Book a demo

Precast Geopolymer Concrete Patent Landscape 2026

Precast Geopolymer Concrete Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
Precast Geopolymer Concrete Patent Landscape in 2026

The precast geopolymer concrete patent space is moderately concentrated, with United States Gypsum Co holding a commanding lead over a fragmented field of academic and industrial challengers. Activity has plateaued near its multi-year peak, signalling a maturing core while adjacent application branches remain lightly claimed.

263
Patent families in scope
36%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-7%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
India
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

United States Gypsum Co leads a fragmented, maturing field

United States Gypsum Co stands as the clear leader, holding 81 patent records — more than three times the tally of the second-ranked filer, Entech Corp at 25. The top five filers together account for 36% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, indicating a moderately concentrated tier at the top against a long, diffuse tail.

Beyond the top two, the ranking compresses quickly: Rocla, Catholic University of America, and Cemalt LLC each hold 10–11 patent records, while the remainder of the top twenty ranges from 5 to 7. This tier gap between the leader and the rest creates meaningful first-mover advantages in core formulation IP.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1United States Gypsum Co81
2Entech Corp25
3Rocla11
4Catholic University of America10
5Cemalt LLC10
6Sika Technology AG7
7VEL TECH RANGARAJAN DR SAGUNTHALA R&D INST OF SCI …7
8Sona College of Technology6
9Shenzhen Construction Group Co.6
10Cement Australia Pty6
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Shenzhen Construction Group Hehai Construction Co.6
12Shenzhen Construction Group Western Construction Co.6
13Heungkuk Industrial Co. Ltd6
14Shenzhen Huaju Construction Co.6
15Shenzhen Construction South China Construction Co.6
16King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals6
17C-Probe Systems5
18Lakehead University5
19Easwari Engineering College5
20B-Ton IP GmbH5
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

United States Gypsum Co’s position, almost entirely anchored in C04B ceramics and cement chemistry, suggests its portfolio is deep in binder formulation rather than spread across end-use applications — leaving structural, paving, and shaping branches comparatively open to challengers.

Filings from approximately 20242026 are subject to standard patent-publication lag and are likely under-counted; conclusions about very recent activity should be treated as provisional. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Filing volume has plateaued; chemistry dominates but application branches are thin

Two charts together reveal a field that has reached volume maturity while its technology mix remains heavily skewed toward binder chemistry, leaving a cluster of end-use application classes largely unclaimed.

Annual filing trend

Annual filings rose from 13 in 2017 to a first spike of 39 in 2019, then oscillated in the 20–35 range through 2023 before reaching 35 in 2024 and a reported 44 in 2025. The 2025–2026 figures are subject to publication lag and should not be read as a sustained new peak. The overall trajectory confirms a field that has plateaued near its high-water mark rather than continuing to accelerate.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 44 in 2025.13201792018392019212020322021212022302023352024442025192026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

C04B (Ceramics, cement and refractories) dominates with 422 patent records, dwarfing every other class. B28B (Shaping clay and cement products), E01C (Roads and pavements), E04C (Structural building components), and B28C (Mortar and concrete mixing) each register 17–26 patent records — present but sparse relative to the core chemistry class — pointing to underdeveloped coverage of manufacturing process and end-use application branches.

Technology compositionC04B · Ceramics, cement & refractories leads with 422; B28B · Shaping clay & cement products 26.C04B · Ceramics, cement …422B28B · Shaping clay & ce…26E01C · Roads & pavements22E04C · Structural buildi…21B28C · Mortar & concrete…17E04B · Building structur…17C01B · Non-metallic elem…13E03F · Sewerage7↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
WO2022203641A2Published 2022-09-29

Production method of geopolymer concrete

Yildiz Teknik Universitesi

This invention relates to the production of geopolymer concrete using blast furnace and basic oxygen furnace slags generated during iron and steel production. With this invention, geopolymer concretes that do not require processes such as thermal curing, water curing, steam curing and showing high compressive strength can be produced. With the invention, it… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Production method of geopolymer concrete — patent drawingProduction method of geopolymer concrete — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1High-strength geopolymer composite cellular concrete183
2Geopolymer composite for ultra high performance co…122
3Cementitious materials including stainless steel s…73
4Geopolymer concrete and method of preparation and …65
5Cementicious materials including stainless steel s…59
6Cementitious materials including stainless steel s…43
7Freeze-thaw durable geopolymer compositions and me…40
8Setting control for alkali-activated silicate bind…37

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D strategy

The combination of a maturing filing rate, a dominant single player in binder chemistry, and thin coverage in end-use application classes shapes a specific set of R&D entry and differentiation options.

Maturity

Field has plateaued near peak — core formulation space is crowded

The lifecycle stage is Maturity: annual filings have plateaued near their peak, and the recent-window growth rate is –7%. New entrants seeking differentiation should look beyond core alkali-activation chemistry, where United States Gypsum Co holds an entrenched position, toward process engineering and specific end-use product forms.

Maturity stage
Concentration

Strong leader, weak mid-tier — room to build a challenger position

United States Gypsum Co’s 81 patent records versus Entech Corp’s 25 creates a significant gap at the top, but the mid-tier (10–11 records each) is closely bunched. A focused portfolio in any single adjacent branch — shaping, structural components, or pavement — could establish a credible second-tier position without frontal competition against the leader’s core IP.

