https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/pre-combustion-and-oxy-fuel-capture-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Carbon Capture, Utilization & Storage
Pre-Combustion & Oxy-Fuel Capture Patents: Who Holds the Claims
  • One assignee holds 15 of 59 records while a long tail of single- and double-filing entrants fills out the remaining ranked field of 18 companies.
  • Filings fell 94% from 2021's peak of 17 to just 1 in 2024 the sharpest pullback in the dataset's decade of coverage, though 2025-26 figures are still filling in under normal publication lag.
  • Gas-turbine and steam-cycle classes sit alongside sorbent chemistry F02C and F01K together cover roughly a third of records, showing this is as much a power-plant integration problem as a materials one.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
59
Published Records
69%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-94%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
EP
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (17 records) with 2024 (1) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 59 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape maps 59 published records matching pre-combustion and oxy-fuel carbon capture terms — carbon dioxide stream separation, sorbent regeneration, capture efficiency and related gas-separation claims — filed or published between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off. The scope favours documents that tie capture chemistry to plant-level integration: turbine cycles, steam cycles and sorbent materials all appear as claimed elements rather than being treated as separate fields.

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any trend understate actual filing activity. 2024 is the last year in this dataset that can be read as materially complete; 2025 and 2026 are still filling in.

Filing activity and technology mix, 2015-2026
  1. 1NEXTCHEM SPA15
  2. 2NUOVO PIGNONE TECH SRL11
  3. 3SOLVCOR TECHNOLOGIES LLC5
  4. 4GENERAL ELECTRIC CO5
  5. 5PHOENIX BIOPOWER AB5
  6. 6THE RES FOUNDATION FOR THE STATE UNIV OF NEW YORK3
  7. 7INFINIUM TECHNOLOGY LLC3
  8. 8BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED2
  9. 9JOHN JACKSON2
  10. 101234 10TH STREET LLC1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Pre-Combustion & Oxy-Fuel Capture Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 59 records: how filing activity moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

A sharp peak, then a steep pullback

Filings rose to a peak of 17 in 2021 before falling to 1 in 2024, a 94% drop over that three-year span. Read this as a contraction in new filing activity following the peak, not as a signal that the technology itself has stalled — plant deployment and licensing activity can continue well after the filing curve turns down.

A sharp peak, then a steep pullback0510152012017201820192020172021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Inorganic chemistry and separation dominate, but power-cycle classes are close behind

C01B (non-metallic elements and inorganic compounds) appears in 52.5% of the 59 records, ahead of B01D separation processes at 35.6% and F02C gas-turbine plants at 33.9%. Because records carry multiple IPC classes, these shares add up to more than 100% — the takeaway is that most claims combine a chemistry class with a plant-integration class rather than sitting in either alone.

Inorganic chemistry and separation dominate, but power-cycle classes are close behindC01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…3152.5%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…2135.6%F02C · Gas-turbine plants2033.9%F01K · Steam & thermal power plants813.6%C09K · Materials for misc. applicatio…58.5%C25B · Electrolytic production of com…58.5%F25B · Refrigeration & heat pumps23.4%G11B · Information storage (magnetic/…23.4%Other1220.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 59 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Pre-Combustion & Oxy-Fuel Capture Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Pre-Combustion & Oxy-Fuel Capture Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about pre-combustion & oxy-fuel capture patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The most-cited records in this field

Representative record
US20230058997A12023-02-23

Organosilica membranes, methods of making same, and uses thereof

THE RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK

Provided are composite articles having a membrane and a porous substrate, where the porous substrate has the membrane disposed thereon. The membrane has two layers, each built from polymer chains with defined silicon-oxygen and silicon-carbon ratios, with the second layer at least partially crosslinked to the first.Filed by The Research Foundation for the State University of New York; published 2023-02-23.

US20230058997A1 — patent drawing 1US20230058997A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-cited documents in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US7752848B2System and method for co-production of hydrogen and electrical energy103
2US20050210881A1System and method for co-production of hydrogen and electrical energy63
3EP1582502A1System and method for co-production of hydrogen and electrical energy37
4US20200363108A1Refrigeration Cycles With Liquid-Liquid Phase Transitions20
5WO2023012836A1Method for hydrogen production coupled with co 2 capture10
6WO2021146733A1Organosilica membranes, methods of making same, and uses thereof6
7US10948224B2Refrigeration cycles with liquid-liquid phase transitions6
8WO2019195296A1Thermally-rearranged polymer blends for gas separation membranes6
9WO2022220892A1Process for purification and conversion of carbon dioxide using renewable energy2
10WO2022182296A1Anion-doped metal oxide2

Citation counts favour older documents simply because they have had more time to be cited — treat this as a measure of influence within the searched corpus, not of current technical importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Pre-Combustion & Oxy-Fuel Capture Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say

Three read-throughs from the filing and citation data that matter for anyone deciding where to file or license next.

