Book a demo

Precision Agriculture Resource Efficiency Patent Landscape

Precision Agriculture Resource Efficiency Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape
Precision Agriculture Resource Efficiency Patent Landscape in 2026

The precision agriculture resource efficiency field is in a growth stage, with annual filings still rising and a multi-year growth rate of 139% — led by irrigation and soil-management specialists rather than large agrochemical incumbents. India dominates as the primary filing jurisdiction, driven heavily by academic and institutional applicants, while the top five filers hold a moderate but not dominant share of activity among the hundred largest filers.

258
Patent families in scope
22%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+139%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
India
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Manna Irrigation leads a fragmented, institution-heavy field

Manna Irrigation Ltd holds the top position with 14 patent families, followed by Agri Technovation (Pty) Ltd at 9 and DTN LLC at 8. The ranking immediately below the top three is strikingly flat, with multiple academic institutions — Saveetha Institute, North Carolina State University, Lovely Professional University, and Iowa State University Research Foundation — each holding 7 patent families.

The top five filers together account for 22% of the combined total across the hundred largest filers, a moderate concentration figure indicating no single entity has locked in a commanding position. The gap between rank one and the academic cluster at ranks four through seven is small, suggesting that institutional research programs are genuine contributors rather than peripheral actors.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Manna Irrigation Ltd14
2Agri Technovation (Pty) Ltd9
3DTN LLC8
4SAVEETHA INST OF MEDICAL & TECH SCI7
5North Carolina State University7
6Lovely Professional University7
7Iowa State University Research Foundation Inc7
8Soilmetrix Inc6
9CARMEUSE RES & TECH6
10CVR College of Engineering5
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Nutrien Ag Solutions (Canada) Inc5
12Manipal University Jaipur4
13Saveetha Engineering College4
14Vaibhav Laxman Dhasal (Director)4
15JIS College of Engineering4
16Crop Sentry Ltd3
17Chandigarh University3
18Milestone Tech3
19SR University3
20KKR & KSR INST OF TECH & SCI3
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Manna Irrigation’s lead, built on irrigation control and horticultural data processing, positions it as the clearest commercial specialist. The presence of multiple universities in the top tier suggests that foundational IP is still being generated in academic settings — a structural feature that typically precedes more aggressive commercial consolidation.

The most recent 18–24 months of filings are understated due to standard patent publication lag; activity visible through 20252026 should be treated as a lower bound on true filing volume. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Filing volume accelerating; AI and soil-working dominate the technology mix

The annual filing trend and technology composition charts together reveal a field shifting from slow early adoption to rapid expansion, with computational and agronomic branches both heavily represented.

Annual filing trend

Filings were modest through 2017–2022 before surging sharply from 2023 onward, reaching a visible peak in 2025. The 2025 and 2026 bars are understated by publication lag and should not be read as the ceiling of activity — actual filed volume is likely higher than what is currently indexed.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 103 in 2025.0201717201811201911202062021120221220235420241032025432026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

Business and administrative data processing (G06Q) leads the branch mix, reflecting the decision-support and farm-management software layer of precision agriculture. Horticultural methods (A01G) and soil working (A01B) follow closely, confirming that physical field operations remain central alongside digital layers. AI-based computing (G06N) ranks fourth, signalling that machine-learning integration is now a mainstream rather than niche element of filings in this space.

Technology compositionG06Q · Business, commerce & admin data processing leads with 187; A01G · Horticulture & forestry 163.G06Q · Business, commerc…187A01G · Horticulture & fo…163A01B · Soil working in a…159G06N · Computing based o…115A01C · Planting & sowing63G01N · Material analysis…63H04L · Digital informati…36G06V · Image/video recog…29↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
NZ628791APublished 2016-02-26

Variable rate application system for dispersal of …

Ravensdown Limited

Disclosed is a method of precision farming application of a material using a variable rate application system suitable for use in aerial topdressing. The method includes the steps of: acquiring data over an area to be treated by aerial dispersion of the material; analysing the acquired data to determine a measure of land quality at each location within the… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Customized land surface modeling in a soil-crop sy…181
2System and methods for real time linkage between h…173
3Customized land surface modeling for irrigation de…153
4Delay coordinating system for agricultural machines107
5Delay coordinating system for a system of operativ…105
6Precision farming system for applying product to a…62
7Customized land surface modeling in a soil-crop sy…45
8Methods and systems for irrigation guidance43

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

Four structural features of this landscape — maturity stage, concentration level, collaboration patterns, and geographic footprint — each carry distinct implications for where new R&D investment is likely to encounter resistance or find open ground.

Growth

Growth stage: annual filings still rising

The field is classified at the Growth lifecycle stage, with annual filings still rising and the multi-year window showing 139% growth. No sign of peak-and-plateau dynamics is evident in the evidence. Entrants can still establish meaningful positions before the field reaches maturity and dominant designs lock in.

Growth stage
Concentration

Moderate concentration; no entrenched incumbent

The top five filers’ 22% share of the hundred largest filers means no single player controls the agenda. The flat ranking from position four onward — where several universities match commercial players — confirms that IP accumulation is distributed. A focused portfolio in an underserved sub-domain could meaningfully change a new entrant’s relative position.

