
US10501102B22019-12-10

US10501102B2 - Positive train control system and apparatus employing RFID devices

AVANTE INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.

A positive train control system and method comprises a plurality of RFID devices embedded in a track way and having data representing location stored therein, and an RFID reader/detector mounted on a train for reading the location data from the embedded RFID devices. The location data is processed on the train and/or at a central facility for determining whether the train location and/or time is consistent with a train routing order. Messages, alerts and/or warnings may be generated for an alert device and/or for automated response, e.g., via a train control system.Filed by Avante International Technology; granted 2019-12-10.

US10501102B2 — patent drawing 1US10501102B2 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20160046308A1Positive train control system and apparatus therefor132
2US20180222505A1Positive train control system and apparatus employing RFID devices59
3US20220055672A1Method and device for cooperative control of multiple trains47
4US9434397B2Positive train control system and apparatus therefor47
5US20160339934A1Positive train control apparatus24
6US20140183304A1Train end and train integrity circuit for train control system22
7WO2016022635A1Positive train control system and apparatus therefor20
8US10501102B2Positive train control system and apparatus employing RFID devices12
9US20180093685A1Positive train control system and method11
10US10611388B2Positive train control system and method9

Citation counts reflect influence within this searched corpus and skew toward older, earlier-published records; they are not a measure of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Positive Train Control Wireless Connectivity and IoT covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

Three read-outs from the trend, receiving-office split and citation table that matter for anyone deciding where to file or what to design around.

Filing momentum
8 → 0
peak to midpoint filings

The field has gone quiet since 2017

Annual filings ran as high as 8 in 2017 and had fallen to 0 by 2022. Even allowing for publication lag on the most recent one or two years, the multi-year plateau before that lag window suggests the core PTC wireless architecture claims were largely settled early rather than still being actively contested.

Based on the 2017-2026 filing trend
Jurisdiction spread
14 US · 11 EPO
leading receiving offices

Filing is concentrated in two blocs

The United States and the EPO together account for the bulk of tracked filings, with India, Austria, Malaysia and the PCT route contributing single-digit counts each. A filer targeting only US protection would miss over a third of the documented activity sitting in Europe.

Based on receiving-office counts
Citation concentration
132 citations
top-cited record

Influence sits with the earliest RFID and PTC apparatus filings

The most-cited records in the corpus are early PTC system and apparatus filings, including RFID-based location approaches. High citation counts here reflect age and foundational position within this searched set more than current relevance, since citation counts inside any fixed corpus favour older records.

Based on the most-cited records table
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to positive train control wireless connectivity and iot, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Positive Train Control Wireless Connectivity and IoT covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the claim territory

36 families is a small corpus, and the assignee picture reflects that: activity is thin across the board, with no single filer showing recent-year momentum.

Named individual filers
3 co-assignee pairs
strongest pairings

Individual inventor-assignees cluster together

Kanner Abe, Farcasiu Ioan and Dooyeweerd Paul each appear paired with one another across the co-assignee data, a pattern typical of a small team filing under individual names rather than a single corporate assignee.

Based on co-assignee pair counts
Corporate assignees
0 in latest year
recent-year filings, all tracked assignees

No assignee shows current-year activity

Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum, corporate and individual alike, shows zero filings in the latest year. That is consistent with the broader trend line and suggests any renewed activity would represent a genuinely new entrant rather than an incumbent doubling down.

Based on recent-year momentum by assignee
Geographic mix
36 families, 6 offices
receiving offices represented

A rail-transit sector footprint, not a single-market one

Assignees named in the dataset span technology and rail-signalling firms as well as a university, filing across US, European, Indian, Austrian, Malaysian and PCT routes. That spread reflects PTC's regulatory reach across multiple national rail networks rather than a single dominant jurisdiction.

Based on assignee and receiving-office data
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
Sub-areas inside the B61L-dominated corpus with thin coverage relative to the core PTC apparatus claims.
220 MHz radio link redundancyRFID track-embedded location taggingsecure wireless authority messagingtrain-to-wayside handover protocolsmulti-train cooperative control links
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Panasonic Corporation0
Avante International Technology, Inc.0
Thales Canada Inc.0
Beijing Jiaotong University0
KANNER ABE0
FARCASIU IOAN0
DOOYEWEERD PAUL0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Positive Train Control Wireless Connectivity and IoT covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The trend and assignee data point to a settled core and a thin, quiet periphery. The next steps depend on whether you are clearing a product or scouting for acquisition targets.

Map claims against a specific wireless protocol

The corpus groups 220 MHz radio, RFID track sensing and secure messaging together at the search-string level; a design team should pull the independent claims apart by protocol before assuming any one route is clear.

Explore claim breakdowns in Eureka

Watch for a re-entry signal

With every tracked assignee at zero filings in the latest year, a single new filing from a corporate assignee would be a meaningful signal worth monitoring rather than noise.

Set up monitoring in Eureka

Check the co-assignee cluster's current standing

The individual-inventor filings behind the strongest co-assignee pairs are worth checking for assignment history and current ownership before treating them as abandoned prior art.

Trace assignment history in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Positive Train Control Wireless Connectivity and IoT covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Positive Train Control Wireless Connectivity and IoT covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Positive Train Control Wireless Connectivity and IoT in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole positive train control wireless connectivity and iot corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.