https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/power-semiconductors-vertical-gan-transistor-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Power Semiconductors · Patent Landscape
Vertical GaN Transistor Patents: Leaders, Filing Trends and Open Claim Space

A patent landscape review of vertical GaN transistor filings: leading assignees, filing trends, IPC composition and white space, built from 330 records published 2015-2026.

330
Published Records
25%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+20%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth = 2021 (15 records) → 2024 (18); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 330 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.

Check your own idea
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the vertical GaN transistor patent record shows

Vertical GaN transistor architectures move current through the thickness of the device rather than laterally across its surface, a geometry that promises higher breakdown voltage and better thermal handling than lateral HEMT designs. The patent record captured here spans 330 published records from 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, drawn from filings that describe vertical GaN structures directly in their claims or that combine vertical transistor claims with core semiconductor-device IPC classes. Publication lag means the last one to two years of filings are still arriving, so the most recent counts understate real filing activity.

The dataset is built from patent families rather than raw document duplicates, which keeps continuation filings and multi-jurisdiction copies of the same invention from inflating any single company's apparent output. That matters here because a handful of assignees file heavily across multiple offices, and family-level counting is what keeps the concentration figures honest.

Filing activity and technology mix, 2015-2026
  1. 1KK TOSHIBA20
  2. 2ROBERT BOSCH GMBH18
  3. 3SEMICON COMPONENTS IND LLC18
  4. 4POWER INTEGRATIONS INC13
  5. 5COMMISSARIAT A LENERGIE ATOMIQUE ET AUX ENERGIES ALTERNATIVES13
  6. 6GAN SYST INC11
  7. 7WOLFSPEED INC11
  8. 8GENERAL ELECTRIC CO10
  9. 9GUANGDONG ZHINENG TECH CO LTD8
  10. 10SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR8
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Power Semiconductors: Vertical GaN Transistor Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 330-record dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those records break down across IPC subclasses. Both use the full record set as the denominator.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Annual filings rose from 23 in 2017 to a peak of 24 in 2020, held in a similar band through the low-to-mid twenties, then grew 20% from 2021 (15) to 2024 (18) in the last span unaffected by publication lag. 2025 and 2026 figures are partial by construction and should not be read as a slowdown.

Filing trend, 2017-202606131925232017201820192420202021202220232024202532026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.

IPC subclass composition

H01L (semiconductor devices generally) covers 91.8% of the 330 records and H10D (semiconductor devices, general) covers 53.9%, confirming that most filings sit squarely in core device structure claims. Smaller subclasses — H10P at 7.9%, H03K at 7.0%, H10W at 6.4%, H10N at 2.7%, H10B at 1.8% and H01S at 1.5% — mark where circuit integration, memory-adjacent manufacture and optoelectronic crossover claims are comparatively rare, since a record can carry more than one class these shares sum above 100%.

IPC subclass compositionH01L · Semiconductor devices30391.8%H10D · Semiconductor devices (general)17853.9%H10P267.9%H03K · Pulse technique & logic circui…237.0%H10W216.4%H10N · Other electric solid-state dev…92.7%H10B · Memory device manufacture61.8%H01S · Lasers & stimulated emission51.5%Other319.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 330 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Power Semiconductors: Vertical GaN Transistor Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Power Semiconductors: Vertical GaN Transistor Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about power semiconductors: vertical gan transistor patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

Representative filing and most-cited prior art

Representative record
WO2019103698A12019-05-31

WO2019103698A1 — Vertical GaN transistor with insulating channel

ELEKTROTECHNICKÝ ÚSTAV SAV

The filing describes a vertical GaN transistor built from a conductive GaN substrate, a drift n-GaN layer, and a channel-insulating GaN layer where residual donors are compensated by impurities and defects, topped with a contacting n+ GaN layer. Source and gate electrodes sit on the front and along the channel, while the drain electrode is placed on the substrate backside — a fully vertical current path through compensated, insulating GaN rather than a conventional doped channel.Filed by Elektrotechnický ústav SAV, published 2019-05-31.