Moderate concentration
Collaboration

Shenzhen Construction Group subsidiaries form the most active co-filing cluster

The most active co-filing network involves Shenzhen Construction South China Construction Co., Shenzhen Construction Group Western Construction Co., Shenzhen Construction Group Co., Shenzhen Construction Group Hehai Construction Co., and Shenzhen Huaju Construction Co., each sharing 6 joint records. NTPC Ltd co-files with the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research and with Annamalai University (2 records each), reflecting a government-academic collaboration in India. Imerys Ceramics France and its affiliated entity share 2 joint records.

Cluster co-filing
Geography

India leads filings; US and China are secondary hubs

India accounts for 129 patent records — the largest single jurisdiction — reflecting strong academic and governmental activity. The United States follows at 74, China at 54, with WIPO PCT and EPO at 32 and 31 respectively. Australia and Canada each register 21. Geographies such as Japan and South Korea each show only 5 records, suggesting limited defensive filing in those markets and potential freedom-to-operate for entrants targeting East Asian construction markets.

India-led geography
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Shenzhen Construction South China Construction Co.Shenzhen Construction Group Western Construction Co.6
Shenzhen Construction South China Construction Co.Shenzhen Construction Group Co.6
Shenzhen Construction South China Construction Co.Shenzhen Construction Group Hehai Construction Co.6
Shenzhen Construction South China Construction Co.Shenzhen Huaju Construction Co.6
NTPC LtdCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research2
NTPC LtdTHE REGISTRAR ANNAMALAI UNIV2
Imerys Ceramics FranceImerys S.A.2

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Jurisdiction counts are at the patent-record level and reflect where protection has been sought, not unique family counts.Explore insights →
Leaders

United States Gypsum Co anchors the field; Shenzhen Construction South China is a notable new entrant

The leader’s portfolio is almost entirely concentrated in C04B binder chemistry subclasses, while the most recent new entrant brings a construction-systems perspective from a large state-linked contractor.

Leader · United States Gypsum Co

United States Gypsum Co

With 81 patent records, United States Gypsum Co’s portfolio is concentrated in C04B 28 (alkali-activated binders, 80 records), C04B 12 (hydraulic cements, 48 records), and C04B 111 (use-coded ceramics, 39 records) — a deep, chemistry-first position in core geopolymer formulation. Its momentum data is not separately flagged in the evidence, indicating an established rather than accelerating filing pace.

patent records: 81
New Entrant · Shenzhen Construction South China Construction Co.

Shenzhen Construction South China Construction Co.

Holding 6 patent records with a trajectory flagged as a new entrant, this Shenzhen Construction Group subsidiary focuses on C04B 28 (6 records), C04B 12 (3 records), and C04B 7 (3 records). Its co-filing with four related group entities on all 6 records signals a coordinated, construction-systems-led approach rather than isolated formulation research — a different strategic posture from the chemistry-oriented incumbents.

patent records: 6
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles, momentum scores, and technology emphasis for all top-100 filers in this corpus.
RoclaSika Technology AG+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
VEL TECH RANGARAJAN DR SAGUNTHALA R&D INST OF SCI …3▲ new entrant
Shenzhen Construction South China Construction Co.5▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player rankings are based on patent records within the precast geopolymer concrete corpus.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Shaping, paving, and structural components are under-served relative to the chemistry core

Several IPC classes that represent direct end-use product and manufacturing-process applications of geopolymer concrete hold only a small fraction of the records concentrated in C04B, making them worth monitoring as adjacent entry points.

B28B · Shaping clay and cement products

With 26 patent records against C04B’s 422, B28B covers moulding, casting, and forming processes directly relevant to precast production lines. The technical value is immediate: optimised shaping processes could differentiate precast geopolymer products on cycle time and dimensional precision without re-litigating binder IP. Entry path for an industrial equipment maker or precaster is relatively uncontested given current sparse coverage.

Search this in Eureka →

E04C · Structural building components

E04C captures patent claims on beams, columns, panels, and other load-bearing precast elements — only 21 patent records exist here. Geopolymer’s higher fire resistance and lower embodied-carbon credentials make structural components a technically plausible differentiation angle, yet IP coverage is thin. A precaster or structural engineer filing claims on element geometry, reinforcement integration, or connection systems in geopolymer would face limited prior art in this branch.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all adjacent IPC branches with filing counts, share of corpus, and recommended search strings for deeper due diligence.
E01C · Roads and pavementsB28C · Mortar and concrete mixing+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch counts are at the patent-record level; sparsity relative to C04B is an observation of relative coverage, not a validated market signal.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ by technology route

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerC04B 28 · Ceramics, cement & refractoriesC04B 111 · Ceramics, cement & refractoriesC04B 12 · Ceramics, cement & refractoriesC04B 18 · Ceramics, cement & refractoriesC04B 22 · Ceramics, cement & refractories
United States Gypsum CoStrong · 80Moderate · 39Strong · 48Emerging · 5Emerging · 12
Entech CorpStrong · 25Moderate · 6AbsentStrong · 18Absent
Cemalt LLCStrong · 10AbsentAbsentStrong · 8Strong · 8
NTPC LtdStrong · 10Moderate · 4Strong · 8AbsentAbsent
Catholic University of AmericaStrong · 10AbsentAbsentStrong · 7Absent
RoclaStrong · 11AbsentAbsentAbsentModerate · 5
Imerys Ceramics FranceStrong · 7Strong · 6AbsentAbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Map your own precast geopolymer concrete landscape

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.