Book a demo

Precision Ag Route & Application Optimization Patent Landscape

Precision Ag Route & Application Optimization Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape
Precision Ag Route & Application Optimization Patent Landscape in 2026

The precision agriculture route and application optimization patent corpus is geographically concentrated in India and dominated by academic institutions rather than commercial agritech firms, with virtually all activity originating after 2022. The field is expanding rapidly from a near-zero base, driven by AI-soil-management combinations, though the shallow citation depth and absence of cross-border filings signal an early-stage, pre-commercialization landscape.

110
Patent families in scope
15%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
India
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

India-based universities co-lead a nascent, fragmented field

Manipal University Jaipur and Anurag University share the top rank, each with 4 patent families, followed closely by a cluster of individual inventors and engineering colleges at 3 families apiece. No single applicant holds a commanding position.

The top five filers account for 15 percent of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, indicating low concentration — no applicant has yet established a defensible portfolio lead. The field is populated by a long tail of universities, colleges, and individual inventors rather than by agricultural-technology corporations.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Manipal University Jaipur4
2Anurag University4
3Anil D3
4Suresha S3
5CVR College of Engineering3
6Lovely Professional University2
7Vishwakarma Institute of Technology2
8Chandigarh University2
9Vaibhav Laxman Dhasal2
10K S Rangasamy College of Technology2
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11G. Ashwin Prabhu2
12Dandamudi Srilatha1
13BVRIT Hyderabad College of Engineering for Women1
14SAVEETHA INST OF MEDICAL & TECH SCI1
15Reddy Viswanathan Ramasamy1
16Pradeep Chauhan1
17Utkarsh Arun Avalekar1
18Yogesh Kalyani1
19Kamble Aayushee Ghanshyam1
20Vidya Kamma1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The absence of major agritech or agri-input multinationals from the ranking suggests that industry has not yet translated academic prototype work into patent-protected commercial products in this specific optimization sub-domain, leaving the competitive landscape open to future entrants.

The most recent filing cohorts (20252026) are subject to publication lag and are likely under-counted; the true volume for those years will be higher once applications clear examination. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Explosive post-2022 growth anchored in AI and soil-management classes

Two charts together reveal both the pace of market entry and the technology bets being placed: filing volume shows when interest ignited, while IPC composition shows which technical problems are being addressed.

Annual filing trend

Filings were effectively zero from 2017 through 2021, reached 1 in 2022, then accelerated sharply to 11 in 2023 and 29 in 2024. The 2025 cohort already shows 53 published families, making it the largest year on record, while the 2026 figure of 16 reflects partial-year publication and should be read as a lower bound. The growth trajectory from 2022 onward is steep and uninterrupted in the published record.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 53 in 2025.020170201802019020200202112022112023292024532025162026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

G06Q (business and administrative data processing) leads the IPC mix, followed closely by A01B (soil working in agriculture) and G06N (AI and machine-learning models), together forming the core triad of this landscape. Horticulture and forestry (A01G) and digital transmission (H04L) represent a secondary tier. Lower-frequency classes — image recognition (G06V), wireless networks (H04W), planting and sowing (A01C), pest control (A01M), and drone platforms (B64C) — indicate where adjacent technical problems are only lightly addressed.

Technology compositionG06Q · Business, commerce & admin data processing leads with 90; A01B · Soil working in agriculture 73.G06Q · Business, commerc…90A01B · Soil working in a…73G06N · Computing based o…62A01G · Horticulture & fo…35H04L · Digital informati…24G01N · Material analysis…23G05D · Control of non-el…17G06V · Image/video recog…13↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
WO2026018223A1Published 2026-01-22

Tethered drone system and method for precision agr…

Best Agrolife Limited

The present invention provides a tethered drone system comprising a base station, an operational drone, and a plurality of support drones connected via a multichannel tether The system enables continuous power supply and delivery of diverse agricultural payloads, including liquids, granules, seeds, and gases, through the operational drone. Support drones… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Tethered drone system and method for precision agr… — patent drawingTethered drone system and method for precision agr… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Ai and iot-driven precision farming platform1
2Smart farming: machine learning applications for s…1

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

Four structural observations — maturity, concentration, collaboration, and geography — each carry distinct implications for teams deciding whether to enter, partner, or monitor this space.

Maturity

Pre-commercial emergence phase

The lifecycle evidence shows activity igniting from zero only in 2022, with all momentum indicators pointing to a field still in its formation stage. Academic institutions are filing proof-of-concept work rather than production-ready systems. An R&D team entering now would face minimal blocking IP but would need to plan for the competitive landscape maturing within a three-to-five year window as commercial players discover the space.

Early stage
Concentration

Highly fragmented; no incumbent to displace

The top five filers hold only 15 percent of the top-hundred filers’ combined output, and the leading applicants each hold just 4 patent families. There is no incumbent with a portfolio large enough to create freedom-to-operate risk for a new entrant. The fragmentation also means no single entity can set a de-facto technical standard, so the architecture of future commercial systems remains genuinely open.

