Book a demo

Potassium-Ion Battery Patent Landscape 2026

Potassium-Ion Battery Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

Potassium-Ion Battery Patent Landscape in 2026

Contemporary Amperex Technology leads a moderately concentrated field with 1,697 patent families in scope, holding a commanding position ahead of Toyota and American Lithium Energy. Annual filing volume plateaued near its 2022 peak, signaling a maturing but still active competitive environment.

1,697
Patent families in scope
25%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+12%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

CATL’s Hong Kong entity leads a moderately concentrated field

Contemporary Amperex Technology (Hong Kong) Limited holds the top position in potassium-ion battery patenting, followed by Toyota Jidosha KK in second place and American Lithium Energy Corp in third. The top five filers account for roughly a quarter of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, indicating moderate but not extreme concentration.

A clear tier gap separates the leader from the rest: the top-ranked entity holds nearly twice the patent families of the second-ranked Toyota, and the gap widens further below the top three. Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd (the mainland entity) ranks fifth independently, meaning the broader CATL group’s combined footprint is substantially larger than any single competitor.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Contemporary Amperex Technology (Hong Kong) Limited119
2Toyota Motor Corporation64
3American Lithium Energy Corp.58
4GRST Singapore Pte Ltd47
5Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.36
6Hydro-Quebec35
7Honeycomb Battery Co.31
8Sharp Corporation30
9PetroChina Co., Ltd.29
10Jinan University24
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Wuyi University24
12Joby Aero, Inc.24
13Tokyo University of Science22
14UNIV OF SCI & TECH BEIJING19
15GRST International Limited19
16SHAANXI UNIV OF SCI & TECH18
17Guangdong University of Technology18
18Shandong University17
19Toyota Motor Corporation16
20Enovix Corporation15
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leader’s dominant position, combined with strong momentum data, suggests CATL has moved potassium-ion batteries from exploratory research toward product-oriented IP protection. Toyota’s second-place standing reflects a strategic hedge alongside its established lithium-ion and solid-state programs.

Filing counts for 2024 and 2025 are understated due to typical patent publication lag of 18–24 months; apparent softness in those years should not be read as a genuine decline in activity. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Volume plateaued near peak; electrode and materials chemistry dominate the mix

The annual filing trend reveals a field that expanded rapidly from 2017 through 2022 before plateauing, while the technology composition chart shows overwhelming concentration in battery cell and electrode classes with a long tail of adjacent material sciences.

Annual filing trend

Filings grew steadily from 2017 through a plateau around 2022–2023, consistent with a maturing field. Figures for 2024 onward reflect publication lag and undercount actual filing activity; do not interpret the apparent drop as a real decline.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 250 in 2022.106201712020181902019209202022120212502022250202319220241482025112026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H01M (batteries, cells and fuel cells) dominates the branch mix by a wide margin. Secondary branches — C01B inorganic compounds, C01G metal compounds, and B82Y nanotechnology — each represent materially smaller shares, pointing to the electrode and electrolyte material synthesis work that underpins cell performance improvements.

Technology compositionH01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells leads with 1,883; C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorganic compounds 252.H01M · Batteries, cells …1,883C01B · Non-metallic elem…252C01G · Compounds of othe…172B82Y · Nanotechnology ap…161H01G · Capacitors72C01C · Ammonia, cyanides…46B60L · Electric vehicle …41C08F · Addition polymers…39↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20190280299A1Published 2019-09-12

Positive electrode active material for potassium i…

Tokyo University Of Science Foundation

Provided is the positive electrode active material for a potassium ion battery according to the embodiment comprises a compound represented by Formula (1), in which M represents at least one element selected from the group consisting of V, Fe, Co, Ni, and Mn, and x represents a number from 0 to 1; and is a positive electrode for a potassium ion battery… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Positive electrode active material for potassium i… — patent drawingPositive electrode active material for potassium i… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Method and System for Predicting Useful Life of a …151
2Battery thermal management system and method149
3Continuous process for producing electrodes and al…135
4Alkali metal or Alkali-Ion batteries having high v…111
5Battery with molten salt electrolyte and high volt…96
6Anode Particulates or Cathode Particulates and Alk…80
7Battery thermal management system and method70
8Anode material having a uniform metal-semiconducto…68

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment

The combination of a maturing filing curve, moderate concentration among top filers, and active international co-development signals a field where differentiated materials chemistry and system-level IP are the most defensible entry points.

Maturity

Field has plateaued near peak annual volume

The lifecycle stage is Maturity: annual filings plateaued near the 2022 peak and have eased since, while the multi-year window still shows 12% growth on a recent basis. This pattern is consistent with a field that has passed its steepest growth phase. New entrants face a denser prior-art landscape, making freedom-to-operate analysis and differentiated claim strategies more important than speed alone.

Mature / plateauing
Concentration

Moderate concentration with a pronounced leader gap

The top five filers account for 25% of the output of the hundred largest filers, a moderate concentration level. However, the gap between first and second place is large — Contemporary Amperex Technology (Hong Kong) Limited holds 119 patent families versus Toyota’s 64 — suggesting the leader has built a structural IP moat that challengers would need sustained investment to close. Mid-tier players including Hydro-Quebec and Honeycomb Battery occupy defensible niches below the top tier.

