Book a demo

Precision Spraying Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026

Precision Spraying Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/precision-and-variable-rate-spraying-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Crop Protection Machinery
Precision and Variable Rate Spraying Patents: Who Leads and Where the Gaps Sit
  • Concentrated at the top. The top 5 ranked assignees account for 81.5% of all 27 records in scope, with the leader alone holding 6.
  • Pest control dominates the claim map. A01M (pest & vermin control) appears in 77.8% of records, far ahead of any other IPC subclass tracked.
  • Filing has not scaled past single digits. The peak year so far is 2025 with 5 records, and the 2021→2024 span shows a -100% swing — this is still a thin, early field.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
27
Published Records
81%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-100%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
IN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (1 records) with 2024 (0) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 27 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the filing record shows

Precision and variable rate spraying sits at the intersection of agricultural machinery, machine vision and chemical application control. The 27 records in scope span weed-detection cameras, nozzle switching logic, prescription-map execution and latency compensation for moving sprayers — the mechanics that let a machine apply chemical only where it is needed rather than across a whole field. Patent families are the fairer unit here because they strip out duplicate filings across jurisdictions and continuations, and this dataset already ranks assignees on that basis.

Filing activity is recent and volume remains low in absolute terms, with the field's busiest year to date producing only 5 records. Because publication typically lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one or two years understate real filing activity and should not be read as a slowdown.

Filing activity and technology mix, 2015–2026
  1. 1MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA LTD6
  2. 2GUANGZHOU XAIRCRAFT TECH CO LTD5
  3. 3PAY COLIN4
  4. 4FAUNAPHOTONICS AGRI & ENVIRONMENTAL AS4
  5. 5CENTURE APPL LTD3
  6. 6DAMODARAN PREETHIKA1
  7. 7JOSE JERIN J1
  8. 8VIDHYA K1
  9. 9BHATTACHARYA SUMANTA1
  10. 10D RAMYA KRISHNA1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Precision and Variable Rate Spraying covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 27 records: how filing has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim volume.

Filing trend: thin and early

The trend runs from 0 filings in 2017 to a peak of 5 in 2025, with 2026 already showing 2 (partial year). The tracked growth figure — 2021 to 2024, -100% — reflects a genuine dip in a small-numbers field rather than a maturing market pulling back; there simply are not yet enough filers to smooth out year-to-year swings.

Filing trend: thin and early013450201720182019202020212022202320245202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology mix: pest control plus soil working lead

A01M (pest & vermin control) covers 77.8% of the 27 records, with A01B (soil working) at 37.0% and B05B (spraying & atomising) and B64D (aircraft equipment) tied at 22.2% each. G06V (image/video recognition) sits at only 14.8%, and B25J (manipulators & robots) at 11.1% — both notably thinner than the core spraying-control classes, given how central detection and robotics are to the stated problem.

Technology mix: pest control plus soil working leadA01M · Pest & vermin control2177.8%A01B · Soil working in agriculture1037.0%B05B · Spraying & atomising622.2%B64D · Aircraft equipment622.2%A01C · Planting & sowing518.5%G06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…518.5%G06V · Image/video recognition414.8%B25J · Manipulators & robots311.1%Other1970.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 27 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Precision and Variable Rate Spraying covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Precision and Variable Rate Spraying with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about precision and variable rate spraying and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited record in this set

Representative filing
US20210392868A12021-12-23

Pesticide spraying control method, device, and storage medium

GUANGZHOU XAIRCRAFT TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.

Disclosed are a pesticide spraying control method, a device, and a storage medium. The method includes planning a spraying route matching an area to be sprayed, mapping the route to a crop prescription map, and determining a spraying control point and matching spraying amount based on crop state information across at least two mapped areas. The spraying control point is associated with an actual spraying point of an operation unmanned aerial vehicle, spaced from the control point by a defined margin.Filed by Guangzhou XAG (Guangzhou Xaircraft Technology Co., Ltd.), dated 2021-12-23.