Low concentration
Collaboration

No recorded co-applicant filings in scope

The collaboration evidence shows no co-applicant filings within this corpus. Each university and individual inventor appears to be filing independently. This absence of consortium activity suggests that cross-institutional or industry-academia partnerships have not yet formed around shared platforms, creating an opportunity for a commercial actor to anchor a collaborative R&D programme.

Evidence pending
Geography

India-only footprint with one PCT filing

India accounts for 109 of the 110 patent records, with a single WIPO PCT application representing the only international protection attempt. This near-total geographic concentration means existing portfolios provide no IP barrier in North America, Europe, or East Asia — regions with the largest precision-agriculture equipment markets. Commercial entrants targeting those markets can build freely without worrying about blocking IP from the current applicant pool.

India-centric
Patsnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Cards are grounded in applicant ranking, lifecycle, collaboration, and jurisdiction evidence from the analysed corpus.Explore insights →
Leaders

Academic institutions lead; all top filers are new entrants since 2022

Every applicant with tracked momentum shows the same trend: new entrant. No organization had a prior filing base in this sub-domain, which means current rankings reflect only the most recent filing cycle.

Leader · Manipal University Jaipur

Manipal University Jaipur

Holds 4 patent families and is the joint top filer. Its filings concentrate on soil working in agriculture (A01B), business data processing for agriculture (G06Q), and AI models (G06N), suggesting a system-level focus that integrates sensor-driven soil management with AI decision layers. Momentum is flagged as a new entrant, meaning all activity is recent.

families: 4
Challenger · Anurag University

Anurag University

Also holds 4 patent families and shares the top rank. Its technology emphasis mirrors the leader — soil working (A01B) and business data processing (G06Q) — with a secondary focus on route and logistics optimization under G06Q 10. Like all peers in this corpus, it entered after 2022 with no prior filing history in this domain.

families: 4
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all tracked filers, including technology emphasis and filing trajectory.
CVR College of EngineeringK S Rangasamy College of Technology+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Manipal University Jaipur1▲ new entrant
Anurag University1▲ new entrant
Suresha S3▲ new entrant
CVR College of Engineering1▲ new entrant
Anil D3▲ new entrant
Lovely Professional University2▲ new entrant
K S Rangasamy College of Technology2▲ new entrant
G. Ashwin Prabhu1▲ new entrant
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Player cards reflect patent-family counts from the applicant ranking and technology focus from IPC tagging.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served technical branches adjacent to the dominant AI-soil core

The following IPC classes appear in the corpus but at markedly lower frequency than the dominant G06Q/A01B/G06N triad, indicating that their technical problems are recognized but not yet well-addressed by existing filings.

G06V · Image and video recognition for field scouting

G06V accounts for only 13 patent records in a corpus where AI (G06N) and soil management (A01B) each exceed 60 records. Computer-vision techniques for in-field crop-health scouting, weed detection, and canopy mapping are technically mature in adjacent domains (medical imaging, autonomous vehicles) but sparsely applied to precision-ag route optimization here. An entrant with existing vision-pipeline IP could adapt it to field-scouting UAV or ground-robot contexts with relatively low development risk.

Search this in Eureka →

H04W · Wireless networks for real-time field-device coordination

Wireless communication networks (H04W) appear in only 11 patent records, despite being a fundamental enabler of any real-time route or application-rate optimization system that must coordinate multiple field devices. LoRaWAN, NB-IoT, and 5G-based mesh architectures for agricultural environments are underrepresented. Given the rural connectivity constraints of Indian and export markets, robust low-power wide-area network architectures represent a technically plausible and commercially relevant entry point.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all under-served IPC branches with filing counts, share data, and suggested search strategies.
G01N · Material analysis & testing for soil sensorsG05D · Control of non-electric variables for autonomous actuators+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Adjacent branches are identified by comparing filing frequency against the dominant IPC classes in the corpus.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ across technology routes

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerG06Q 50 · Business, commerce & admin data processingA01B 79 · Soil working in agricultureG06N 20 · Computing based on AI modelsG06Q 10 · Business, commerce & admin data processingA01G 25 · Horticulture & forestry
Anil DStrong · 3Strong · 3AbsentStrong · 2Strong · 3
Suresha SStrong · 3Strong · 3AbsentStrong · 2Strong · 3
Anurag UniversityStrong · 3Strong · 3AbsentStrong · 2Moderate · 1
Manipal University JaipurStrong · 3Strong · 4Moderate · 2AbsentAbsent
Chandigarh UniversityStrong · 2Strong · 2Strong · 2AbsentAbsent
G. Ashwin PrabhuStrong · 2AbsentStrong · 2Strong · 2Absent
CVR College of EngineeringStrong · 2Strong · 3AbsentAbsentAbsent
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.