Moderate HHI
Collaboration

Cross-border and industry-academic co-filing pairs are active

The most active co-filing relationships involve GRST International Ltd with GRST Singapore Pte Ltd (six co-filed families) and Hydro-Quebec with the University of Texas system (six co-filed families). Altris AB and Northvolt have co-filed three families, and Toyota Jidosha KK has co-filed with Tokyo Institute of Technology. These pairings reflect a pattern of manufacturers anchoring academic or startup expertise, particularly in electrolyte and cathode material chemistry.

Industry-academic pairs
Geography

China leads filings; US and Europe are active secondary markets

China is the leading jurisdiction by patent records, followed by the United States and the European Patent Office. WIPO PCT filings indicate applicants seeking broad international protection beyond domestic markets. India appears as a notable emerging jurisdiction. Japan and South Korea, home to major battery manufacturers, show comparatively lower record counts, suggesting some players file domestically under those offices separately rather than through EPO or PCT routes.

China-led, global spread
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
GRST International LimitedGRST Singapore Pte Ltd6
Hydro-QuebecBoard of Regents, The University of Texas System6
Altris ABNorthvolt AB3
Toyota Motor CorporationTokyo Institute of Technology1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Jurisdiction counts are at the patent-record level; a single family may be recorded in multiple offices.Explore insights →
Leaders

CATL group dominates; Toyota and Hydro-Quebec are the closest challengers

The ranking is led by entities within the CATL group, with Toyota Jidosha KK as the most credible standalone challenger. Momentum data shows both CATL entities and Hydro-Quebec accelerating, while GRST Singapore has decelerated sharply.

Leader · Contemporary Amperex Technology (Hong Kong) Limited

Contemporary Amperex Technology (Hong Kong) Limited

The top-ranked entity holds 119 patent families, concentrated heavily in battery cell and electrode subclasses (H01M 10 and H01M 4). Its parent group entity, Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd, adds a further 36 patent families independently at rank five. Recent momentum for the mainland entity shows a 170% increase versus the prior period, confirming that CATL’s potassium-ion program is accelerating, not consolidating.

families: 119
Challenger · Toyota Jidosha KK

Toyota Jidosha KK

Toyota ranks second with 64 patent families and shows a 32% increase in recent filings versus the prior period. Its technology emphasis spans both electrode chemistry (H01M 4) and cell engineering (H01M 10), with a secondary cluster in C01B inorganic compounds, reflecting materials-synthesis work consistent with its broader solid-state and next-generation battery research programs. Toyota Motor Co Ltd adds 16 further families at rank nineteen.

families: 64
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles, momentum scores, and technology emphasis for all top filers in the potassium-ion battery space.
Hydro-QuebecHoneycomb Battery Co+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.62▲ +170%
Toyota Motor Corporation29▲ +32%
American Lithium Energy Corp.5▲ new entrant
Contemporary Amperex Technology (Hong Kong) Limited38▲ new entrant
GRST International Limited4▼ -90%
Hydro-Quebec17▲ +42%
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Patent family counts are at the family level; momentum trends compare recent versus prior three-year filing windows.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the core cell chemistry

Several IPC branches sit adjacent to the dominant H01M core but have comparatively sparse coverage, representing areas where incremental differentiation may still be achievable. These are observations of relative filing sparsity; they should be evaluated against technical feasibility and competitive dynamics before treating them as investment priorities.

B82Y · Nanotechnology applications in potassium-ion systems

Nanotechnology applications (B82Y) account for a small share of records relative to the core battery class, despite the well-established role of nanostructured anodes and cathodes in improving rate capability and cycle life for potassium-ion chemistries. The sparse filing count suggests that nano-engineering of potassium-ion electrode materials is not yet as heavily contested as in lithium-ion, offering a potential differentiation path for groups with materials synthesis expertise. Entry would require demonstrating potassium-specific structural stability advantages over conventional particulate electrodes.

Search this in Eureka →

H01G · Capacitor-battery hybrid and supercapacitor integration

H01G (capacitors) appears in the corpus at a materially lower density than the dominant battery classes, despite growing interest in potassium-ion capacitors and hybrid energy storage devices that combine faradaic and capacitive storage. This branch is under-served relative to its technical relevance for high-power applications such as grid buffering and regenerative braking. Groups with expertise in activated-carbon or graphene-based electrode fabrication could explore hybrid architectures that exploit potassium’s favorable intercalation kinetics in carbon hosts.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all adjacent IPC branches with low filing density, mapped against technical maturity and competitive entry barriers.
C01C · Nitrogen-based electrolyte additivesC01G · Transition-metal cathode compound synthesis+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch sparsity is relative to the dominant H01M class and does not independently confirm commercial opportunity.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ by technology route emphasis

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerH01M 10 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsH01M 4 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsH01M 50 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsC01B 32 · Non-metallic elements & inorganic compoundsB82Y 30 · Nanotechnology applications
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.Strong · 72Strong · 72Moderate · 28AbsentAbsent
American Lithium Energy Corp.Strong · 58Strong · 38Strong · 44AbsentAbsent
Toyota Motor CorporationStrong · 54Strong · 58AbsentAbsentAbsent
Contemporary Amperex Technology (Hong Kong) LimitedStrong · 45Strong · 49AbsentAbsentAbsent
Hydro-QuebecStrong · 31Strong · 27AbsentAbsentAbsent
Nanotek Instruments, Inc.Strong · 29Strong · 29AbsentAbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own potassium-ion battery landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.