US20210392868A1 — patent drawing 1US20210392868A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1WO2005123503A1Injection variable rate chemical distribution32
2US20210392868A1Pesticide spraying control method, device, and storage medium13
3US20240284891A1Apperatus and method for measuring insect activity4
4WO2023247209A1Apparatus and method for measuring insect activity3
5WO2022268756A1Apperatus and method for measuring insect activity3
6US20210321553A1Methods and systems for applying a remedy for a region under cultivation2
7CA3132736A1Pesticide spraying control method and apparatus, device, and storage medium1
8WO2020110134A1"methods and systems for applying a remedy for a region under cultivation"1
9AU2012201717A1Injection Variable Rate Chemical Distribution1

Ranked by citation count within the searched corpus; older records accumulate citations simply by being available longer, so treat this as a signal of influence rather than of current importance.

Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (9 of 9 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Precision and Variable Rate Spraying covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three findings that shape where to file, where to watch, and where a claim might still land clean.

Concentration
81.5%
of 27 records held by top 5 assignees

A small group controls most of the claim space

With the leader holding 6 records and the top 5 combined accounting for 81.5% of all 27 records in scope, this is not a fragmented field. The ranked list runs to 22 companies total, and the top 10 combined reach 100.0% of records — meaning every record in this dataset traces to one of the ten most active filers.

Source: assignee ranking, 27-record corpus
Technology skew
77.8%
of records touch A01M (pest & vermin control)

Detection and control logic outweigh the hardware classes

A01M dominates the class mix, with A01B (soil working) as the clear second at 37.0%. Machine vision (G06V, 14.8%) and robotics (B25J, 11.1%) are present but thin relative to the core control classes, suggesting the vision and manipulator layers are less crowded than the application-control layer itself.

Source: IPC subclass distribution, 27-record corpus
Momentum
-100%
swing 2021→2024 (single-digit base)

Growth figures move sharply on a small base

The field's peak year to date is 2025 with 5 filings, and the 2021-to-2024 comparison shows a -100% swing — a reminder that with totals this low, one or two filings shift the percentage dramatically. Recent-year momentum by assignee shows several individual filers each contributing a single record in the latest year rather than any one company pulling ahead.

Source: filing trend and momentum data, 27-record corpus
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to precision and variable rate spraying, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Precision and Variable Rate Spraying covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and what is still open

The ranked list covers 22 companies counted in records, with filings concentrated among a handful of leaders and a long tail of single-filing entrants including individual inventors.

Leader
6
records held by the top-ranked assignee

One filer sets the pace

The leading assignee holds 6 of the 27 records in scope, roughly double the count at fifth place (3). That gap suggests an early but real head start in claim coverage around spraying control and route-to-prescription-map logic.

Source: assignee ranking
Mid-field
3
records at fifth place

A compact group of active filers

Fifth place holds 3 records, and the top 5 together cover 81.5% of the 27-record corpus. Below that, filing drops off quickly to single-record entrants, several of them individual named inventors rather than corporate assignees.

Source: assignee ranking
Co-filing
10
co-assignee pairs identified

Collaboration is limited but present

Ten co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, with the strongest repeated pairings involving individual named inventors filing together on more than one record. This points to small research or founder-led teams rather than large joint-venture structures.

Source: co-assignee pair analysis
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
Sub-areas where the current IPC mix suggests thinner coverage relative to the field's stated problem.
Latency compensation for boom swayWeed-detection camera fusion with prescription mapsNozzle-level switching validation trialsRobotic manipulator integration (B25J)Chemical-saving dose reconciliation logic
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
VISHNUPRIYA K1
VIDHYA K1
SURESHKUMAR P1
RATHORE VINEETA1
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd.0
Guangzhou Xaircraft Technology Co., Ltd. (XAG)0
FaunaPhotonics Agri & Environmental A/S0
PAY COLIN0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Precision and Variable Rate Spraying covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this

The dataset points to a field still forming its claim boundaries rather than one with settled dominant designs.

Watch the mid-field, not just the leader

With the top 10 assignees covering 100.0% of records, any new entrant's freedom to operate depends on how the fifth-through-tenth-ranked filers have drawn their claims, not just the leader's.

Explore assignee detail in Eureka

Test claim scope against the thin classes

G06V and B25J carry the lowest record shares among the tracked IPC classes — a first claim built around vision-robotics integration may have more room than one built around A01M pest-control logic alone.

Run a white-space check in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Precision and Variable Rate Spraying covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this field

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Precision and Variable Rate Spraying covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Precision and Variable Rate Spraying in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole precision and variable rate spraying corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.