https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/precision-and-ultraprecision-manufacturing-fast-tool-servo-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Precision Manufacturing
Fast Tool Servo Patents: Mapping Leaders, Filing Trends and White Space

A data-backed look at fast tool servo patents: who holds the most families, how filings have grown since 2021, which IPC classes carry the claim density, and where under-claimed branches remain open for 2026 filers.

246
Published Records
40%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+20%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth = 2021 (10 records) → 2024 (12); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 246 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.

Check your own idea
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the fast tool servo patent record actually shows

A fast tool servo (FTS) is an actuator stage bolted onto a lathe or grinder that drives a cutting tool through a fast, controlled offset motion synchronized to workpiece rotation, letting a machine cut non-rotationally-symmetric or micro-structured surfaces — freeform optics, diffractive lenses, micro-lens arrays — on equipment that was originally built for round parts. The 246 records in scope span 2015 through the current filing year, drawing on a search built around fast tool servo terminology plus claim-level machine-tool classifications. Patent families, not raw document counts, are the fairer unit here because they strip out repeat filings across jurisdictions and continuation practice within a single invention.

The record set skews toward mechanical and control claims rather than optics or semiconductor-adjacent applications, and filing activity is concentrated among a small number of repeat filers with a long tail of one-off applicants behind them. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent one to two years in any trend chart will always look thinner than the underlying filing activity actually was.

Filing trend and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 13M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES CO37
  2. 2SATISLOH AG20
  3. 3MASSACHUSETTS INST OF TECH17
  4. 4OPTOTECH OPTIKMASCHINEN GMBH13
  5. 5JILIN UNIVERSITY12
  6. 6GUANGDONG UNIV OF TECH9
  7. 7ZHEJIANG UNIV8
  8. 8PUSAN NAT UNIV IND UNIV COOPERATION FOUND8
  9. 9LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NAT SECURITY LLC6
  10. 10TRUMPER DAVID L6
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Precision & Ultraprecision Manufacturing: Fast Tool Servo Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 246-record set: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which machine-tool and adjacent classes carry the claim volume.

Filing activity, 2017-2026

Filings ran 5 in 2017 and reached a peak of 13 in 2019. The 2021-2024 window shows sustained growth — 10 filings in 2021 climbing to 12 in 2024, a 20% increase over that three-year span. Counts for 2025 and 2026 are still filling in as publication catches up to filing, so they should not be read as a slowdown.

Filing activity, 2017-2026048111552017201813201920202021202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

B23Q (machine tool fittings) sits under 71.1% of all 246 records, the natural home for the servo mechanism itself. B23B (turning and boring) and B24B (grinding and polishing) follow at 32.9% and 19.1%, reflecting the two dominant machining contexts FTS is bolted onto. Control systems (G05B), optics (G02B), milling (B23C), MEMS (B81C) and semiconductor devices (H01L) each sit in single digits — present, but far less contested.

Technology composition by IPC subclassB23Q · Machine tool fittings17571.1%B23B · Turning & boring8132.9%B24B · Grinding & polishing4719.1%G05B · Control & regulating systems249.8%G02B · Optical elements & systems135.3%B23C · Milling114.5%B81C · MEMS manufacturing93.7%H01L · Semiconductor devices83.3%Other7329.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 246 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Precision & Ultraprecision Manufacturing: Fast Tool Servo Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Precision & Ultraprecision Manufacturing: Fast Tool Servo Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about precision & ultraprecision manufacturing: fast tool servo patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited records and a representative claim

Representative Record
US20050056125A12005-03-17

US20050056125A1 — Flux-biased electromagnetic fast tool servo systems and methods

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

A high bandwidth rotary fast tool servo provides tool motion in a direction nominally parallel to the surface-normal of a workpiece at the point of contact between the cutting tool and workpiece. Three or more flexure blades having all ends fixed form an axis of rotation for a swing arm carrying a cutting tool at a set radius. An actuator rotates the swing arm assembly so the tool moves in and away from the lathe-mounted, rotating workpiece in a rapid, controlled manner, with a pair of position sensors feeding rotation and position data back to a control system.Filed by Massachusetts Institute of Technology, this application sits at the center of the flexure-based rotary FTS design family and is a frequent reference point for later filings in the same mechanical class.

