https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/precision-fermentation-media-optimization-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Precision Fermentation Media
Precision Fermentation Media Optimization Patents: Who Holds the Claims
  • Filing is concentrated but not locked up. the top 5 assignees account for 28.1% of all 1,315 records in scope, and the top 10 combined reach 37.6% — leaving a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants.
  • Growth has resumed after the 2017 peak. filings ran from 33 in 2021 to 35 in 2024, a +6% rise over that span, even though the 2017 high of 106 has not been retested.
  • Bioreactor claims sit almost as deep as fermentation claims. C12M (bioreactors & enzyme apparatus) reaches 53.2% of records, close behind C12N genetic engineering at 57.1%, meaning apparatus and process claims overlap heavily.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,315
Published Records
28%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+6%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (33 records) with 2024 (35) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,315 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks patent activity at the intersection of microbial and recombinant fermentation and the media-engineering variables that determine yield and cost: carbon source, nitrogen source, trace elements, vitamin supply, osmolarity control and media sterilization. The scope is defined by IPC classes covering fermentation and enzymatic synthesis (C12P), microorganism and genetic engineering work (C12N15/09) and bioreactor apparatus (C12M1/00), so it captures both the biological process claims and the hardware used to run them.

The dataset spans 2015 through the 2026-07-31 cut-off and holds 1,315 published records. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent one to two years are undercounted and should be read as a floor, not a ceiling, on actual filing activity.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1LANZATECH INC105
  2. 2LANZATECH NZ INC101
  3. 3LANZATECH NEW ZEALAND LTD70
  4. 4GENECOR INC47
  5. 5CALYSTA INC46
  6. 6ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND CO27
  7. 7PURDUE RES FOUND26
  8. 8SEKISUI CHEMICAL CO LTD25
  9. 9JUPENG BIO HK LTD24
  10. 10KIVERDI INC24
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Precision Fermentation Media Optimization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 1,315-record corpus: filings by year, and the IPC subclasses those filings carry. Because a single record can carry several IPC codes, the class shares below sum to more than 100% of records.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings peaked at 106 in 2017 and declined through the early 2020s before firming up: 2021 filings (33) grew to 35 by 2024, a +6% rise over that three-year window. 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete due to publication lag and should not be read as a downturn.

Filing trend, 2017-2026030609012010620172018201920202021202220232024202552026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

C12P (fermentation and enzymatic synthesis) touches 76.7% of the 1,315 records, confirming this as a process-claim-heavy field. C12N (microorganisms and genetic engineering) and C12M (bioreactors and apparatus) follow closely at 57.1% and 53.2%, showing that strain engineering and hardware claims are filed together as often as separately. Smaller shares in A23L (foods) at 5.8% and A23K (animal feed) at 5.6% mark where fermentation media work is starting to reach downstream product categories.

IPC subclass compositionC12P · Fermentation & enzymatic synth…1,00976.7%C12N · Microorganisms & genetic engin…75157.1%C12M · Bioreactors & enzyme apparatus69953.2%C12R · Microorganisms (index)24918.9%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…997.5%C07K · Peptides & proteins947.1%A23L · Foods & non-alcoholic beverages765.8%A23K · Animal feed735.6%Other86966.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,315 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Precision Fermentation Media Optimization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Precision Fermentation Media Optimization with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about precision fermentation media optimization and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records and a representative filing

Representative Filing
US20080050779A12008-02-28

US20080050779A1 — Fermentation Process Using Faba Beans as Nitrogen Source

DSM IP ASSETS B.V.

The present invention describes a microbial fermentation process using a fermentation medium comprising a complex nitrogen source, wherein a substantial part of the nitrogen supplied by the complex nitrogen source is provided by faba bean meal. The use of faba bean meal has a viscosity lowering effect as compared to the use of a complex nitrogen source other than faba bean meal.Filed by DSM IP Assets B.V., published 2008-02-28 — illustrates how a single substitution in the nitrogen-source formulation is claimed as a distinct process improvement.

US20080050779A1 — patent drawing 1US20080050779A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1WO1992022324A1Microbially-produced antibody fragments and their conjugates1,588
2US6022725ACloning and amplification of the beta -glucosidase gene of Trichoderma reesei874
3WO1998046772A2Gene conversion as a tool for the construction of recombinant industrial filamentous fungi501
4WO2003027306A2BGL3 beta−glucosidase and nucleic acids encoding the same436
5EP0361991A2Method for the microbiological preparation of human serum albumin and other heterologous proteins from a yeast428
6WO2003052118A2BGL4 beta-glucosidase and nucleic acids encoding the same427
7WO2003052054A2BGL5 beta-glucosidase and nucleic acids encoding the same422
8WO2008151149A2Production of oil in microorganisms392
9US5830716AIncreased amounts of substances by modifying a microorganism to increase production of NADPH from NADH345
10US5789210ARecombinant yeasts for effective fermentation of glucose and xylose229

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate references — treat this table as a map of influential prior art, not a ranking of current relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Precision Fermentation Media Optimization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data means for strategy

Three patterns stand out once filing counts, IPC composition and assignee concentration are read together.

