Book a demo

Precision Agriculture AI/ML Patent Landscape 2026

Precision Agriculture AI/ML Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
Precision Agriculture AI/ML Patent Landscape in 2026

The precision agriculture AI/ML patent space is in a clear growth phase, with academic institutions — predominantly Indian engineering universities — holding the top positions and commercial technology players occupying a distinct secondary tier. Filing activity has surged on a multi-year basis, with India accounting for the overwhelming majority of jurisdictional coverage, making this one of the most geographically concentrated emerging-technology landscapes observed at this scale.

988
Patent families in scope
20%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+263%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
India
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Indian academic institutions lead a fragmented but rapidly expanding field

CVR College of Engineering holds the top position with 25 patent families, followed closely by SR University at 24 and Lovely Professional University at 20. The leading commercial filers — Accenture Global Services and Deere & Co. — rank sixth and ninth respectively, each with 13–14 patent families, indicating that academic output currently defines the competitive frontier.

The top five filers account for 20% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, signaling a moderately fragmented field with no single dominant actor able to set the agenda unilaterally. The gap between the top academic cluster and the commercial tier is narrow in absolute terms, suggesting the competitive structure could shift quickly as commercial players accelerate.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1CVR College of Engineering25
2SR University24
3Lovely Professional University20
4Cohen Harris Lee17
5Chandigarh University16
6Accenture Global Services Ltd14
7Vaibhav Laxman Dhasal14
8Manipal University Jaipur13
9DEERE & CO13
10Stout Industrial Technology Inc13
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11SAVEETHA INST OF MEDICAL & TECH SCI11
12Saveetha Engineering College11
13Tata Consultancy Services Ltd10
14Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation9
15Agri Technovation (Pty) Ltd9
16REVA University8
17Vellore Institute of Technology Chennai7
18Sri Eshwar College of Engineering7
19North Carolina State University6
20Dayananda Sagar College of Engineering6
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leaders’ positions imply that IP barriers from any single incumbent are limited: no filer has yet built a blocking portfolio of the scale typically seen in mature technology fields. This creates near-term room for well-targeted commercial entrants to establish differentiated positions, particularly in applied and hardware-integrated routes where academic filings are thinner.

Activity in the most recent 18–24 months is likely understated due to standard patent publication lag; current totals should be treated as a lower bound for that period. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Filings have accelerated sharply since 2021; AI computing dominates the technology mix

Two complementary views — annual filing volume and IPC technology composition — together explain both the pace and the character of innovation activity in this space.

Annual filing trend

Filing volume was modest and relatively flat from 2017 through 2020, then began climbing sharply from 2021 onward, consistent with the 263% growth recorded over the recent window. The 2025 and 2026 bars are subject to publication lag and should be read as partial counts; the underlying trajectory is nonetheless clearly upward.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 381 in 2025.222017132018192019202020402021482022842023155202438120252062026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

G06N (AI computing models) is by far the dominant branch, reflecting the field’s core algorithmic focus. G06Q (business and administrative data processing) and A01B (soil working in agriculture) are the second and third largest branches, indicating that applied agronomic and decision-support use cases are well represented alongside core ML work. Branches such as A01C (planting and sowing), A01M (pest control), and B64U (unmanned aerial vehicles) are present but comparatively sparse, pointing to areas where the technology mix has not yet converged.

Technology compositionG06N · Computing based on AI models leads with 800; G06Q · Business, commerce & admin data processing 604.G06N · Computing based o…800G06Q · Business, commerc…604A01B · Soil working in a…456A01G · Horticulture & fo…267G06V · Image/video recog…259G01N · Material analysis…172H04L · Digital informati…132A01C · Planting & sowing120↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US11432469B2Published 2022-09-06

Method for prediction of soil and/or plant condition

Hexagon Innovation Hub GMBH

A method and system for predicting soil and/or plant condition in precision agriculture with a classification of measurement data for providing an assignment of a measurement parcel to classes of interest. The assignment is used for providing action recommendations, particularly in real time or close to real time, to a farmer and/or to an agricultural… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Method for prediction of soil and/or plant condition — patent drawingMethod for prediction of soil and/or plant condition — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Mapping and analysis system for precision farming …440
2Precision agriculture system219
3Pest occurrence risk assessment and prediction in …182
4Precision agriculture system75
5Management zones for precision farming68
6Method for prediction of soil and/or plant condition56
7Precision agriculture system44
8Computer-implemented methods, computer readable me…42

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

Four structural dimensions — maturity, concentration, collaboration, and geography — each carry distinct implications for teams deciding where and how to invest.

Growth

Growth stage: annual filings still rising

The field is in a confirmed growth stage, with annual filing volume climbing consistently and the most recent years understated by publication lag. The 263% growth rate across the recent window confirms that the technology has moved well past early exploration but has not yet reached the plateau typical of mature fields. This is a window in which filing strategy can still establish durable positions.

Growth stage
Concentration

Fragmented top tier; no blocking incumbent

The top five filers hold 20% of the hundred largest filers’ combined output — moderate concentration that leaves substantial room for new entrants. Academic institutions occupy most leading slots, meaning that commercially oriented portfolios covering hardware integration, real-time inference, or specific crop systems are not yet controlled by any single entity. The tier gap between academic leaders and commercial players (Accenture, Deere) is narrow enough that targeted investment could close it quickly.