US20050056125A1 — patent drawing 1US20050056125A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited fast tool servo patents in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US7328638B2Cutting tool using interrupted cut fast tool servo202
2US9418193B2Arrayed imaging systems having improved alignment and associated methods129
3US10002215B2Arrayed imaging systems having improved alignment and associated methods117
4US6170367B1Single-point flexure toric contact lens forming machine and method62
5US20050223858A1Variable reluctance fast positioning system and methods49
6US20040035266A1Rotary fast tool servo system and methods47
7CN102528522A刚度可调节的快刀伺服器41
8US20130345034A1Fast Tool Changing System by Means of Synchronizing Displacement and Linkage of Main Spindle and Tool Magazine37
9US20050056125A1Flux-biased electromagnetic fast tool servo systems and methods37
10CN106975961A一种长行程快速刀具伺服装置33

Citation counts reflect influence within this searched corpus and skew toward older records — read them as a signal of what other filers built on, not of current commercial weight.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Precision & Ultraprecision Manufacturing: Fast Tool Servo Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the concentration and class data mean for a filing decision

Three patterns worth acting on before drafting a new application in this space.

Concentration
40.2%
of 246 records held by the top 5 assignees

The top of the field is genuinely crowded

With the leading assignee alone at 37 records and the top five combined controlling 40.2% of all 246 records in scope, freedom-to-operate work in the core flexure and actuator mechanisms should start with those filers' claim sets, not a general prior-art sweep.

Top 5 combined, 246-record base
Filing trend
+20%
growth 2021 to 2024

Activity is still building, not tapering off

Filings rose from 10 in 2021 to 12 in 2024, a 20% increase over that span. 2019 remains the single busiest year so far, but the more recent complete years show the field has not gone quiet — 2025-2026 figures are simply still filling in behind publication lag.

2021-2024 window, complete-year data only
Claim geography
71.1%
of records touch B23Q

The servo mechanism itself is the densest ground

B23Q machine tool fittings underlie 71.1% of the 246 records, with turning/boring (32.9%) and grinding/polishing (19.1%) as the two dominant application contexts. Control systems, optics, milling, MEMS and semiconductor classes each sit in single digits — thinner claim traffic, and correspondingly more room to stake out a defensible position.

IPC subclass shares, 246-record base
Collaboration
10
co-assignee pairs identified

Cross-institution filing is limited but real

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, the strongest linking an academic research group to a named individual inventor across six shared records. Most filers here act alone rather than through joint ventures or research consortia.

Co-assignee pairs across 246 records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to precision & ultraprecision manufacturing: fast tool servo patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Precision & Ultraprecision Manufacturing: Fast Tool Servo Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether you are scoping freedom-to-operate, choosing a filing angle, or tracking a competitor.

Map the leading assignees' full portfolios

Concentration at the top means a handful of filers' claim sets deserve line-by-line review before committing engineering resources to a flexure or actuator design in this space.

Explore assignee portfolios in Eureka

Track the under-claimed branches

MEMS manufacturing and semiconductor-adjacent applications of fast tool servo technology carry single-digit record shares — worth a deeper look before assuming the ground is already occupied.

Run a white space search in Eureka

Watch the 2025-2026 filing window

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent years in this dataset will keep filling in — set up a monitor rather than treating the current count as final.

Set up filing alerts in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Precision & Ultraprecision Manufacturing: Fast Tool Servo Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about fast tool servo patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Precision & Ultraprecision Manufacturing: Fast Tool Servo Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Precision & Ultraprecision Manufacturing: Fast Tool Servo Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole precision & ultraprecision manufacturing: fast tool servo patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.