Concentration
28.1% of 1,315 records
held by the top 5 assignees

Leadership is real but not exclusive

The top 5 assignees combine for 28.1% of all records and the top 10 for 37.6% — meaningful concentration, but well short of a closed field. Over 60% of records sit outside the ten most active filers, spread across the ranked leaders and beyond.

Concentration signal, not exclusivity
Momentum
+6% (2021→2024)
filing growth, most recent complete years

Growth is modest but positive

After the 2017 peak of 106 filings, activity cooled before edging back up: 33 filings in 2021 rose to 35 in 2024. That is a real, if small, resumption of filing interest rather than a field in decline.

Reflects only years unaffected by publication lag
Composition
76.7% vs 53.2%
C12P share vs C12M share of records

Process and apparatus claims overlap

C12P fermentation claims appear in 76.7% of records while C12M bioreactor/apparatus claims appear in 53.2% — a large overlap that suggests most serious filers are claiming the process and the equipment together rather than licensing one and building the other.

Subclass shares overlap by design
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to precision fermentation media optimization, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Co-filing is rare
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Genencor International Inc.YAO JIAN10
Genencor International Inc.WARD MICHAEL10
Genencor International Inc.GOEDEGEBUUR FRITS10
Genencor International Inc.DUNN COLEMAN NIGEL10
LanzaTech New Zealand Ltd.SCHULTZ MICHAEL ANTHONY9
LanzaTech New Zealand Ltd.LANZATECH NZ INC8
LanzaTech New Zealand Ltd.DBT IOC CENT FOR ADVANCED BIO ENERGY RES5
LanzaTech New Zealand Ltd.RAISER THOMAS EWALD3

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest recurring pairings involve named inventors alongside a single corporate assignee — evidence that most filings here are made by a sole owner rather than through joint ventures or research consortia.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Precision Fermentation Media Optimization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who's Filing

Assignee landscape

The ranking covers 100 companies across the 1,315 records in scope. The leader holds 105 records; by fifth place that figure has fallen to 46, and by tenth place to 24 — a steep drop-off that points to one clear front-runner followed by a wide, thinning field.

Leader
105 records
top-ranked assignee

One filer well ahead of the field

The leading assignee holds more than double the fifth-place total, a gap consistent with a company that has built out a broad fermentation platform (gas fermentation and related process IP) rather than filing opportunistically around single products.

Gap to 5th place: more than 2x
Mid-field
46 → 24 records
5th to 10th place

A fast taper past the leader

Filing counts fall from 46 at fifth place to 24 at tenth, showing that beyond the very top the field is competitive rather than dominated — no single runner-up has built a comparable position.

Ranked leaders, not a top-50 or top-100 list
Momentum
0 in latest year
for several formerly active filers

Recent-year activity has gone quiet for early movers

Several of the most historically active assignees show zero filings in the latest year, including entities with -100% year-on-year change. This is consistent with publication lag rather than necessarily an exit, but it means recent competitive signal should be read cautiously.

Affected by 18-month publication lag
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth watching
Branches of the media-optimization space with comparatively thin filing density relative to the core fermentation and genetic-engineering claims.
osmolarity control formulationsvitamin supply co-feeding schedulestrace element chelation for scale-upmedia sterilization without heatanimal feed byproduct nitrogen sources
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
LanzaTech New Zealand Ltd.0
LanzaTech Inc.0-100%
Genencor International Inc.0
Calysta Inc.0
LANZATECH NZ INC0
Purdue Research Foundation0
Sekisui Chemical Co., Ltd.0
Sweetwater Energy Inc.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Precision Fermentation Media Optimization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The landscape points to where claim space is dense and where it is thin. The next step is usually narrower: checking a specific formulation idea against the filings that already exist.

Check freedom-to-operate on a specific media formulation

Run a targeted search against the carbon-source, nitrogen-source or trace-element claims closest to your own formulation before committing R&D spend.

Explore in Eureka →

Track the leading filer's platform claims

Follow how the top-ranked assignee's gas-fermentation and process IP is evolving, since it accounts for a disproportionate share of records in this corpus.

Set up monitoring in Eureka →

Draft around thin claim density

Use the under-claimed sub-areas identified here as a starting point for drafting claims that avoid the densest prior art clusters.

Start drafting in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Precision Fermentation Media Optimization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Precision Fermentation Media Optimization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Precision Fermentation Media Optimization in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole precision fermentation media optimization corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.