Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →A data-backed look at fast tool servo patents: who holds the most families, how filings have grown since 2021, which IPC classes carry the claim density, and where under-claimed branches remain open for 2026 filers.
Filing growth = 2021 (10 records) → 2024 (12); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 246 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.
A fast tool servo (FTS) is an actuator stage bolted onto a lathe or grinder that drives a cutting tool through a fast, controlled offset motion synchronized to workpiece rotation, letting a machine cut non-rotationally-symmetric or micro-structured surfaces — freeform optics, diffractive lenses, micro-lens arrays — on equipment that was originally built for round parts. The 246 records in scope span 2015 through the current filing year, drawing on a search built around fast tool servo terminology plus claim-level machine-tool classifications. Patent families, not raw document counts, are the fairer unit here because they strip out repeat filings across jurisdictions and continuation practice within a single invention.
The record set skews toward mechanical and control claims rather than optics or semiconductor-adjacent applications, and filing activity is concentrated among a small number of repeat filers with a long tail of one-off applicants behind them. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent one to two years in any trend chart will always look thinner than the underlying filing activity actually was.
Two views of the same 246-record set: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which machine-tool and adjacent classes carry the claim volume.
Filings ran 5 in 2017 and reached a peak of 13 in 2019. The 2021-2024 window shows sustained growth — 10 filings in 2021 climbing to 12 in 2024, a 20% increase over that three-year span. Counts for 2025 and 2026 are still filling in as publication catches up to filing, so they should not be read as a slowdown.
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.
B23Q (machine tool fittings) sits under 71.1% of all 246 records, the natural home for the servo mechanism itself. B23B (turning and boring) and B24B (grinding and polishing) follow at 32.9% and 19.1%, reflecting the two dominant machining contexts FTS is bolted onto. Control systems (G05B), optics (G02B), milling (B23C), MEMS (B81C) and semiconductor devices (H01L) each sit in single digits — present, but far less contested.
Shares are the percentage of the 246 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about precision & ultraprecision manufacturing: fast tool servo patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA high bandwidth rotary fast tool servo provides tool motion in a direction nominally parallel to the surface-normal of a workpiece at the point of contact between the cutting tool and workpiece. Three or more flexure blades having all ends fixed form an axis of rotation for a swing arm carrying a cutting tool at a set radius. An actuator rotates the swing arm assembly so the tool moves in and away from the lathe-mounted, rotating workpiece in a rapid, controlled manner, with a pair of position sensors feeding rotation and position data back to a control system.Filed by Massachusetts Institute of Technology, this application sits at the center of the flexure-based rotary FTS design family and is a frequent reference point for later filings in the same mechanical class.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US7328638B2 | Cutting tool using interrupted cut fast tool servo | 202 |
| 2 | US9418193B2 | Arrayed imaging systems having improved alignment and associated methods | 129 |
| 3 | US10002215B2 | Arrayed imaging systems having improved alignment and associated methods | 117 |
| 4 | US6170367B1 | Single-point flexure toric contact lens forming machine and method | 62 |
| 5 | US20050223858A1 | Variable reluctance fast positioning system and methods | 49 |
| 6 | US20040035266A1 | Rotary fast tool servo system and methods | 47 |
| 7 | CN102528522A | 刚度可调节的快刀伺服器 | 41 |
| 8 | US20130345034A1 | Fast Tool Changing System by Means of Synchronizing Displacement and Linkage of Main Spindle and Tool Magazine | 37 |
| 9 | US20050056125A1 | Flux-biased electromagnetic fast tool servo systems and methods | 37 |
| 10 | CN106975961A | 一种长行程快速刀具伺服装置 | 33 |
Citation counts reflect influence within this searched corpus and skew toward older records — read them as a signal of what other filers built on, not of current commercial weight.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns worth acting on before drafting a new application in this space.
With the leading assignee alone at 37 records and the top five combined controlling 40.2% of all 246 records in scope, freedom-to-operate work in the core flexure and actuator mechanisms should start with those filers' claim sets, not a general prior-art sweep.