Fragmented field
Collaboration

Iowa State–NC State–Soilmetrix trio anchors the university-industry bridge

The most active co-filing relationships are between Iowa State University Research Foundation and North Carolina State University (5 joint families), Iowa State and Soilmetrix Inc (3 families), and NC State and Soilmetrix (3 families). A secondary cluster links both universities to Soilmetrix’s parent entity. This tightly connected triad — two land-grant universities and a soil-sensing specialist — is the dominant collaboration nucleus in the field, and any commercial player seeking university-validated soil and crop modeling IP should consider engagement with this cluster.

University-industry cluster
Geography

India is the dominant filing jurisdiction by a wide margin

India accounts for the largest share of filings at the patent-record level, far ahead of the United States and the EPO. Israel and WIPO PCT filings are present but small. This geographic skew reflects the high volume of Indian academic institution filings and suggests that commercially defensible positions in US and European markets may be less contested than the headline volume implies — creating a potential asymmetry for applicants targeting those jurisdictions.

India-led, US/EPO open
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Iowa State University Research Foundation IncNorth Carolina State University5
Iowa State University Research Foundation IncSoilmetrix Inc3
North Carolina State UniversitySoilmetrix Inc3
Iowa State University Research Foundation IncSoilmetrix Inc2
North Carolina State UniversitySoilmetrix Inc2

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights are derived from applicant ranking, lifecycle, collaboration, and jurisdiction evidence.Explore insights →
Leaders

Irrigation control specialist leads; soil-working and AI image-recognition challengers closing in

The top two commercial players occupy distinct technology niches, and their trajectories diverge: one has built a deep irrigation-focused portfolio while the other spans physical field operations broadly. New-entrant momentum is concentrated in academic institutions.

Leader · Manna Irrigation Ltd

Manna Irrigation Ltd

Manna Irrigation Ltd leads with 14 patent families, concentrated in irrigation and horticultural methods (A01G 25), farm-management data processing (G06Q 50), and control systems (G05B 19). This focus on smart irrigation as a vertically integrated domain — from soil sensing to decision logic — gives it a coherent, defensible niche. Momentum data does not flag it as a new entrant, implying a sustained rather than sudden filing posture.

families: 14
Challenger · Agri Technovation (Pty) Ltd

Agri Technovation (Pty) Ltd

Agri Technovation (Pty) Ltd holds 9 patent families with a broad physical-operations emphasis spanning soil working (A01B 79), harvesting (A01D 1), and horticultural methods (A01G 3). Its portfolio covers the full crop-cycle from field preparation through harvest, a wider scope than Manna Irrigation’s irrigation-centric stack. Momentum data does not classify it as a new entrant, suggesting an established and continuing filing program.

families: 9
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access rankings, momentum trends, and technology focus for all top filers in this landscape.
DTN LLCSoilmetrix Inc+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Lovely Professional University3▲ new entrant
SAVEETHA INST OF MEDICAL & TECH SCI7▲ new entrant
Iowa State University Research Foundation Inc2▲ new entrant
North Carolina State University2▲ new entrant
CVR College of Engineering1▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards cite patent family counts from the applicant ranking; technology emphasis from IPC focus data.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served adjacent branches worth monitoring

Several IPC branches adjacent to the dominant soil-working and AI-processing core carry lower filing counts relative to the field’s overall volume. These are observations of relative sparsity; technical and commercial relevance varies by branch.

G06V · Image and video recognition for crop and field analysis

Image and video recognition (G06V) registers 29 patent records — materially below the AI computing (G06N) and soil-working (A01B) branches that define the field’s core. Given that drone and satellite imagery for crop stress detection, weed identification, and yield estimation are well-established technical use cases, this sparsity suggests that image-AI integration for precision agriculture is under-claimed relative to its practical deployment. Iowa State University Research Foundation and North Carolina State University are the most active filers here, but the branch remains open to new entrants with strong computer-vision capabilities.

Search this in Eureka →

H04L / H04W · Digital transmission and wireless networks for farm connectivity

Digital information transmission (H04L, 36 records) and wireless communication networks (H04W, 27 records) together represent the connectivity infrastructure layer of precision agriculture — IoT sensor networks, LPWAN field telemetry, and edge-to-cloud data pipelines. Both branches sit well below the computational and agronomic leaders. As farm connectivity becomes a prerequisite for real-time resource optimization, these branches represent an adjacent entry point for connectivity specialists or equipment manufacturers seeking to expand into precision agriculture IP without competing directly in the AI-modeling core.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all under-served IPC branches, filing gaps by jurisdiction, and technology intersection maps for this landscape.
A01C · Planting and sowing automationG01N · Soil and material analysis and testing+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch counts are at the patent-record level; lower counts relative to the dominant branches indicate relative sparsity, not absence of activity.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ by technology route

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerG06Q 50 · Business, commerce & admin data processingA01B 79 · Soil working in agricultureA01G 25 · Horticulture & forestryG06N 20 · Computing based on AI modelsG01N 33 · Material analysis & testing
Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical SciencesStrong · 7Strong · 6Strong · 4Moderate · 3Strong · 4
Manna Irrigation LtdModerate · 7AbsentStrong · 14AbsentAbsent
CVR College of EngineeringStrong · 4AbsentStrong · 3Moderate · 2Strong · 3
Chandigarh UniversityStrong · 3AbsentStrong · 2Strong · 2Strong · 2
Manipal University JaipurStrong · 3Strong · 4AbsentModerate · 2Absent
Saveetha Engineering CollegeStrong · 3Strong · 4AbsentModerate · 2Absent
Agri Technovation (Pty) LtdAbsentStrong · 9AbsentAbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own precision agriculture landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.