Concentration
69.5%
of 59 records held by the top 5 assignees

Filing sits with a small group, not a single monopolist

The top 5 combined account for 69.5% of all 59 records in scope, and the top 10 reach 88.1%. The leader holds 15 records against a fifth-place figure of 5 and a tenth-place figure of 1 — concentration at the top, but not a single-owner field.

Assignee ranking, 18 companies
Momentum
-94%
2021 peak (17) to 2024 (1)

The filing peak has passed, at least on paper

Every leading assignee tracked for recent-year momentum shows zero filings in the latest year, consistent with the overall -94% contraction from 2021 to 2024. Treat this as the filing curve cooling after a peak rather than proof the underlying capture routes are abandoned.

Filing trend, 2015-2026
Citations
103 citations
on the top-cited record

Influence clusters around one hydrogen co-production family

The most-cited documents in this dataset are variants of the same co-production of hydrogen and electrical energy system, with the lead record cited 103 times. A more recent refrigeration-cycle record and a 2023 hydrogen-with-CO2-capture method show citation activity has not stopped, just shifted to newer filings.

Most-cited records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to pre-combustion & oxy-fuel capture patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Pre-Combustion & Oxy-Fuel Capture Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The ranked field covers 18 companies; a handful account for most of the volume while sub-areas of the claim space remain thin.

Leader
15 records
of 59 in scope

One assignee sets the pace

The leading assignee's 15 records put it well ahead of the fifth-place figure of 5, giving it the densest claim coverage in the dataset. Anyone filing adjacent to its core chemistry should expect to design around, not just file near, its existing family.

Assignee ranking
Long tail
18 companies
in the ranked field

A wide field below the leader

Below the top 10 (88.1% of records), the remaining entrants each hold small numbers of filings. That long tail includes research foundations and individual inventors alongside industrial gas and turbine companies, suggesting the field is still open to new entrants rather than locked up.

Assignee ranking, 18 companies
Geography
13 EPO filings
leading receiving office

Europe and the US lead filing venues

Europe (EPO) leads with 13 filings, ahead of the United States at 11 and WIPO (PCT) route filings at 9. India, Canada and Australia each carry smaller but non-trivial shares, pointing to filing strategies that reach beyond a single home jurisdiction.

Receiving offices
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches of the claim space with comparatively thin filing density in this dataset.
Sorbent regeneration cycle designRefrigeration-cycle liquid-liquid phase transitionsOrganosilica membrane crosslinking ratiosElectrolytic CO2 stream conversion (C25B)Hydrogen co-production coupled with capture
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
NextChem S.p.A.0
Nuovo Pignone Tecnologie S.r.l.0-100%
General Electric Company0
Infinium Technology LLC0
European Turbine Company0
THE RES FOUNDATION FOR THE STATE UNIV OF NEW YORK0
NOVEK ETHAN J0
JACKSON JOHN0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Pre-Combustion & Oxy-Fuel Capture Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this next

The dataset points to a field with a settled leader, a cooling filing curve on paper, and several sub-areas still open to new claims.

Check freedom-to-operate before filing near the leader

With one assignee holding 15 of 59 records, a new filing in its core chemistry needs a claim-by-claim comparison, not just a keyword search.

Run a freedom-to-operate check

Track whether 2025-26 filings confirm the pullback

The -94% drop from 2021 to 2024 is real, but publication lag means 2025-26 figures are still incomplete — revisit this trend once they settle.

Monitor filing trends

Explore the under-claimed branches directly

Sorbent regeneration cycles, organosilica membrane ratios and electrolytic CO2 conversion show thinner filing density than the core chemistry classes.

Explore white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Pre-Combustion & Oxy-Fuel Capture Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Pre-Combustion & Oxy-Fuel Capture Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Pre-Combustion & Oxy-Fuel Capture Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole pre-combustion & oxy-fuel capture patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.