Filings rose from 10 in 2021 to 12 in 2024, a 20% increase over that span. 2019 remains the single busiest year so far, but the more recent complete years show the field has not gone quiet — 2025-2026 figures are simply still filling in behind publication lag.
B23Q machine tool fittings underlie 71.1% of the 246 records, with turning/boring (32.9%) and grinding/polishing (19.1%) as the two dominant application contexts. Control systems, optics, milling, MEMS and semiconductor classes each sit in single digits — thinner claim traffic, and correspondingly more room to stake out a defensible position.
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, the strongest linking an academic research group to a named individual inventor across six shared records. Most filers here act alone rather than through joint ventures or research consortia.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to precision & ultraprecision manufacturing: fast tool servo patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether you are scoping freedom-to-operate, choosing a filing angle, or tracking a competitor.
Concentration at the top means a handful of filers' claim sets deserve line-by-line review before committing engineering resources to a flexure or actuator design in this space.
Explore assignee portfolios in EurekaMEMS manufacturing and semiconductor-adjacent applications of fast tool servo technology carry single-digit record shares — worth a deeper look before assuming the ground is already occupied.
Run a white space search in EurekaBecause publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent years in this dataset will keep filling in — set up a monitor rather than treating the current count as final.
Set up filing alerts in EurekaA fast tool servo is an actuator stage mounted on a lathe, grinder or milling machine that drives the cutting tool through a rapid, precisely timed offset motion synchronized to the rotation of the workpiece. It lets equipment designed for round, rotationally symmetric parts cut freeform or micro-structured surfaces instead, which is why the claims in this dataset cluster heavily under machine tool fittings (B23Q) and turning/boring (B23B) classifications rather than under optics or semiconductor categories. The technology is a mechanical and control-systems add-on to existing machine architectures, not a standalone machine type, which is reflected in how broadly the IPC classes spread across the 246 records in scope.
The assignee ranking behind this dataset covers 100 companies and research institutions, with the leading filer holding 37 of the 246 records in scope and the five most active filers together accounting for 40.2% of all records. Below that top group, the ranking drops off quickly into a long tail of filers with only one or two records each. This pattern — a handful of repeat filers alongside many single-filing entrants — is typical of a technology area anchored by a small number of specialist labs and manufacturers rather than one dominated by a single monopoly holder.
Filing activity grew from 10 records in 2021 to 12 in 2024, a 20% increase over that three-year span, and 2019 remains the busiest single year recorded so far at 13 filings. Because patent publication typically lags the actual filing date by around 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 figures in any trend chart will look artificially low simply because many of those applications have not published yet. Reading the most recent one to two years as a decline would be a misreading of the publication pipeline, not a genuine drop in filing activity.
Machine tool fittings (B23Q) sit under 71.1% of the 246 records in scope, making it by far the densest classification, followed by turning and boring (B23B) at 32.9% and grinding and polishing (B24B) at 19.1%. Control and regulating systems (G05B), optical elements (G02B), milling (B23C), MEMS manufacturing (B81C) and semiconductor devices (H01L) each sit in single-digit shares. Because a single record can carry several IPC classes, these figures add up to more than 100%, and the lower shares in adjacent classes point toward areas with comparatively less occupied claim space.
US20050056125A1, filed by Massachusetts Institute of Technology, describes a flux-biased electromagnetic fast tool servo using flexure blades to form a swing-arm rotation axis, with position sensors feeding a control loop that drives the cutting tool toward and away from the workpiece. It represents a specific mechanical design family — flexure-based rotary actuation with electromagnetic drive — rather than the entire fast tool servo concept, and its claims should be checked against any new rotary-flexure design before assuming freedom to operate. Later filings referencing similar flexure and swing-arm arrangements are worth reviewing alongside it rather than in isolation.
Go past this page: query the whole precision & ultraprecision manufacturing: fast tool servo patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.