Fragmented
Collaboration

Limited co-filing activity; Accenture entities the only confirmed pair

The only documented co-filing relationship in the evidence is between Accenture Global Services and Accenture Global Solutions — two related Accenture entities that jointly filed 3 patent families. No cross-institutional or industry-academic co-filing pairs are present in the data. This absence of broad collaborative networks may reflect the early-stage, academic-output-driven character of the field, and also means that ecosystem-level IP alliances have not yet formed.

Low collaboration
Geography

India-dominant filing base; US and China secondary

India accounts for 833 of the jurisdictional records, making it by far the primary filing office and consistent with the academic-institution profile of the leading applicants. The United States is the second jurisdiction at 74 records, followed by China at 49. Europe (EPO) and WIPO (PCT) filings are minimal. Commercial players seeking international protection should note that most existing filings are India-only, leaving non-Indian markets comparatively open.

India-concentrated
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Accenture Global Services LtdAccenture Global Solutions Ltd3

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights are derived from applicant ranking, lifecycle, collaboration, and jurisdiction data compiled by PatSnap Eureka.Explore insights →
Leaders

Academic institutions lead on volume; commercial players differentiate on applied and hardware routes

CVR College of Engineering holds the top rank by family count, with a technology emphasis spanning AI models, business data processing, and soil-working applications. Among commercial players, Stout Industrial Technology stands out for its image-recognition and soil-working focus — a more applied, hardware-adjacent profile than the dominant academic filers.

Leader · CVR College of Engineering

CVR College of Engineering

CVR College of Engineering holds the top position with 25 patent families and is classified as a new entrant in momentum terms, with 7 families filed in the recent period. Its technology emphasis spans G06Q (business and administrative data processing), G06N (AI computing models), and A01B (soil working in agriculture) — a broad, AI-first focus characteristic of academic portfolio building rather than targeted commercial application.

families: 25
Challenger · Stout Industrial Technology

Stout Industrial Technology

Stout Industrial Technology ranks tenth with 13 patent families and is also a new entrant by momentum, with 8 recent families — a notably active recent pace for a commercial filer of its scale. Its technology focus is concentrated on A01B (soil working in agriculture) and G06V (image and video recognition), with a secondary position in A01B63, indicating a more applied, machine-vision-driven approach to field automation that contrasts with the broader AI-model emphasis of academic leaders.

families: 13
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Explore the complete ranked list of filers, their technology emphasis, and filing momentum across the full corpus.
Deere & Co.Tata Consultancy Services+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
CVR College of Engineering7▲ new entrant
Lovely Professional University12▲ new entrant
Chandigarh University3▲ new entrant
Stout Industrial Technology Inc8▲ new entrant
Manipal University Jaipur3▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player profiles are drawn from PatSnap Eureka applicant ranking, technology focus, and momentum data.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the dominant AI computing core

Several IPC branches appear at lower relative share alongside the dominant G06N and G06Q classes; three in particular have plausible technical value for precision agriculture that has not yet been extensively captured in the patent record.

A01C · Planting & Sowing — AI-guided precision application

A01C (planting and sowing) accounts for 120 patent records — a 3% share — despite being a direct operational target for AI-driven variable-rate seeding and transplanting systems. The branch sits adjacent to the heavily filed A01B (soil working) cluster and to the image-recognition work in G06V, making it a natural extension for teams combining soil data inference with actuator control. The relatively sparse filing density means that well-scoped patents covering ML-guided seed placement or adaptive row spacing could establish early positions without navigating a dense prior-art thicket.

Search this in Eureka →

B64U · Unmanned Aerial Vehicles — drone-based field intelligence

B64U (unmanned aerial vehicles) appears at only 19 patent records despite drones being a widely discussed sensing and actuation platform in precision agriculture. The sparse count contrasts with the more developed G06V (image recognition, 259 records) and H04L (digital transmission, 132 records) branches that would naturally connect to drone-borne sensing payloads. Teams working on onboard inference, multi-drone coordination, or drone-to-ground data pipelines have room to build differentiated IP with limited direct competition in this branch.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
Access the complete branch-level analysis to identify all under-served IPC classes and prioritize R&D targeting.
G01N · Material analysis — soil and tissue testing AIA01M · Pest & vermin control — AI-driven detection+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branch observations are based on relative IPC share within the corpus as computed by PatSnap Eureka.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading filers differ across technology routes

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerG06Q 50 · Business, commerce & admin data processingG06N 20 · Computing based on AI modelsA01B 79 · Soil working in agricultureG06N 3 · Computing based on AI modelsA01G 25 · Horticulture & forestry
CVR College of EngineeringStrong · 18Strong · 10Strong · 10Strong · 14Emerging · 2
Cohen Harris LeeStrong · 9Strong · 17Strong · 9Strong · 10Moderate · 4
Chandigarh UniversityStrong · 11Strong · 10Strong · 11Moderate · 4Strong · 6
SR UniversityStrong · 11Strong · 11AbsentStrong · 18Absent
Lovely Professional UniversityStrong · 8Strong · 10Strong · 15AbsentAbsent
Accenture Global Services LtdStrong · 12Strong · 11Strong · 8AbsentAbsent
Manipal University JaipurStrong · 8Strong · 6Strong · 11AbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own precision agriculture AI/ML landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.