WO2019103698A1 — patent drawing 1WO2019103698A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in the dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20050258451A1Methods of fabricating nitride-based transistors having regrown ohmic contact regions and nitride-based trans…261
2US20140353574A1Field effect transistor structure comprising a stack of vertically separated channel nanowires121
3US20070295993A1Low Density Drain HEMTs104
4US20150255547A1III-Nitride High Electron Mobility Transistor Structures and Methods for Fabrication of Same98
5US20050258450A1Semiconductor devices having a hybrid channel layer, current aperture transistors and methods of fabricating …91
6US20160240471A1EMBEDDED PACKAGING FOR DEVICES AND SYSTEMS COMPRISING LATERAL GaN POWER TRANSISTORS83
7US20130307513A1High voltage field effect transistors79
8US20160307826A1PACKAGING SOLUTIONS FOR DEVICES AND SYSTEMS COMPRISING LATERAL GaN POWER TRANSISTORS70
9US20050040432A1Light emitting device and method66
10US20100084687A1Aluminum gallium nitride/gallium nitride high electron mobility transistors64

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to accumulate references; treat them as a signal of influence on the field, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Power Semiconductors: Vertical GaN Transistor Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for strategy

Concentration, growth and classification data each point to a different decision: where competitors are entrenched, whether the field is still expanding, and which technical corners remain open.

Concentration
24.8%
of 330 records held by top 5 assignees

Leadership is present but not locked down

A leader at 20 records and a fifth-place filer at 13 shows a real gap between the front and the pack, but the top 5 combined still only account for 24.8% of all 330 records. That leaves the majority of the field to a long tail of single- and low-filing entrants, meaning freedom-to-operate analysis cannot rely on watching one or two firms.

Top 10 combined reach 39.4% of all records.
Growth
+20%
filing growth, 2021 to 2024

Steady expansion, not a rush

Filings grew from 15 in 2021 to 18 in 2024, a 20% rise over the only recent span not muddied by publication lag. That is measured growth rather than a land-rush, consistent with a technology moving from proof-of-concept toward qualification rather than an emerging hype cycle.

2025-2026 counts are still filling in and understate true activity.
Classification
91.8%
of records touch H01L

Core device claims dominate; integration claims are thin

H01L and H10D between them cover the bulk of filings, meaning most inventive effort is going into the transistor structure itself — layer stacks, channel design, electrode placement. Subclasses tied to circuit integration (H03K), packaging-adjacent work (H10W) and optoelectronic crossover (H01S) sit in single digits, which is where structural claim space is least occupied.

Shares sum above 100% because records carry multiple IPC classes.
Prior art
261 citations
on the most-cited record

Foundational nitride-transistor art still anchors the field

The most-cited record in the dataset concerns regrown ohmic contact regions in nitride-based transistors, filed well before the current wave of vertical-specific claims. High citation counts here reflect age and foundational status inside this corpus rather than present commercial weight, and should be read alongside the newer, lower-citation vertical-architecture claims rather than instead of them.

Citation counts favour older filings by construction.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to power semiconductors: vertical gan transistor patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Power Semiconductors: Vertical GaN Transistor Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a field with clear structural leaders but wide open claim territory around integration and packaging. The next step is turning that into a specific filing or freedom-to-operate decision.

Map the white space precisely

Subclasses like H10N, H10B and H01S each cover under 3% of records, suggesting device integration and optoelectronic crossover claims around vertical GaN are comparatively open. A deeper claim-chart pass on those subclasses would confirm exactly where a first-filed claim could sit.

Explore white space in Eureka

Track the long tail, not just the leader

With the top 5 assignees holding only 24.8% of the 330 records, most competitive activity comes from entrants outside the ranked leadership. Ongoing monitoring of new filers matters as much as watching the incumbent with 20 records.

Set up assignee tracking in Eureka

Test designs against the most-cited prior art

The five most-cited records anchor decades of nitride-transistor claim language; any new vertical GaN filing should be checked against their claim scope before drafting, particularly around ohmic contact regrowth and channel layer structure.

Run a claim comparison in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Power Semiconductors: Vertical GaN Transistor Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on vertical GaN transistor patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Power Semiconductors: Vertical GaN Transistor Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Power Semiconductors: Vertical GaN Transistor Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole power semiconductors: vertical gan transistor patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.